Look at the crap the Ferguson grand jury had to deal with

Loading

FERGUSON, Mo. (AP) — Some witnesses said Michael Brown had been shot in the back. Another said he was lying face-down when Officer Darren Wilson finished him off. Still others acknowledged changing their stories to fit published details about the autopsy, or admitted that they didn’t see the shooting at all.

An Associated Press review of thousands of pages of grand jury documents reveals numerous examples of statements made during the shooting investigation that were inconsistent, fabricated or provably wrong. For one, the autopsies ultimately showed Brown wasn’t struck by any bullets in his back.

Prosecutors exposed these inconsistencies before the jurors, which likely influenced their decision not to indict Wilson in Brown’s death.

Bob McCulloch, the St. Louis County prosecutor, said the grand jury had to weigh testimony that conflicted with physical evidence and conflicting statements by witnesses as it decided whether Wilson should face charges.

“Many witnesses to the shooting of Michael Brown made statements inconsistent with other statements they made and also conflicting with the physical evidence. Some were completely refuted by the physical evidence,” McCulloch said.

The decision Monday not to charge Wilson with any crime set off more violent protests in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson and around the country, fueled by claims that the unarmed black 18-year-old was shot while peacefully surrendering to the white officer in the mostly African-American city.

What people thought were facts about the Aug. 9 shooting have become intertwined with what many see as abuses of power and racial inequality in America.

More here

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I hope every black protester is reading the transcript.
There is a lot of talk about how the police and law enforcers did ”character assassination” of Michael Brown.
But read the transcript.
There are plenty of nasty things about Michael Brown in them that have NEVER been made part of the prosecution narrative, before or after the GJ finished!
Real nasty.
If these things ever become widely known the protests flop.
They utterly destroy the narrative surrounding Michael Brown.
Find another ”poster boy,” guys.

Would have edited the above to add:
CNN has gotten tired of this Shawn Parcells character.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/26/health/ferguson-michael-brown-pathologist-credentials/
He’s the guy who did the Brown family version of an autopsy.
As a result of his ”work” on another body, the killer of the dead man walked free and later beat up the victim’s wife!

@Nanny: This was never about Brown or justice. That was just a pretext.