7 Feb

News Media Scrub Cop Murderer’s Manifesto of Pro-Obama, Hillary, MSNBC, CNN, Gay, and Anti-Gun Comments

Soopermexican:

I’ve been following closely the news story about Chris Dorner, who is now suspected of murdering three people, including one police officer, and shooting another two police officers. He is targeting police and their families for what he says is a corrupt system that robbed him of his name and his life.

You can read all the details here.

However, I started noticing that some of the details the media was talking about didn’t fit the released manifesto I’ve read everywhere. Especially interesting, is that KFI’s morning news regurgitator Bill Handel had mentioned some pro-Obama comments and anti-NRA sentiments in the manifesto.

But these weren’t in the copy that KFI themselves released – see for yourself.

This video from FOX News Los Angeles reports that the manifesto was 22 pages long, while the manifesto released was only 11.

The page where FOX News LA had the manifesto is now deleted.Comments don’t mention the manifesto at all.

KTLA also has the abbreviated manifesto, with this parenthetical: “KTLA has removed the names of a number of officers out of respect for their privacy.”

FOX News reposted the manifesto, with all the names redacted as the authorities asked, but it still doesn’t have the second half.

ABC 7 has also posted a redacted half version of the manifesto.

Being curious, I started looking for a complete copy, but other mainstream news media only had the abbreviated copy.

However, I was able to find a complete copy of the posting, from the website “Crime File News” – the details in it corroborate with the reading that Bill Handel gave on the KFI morning show today.

So why did they edit it?

Read more

       

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 24 years.

49 Responses to News Media Scrub Cop Murderer’s Manifesto of Pro-Obama, Hillary, MSNBC, CNN, Gay, and Anti-Gun Comments

  1. Nan G says: 1

    The SooperMexican is doing a vital job by actually posting all of the redacted pages (minus the names, of course).
    Nope, this madman does not ”fit the narrative.”
    Still, he is a madman.
    I bet Obama wants him dead rather than allowed a day in court.
    I wonder if the madman will oblige him or give himself up as law enforcement is asking.

    ReplyReply
  2. Hard Right says: 2

    I guess we should do what the left does and blame obama, Feinstein, and other leftists for his rampage.

    ReplyReply
  3. Richard Wheeler says: 3

    NanG. Do you give a F— If this guy gets his “day in court” or goes out in a hail of gunfire like that kidnapping murderer in Alabama?

    ReplyReply
  4. Nan G says: 4

    @Richard Wheeler:
    RW, I sat as a juror in a death penalty case (with special circumstances).
    I was proud of police who restrained themselves while arresting this man and his two accomplisses.
    (How do you spell that!)

    There were more than two sides in the case.
    All sides got to be heard.
    Although we found him guilty and with the special circumstances he was sentenced to die, he is still alive and going through a legal appeal process.
    This has been going on for years now.
    But that is our due process.

    Dorner is crazy, read his uncut ”manifesto” and you know he is.
    As such he will likely never get a death penalty other than in the process of bringing him in.

    Do YOU think crazy people deserve to get due process or that they must be killed?

    Ultimately it will be up to Dorner how he comes in.
    The Clash asked, “How you gonna go? With your hands on your head or on the trigger of your gun?”
    Police have less-than-lethal weapons like bean bags and rubber bullets, tasers and even clubs.
    It will be Dorner’s choice.

    ReplyReply
  5. Richard Wheeler says: 5

    NanG. accomplices Guys like this cop killer and murderer of 2 innocent kids in Irvine and the kidnapper in Al. should be taken out with “extreme prejudice” before they do more damage.

    Do I think crazed killers of innocents deserve due process? Read immediately above.

    ReplyReply
  6. Pete says: 6

    The left is evil. Period. Propaganda, double standards, blatant deceit. I am sickened by the hypocrisy. They KNOW they are doing this, and they don’t care…they won’t be called on it by anyone except a few of us on the conservative side…who are branded as cranks and crazies by the MSM.

    Can you imagine the wall to wall coverage on all channels if his manifesto had been pro-TEA party, pro-Reagan, anti-Obama? This is exactly the same media blackout that occured with Loughner shooting in AZ and the pro-marxist manifesto guy who flew his plane into the IRS building in Texas a couple of years ago.

