There is no excuse: child molestation is the murder of an innocent soul, for that soul will never be able to grow and mature into the adult that it was meant to be. We all know victims of childhood sexual molestation, whether they have told you or not, you know them. Some of them have a strong survival instinct and persevere through the shame and confusion to become productive adults: others are destroyed, they are the ones for whom the pain and humiliation were too much. They are often consumed by drugs and alcohol or they become prostitutes to complete their pain and be ground down into the gutters of life.

These broken birds were damaged and preyed upon so that some sick twisted bastard could have a few minutes of pleasure by compromising the life of a child. If there is a hierarchy of sick perverted bastards, this type of scum is among the lowest sickest human beings on the face of the earth.

Jerry Sandusky, the alleged serial rapist of boys, claims that he didn’t have sex with these boys; no, not at all, he just showered with them, touched their legs, and rough housed with them. There is something wrong with a man who defends his actions with such antics. He assumes it is perfectly natural for a middle aged man to shower with adolescent boys and to touch their legs in a non-sexual way. He said this in an interview to try and gain sympathy. The problem is, this constitutes sexual perversion to most of us and only a pervert would see it as normal behavior.

Sandusky claims that he likes children; perhaps, he is just a little too affectionate when he hugs them in the shower and touches their legs. Its all been a horrible mistake; he is just a soft pervert, not an utterly despicable sexual deviant.

It is time for all of us to realize these perverts are out there and they are always ready to attack. We must be ready to offer a helping and appropriate hand or to call the police. Be ready to offer assistance or a listening ear if necessary.

Once upon a time, I was able to provide assistance. It wasn’t dramatic and I should have done more. A young teenage girl rode up while I was working at a horse show and literally holding on to a horse. She said some men were following her and making inappropriate comments. I told her to stand next to me and they would not bother her. They suddenly lost interest and found other things to occupy their weak minds. I asked her where her parents were, it turned out her dad was the manager of the show. I told her we will go talk to him. We walked over the office and related the story to her father. The workers were promptly told to straighten up or ship out.

Perhaps, I should have called the cops immediately. I’m not sure. I was hopelessly outnumbered if the situate would haven turned ugly, but thankfully, my presence was enough to defuse the incident, sometimes just a little help can make a difference. Most perverts are cowards and facing an adult is more than they can handle.

I will promise to always be there to help a child. If everyone would make that commitment, our children would be much safer.

It’s the timing Mr President, when you come out with the Iranian Amateur Hour version of a terror attack within hours of your Attorney General being served with a subpoena, it’s no wonder people are a little, no, make that a lot, skeptical. Was the attack so imminent or so dangerous that it was imperative that it be released at precisely that instant or was it an effort to show how diligent your Attorney General is, the same one who sells advanced military grade weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels for no apparent or logical reason, weapons that have so far been instrumental in the killing of two federal agents and probably used in the commission of hundreds of deaths of Mexican nationals in Mexico. The same weapons that will probably be used in countless attacks and murders on both sides of the border for decades in the future. Are we supposed to believe that this same Attorney General is instrumental in rounding up an Iranian American, who was recruiting Mexican henchmen from the drug cartels to act as terrorists for the Iranians.

Yes, it’s no wonder people are looking a little fish eyed at your accusations and doubt your ability and that of your Attorney General, the one who neglected to notice multiple briefs on Fast and Furious, briefs that were addressed to him, the same one that is beginning to look like an accessory to murder.

Is it no wonder that you don’t even have the true believers hanging on every word in worshipful praise and thanks as you pronounce “toughest sanctions” against Iran for the imminent threat of a used car salesman planning an attack on the Saudi ambassador to the US.

Iran scoffs at the accusation and many in the US are more than a little doubtful Mr President, timing is important and your timing was a little too obvious; otherwise, you would not need to justify your claims, like this one explaining how American officials knew:

“know that he had direct links, was paid by, and directed by individuals in the Iranian government.”

“Now those facts are there for all to see. We would not be bringing forward a case unless we knew exactly how to support all the allegations that are contained in the indictment.”

