Site icon Flopping Aces

Lawmakers Seek To Gut Ethic Office [Reader Post]

Sometimes you almost don’t need anything but a title.

The Office of Congressional Ethics, a powerful symbol of Democrats’ promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington, is in danger of having its power stripped after the midterm elections.

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have led the charge, airing complaints about the aggressive, independent panel in a private session with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last month, and they’ve drafted a resolution that, if approved, would severely curtail the panel’s power.

But there’s hot competition between the CBC and the official House ethics committee over who has less regard for the Office of Congressional Ethics, also known as the OCE. And the rest of the House doesn’t appear to be far behind in its disdain. Privately, Democratic and Republican lawmakers, and even some congressional leaders, acknowledge that there’s a strong sentiment to change rules that empower the office to publicize investigations and wreak havoc on lawmakers’ political lives.

But pay no attention to the man behind the curtain:

Of course, nobody wants to be portrayed as loosening ethics in an election year, and Butterfield was quick to point out that change could come as members “promulgate rules for the 112th Congress” in January 2011.

The thing apparently is working:

The threat to the OCE’s independent authority was underscored Wednesday when a group of government watchdog groups released a letter to Pelosi, calling on her to keep the office intact.

“To date, the OCE has made important progress in restoring the shattered credibility of the House ethics enforcement process,” wrote six groups, including the League of Women Voters, The Campaign Legal Center and Public Citizen.

Which is why Democrats want it trimmed. Here’s the nugget:

But several said a turning point for the office was its handling of the PMA investigation.

A number of Democrats were privately infuriated that the OCE board had authorized handing over PMA to the Justice Department — a significant upgrade in the seriousness of the investigation.

The now-defunct lobbying group — which specialized in obtaining spending earmarks for its clients — is at the center of a still ongoing criminal probe by DoJ. Several senior members of the Appropriations Committee, including the late Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) and Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.), have been implicated.

Under the OCE’s rules, it may “refer information to state and federal authorities in the event that information indicates a crime has occurred or is about to occur.”

But members from both parties insist there was no indication criminal action had occurred in interactions with PMA, and the Justice Department has not charged anyone involved in the case, on or off Capitol Hill, at this point. OCE critics say this shows the panel overreached on the PMA inquiry.

The OCE acted within the limits of its power and Democrats were caught red-handed. The real objection here is that Congressmen are pressured to act ethically at all times. As Mike might say

“Wah wah wah wah”

And a couple of reminders:

Nazi Pelosi, 2006:

“The American people voted to restore integrity and honesty in Washington, D.C., and the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history,”

Nazi Pelosi, 2010:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Friday said that she is running the most ethical Congress in history.

That’s reflected nicely in the non-action on Rangel.

“Ethics? We don’ need no stinkin’ ethics!”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version