    I have no respect for anyone who supports democrats in any form. If they are too stupid to see how they are forging the chains for their own enslavement, then I will shed no tears when they complain about being slaves.

    ReplyReply
  7. Richard Wheeler says: 7

    Pete Why should this crazed killer’s “manifesto” get any coverage at all? It’s pure B.S.

    ReplyReply
  8. VoteOutIncumbents says: 8

    The news media is deeply, deeply corrupt.

    ReplyReply
  9. Buffalobob says: 9

    Barbara Boxer’s gun ban/confiscation proposal would exclude governmental officials. So the question for Mrs. Boxer is would this nut job bat shit crazy be one of her chosen ones?

    ReplyReply
  10. just show that FOX was too polite to get the fact that the crazy criminal
    was sold to OBAMA and the same followers, that could be the clue we are looking for all the criminals gone bazurk in a killing spree lately, to tell us it’s source is the dividing and racist card they play, WHICH INCITE THE FOLLOWERS TO HIS AGENDA, WHICH IS LOOKING MORE LIKE A CULT, THAT WORD WAS MENTIONNED BEFORE BY THE REV. JEREMY WRIGHT IN HIS CHURCH, YES A CULT TO THE POINT
    OF EXPLOSIVES ACTIONS BY CRIMINAL MINDS.
    they keep listening to OBAMA campaigns speechs ON AND ON, of blaming others, the CONGRESS, THE REPUBLICANS THE PEOPLE,
    WHO EXPOSE HIM AND HIS FAILURES , ANY ONE BUT HIMSELF.
    if you repeat that as a truth, so many times they take it as truth, instead of a lie.
    IT WORK ON THE CRIMINAL MIND, AS IT WORK IN THE UNAWARE MIND, THEY TAKE THAT HATE FOR THEIR OWN,
    WE ARE FACING IT EVERY DAY, BY THEIR COMMENTS
    IN MANY WEB SPACE
    FOX left that for them to find ,
    FOX HAS ALWAYS BEEN COURTEOUS EVEN FOR HIS OPPONENT,
    they don’t play the opponent game, THEY HAVE CLASS,

    ReplyReply
  11. Nan G says: 11

    Facebook has a page started in SUPPORT of this killer!
    http://www.presstelegram.com/ci_22543783
    So, the Left responded to his ranting favorably!
    How odd.
    The Left races to put down killers when they are (falsely) associated with the Right in any way.
    But to support this guy?
    See?
    The Occupy Movement IS potentially a very violent group.
    And so are ”the Left.”

    ReplyReply
  12. Nan G
    wow that is not normal people, they are even as dangerous
    as the killer of 3 people already,
    I just heard that SCIENTISTS HAVE LOCATED A PLACE IN THE BRAIN
    WHERE EVIL IS CONCENTRATED, A DARK SPOT SHOW A FUTURE CRIMINAL ACTION
    THAT IS QUITE A REVOLUTION FIND,
    AND ANOTHER FIND IS THEY CAN SWISH OUT A DEPRESSION
    USING ELECTROD STIMULATION.

    ReplyReply
  13. retire05 says: 13

    @Richard Wheeler:

    Guys like this cop killer and murderer of 2 innocent kids in Irvine and the kidnapper in Al. should be taken out with “extreme prejudice” before they do more damage.

    Well, then, let’s just abolish everyone’s Constitutional right to “due process” . You know those drug runners who bring their product across our borders that contribute to the deaths of Americans? Just shoot them. How about all those who participate in life destructive human traffic? Extreme prejudice. Think how that will clear out our court rooms. Rapists? Shoot them.

    Why should this crazed killer’s “manifesto” get any coverage at all? It’s pure B.S.

    For the same reason that the left wing press released the manifesto of the anarchist who flew a plane into the IRS building in Austin, Texas. It’s news. It just isn’t the news that protects the meme that all these crazy people are “Tea Partiers.” This guy in California is a hard core liberal. Ooooops; that makes the left look bad. Just like the gun who decided to go on a shooting rampage picking his targets from a list put out by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is far left wing. Or the guy who shot three women because he learned to hate white people when he was in college.

    There are nut cases on both sides of the aisle. But you seem to think if they are on the LEFT side of the aisle, the details are not important.

