President Bush gave a great speech today, actually a outstanding speech:
[…]In the four years since September the 11th, the evil that reached our shores has reappeared on other days, in other places — in Mombasa and Casablanca and Riyadh and Jakarta and Istanbul and Madrid and Beslan and Taba and Netanya and Baghdad, and elsewhere. In the past few months, we have seen a new terror offensive with attacks on London and Sharm el-Sheikh, another deadly strike in Bali, and this week, a series of bombings in Amman, Jordan, that killed dozens of innocent Jordanians and their guests.
[…]Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; and still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever it’s called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam. This form of radicalism exploits Islam to serve a violent, political vision: the establishment, by terrorism, subversion and insurgency, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom. These extremists distort the idea of jihad into a call for terrorist murder against Christians and Hindus and Jews — and against Muslims, themselves, who do not share their radical vision.
[…]Last month, the world learned of a letter written by al Qaeda’s number two leader, a guy named Zawahiri. And he wrote this letter to his chief deputy in Iraq — the terrorist Zarqawi. In it, Zawahiri points to the Vietnam War as a model for al Qaeda. This is what he said: “The aftermath of the collapse of American power in Vietnam — and how they ran and left their agents — is noteworthy.” The terrorists witnessed a similar response after the attacks on American troops in Beirut in 1983 and Mogadishu in 1993. They believe that America can be made to run again — only this time on a larger scale, with greater consequences.
[…]Some might be tempted to dismiss these goals as fanatical or extreme. They are fanatical and extreme — but they should not be dismissed. Our enemy is utterly committed. As Zarqawi has vowed, “We will either achieve victory over the human race or we will pass to the eternal life.” (Applause.) And the civilized world knows very well that other fanatics in history, from Hitler to Stalin to Pol Pot, consumed whole nations in war and genocide before leaving the stage of history. Evil men, obsessed with ambition and unburdened by conscience, must be taken very seriously — and we must stop them before their crimes can multiply.
[…]Some have also argued that extremism has been strengthened by the actions in Iraq — claiming that our presence in that country has somehow caused or triggered the rage of radicals. I would remind them that we were not in Iraq on September the 11th, 2001. (Applause.) The hatred of the radicals existed before Iraq was an issue, and it will exist after Iraq is no longer an excuse. The government of Russia did not support Operation Iraqi Freedom — and, yet, the militants killed more than 150 Russian schoolchildren in Beslan.
[…]Over the years these extremists have used a litany of excuses for violence: the Israeli presence on the West Bank, the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, the defeat of the Taliban, or the Crusades of a thousand years ago. In fact, we’re not facing a set of grievances that can be soothed and addressed. We’re facing a radical ideology with inalterable objectives: to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world. No act of ours invited the rage of killers — and no concession, bribe, or act of appeasement would change or limit their plans for murder.
[…]Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy pursues totalitarian aims. Its leaders pretend to be an aggrieved party, representing the powerless against imperial enemies. In truth, they have endless ambitions of imperial domination — and they wish to make everyone powerless, except themselves. Under their rule, they have banned books, and desecrated historical monuments, and brutalized women. They seek to end dissent in every form, to control every aspect of life, to rule the soul itself. While promising a future of justice and holiness, the terrorists are preparing a future of oppression and misery.
Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy is dismissive of free peoples — claiming that men and women who live in liberty are weak and decadent. Zarqawi has said that Americans are, “the most cowardly of God’s creatures.” But let us be clear: It is cowardice that seeks to kill children and the elderly with car bombs, and cuts the throat of a bound captive, and targets worshipers leaving a mosque.
[…]And our debate at home must also be fair-minded. One of the hallmarks of a free society and what makes our country strong is that our political leaders can discuss their differences openly, even in times of war. When I made the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power, Congress approved it with strong bipartisan support. I also recognize that some of our fellow citizens and elected officials didn’t support the liberation of Iraq. And that is their right, and I respect it. As President and Commander-in-Chief, I accept the responsibilities, and the criticisms, and the consequences that come with such a solemn decision.
While it’s perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began. (Applause.) Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community’s judgments related to Iraq’s weapons programs.
They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein. They know the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing his development and possession of weapons of mass destruction. And many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: “When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security.” That’s why more than a hundred Democrats in the House and the Senate — who had access to the same intelligence — voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power. (Applause.)
The stakes in the global war on terror are too high, and the national interest is too important, for politicians to throw out false charges. (Applause.) These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America’s will. As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them. (Applause.) Our troops deserve to know that this support will remain firm when the going gets tough. (Applause.) And our troops deserve to know that whatever our differences in Washington, our will is strong, our nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory. (Applause.)
You can view one of my favorite parts.
About time he swung back at these idiots on the left and the MSM.
I also believe this was a great day to make this speech. What better way to honor our Veterans then telling them how noble, how right this fight they are fighting is. Plus, this is a great day to remind people how successful our military has been in Iraq. How we kicked Saddam’s ass into jail, brought Democracy to a dictatorship, and freed millions in a little over 2 1/2 years! Every loss is sad but to do this with a little over 2,000 casualities is amazing. This was the perfect day to make this speech in my opinion.
Getting to heart of the matter tho is the fact that the Democrats and the left should finally just come out and admit that they support Saddam. They wish Saddam was back in power, that way the French and Russians could still prosper and those rape chambers could continue.
They don’t want anyone telling them about Saddam’s support of terrorism, his payments to families of homicide bombers. Don’t talk about his invasion of Kuwait or the fact that after we kicked his butt out of there he signed a cease fire with us. The cease fire stated he must allow inspectors in to search for WMD’s that EVERYONE knew he had. He didn’t abide by this cease fire, he didn’t abide by the 17 UN resolutions telling him he MUST abide by the cease fire. Don’t tell them about Saddam’s connections to Al-Qaeda that even the 9/11 commission stated he had and that after 9/11 it would have been criminal to allow Saddam to stay in power.
The left doesn’t want anyone telling them the truth because in their fairy tale worlds they can hate as much as they want.
Other’s blogging:
The Political Teen
Stop The ACLU
Dr. Sanity
Conservative Thoughts
Michelle Malkin
Generation Why
Point Five
Myopic Zeal
Gateway Pundit
Protein Wisdom
Donkey Stump
Say Anything
California Conservative
Boxer Watch
Mike’s America
Ace of Spades HQ
Getting to heart of the matter tho is the fact that the Democrats and the left should finally just come out and admit that they support Saddam. They wish Saddam was back in power, that way the French and Russians could still prosper and those rape chambers could continue.

See author page
Holy christ, there are soooo many freakin holes in ur comment that I HAVE to believe you are being sarcastic. If I am wrong then you have my condolences, I’m sure your brain will be missed.
What are you on about? The weapons inspectors were back in Iraq before the tactically worthless “shock and awe” campaign began, you revisionist liar. They were only forced to leave when Bush began bombing again, why would you write otherwise? You had better change that, liar. How low can you get, filthy little Orwell.
Furthermore, the original mandate in OIF was the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. That “Mission Accomplished” actually occurred — they didn’t just put up a dumb banner in those days, they actually did what they claimed. Nothing in that or any resolution that followed authorized the unseating of his government. Why don’t you speak to that? :lol_wp:
Callimachus, at Done with Mirrors, has a really depressing post about the fact that the MSM, recognizing what a good speech it was, utterly failed to make it available through the media. Instead, every MSM outlet either buried it (tne NY Times) or gave selective small quotations, followed immediately by lengthy Left criticisms. Those Americans who aren’t blog savvy, never got the real deal.