You are a little too obvious in your defense when you say, “We would not be bringing forward a case, unless we knew exactly how to support the allegations…”, it’s integrity Mr president, you have lost your integrity. The American public and the world no longer trusts you or your Attorney General.

Susan Rice will obviously strike fear into the heart of Iran, but your State Department spokesperson, Ms Victoria Nuland confirms many American doubts when she roars like a lioness with this line:

“When you look at these details, it seems like something out of a movie. But as you begin to give more detail on what we knew and when we knew it and how we knew it, it has credibility.”

So it has credibility! You can’t get more authentic than that Mr President. Unfortunately, like the pregnant teenager in junior high school, you might be all alone in the international community in your condemnation of Iran.

So you have laid out all the facts of a deranged used car salesmen acting as international terror brokers for international leaders and so far, you have yourself convinced:

“We’ve laid the facts before them, and we believe that after people have analyzed them, there will not be a dispute that this is in fact what happened.”

Our ally Britain, whom you have ignored and insulted in the past, offered this bit of anemic support from the British foreign secretary, William Hague by saying on record that the incident:

“would appear to constitute a major escalation in Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism outside its borders. He added that the British government was “in close touch with the U.S. authorities and will work to agree an international response, along with the U.S., the rest of the E.U. and Saudi Arabia.”

We can see that the British have expressed their outrage, to be expressed further if it turns out that anyone else believes the accusations. Of course it is pretty serious if a rogue nation is sponsoring terrorism outside its borders with a covert used car salesmen.

From the Saudi foreign minister:

“this dastardly act reflects the policies of Iran.” The Saudi government has not yet decided whether to withdraw its ambassador from Tehran in protest, he said.

Oh my, how serious does it get if the Saudis can’t decide whether to withdraw their ambassador from Tehran.

You have brought this upon yourself Mr President. You have indirectly brought about feelings of indifference and apathy from Americans and the international community. You have essentially made yourself into a lame duck president and people are only counting the days until a new president can be sworn in. A year of campaigning and cheap theatrics like this will only deepen the public’s distrust in you and your administration. It is probably best if you try to tread water while trying not to make waves. In that way you may improve your image slightly, rather than creating more animosity in this country and the world.

The US has almost no business dealings with Iran, other countries make massive amounts of money by trading with Iran. Is it no wonder that the rest of the world will be looking at your latest B-Movie plot with skepticism. They don’t believe you Mr President, the Amateur Hour is almost over.

Warning: Don’t read if you have a weak stomach or you are easily offended.

Casey Pantomimes Like A Petulant Child upon Learning She Must Stay In Prison A Few More Days

America died with Caylee Anthony, not literally, but we will never be the same. A Narcissistic mother forgets to report her daughter missing, decides to party for a month and get a tattoo that reads “Beautiful Life,” while her daughter decomposes in a plastic sack. Is this the sign of a mad woman; perhaps it is a desensitizing to the ideal of a mother’s right to choose or what we should celebrate as our culture of death. Ms Anthony has spent the last four years in jail, but if she would have elected to have a partial birth abortion and had her daughter’s brain sucked out while being born, there would have been no issue.

Twenty-four plus months of indecision separated Ms Anthony from being without blame and spending years in prison with the possibility of execution. If she killed her daughter in order to party without the inconvenience of caring for a toddler, she waited too long to make up her mind. However, it appeared as though she enjoyed the media attention; but a partial birth abortion (now illegal) doesn’t put you on everyone’s TV screen and in the tabloids. Thus in the illogic reasoning of a Narcissist, the jail time may have been an inconvenience, but altogether necessary to achieve ever elusive fame. Even now that it is over, she will need to be under guard to be protected from the angry mob. It is like being a celebrity or a member of the First Family, at least in the mind of a psychopath.