    ReplyReply
  14. Aye says: 14

    Remember how the leftists hurried in from the cold to blame people on the right for the shooting of Gabby Giffords? For days and days and days that’s all we heard about.

    Remember the shrieking and caterwauling when the shootings in Norway happened and how that was supposedly all our fault too?

    Remember when the Aurora theater shootings happened and how the leftists gleefully dipped their fingers in their own poo to smear the right with false accusations? Major networks alleged that the shooter was a member of the Tea Party. Of course, that accusation, like so many before it turned out to be false.

    And, of course, there were many other occasions of such slanderous, scurrilous, and hasty efforts of prejudgment. All of which turned out to be 100% wrong.

    Now, we have this nut bag wreaking havoc in California and what do we know about him?

    From his own writings, we know for sure that he’s a huge fan of Obie.

    And Hillary.

    And Piers Morgan.

    We know that this guy is firmly lodged in the Fever SwampTM of the left.

    Yet, none of the cadre of usual suspects…the Azz Clown CircusTM that likes to falsely blame this stuff on the right…none of them, NOT ONE…has demonstrated the courage to be honest about this guy and his ideology.

    I wonder why.

    Oh… I know why… That would require honesty. And consistency. Both of which are sorely lacking within the deranged masses of the left.

    ReplyReply
  15. Richard Wheeler says: 15

    Retire05 says crazy cop is a “hard core liberal”. Should I call the Alabama survivalist a “staunch Conservative?”
    It’s B.S. to politicize insanity and if they go out in a hail of gunfire I got no problem with it.

    ReplyReply
  16. Aye
    yes you pin the point right on, and you read my mind of their accusing
    falsely the right for the other criminals, and they had accused SARAH PALIN ALSO,
    CREEPY ON THAT SIDE AIN’T IT?
    BYE

    ReplyReply
  17. retire05 says: 17

    @Richard Wheeler:

    It’s B.S. to politicize insanity and if they go out in a hail of gunfire I got no problem with it.

    You’re a leftist, Rich, so no surprise that you would have no problem with any abolition of Constitutional rights. After all, it’s just us looney right wingers who think that document has any meaning other than what The Won says it does.

    So……………tell me;

    do you agree that our Border Patrol should just be allowed to exercise “extreme prejudice” against drug runners and those who traffic in human beings? Should the police just be allowed to use “extreme prejudice” against a rapist, a murderer, a drug dealer whose clients are children?

    You’re such a joke, Rich, except you are not funny. You are what is wrong with this nation.

    ReplyReply
  18. Richard Wheeler says: 18

    Retireo5 Do you have a problem with the Alabama outcome? Should we have continued to coddle that poor misunderstood killer/kidnapper? Were his Constitutional rights trampled?

    ReplyReply
  19. retire05 says: 19

    @Richard Wheeler:

    Retireo5 Do you have a problem with the Alabama outcome? Should we have continued to coddle that poor misunderstood killer/kidnapper? Were his Constitutional rights trampled?

    If there is no other way than taking someone out, I have no problem with it. But the ideal end result would be capture, not kill.

    Now, you answer my questions which were:

    do you agree that our Border Patrol should just be allowed to exercise “extreme prejudice” against drug runners and those who traffic in human beings? Should the police just be allowed to use “extreme prejudice” against a rapist, a murderer, a drug dealer whose clients are children?

    ReplyReply
  20. Skook says: 20

    Manipulating the story or facts is a process known as propaganda. The Left with its control of the media has become very proficient at propaganda, but when the story doesn’t fit their template and is counter productive to the party line it becomes non-news, unfit for public viewing.

    It becomes expedient to redact the embarrassing parts of the story/manifesto in the tradition of Stalin and Obama. There is no reason for the public to know the truth or the full story; it will confuse them and cause them to question the programmed news of the future.

    Once the propagandists get the story this man becomes a nebulous psychopath, rather than a follower of Obama and Hillary who might have been swayed by the rhetoric and figures he is performing a noble service by demonstrating the effectiveness of the AR 15. In his twisted mind, he feels he is aiding or contributing to the party line. There will be more of these loose cannons in the future; people who have been dealt a bad hand or had honor where there was none and weren’t capable of dealing with injustice and the evils of political corruption. They believe the lies of the Left and think the national political figures actually care about their pathetic existences, only to be faced with the shallowness of indifferent leaders who use them for their votes like pimps use women for their bodies.

