15 Nov

‘Wilmer’ Obama’s gaudy demagogic patter faces no Sam Spade press

Michael A. Devine @ The Washington Examiner:

How long must President Obama investigate himself before he can tell the American people what actions he took before, during and after the seven hour attack on Americans inBenghazi?

Presidential press conference as direct examination of friendly cheap gangster witness

How tame is the Washington press corps faced by President Barack Obama yesterday? Mitt Romney was tougher on him in their third “debate”. I counted no more than one or two minimally “tough” questions asked, none competently phrased, and zero effective follow-ups. But why should anyone expect tough questions when the agenda of most of the media is to promote their modern-day liberal ideology and its current Democratic Party champion? The only real quest for the truth among most all self-described “journalists” on matters Libyan, are the efforts of photographers to capture candid camera images of Paula Broadwell’s cleavage.

Four brave Americans were killed on the American consulate grounds in Benghazi, Libya on the eleventh anniversary of the September 11, 2001 al Qaeda’s attacks on the American homeland. The evidence uncovered to date establishes that:

  • the Obama Administration’s acquiescence in Libyan government demands for less American armed force security there than in our Paris embassy;
  • threats and attacks in Benghazi months earlier that prompted several requests directed to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton weeks earlier;
  • the refusal of our government to send help to those requesting help during the 9/11/12 attacks;
  • the State Department and CIA knew the attacks were planned and carried out by organized terrorists including al Qaeda in real-time; and
  • for weeks after the attacks, Administration officials, especially including the President himself, Secretary Clinton and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, disseminated misinformation blaming them on a spontaneous mob upset with an anti-Prophet Mohammed video produced by an American citizen.

Before the election the main interest of CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN in the story was in pretending a statement made by Republican Mitt Romney about unrelated mobs in Egypt hours before the Libyan attacks were inappropriate comments about Benghazi. Immediately after the election, only crickets could be heard on the matter from the press until the Director of Central Intelligence resigned citing adultery as the cause.

But, given the dead bodies, the desire to feign independent objectivity as the Fourth Estate, and the total solar eclipse-like rarity of President Obama subjecting himself to questions while not sitting on David Letterman’s couch or while sharing a stage with a Republican presidential nominee as prime target; the following question was the first one asked by AP:

Read more

       

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.

7 Responses to ‘Wilmer’ Obama’s gaudy demagogic patter faces no Sam Spade press

  1. FAITH7 says: 1

    “How hard is it to ask the President what he knew, when he knew it, and what was done as a result before, during and after the Benghazi attacks? How hard is to follow-up and ask for President Obama to tell us where he was and what he was doing during the seven hours of the siege? Not very.”

    http://www.examiner.com/article/wilmer-obama-s-gaudy-demagogic-patter-faces-no-sam-spade-press

    I think the propaganda machine consisting of the indoctrinated abyss….in reality….are really not able to analyze the situation, evaluate situations with critical thinking and draw ‘their own’ conclusions, or even ‘challenge’ the elitists that be… [OFraud]… So, No “HardQuestions” are NOT asked of the President [could they be AFRAID to ask the President ??] Isn’t he the ‘be all’/'end all’ anyway?

    Surely the indoctrination has worked…

    I mean come on, for how long have we passed people through the education system with a pat on the head and a ‘you tried your best’ attitude and just passed them along??

    Either that or it’s purposeful ignorance…

    Besides, we would get half an answer or spin or bull shit or any other crap answer, than the TRUTH – anything to avoid the TRUTH…

    ReplyReply
  2. FAITH7 says: 2

    Oh, how the hypocrisy oozes and oozes out…

    OFraud says: “But for them to go after the U.N. ambassador, who had nothing to do with Benghazi and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous.”

    http://www.examiner.com/article/wilmer-obama-s-gaudy-demagogic-patter-faces-no-sam-spade-press

    Someone else, a US Citizen who, in reality and truth “Had Nothing to do With Benghazi”…is this not “outrageous” also Mr O-Fraud???

    So what about “the blame” on a unknown film maker and the [poorly made] “film” itself…this US Citizen being ‘made and example of’ for the sake of the radical muslim world….by being arrested, and dragged out of his home in the middle of the night? BTW who also ” had nothing to do in truth, with Benghazi” ??

    I suppose bad information and “bad intelligence” is everywhere under your “watch” and ‘in” your administration..huh Mr Ofraud???

    But we are just not ‘allowed’ to point that out huh?? Especially Republicans..

    ReplyReply
  3. Liberal1 (Objectivity) says: 3

    @FAITH7: Even if President Obama told the absolute, verifiable, objective, unadulterated truth, you wouldn’t believe him.

    ReplyReply
  4. Liberal1 (Objectivity) says: 4

    @FAITH7: ibidem

    ReplyReply
  5. retire05 says: 5

    @Liberal1 (Objectivity):

    There is no chance that Obama WILL EVER tell the absolute, verifiable, objective, unadulterated truth. It’s not his style or the style of the Chicago political mafia.

    ReplyReply
  6. FAITH7 says: 6

    @Lib1 #3 – Gee, lo1 I must say, I ‘do’ believe the Won when he tells us what his ‘fave foods’ are… [sarc]…then there is that little story about the ‘Boy who cried wolf ‘…. slight difference…the Won is perpetual when it comes to the Lies…unless of course the ‘story’ puts him in a ‘good light’ … then it is truth and rainbows…

    I was once like you, but then I grew up…I found out I could “think all by myself” and actually can judge a person based on his ‘character’, his merit, and the ‘actions’ that follow…all that, without the Government’s or the Liberal Educational System’s “help”…

    Oh, and Retire05 @5 – I ditto that!!!

    ReplyReply
  7. I JUST LEARN a new fact, it come from the POST above
    about that the LIBYAN GOVERNMENT DEMAND TO MINIMIZE THE SECURITY
    AND WAS ACQUIESCE BY THE OBAMA ,
    it was mention by a blogger as possible, but this confirm it,
    that tell us why OBAMA did not give THE AMBASSADOR THE HELP REQUIRED, ONE WHO MUST HAVE BEEN BRIEF
    he prefer to obey the LIBYAN LEADER AND TRUST THEM, INSTEAD OF THE AMERICANS
    WHICH KEPT ASKING FOR SECURITY.
    NOW THAT WAS OBAMA RESPONSIBILITY, HE IS THE ONE WHO SURELY HAS BEEN BRIEF
    OF SO MANY DEMANDS, HE IS GUILTY AS HELL,
    CASE CLOSE

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site