Now we have a precedent for mothers who grow tired of their young children, since they are here on approval whether for a few months or a few weeks in the uterus, why not extend the period. Let’s say you can opt out for an abortion at say two years as long as it can’t be determined how the child died or probable cause can’t be shown. What mother wants to harm their child, well if the child prevents her from enjoying the life of a liberated female with the freedom to choose, there may be thousands. Of course this is an arbitrary probationary period, perhaps we should make the cut off period three years or even five years. That would be long enough to either establish bonding or let the mother decide whether she is really ready to take care of the walking fetus. Yes, until they start school, they should now be called walking fetuses. That way the public and family will realize the mother is still in deliberation as to whether she wants to abort the walking fetus.

Perhaps naming the walking fetus is a mistake. Potential mothers never name their fetuses they are about to abort nor does anyone attach a name to a bowel movement. It helps to be practical in these matters and to distinguish from late term abortion and infanticide. Abortion is legal: infanticide can have dire consequences. This can all be avoided if we just increase the period for late term abortions to three years of age. Threats of abortion can also be used to handle behavioral problems in two year olds. What child wont do better at the thought of duct tape over the mouth and being stuffed in a plastic sack and thrown into a swamp. A heart sticker attached to the duct tape is a nice motherly touch, before aborting a walking fetus to a swamp.

Unfortunately for Ms Anthony, she will never enjoy the freedom she so desperately needed. Her life as a care free liberated female with choices are over. She is hated by the world and will never know the freedom that her daughter’s death was supposed to bring. May her life be a living Hell.

Let Him Hang

In 1994, a sixteen year old girl was brutally raped and murdered by having her head smashed in with a thirty to forty pound piece of asphalt, her killer is finally due to be executed tonight in Texas; President Obama is pleading for this monster’s life by asking the Supreme Court to grant a stay of execution, alleging the killer, another illegal alien, wasn’t granted consular access to the Mexican Embassy. In this new world of Obama Law, Terrorists are to be granted the rights of an American citizen and illegal aliens have more rights than an American citizen.

Humberto Leal is the 38 year old illegal alien that has Obama acting like an ACLU lawyer. Obama wants a stay so that congress can consider a law that will require court reviews of cases of condemned foreign nationals who did not receive advice from their consulates. President Obama maintains that the case will affect not only foreign nationals, but Americans arrested in foreign countries. Prosectors insist the president’s entreaties are an attempt to delay the execution and that the future legislation is bound to fail.

Leal left the nude sixteen year old’s body impaled with a stick and the head caved in; he arrived home bloody and told his brother he had killed a girl. The Mexican government maintains that if Leal had been given access to consular assistance, he would have never been convicted or received the death penalty, so powerful is their influence with the American government.

Leal moved to the U.S. as a toddler with his family from Monterey. His appeals contend that under an international treaty that Texas didn’t sign, that police didn’t advise him that he could have had access to consular assistance and that would have strengthened his defense.

The argument is not new, Texas is very proficient at executing foreign nationals or illegal aliens who commit heinous crimes in Texas.

Leal’s appeals have focused on legislation introduced in the Senate by D. Patrick Leahy, that would impose the rules of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations regarding the arrest of foreign nationals, ensuring court reviews for condemned foreign nationals to determine if consular assistance would have made a significant difference in their verdicts.

In the tradition of the Skippy Gates affair that ended in a beer summit, the Obama Administration took the unusual step of interfering in a state murder case by asking the high court to halt an execution.

Sandra Babcock, a Northwestern University law professor and one of Leal’s lawyers:

“The legislation would give Mr. Leal an opportunity to demonstrate that with consular assistance, he likely would not have been convicted, let alone sentenced to death.”

Even though the savage rape and murder happened two decades ago, the Mexican government contends that the execution should be delayed to give them time to review the case. They also implied a veiled threat by intimating that the execution could imperil Americans detained abroad.

Legislation similar to that required by Leal has failed twice in congressional sessions. The Texas Attorney General’s office cites those failures:

“legislative relief was not likely to be forthcoming.”

Stephen Hoffman, assistant attorney general:

“At this point, it is clear that Leal is attempting to avoid execution by overwhelming the state and the courts with as many meritless lawsuits and motions as humanly possible.”