    ReplyReply
  21. Richard Wheeler says: 21

    Retire05 I do not grant free reign to Border Patrol,Cops or POTUS.
    “no other way” Concur.
    I believe in a free press but publishing and politicizing “manifestos” of the deranged is stretching it.

    ReplyReply
  22. Hard Right says: 22

    @Aye:

    And they will be convinced there is no contradiction or double standard.

    ReplyReply
  23. HOW COMPLICATED THIS AMERICA BECAME,
    when the first immigrants came to find their space and register it,
    it was easy, and when one of their hired hand stole a horse he was hang
    it was easy, and all that was left was freedom to live, no bad criminal around,
    life was hard but it was easy, you did not have a key for the door, you could walk for miles on your land
    unafraid to meet a bad human, but if it happen you had a gun to save your life and no body said anything,
    it was so easy than. and they keep complicating it with entitlements every day,
    and the prisons are full and overcrowded paid by
    THE PEOPLE WHO WORK
    SO HARD
    TO MAKE
    LIFE EASY
    BUT ARE NO MORE FREE TO DO IT.

    ReplyReply
  24. Tom says: 24

    He lists GHWB as his second favorite President of all time. He writes in support of Chick-Fil-A and deporting CNN’s Fareed Zakaria. He claims that he didn’t vote for Obama, didn’t vote at all, because he supported John Huntsman. While he supports Clinton for President in 2016, his second choice is Chris Christie. This is the same Liberal, Obamaphile, dyed-in-the-wool ardent Democrat you speak of? This is the under-reported story you cry about, that a mad mad pens a meandering, nonsensical “manifesto”, and it demands a serious, careful parsing for possible Leftist sympathies, and therefore (you believe) meaning? Good luck with that.

    ReplyReply
  25. Skook says: 25

    It was the line about liking Michelle’s new hairdo with the bangs that made me wonder. I think it looks good as well, but is this the sort of thing you write before going on an assassination mission?

    If it is so insignificant, why were so many pages redacted by the media?

    Is the evidence within the manifesto more inconsequential than blaming Palin for consequential evidence that didn’t exist?

    No, a killer whose bubble is slightly off center is eligible to come from either side of the aisle. The Left has been overly quick to point the finger of blame at the right, even when they had no evidence. When contradictory evidence exists they deny the evidence and say it has no political relevance. These are two way streets and these little machines at our fingertips are the street lamps along the roads of news that were once dominated by the MSM.

    ReplyReply
  26. Richard Wheeler says: 26

    Skooks With all due respect to my fellow Marine I feel you’ve gone off the deep end with your insistance on tying this deranged fired cop’s actions to Obama ,HRC,his 2nd favorite POTUS GHWB or Rambo.
    He’s mad at the LAPD for firing him and hurting his Naval career.As Tom points out, his rambling manifesto merely confirms his unbalanced mind.
    IMO to make this more than what it is serves no intelligent purpose.Singular goal — Get him off the street.

    ReplyReply
  27. Hard Right says: 27

    From seeing his manifesto, he’s not insane. He’s evil. Is he of the left? Absolutely.
    I’m not surprised the same people who ignored how their comrades smeared us regardless of whether the gunman was actually a Republican, now want to pretend that he’s crazy and of no reflection on the left. Too bad he is exactly that.
    In fact, he even sounds like some of the leaders/activists od the dem party.

    ReplyReply
  28. Tom says: 28

    @Hard Right:

    Is he of the left? Absolutely.

    Well, at least now I have some context for why his killing three people has your attention. It’s amazingly gratifying to me for some reason that you think this somehow proves that all liberals are potential murderers, and all murderers liberals. It validates everything I might ever suspect about a person who goes by a ridiculous moniker like “Hard Right”. By the way, I hear that Count Chocula, being on the swarthy side himself, is quite the Obamaphile. Do you think this means all Vampires are Leftists?

    ReplyReply
  29. Skook says: 29

    Rich, with all due respect to a former Marine officer I may have passed along some dirt road, I must say past performance is on our side. We have been quick to receive verbal assaults over these nut cases whether there was justification or not. Now we have a man who admired a former Naval Aviator who was president, but otherwise agrees with all the Liberal talking points of the day. Can there be hero worship that is inconsistent with Leftist ideology, all within the same Liberal or do you believe that Liberals cannot break from formation, even to admire a hero of the past.

