Krauthammer is very coldly objective, never allows emotion to sway his relatively impartial contemplation of an issue, and most of the time I have to admit he is also dead right on target. Nor is he an “ultra-conservative” instead falling more between establishment and conservative. I admire his ability to withhold from utterly destroying the lessor equipped Juan Williams who is woefully out of his league when arguing weak counterpoints with his fellow panel members. You on the other hand are one of the last I would consider as a reliable source of information. All we ever get out of you is the same old Democratic talking points, poorly phrased ideological rhetoric, and typical war-weary partisan slurs, often with attempted diversionary tactics such as this, where rather than discuss the issue, you concentrate on shooting the messenger.
Just what I’d expect him to say. Does anyone at the ultra-conservative table still think Krauthammer is an objective source of information?
@Liberal1 (objectivity):
Krauthammer is very coldly objective, never allows emotion to sway his relatively impartial contemplation of an issue, and most of the time I have to admit he is also dead right on target. Nor is he an “ultra-conservative” instead falling more between establishment and conservative. I admire his ability to withhold from utterly destroying the lessor equipped Juan Williams who is woefully out of his league when arguing weak counterpoints with his fellow panel members. You on the other hand are one of the last I would consider as a reliable source of information. All we ever get out of you is the same old Democratic talking points, poorly phrased ideological rhetoric, and typical war-weary partisan slurs, often with attempted diversionary tactics such as this, where rather than discuss the issue, you concentrate on shooting the messenger.
@Liberal1 (objectivity):
Does anyone at the dinner table you sit at think you’re dumber than a pile of dirt?