These fires never would’ve happened America had followed a policy of non-interventionism like Ron Paul advocates. Besides, we all know it’s Bush’s fault.
NO BLOOD FOR KINDLING!!!
John Ryan
17 years ago
The Republicans better hope that the 4% of their party that supports Paul ends up voting for the Republican nominee. But if both the polls and Vegas are right I guess it will not matter much anyway.
Scott Malensek
17 years ago
What difference does it make? I mean, if a Republican gets elected, fine. If Hillary gets elected, it’s like having 4 more years of Bush and 8 more years of war in Iraq;
she promoted the war
she “lied about the intel”
she authorized the war once diplomacy had been tried (say, for like…5 months)
then she supported the war
she promoted the war
she demanded more troops for the war
then she declared her candidacy, and opposed the war, and vowed to continue combat operations (war) until at least 2013.
Hell, anyone who wants GWBpt deux just has to vote Hillary.
What amazes me is that so many people claim to oppose the war, but will still suck it up and vote for Hillary irregardless of the fact that she’s followed the same course that Bush has. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Bush and proof that opposition to the war is just opposition to Bush in a veil.
bbartlog
17 years ago
That’s true if you’re a single-issue voter whose concern is the war. But obviously once you start looking at other issues Hillary is not the same as Bush or the Republicans.
Scott Malensek
17 years ago
How can anyone be a single-issue voter and support Hillary’s multiple positions on every issue? The only reasons people will vote for Hillary:
-not a Republican, voting party duty not patriotic duty
-she’s a woman, and for many women, any woman will do
-memories of Bill’s first 6yrs, and the idea of getting Bill in there again in complete ignorance of any and all bad that happened back then
Single-issue voters….that’s funny.
David
17 years ago
I didn’t know fire can really burn wood! (LOL, really loud.)
These fires never would’ve happened America had followed a policy of non-interventionism like Ron Paul advocates. Besides, we all know it’s Bush’s fault.
NO BLOOD FOR KINDLING!!!
The Republicans better hope that the 4% of their party that supports Paul ends up voting for the Republican nominee. But if both the polls and Vegas are right I guess it will not matter much anyway.
What difference does it make? I mean, if a Republican gets elected, fine. If Hillary gets elected, it’s like having 4 more years of Bush and 8 more years of war in Iraq;
she promoted the war
she “lied about the intel”
she authorized the war once diplomacy had been tried (say, for like…5 months)
then she supported the war
she promoted the war
she demanded more troops for the war
then she declared her candidacy, and opposed the war, and vowed to continue combat operations (war) until at least 2013.
Hell, anyone who wants GWBpt deux just has to vote Hillary.
What amazes me is that so many people claim to oppose the war, but will still suck it up and vote for Hillary irregardless of the fact that she’s followed the same course that Bush has. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Bush and proof that opposition to the war is just opposition to Bush in a veil.
That’s true if you’re a single-issue voter whose concern is the war. But obviously once you start looking at other issues Hillary is not the same as Bush or the Republicans.
How can anyone be a single-issue voter and support Hillary’s multiple positions on every issue? The only reasons people will vote for Hillary:
-not a Republican, voting party duty not patriotic duty
-she’s a woman, and for many women, any woman will do
-memories of Bill’s first 6yrs, and the idea of getting Bill in there again in complete ignorance of any and all bad that happened back then
Single-issue voters….that’s funny.
I didn’t know fire can really burn wood! (LOL, really loud.)
Not “burn”….MELT
Fire cannot melt wood thus it cannot melt steel.