Prosecutors said Sauceda was drunk and high on cocaine the night she was killed, and that Leal offered to take her home. Witnesses said Leal drove off with her around 5 a.m. Some partygoers found her brutalized nude body later that morning and called police.

There was evidence Sauceda had been bitten, strangled and raped. A large stick that had a screw protruding from it was left in her body.

A witness testified that Leal’s brother appeared at the party, agitated that Leal had arrived home bloody and saying he had killed a girl.

In his first statement to police, Leal said Sauceda bolted from his car and ran off. After he was told his brother had given detectives a statement, he changed his story, saying Sauceda attacked him and fell to the ground after he fought back. He said when he couldn’t wake her and saw bubbles in her nose, he got scared and went home.

Testifying during his trial’s punishment phase, Leal acknowledged being intoxicated and doing wrong but said he wasn’t responsible for what prosecutors alleged. A psychiatrist testified Leal suffered from alcohol dependence and pathological intoxication.

Sauceda’s mother, Rachel Terry, told San Antonio television station KSAT her family already had suffered too long.

“A technicality doesn’t give anyone a right to come to this country and rape, torture and murder anyone,” she said.

George Bush, in 2005, agreed with an International Court ruling that Leal and 50 other Mexican nationals were entitled to new U.S. hearings if their consular rights were violated. The Supreme Court later overruled Bush.

President Obama should find less despicable characters to promote placing the sovereignty of US courts under international control. Texas will hopefully be able to maintain its conservative principles despite an ever increasing illegal alien invasion from Mexico that will surely be influencing the political situation in the years to come. Placing the Texas and the other state court systems under the review of national court systems is a method of control that Obama has been advocating as a means to weaken America and to bring America under the influence and control of the UN and international courts so that sovereignty and power can be slowly diminished.

One Of The Weapons The ATF Allowed To Be Purchased By Mexican Drug Cartels

Republican Darrell Issa of CA, wrote a letter to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Deputy Director William J. Hoover, demanding that there be no reprisals against the ATF agents testifying in the illegal Operation Fast and Furious; the operation termed “Felony Stupid” by Issa.

Twenty four hours later, Agent Vince Cefalu received notice that the agency wants to terminate him, after thirty years, for an apparent “lack of candor”.

Agent Cefalu problems with the ATF go back four years, when he caused ill feelings with the agency by refusing to use illegal wiretaps set up by local law enforcement, a case referred to as “Road Dog”.

I threw the locals under the bus. … I became the most vocal critic and they got sick of my s***.

For the last four years, Cefalu has been given jobs with no importance to get him to retire early.

They put me in a cage, paid me full salary, and hoped it would break me down mentally and I would retire.

In May, Cefalu did a three part interview with CNN b Anderson Cooper, concerning problems in the ATF; since then, he has only been given 122 minutes worth of work, not the usual investigative work, he was instructed to change batteries or fill up cars with gasoline.

He has endured seven internal affairs investigations, since he blew the whistle, with an attorney present, he answered every question.

He represents dozens of other officers with grievances against the ATF and if he is terminated or retired early, he thinks the ATF will consider those grievances dead..

Cefalu maintains that there should be prosecutions in the failed Operation Fast and Furious, AKA as Gunwalker.

Of course it violates the law! They conspired to traffic firearms, you can’t do that under color of law. … There was no intent to follow the guns, this never had a chance of succeeding. It was a failed plan from the beginning.

He also says there is no huge gun-trafficking operation, no “Iron Pipeline” of firearms traveling from the U.S. to Mexico — just lots of buyers who can make a couple thousand dollars selling weapons across the border.

In addition, he has some more explosive allegations: he says the Mexican government was not made aware of the operation, and neither was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico.

And he says people within the Justice Department had to be aware of the operation — contrary to what Attorney General Eric Holder claimed. Cefalu says no one runs a major operation like this without getting approval from their boss.

Again the Obama/Holder Administration seems to be conducting the cover up with Chicago Thug type tactics. Will the investigation be allowed to proceed or will the Holder and Obama continue to stonewall?

