153 Responses to #NARRATIVEFAIL: CNN: Witnesses Tell FBI That Zimmerman Is No Racist.

1. Mike O'Malley says: 151

   @MataHarley:

   [Mike says] For instance you were correct, George Zimmerman did put his cellphone in his pocket so that, at the moment he struck, Trayvon Martin would have observed a flashlight in one of Zimmerman’s hands and the other hand empty.

   [Mata replies]The flashlight wasn’t working… per Zimmerman. Why would he be holding a flashlight that didn’t work? duh.. Nor do you know what Zim had in his hands because he has never said. Making it up as you go along.

   Here again like Angela Corey you leave information about important evidence on the editing room floor. You say nothing about the second flashlight. Two of George Zimmerman’s flashlights were recovered on the grass at the scene of the attack. Both appear to have been flung aside when Martin decked Zimmerman. Why did not you tell us about this MataHarley? Evidence photo of item #5 is of a moderate size black flashlight with a carrying cord attached. Would this not be the flashlight that George Zimmerman said was not working? The other flashlight is a smaller key-chain flashlight. This flashlight can be seen in evidence photo of item #1 on the grass still attached to the keys to George Zimmerman’s vehicle.

   [Mata mocks] Why would he be holding a flashlight that didn’t work? duh..

   Now Mata need one ask why might George Zimmerman be holding a less adequate flashlight and his attached car keys as he returned to his vehicle?

   Reply

   July 31, 2012 at 3:39 am
2. MataHarley says: 152

   O’Malley: Here again like Angela Corey you leave information about important evidence on the editing room floor. You say nothing about the second flashlight. Two of George Zimmerman’s flashlights were recovered on the grass at the scene of the attack. Both appear to have been flung aside when Martin decked Zimmerman.

   I’m well aware of all of the evidence, and of the debris path. So while you want to pompously lecture me about leaving out details, which I don’t (pointing out evidence and timelines), you instead make things up and continue your shuck, dodge a jive dance. Take this statement alone as a perfect example:

   Both appear to have been flung aside when Martin decked Zimmerman

   sigh… the keychain flashlight was found a few feet south of the tee where Zimmerman insists that Martin “decked” him. But Martin’s body, his cell and the tactical flashlight belonging to Zimmerman were found 45′ or more south of that. If Zim were decked, and engaged in the fight for his life where he says he was (at the tee) – screaming for help the last 38 seconds… all while his head was supposedly being pounded into the sidewalk and his nose and mouth covered “suffocating” him… pray tell how did the body and the tactical flashlight end up so far south on that pathway?

   Pesky details that get in the way of Zim’s credibility.

   Point is, you can’t reconcile Zim’s “circling” lies, you can’t explain away that Zim doesn’t detail how they ended so far south from where he says he fought for his life. You don’t want to accept why the bullet holes in Martin’s inner and outer shirts align perfectly, but are a good 2.5 to 3.5 inches above the entry wound on the body.

   This trial is necessary because the stories don’t match the time elapsed and the forensic evidence. Get over it.

   Reply

   July 31, 2012 at 9:29 am
3. Mike O'Malley says: 153

   @MataHarley:

   the keychain flashlight was found a few feet south of the tee where Zimmerman insists that Martin “decked” him. But Martin’s body, his cell and the tactical flashlight belonging to Zimmerman were found 45′ or more south of that.

   So then Mataharley what I observed and said about your response to me was accurate, was it not?

   Again like Angela Corey you left information about important evidence on the editing room floor. You said nothing about the second flashlight until I brought it up in post #151. Two of George Zimmerman’s flashlights were recovered on the grass at the scene of the attack. Both appear to have been flung aside when Martin decked Zimmerman. Why did not you tell us about this before I brought it up in post #151, MataHarley? Evidence photo of item #5 is of a moderate size black flashlight with a carrying cord attached. Would this not be the flashlight that George Zimmerman said was not working? The other flashlight is a smaller key-chain flashlight. This flashlight can be seen in evidence photo of item #1 on the grass still attached to the keys to George Zimmerman’s vehicle.

   This was our earlier exchange:

   [Mike says] For instance you were correct, George Zimmerman did put his cellphone in his pocket so that, at the moment he struck, Trayvon Martin would have observed a flashlight in one of Zimmerman’s hands and the other hand empty.

   [Mata mockingly replied]The flashlight wasn’t working… per Zimmerman. Why would he be holding a flashlight that didn’t work? duh.. Nor do you know what Zim had in his hands because he has never said. Making it up as you go along.

   You left information about important evidence on the editing room floor.

   Reply

   August 29, 2012 at 6:54 pm