    I hope he is captured alive. There seems to be quite a bit to be learned from his feelings of injustice and corruption. This Villarigosa (sp) pops up a lot and many have him pegged as a future national politician. There is corruption in LA and this man’s rantings may be from trying to expose a rotten core. If this is the case, his chances of being taken alive are nil. I will volunteer to talk to him before and after capture; sometimes these guys just need someone to listen to them for a while. I think he has some interesting stories to tell.

    We are not killers, that is a long way from the ideals of our justice system. He should only be killed if there is no other means. Like our al Qaeda enemies, he has valuable information, but unlike them, he is ready to talk if someone will listen.

    ReplyReply
  30. Hard Right says: 30

    @Tom:

    Ah yes, tom. They very leftist who attacked the GOP for pointing out how he and others were smearing us for the actions of loughner.
    He’s of the left thanks to his views, tom. You know that though. You just saw another chance to smear those you hate. That has been one of your two chief trademarks here on this site, the other being outright bigotry.

    ReplyReply
  31. Richard Wheeler says: 31

    Skooks “He has valuable information” He’s had his “day in court” and lost his appeal for reinstatement.
    The whir of helicopters. Where is Ollie Stone?

    ReplyReply
  32. retire05 says: 32

    @Skook:

    Let’s not forget how the press was so quick to dump the blame for the Tucson shootings on conservatives in general, and Sarah Palin, in particular. How many left wing publications ran the “Palin targets” which were actually surveyor’s marks? Remember the demand for more “civility” as they blamed Jared Loughner’s actions on conservative “hate” speech?

    How about the guy who flew his plane into the IRS building in Austin, Texas? His manifesto was printed, and reprinted, and even one major news outlet reported that the guy was a Tea Partier, nevermind they had the wrong guy. No apology to the ordinary citizen that newscaster smeared. Now Rich thinks that any information on the CA killer is just sooooooo unimportant. Don’t remember Rich saying that after the Tucson shootings when the press was smearing the conservative side of the aisle.

    When a person goes on a rampage, the press is quick to say “Ah ha, look, the guy is a conservative and hangs out with the Tea Party who are all violent racists. That’s why he did it.” But if the guy is a liberal, it;s “Hey, the guy is just a nut case. Nothing to see here so just move on.”

    Recently, a man who shot three women, killing one of them, testified that he learned to hate white people in college. And he wanted them to pay for slavery. What did we get from the press on that? Crickets, for the most part.

    ReplyReply
  33. Skook says: 33

    Tom, I don’t know whether Count Chocula is a real fictional character or not, but I got a kick out of the name.

    I must say, you are the first to bring up the racial component. No one else seemed to care, except for him. According to him, he was called a vile name by two other officers and retaliated. I understand his reaction. I have been in on similar confrontations among armed men, men who could be very dangerous or at least lethal. It is ugly.

    When you have a man who isn’t wrapped too tight (a race track term for one who is close to the edge) such comments can push them into doing violent things, but we should remember, this man withstood the scrutiny of a Naval officer selection and a police officer selection, his weaknesses were not obvious to trained observers. There were things that pushed him beyond his limits, I want to know what those insults were, if indeed they exist, and none of us can judge from here just how egregious those injustices were that pushed beyond acceptable behavior. I can’t believe I am sounding like a Liberal and our Liberals want him shot down like a mad dog. LOL

    ReplyReply
  34. Hard Right says: 34

    Well Skook, it’s probably because he makes them look bad.

    From Ace of Spades

    Kip’s Law: “Every advocate of central planning always – always – envisions himself as the central planner.”

    Fen’s Law: “The left believes none of the things they lecture the rest of us about.”

    Well these two laws plus the constant gnawing fear that something somewhere somehow might be unequal do account for a solid 85% of all leftist policies.

    ReplyReply
  35. Skook says: 35

    @Hard Right: Fun stuff, but humor is only funny if there is an element of truth, and then it isn’t so funny.

    ReplyReply
  36. Richard Wheeler says: 36

    Skooks says “Can’t believe I’m sounding like a Liberal” There it is.lol
    To pigeonhole all Libs., Conservs., Libertarians or Justice For Vermonters is a mistake and a lesson to be learned by all.