Cefalu insists he just wants to see the agency he loves cleaned up, but the public probably has other ideas that could include impeachment of Holder and even Obama if the investigation reveals that he was aware of the illegal operation.

Diogenes Searches For A Human Or Perhaps An Honest Man

How Beautous Mankind Is! O Brave New World That Has Such People In’t

The Tempest, The Bard

Oh Praise Be The Weiner, at least until he has disgraced himself beyond levels of acceptability. Lies and false accusations of criminality are acceptable to a point, but eventually, even a Democrat reaches a point too far. Now that the hounds of reality and truth have treed the dark haired spokesman for Progressivism and all things Socialist, within the tree of accountability, there is but one option open.

Weiner now must fall upon the blunted sword of mental illness; in a move meant to gather a sympathetic army of witless Progressive Socialists around him, he now feigns a disease that no one has heard of, but one that guarantees him time and an excuse for his degenerate behavior. He is no longer considered a wretched pervert: he is now a victim of a terrible disease that made him helpless to resist the horrible symptoms of the disease.

It would be considered inhumane to unseat a congressman who is in therapy to recover from an addiction. We Americans are always willing to offer help to those seeking to help themselves. The more skeptical among us will view his sudden realization of an affliction of mental illness as a shrewd political maneuver, but we realists are considered cynics and therefore unworthy to pass judgement on such delicate matters.

Now Weiner is poised between the sheets of semi-respectability and he waits; for in this game, timing is critical. If he can present himself in tights and cape and Weiner in hand at a critical moment, the world or at least the Democrat Party may forgive those minor indiscretions of the past and welcome a deciding vote with open arms. With his party behind him once more, he only has those evil and cynical Republicans to contend with and they can be so partisan.

Diogenes The Cynic Searched With A Lantern In Daylight For A Human

Lord Byron, Erotic Image For The Hopeless Romantic

The word sycophant (A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people.) has, for the first time in history, become part of everyday conversation since the election of President Obama. You might legitimately ask why or how did this fairly obscure word become so prominent in our language. The answer lies in the blatant and continuous servile fawning over Obama by our Main Stream Media and their reliance on the Joseph Goebbels school of propaganda:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels

Fortunately, lucid Americans see the parody of the lies concerning Obama and his ‘hard to define or locate intellect‘; consequently, Americans are no longer clamoring for the appeal of the Twenty Second Amendment, those days are over. The truth about the inability of this president to correlate two different thoughts in a coherent sentence or paragraph is painfully obvious.

Our president with his ever present tele-prompters and his verbal stumbling when speaking extemporaneously has led the average person to become skeptical. After all, the teleprompter speeches are nothing more than repeating someone else’s writing: while his spontaneity in ad lib speaking comes off more like the fart, stumble, fall, school of communication. Thus Americans have come to accept the fact that our Commander in Chief as “bumblingly inarticulate”; especially, when he is without his closest friend, the teleprompter. It’s a deficit we can live with, but the question lingers, is this man as smart as the press portrayed him during the campaign? It wouldn’t be an issue, except the state directed media made such a major deal of his intelligence; a man who holds his college transcripts so tight to his chest.

For two and a half years, we have waited for some sign of this brilliance to help in our economy, in our unemployment, in our energy policy, in our foreign policy, and in our wars, we are still waiting; actually, the American people have given up on this superior intellect so highly praised by our media, after waiting two and a half years for just a faint glimmer only the sycophants and some hopeless Useful Idiots are still carrying this less than dubious brilliancy banner.

MEGHAN DAUM, a reporter for the LA Times, has once again tried to promote this lost and forgotten cause or at least has decided to give the dead jackass another sound thrashing, by creative use of weak metaphors. In the true wide eyed form of the typical Useful Idiot that caused Stalin the only laughter in his life that we know of, she explains Obama’s apparent speech impediment without a teleprompter as a true sign of genius. Have patience, the Times actually gives her column space for this lunacy.

