Gasp! Our Elected Leaders Are Setting Policy!

James Risen, a columnist for the NYT’s was pining for the days when Clinton was in office during a interview with the ever annoying Katie Couric: (Video here)

Risen: Well, I?I think that during a period from about 2000?from 9/11 through the beginning of the gulf?the war in Iraq, I think what happened was you?we?the checks and balances that normally keep American foreign policy and national security policy towards the center kind of broke down. And you had more of a radicalization of American foreign policy in which the?the?the career professionals were not really given a chance to kind of forge a consensus within the administration. And so you had the?the?the principles?Rumsfeld, Cheney and Tenet and Rice and many others?who were meeting constantly, setting policy and really never allowed the people who understand?the experts who understand the region to have much of a say.

Couric: You suggest there was a lot of power grabbing going on.

To which Michael Barone responded today:

So, “the career professionals were not really given a chance to kind of forge a consensus within the administration.” Evidently, such consensus-building is how government is supposed to operate. Instead, you had folks like “the principles [sic, presumably transcriber’s mistake]?Rumsfeld, Cheney and Tenet and Rice and many others?who were meeting constantly, settling policy, and really never allowed the people who understand?the experts who understand the region to have much of a say.”

What a scandal! Presidential appointees like Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, and Condoleezza Rice and an elected official like Dick Cheney were meeting together! How dare they? And they were settling policy! Astonishing! What will such people dare to do next?

Risen makes it quite clear how he thinks the government should be run. Elected officials like the president and vice president and top presidential appointees should sit quietly in their chairs. They should not meet, at least not very often. They should wait for career government employees?”the experts who understand the region”?to “forge a consensus.” Policy should always be kept “toward the center,” regardless of what the American people or their elected president think.

So that is the New York Times’s idea, or at least this New York Times reporter’s idea, of how democratic representative government should work. Unelected bureaucrats should rule. If the policies produced by their understanding of the region should produce September 11, they should still rule. Elected officials’ jobs are to sit in their chairs, to meet infrequently if at all, and to accept the decisions of the unelected and for the most part unremovable bureaucrats.

At least so long as those bureaucrats’ policy ideas are considered suitable by James Risen or the New York Times. One suspects that Risen’s theory of government would shift completely if the bureaucrats opposed the policies he liked and the elected officials and their top appointees favored them. Then Risen might favor democratic government. But not now, not while George W. Bush is in office. James Risen: for democracy, but only if elections come out his way.

Excellent point. Since Bush is in office Risen is upset that he is actually making policy, something elected politicians are SUPPOSED to do. All of a sudden he wants career bureaucrats to make policy and to make all the decisions. But you can bet your ass that when Clinton was in office he wanted nothing of the sort.

These two dummies, Risen and Couric, actually believe that our politicians setting policy is a “powergrab”!…sigh.

Other’s Blogging:

The New Editor, Ace Of Spades HQ,

Since Bush is in office Risen is upset that he is actually making policy, something elected politicians are SUPPOSED to do. All of a sudden he wants career bureaucrats to make policy and to make all the decisions. But you can bet your ass that when Clinton was in office he wanted nothing of the sort.

Curt

See author page