    ReplyReply
  37. retire05 says: 37

    @Skook:

    It is my understanding, from the shooter’s manifesto, that a lot of his grievences come from the corruption in the LAPD. Saying there is corruption in the LAPD is like saying the sun will rise in the east and set in the west.

    ReplyReply
  38. Skook says: 38

    @retire05: In fairness to all the previous White slave owners of the past: most people who were here were too poor to own slaves, like I am too poor to invest in drilling rigs. So most Americans whose families were here a 150 years ago, could have never owned a slave if they wanted to own a slave, and many of those same people found the idea of owning another person to be repugnant. It’s history, but you must read the actual period accounts and journals rather than the fictionalized agenda driven history taught in schools.

    ReplyReply
  39. retire05 says: 39

    @Skook:

    I never said poor people owned slaves. Most Southerners didn’t own slaves. What I did point out was that the shooter of those three white women, one he killed, is a black guy who claims to have learned in college to hate whites because of slavery and wanted whites to pay for that slavery.

    I am fully aware of actual history as I am not a fan of “revisionist” history. One has to dig for the truth due to so many “revisionist” history writers. But it can be found, and doesn’t resemble anything currently taught in schools.

    ReplyReply
  40. Skook says: 40

    @retire05: Relax, the point was not directed toward you, but toward people who are capable of blaming all Whites for slavery. Without acknowledging the fact that most of the European migrations occurred after the Civil War.

    I probably didn’t word the phrase correctly, but this what I meant. You can hate a White man for slavery, but in reality, there is a greater possibility t man’s distant relatives hated slavery on moral grounds or because slavery kept wages at a dismal level for the working man. Therefore shooting someone because of slavery or because of a fantasy like the book Roots is a ludicrous injustice.

    ReplyReply
  41. SKOOK
    hi,
    you have the right attitude as usual, you bring the human out of the monster,
    that’s a good lesson to take ,
    I believe THE PEOPLE ARE TRYING SO HARD TO FIND WORK WHICH IS GONE ELSEWHERE,
    CHASE AWAY BY THE UNION’S DEMANDS INAPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME WE ARE LIVING
    AT THIS ADMINISTRATION TIME OF NOT CARING FOR AMERICANS BUT ON THEIR KNEES FOR THE ILLEGALS AND FOREIGNER WHICH IS THEIR PRIORITY SINCE THEY MOVED IN THE WHITE HOUSE,
    NOW THEY EXTEND THEIR VISIT AND EXTEND THE POWER THEY THINK THEY HAVE ON THE PEOPLE,
    THEY ARE PUSHING TO THE LIMIT OF THE PEOPLE BEING IN A STATE OF MIND DANGEROUSLY ANGRY, AND RUNNING OUT OF RESOURCES TO MAKE IT,
    SOME ARE WALKING BOMBS READY TO EXPLODE BY THOSE ENTITELMENTS ON THEIR SHOULDERS,
    THIS GOVERNMENT DID ALL THIS WITH ARROGANCE AND SHAMELESS ACTIONS,
    TO TAKE FULL POWER OVER THIS NATION OF TOLERANT LAW ABIDING AMERICANS,
    THEY CONTINUE TO HAVE AMERICANS BEING CHASE AWAY FROM THEIR COMFORT AND REPLACE BY THE FOREIGNERS WHO COME IN AND WELCOME BY OBAMA BECAUSE HE SEE THEM AS BETTER FOR HIMSELF, NOT FOR AMERICA, IT IS SO EVIDENT, BECAUSE THEY ARE IN THE OPEN NOW,
    HE FEEL SECURE ENOUGH TO GO FOR THE NEXT AMENDMENT TO GET HIM DICTATOR FOR LIFE.
    HE IS NOT LOOKING TO GET THE CLIMATE GOOD FOR JOBS CREATORS, HE SPEND AMERICA TO THE BONES WHAT ELSE CAN THE AMERICANS THINK, AND OTHER ACT OF DESPERATIONS WILL OCCUR,
    OBAMA OPEN THE CAN OF HORRORS AND IT WILL GRADUATE HIGHER AS TIME PASS.
    IT’S A FRENZY DIABOLIC THAT WON’T STOP EASY, NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO,
    what is the solution, we know it is a total reverse of the
    SOCIALIST COMMUNIST indoctrination, a return to GOD
    NATIONAL PRAYERS FROM AMERICANS, AND A DEBRIEFING TOTAL OF THE OBAMA BELIEVERS,
    AND THE DEMOCRATS WHO COVER HIM,

    ReplyReply
  42. Tom says: 42

    @Skook:

    You should feel relieved to have missed a rather strange era in the marketing of terrible cereal to children.

