CNN And Their Lies


Continuing on my blog yesterday The Captain has done some added research on Eason Jordan’s fables recently.

If you remember the CNN exec said recently

During one of the discussions about the number of journalists killed in the Iraq War, Eason Jordan asserted that he knew of 12 journalists who had not only been killed by US troops in Iraq, but they had in fact been targeted. He repeated the assertion a few times, which seemed to win favor in parts of the audience (the anti-US crowd) and cause great strain on others.

Well apparently this guy has quite a history. There is this article written by The Guardian about Mr. Jordan (hat tip Captain’s Quarters)

Eason Jordan, chief news executive at CNN, said there had been only a “limited amount of progress”, despite repeated meetings between news organisations and the US authorities.

“Actions speak louder than words. The reality is that at least 10 journalists have been killed by the US military, and according to reports I believe to be true journalists have been arrested and tortured by US forces,” Mr Jordan told an audience of news executives at the News Xchange conference in Portugal.

OK, now our troops are torturing journalists. Man, is this guy is the perfect example of lefty douchebag or what?

Well The Captain has dug up some more stories Eason spun in 2002

In October 2002, Eason Jordan claimed that the Israeli Defensive Forces had shot a CNN reporter as part of a deliberate strategy of targeting journalists covering the war in the West Bank and Gaza Strip (see post below). I did a little searching on Nexis again, confident that had CNN reporters taken fire in the line of duty, CNN would report it. I conducted a search for ‘CNN reporter shot’ (non-exclusive), and I got only five hits, all of which reported the same incident, which occurred on October 31, 2000.

According to CNN’s own coverage of the incident and their own eyewitness to the event, Eason Jordan lied about it during the October 2002 conference:

Go to the post to see the interview with this reporter, who pretty much sum’s up the fact that they had gone to a place where alot of fighting had been going on and they got caught in the middle. The Jordan guy is a real piece of work. Typical lying piece of liberal dung.

Apparently now CNN is so worried about this that when you email into them complaining they send the following email back

Many blogs have taken Mr. Jordan’s remarks out of context. Eason Jordan does not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists. Mr. Jordan simply pointed out the facts: While the majority of journalists killed in Iraq have been slain at the hands of insurgents, the Pentagon has also noted that the U.S. military on occasion has killed people who turned out to be journalists. The Pentagon has apologized for those actions.

Mr. Jordan was responding to an assertion by Cong. Frank that all 63 journalist victims had been the result of “collateral damage.”

Anyways, now the jackass has given a response.

Here’s what’s important. First, I stressed insurgents are to blame for the vast majority of the 63 journalist deaths in Iraq. Second, when Congressman Franks said the 63 journalists killed in Iraq were the unfortunate victims of “collateral damage,” I felt compelled to dispute that by pointing out journalists in Iraq are being targeted — I did not say all journalists killed were targeted, but that some were shot at on purpose and were not collateral damage victims. In response to a question about whether I believed the U.S. military meant to kill journalists in Iraq, I said, no, I did not believe the U.S. military was trying to kill journalists in Iraq. Yet, unfortunately, U.S. forces have killed several people who turned out to be journalists. In several cases, the U.S. troops who killed those people aimed and fired at them, not knowing they were shooting at journalists. However tragic and, in hindsight, by Pentagon admission, a mistake, such a killing does not fall into the “collateral damage” category. In Iraq and Washington, I have worked closely and constructively with U.S. military and civilian leaders in an effort to heighten the odds of survival for the courageous journalists in Iraq.


In a follow-up email he added:

Most importantly, I do not believe the U.S. is trying to kill journalists in Iraq. To the contrary, the U.S. military has worked hard to protect journalists in Iraq. Nevertheless, there have been several tragic episodes in which U.S. forces killed journalists in what turned out to be cases not of collateral damage but of mistaken identity. Feel free to paste that, too.

This seems to contradict the report given by Rony Abovitz. Plus you have confirmation from another journalist who appears to be a lefty.

The official WEF summary does not mention Eason’s remarks, and there is no transcript or webcast. But I was in the room and Rony’s account is consistent with what I heard.

You will forgive me if based on the above I don’t believe this idiot from CNN. I don’t believe anything coming from that ratnest of network anyways. Powerline blogged a bit ago that CNN contacted him to try to spin the story, these guys must be in a tailspin.

Is it surprising to anyone that this story isn’t being covered by the MSM at all?

La Shawn Barber has got a running list of bloggers covering this story, lots of good stuff there. Plus check out Hugh Hewitt for much more.

To end this post here is some info that is even funnier, or should I say sad. Guess who this guy is seeing romantically? The same guy who is so worried about the danger’s reporters face is seeing the wife of murdered reporter Daniel Pearl (hat tip again Captain’s Quarters)

It was an extraordinary way to lose a husband – butchered in Pakistan by kidnappers who revelled in their own inhumanity, who filmed their deeds in order to heighten the shock to Western sensibilities. But Mariane is an extraordinary woman. Instead of curling into a shell, as she is convinced Daniel’s assassins hoped she would, she has turned her life into a straightforward declaration of intent: “Terrorists may have destroyed my husband, but they will not have the satisfaction of destroying me.” …

She is 37, but looks younger. As part of not allowing herself to be crushed, she refused to play the quietly grieving widow. After a series of e-mail exchanges and a meeting in Paris, she fell in love again, with Eason Jordan, a CNN executive

This guy is just unbelievable. I’m speechless.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments