17 Nov

HUA: More liberals wonder why Benghazi scandal persists despite election being over

Twitchy:

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/statuses/269938055970971648

It was just over a month ago when Obama deputy campaign manager and lying liar Stephanie Cutter got the ball rolling, declaring that the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Libya was only an issue because Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan insisted on politicizing it — a claim that seems even more outrageous in light of the “French kiss” of a third presidential debate.

Confronted yesterday with a question about Benghazi, Democratic Party Communications Director Brad Woodhouse replied by tweeting simply, “We won.” And yet the hearings continue, even though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday smacked down the proposal of a Senate select committee. His reasoning? “The elections are over; it is time to put aside the partisan politicization of national security.”

This time it’s Josh Marshall’s turn to ask: Why won’t you wingnuts on the right just let it go? (Marshall is publisher of Talking Points Memo, which provides special snowflake Soledad O’Brien with her crib notes.)

Finding out the truth behind Benghazi isn’t going to change the election results, so why cling bitterly to that “tragedy”? Marshall asked, and conservatives answered.

Read more

       

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.

8 Responses to HUA: More liberals wonder why Benghazi scandal persists despite election being over

  1. Ditto says: 1

    Duh!!! Because it’s not about the election, it’s about incompetence contributing to the death of four Americans at the hands of Al Queda!

    ReplyReply
  2. Marine72 says: 2

    @Ditto: Even worse than that is how many more Americans will die at the hands of IPOTUS during the next four years.

    ReplyReply
  3. Hard Right says: 3

    This is just another example of how the left projects their vileness onto us. THEY would have used it entirely for political gain and assume that is what we are doing.
    The four Americans killed? The left could care less.

    ReplyReply
  4. Liberal1 (Objectivity) says: 4

    No, we’re not wondering. We understand that after the extreme conservative right wing must throw enough dung on Obama, and hope some of it sticks. That’s the real reason, pure and simple.

    ReplyReply
  5. retire05 says: 5

    @Liberal1 (Objectivity):

    Dung throwing? You mean like you Marxists did to George W. Bush? Odd how you now accuse others of what you yourself did. But that is the progressive mindset; judge everyone by your own standards.

    Get back to us when you see CodePinko protesting with placards of a beheaded Obama.

    Why do you continue to embarrass yourself?

    ReplyReply
  6. Hard Right says: 6

    lib #2 proves my point. Leftist projection.

    ReplyReply
  7. Hard Right
    it’s hard for OBAMA to conceal that he did not care for STEVEN THE AMBASSADOR,
    when we read of so many emails asking for help without any actions,
    this alone should have cost him his election.
    bye

    ReplyReply
  8. Liberal1
    the dung all stick because it’s the truth.
    do you think the CONSERVATIVES TALK FOR THE FUN OF IT?
    LIKE YOU DO ALL THE TIMES

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site