    I must say, you are the first to bring up the racial component.

    Well, aside from Chris Dorner, who clearly had some grievances to air relating to race. Or perhaps we should consider those individuals who rush to assume that a man who didn’t even vote for Obama is Obama’s number 1 fan. I suppose that stereotype about all law enforcement officers blindly loving Obama must be true?

    ReplyReply
  43. Tom says: 43

    @Hard Right:

    He’s of the left thanks to his views, tom. You know that though. You just saw another chance to smear those you hate.

    What really makes me laugh is that you’re apparently too stupid to even understand the reason for this post. Here’s a hint, genius: they’re talking about alleged media bias, not about how “bad people” are always “liberals”. Maybe you can ask your dog to explain it to you after he takes you for a walk.

    ReplyReply
  44. TOM
    PUT YOUR TAIL IN YOUR MOUTH AND EAT IT,
    THAT IS LESS OFFENSIVE THAN YOUR LAST COMMENT.

    ReplyReply
  45. Tom says: 45

    @ilovebeeswarzone:

    You might notice that I endeavor to treat those who are generally respectful, and certainly those who are specifically respectful toward me, in kind. At least I try, whether or not I always succeed. In the specific instance you reference, I ask you, should I treat a congenitally rude and offensive person with endless kindness? Why does this person deserve special treatment? Are you alluding to his/her/its mental faculties? Are you advocating for what amounts to affirmative action in the comments section of a Conservative blog? I wouldn’t think of it. I’ll go to the Huffington Post if I want to play that game.

    ReplyReply
  46. TOM
    YOU INSULT MY FRIEND, AND YOU ARE IN CONSERVATIVE GROUND,
    HOLD YOUR TONGUE, AND YOU WILL BE ANSWERED IN A POLITE WAY,
    JUST GIVE YOUR OPINION, WHICH YOU CAN GIVE SOME GOOD ONES,
    BUT I can’t stand reading insult sent to my friends

    ReplyReply
  47. Hard Right says: 47

    tom, my posts have been pretty clear. So I would say either you are as mentally ill as you appear, or are as big a P.O.S. as you have proven to be by creating strawmen. Maybe even both. You and your leftist cohorts have tried to pretend he wasn’t of your ilk. His manifesto proves otherwise. Their efforts to hide this, and your defense of their efforts does as well. That is your “bias”, but really it’s your rabid bigotry laid bare.
    I think you are far beyond even professional help.

    Bees, after seeing tom’s pro gun-control posts, I really do think he’s not all there. His posts were so hysterical and irrational I almost didn’t believe that he believed what he was saying. Sadly, he meant every word and I learned this from dealing with people like him.
    His gross distortions of what I said on this thread just so he can vent his hatred in a way he can justify to himself only reinforces my belief he’s nuts.
    I would not compare dorner with rich, but with the exception of murder, he seems much like tom.

    ReplyReply
  48. Ditto says: 48

    Least we forget:

    Theodore J. Kaczynski aka the Unabomber, the leftist, neo-luddist, eco-terrorist referred to by the MSM as a “evil genius,” who from 1979-1996 mailed deadly pipe bombs to scientists and corporate targets from California to New Jersey.

    “Ted” received rather respectful treatment by the press, compared to the MSM’s disdainful reporting on the Waco Branch Davidian “cultists” and David Koresh.

    ReplyReply
  49. Hard Right
    hi,
    it’s a bit funny when you see their outrage, they come to dismantle the opinions,
    and if they get stop, they are angry and go to demolition mode,
    that’s what they learned,
    if they bring a knife get a gun, vote for revenge, all negatives slurs to empower other
    and bring them under their weight,
    and now they don’t want to accept the crime come from their words to incite violence,
    and violence occur and what? oh surprise, it come openly from the left,
    direct from the mouth of the one gone bazurk enough to kill instead of doing his job to protect.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>