Awr Hawkins @ Big Government:
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) seemingly endless pursuit of a ban on “assault rifles” since the Sandy Hook tragedy has now led to the introduction of her “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013”–a bill that not only bans “assault rifles,” but numerous handguns and shotguns too.
Here’s a question: When did handguns and shotguns become “assault rifles”?
They didn’t, but Democrats see this as their big chance to take away as many guns as they can, and they’re not about to pass that chance up.
That this move is as shameless as it is unconstitutional is evident in the fact that the vast majority of the weapons Feinstein seeks to ban were not even used in Sandy Hook, the Clackamas Town Center shooting, or the shooting at the Aurora theater. It is a gun grab, pure and simple.
THIS AIN`T HOLLYWOOD AND THIS IS NOT CALIFORNIA . IF SHE THINKS THAT SHE IS GOING TO GET AWAY WITH A THREAT LIKE THIS THEN HER AND THE DEMOCRATS DON`T WANT TO KEEP PEACE THEY ACTUALLY WANT A CIVIL WAR . THE LIBERAL MINDSET IS TO DO AS I SAY NOT AS IDO BUT THIS IS NOT RUSSIA OR CUBA YET AND THEY WILL NEVER SEE A BAN IN OUR CHILDREN`S LIFETIMES . IF THE REPUBLICANS LET THIS HAPPEN THEN WE ARE BACK TO A NEW COLONIAL COUNTRY AND THE ELITES GAVE IN THEN AND THEY WILL NOW !
Yep, all this coming from someone who, in the past, was the only person in San Francisco to have a CCW permit.
I was at a training session a few months back in Morgan Hill Ca, just before the ‘election’ of our Dear Leader. One gentleman was a Democrat, I mentioned that the Dems wanted to take our guns, he said “no they didn’t”. To this I now say, HEY DUMB SHIT what do you think now?