Admittedly, the president is given to a lot of pauses, “uhs” and sputtering starts to his sentences. As polished as he often is before large crowds (where the adjective “soaring” is often applied to his speeches), his impromptu speaking frequently calls to mind a doctoral candidate delivering a wobbly dissertation defense.

But consider this: It’s not that Obama can’t speak clearly. It’s that he employs the intellectual stammer. Not to be confused with a stutter, which the president decidedly does not have, the intellectual stammer signals a brain that is moving so fast that the mouth can’t keep up. The stammer is commonly found among university professors, characters in Woody Allen movies and public thinkers of the sort that might appear on C-SPAN but not CNN. If you’re a member or a fan of that subset, chances are the president’s stammer doesn’t bother you; in fact, you might even love him for it (he sounds just like your grad school roommate, especially when he drank too much Scotch and attempted to expound on the Hegelian dialectic!).

So the president’s inability to speak fluently without a tele-prompter and sounding like a drunk, according to Ms Daum, is a direct result of intellectual stammering, not to be confused with the more common stuttering that afflicts many mere mortals. Woody Allen, the man who married his daughter, portrays this genius in comedic form and that should help those of us that aren’t sycophants believe the lie. Well done, Ms Daum, your lies are so preposterous that people may be hesitant to laugh at them.

Still fawning over her messiah, she mentions William F Buckley in comparison and figures Obama would be considered brilliant beside Buckley, but there are many of us who would have loved to see the wit and intellect of Buckley in debate with the great stammerer. She mentions Buckley’s unsuccessful run for mayor and being asked what he would have done if he had won and he replied, “Demand a recount.” We are left to compare that to the moat with alligators wit of Obama.

Still Ms Daum meanders on without a point of view, besides shameless fawning, in a pointless unknown forest of confusion that is unashamedly promoted as journalism.

Obama’s problem is not that he’s an intellectual (for the sake of argument let’s define it as someone who is scholarly, broadly informed and distinguished as a thinker). It’s that he sounds like an intellectual. Unlike other presumed political brainiacs — Bill Clinton or Newt Gingrich, for example — he isn’t able to bury his ideas behind a folksy regional accent or good-old-boy affectations when he wants to. Nor is he effective at “keeping it real” when he falls into traditionally African American cadences that he clearly never used when he was growing up.

By speaking as though he hails from everywhere, he ends up being from nowhere. The result is that people look at him and see not a Hawaiian or a Chicagoan or even a black man, but a university man.

Towards the end of this utterly useless diatribe, we realize that Ms Daum probably suffered from a lack of attention from the dream boats on campus and she is still lost in the romantic dreaming of the perpetually frustrated or love starved adolescent. It was worth a few laughs, but on a more serious note it is good to remind ourselves of the depths that the Progressive press is willing to resort to in order to keep their failing messiah and his fart stumble fall oratory from being dismissed as a dim bulb.

Here is an example of one of Lord Byron’s adulterous affairs that still has hopeless romantic women panting in frustration

But such passion never lasts. Byron was a victim of his own contradictory personality – he loved to pursue women but, once captured, he longed to leave them. Paradoxically, he could not rest easy without their complete adoration. He could not be simply Caroline’s lover, a participant in a scandalous (but tolerated) affair; he must be her grand passion, her true love – she must belong to him alone. But once she capitulated, he grew bored and irritated with her.

Though Caroline was instantly infatuated, she at first refused Byron’s most heated demands. She would not admit she loved him more than her husband William; Byron told her, ‘My God, you shall pay for this, I’ll wring that obstinate little heart.’ But soon she loved him enough to contemplate leaving her husband, at Byron’s suggestion in May 1812. He was probably testing her commitment for it is unlikely he meant to flee England with her. But he needed to know she loved him more than anything, even her very comfortable life, and so he hinted at ‘elopement.’ His friends, particularly the sensible John Hobhouse, were already shocked by the affair; it had grown increasingly open and hysterical. Byron was eventually persuaded to leave London.

His poem of the type that titillates the frustrated romantic female.

To his mistress, one of many, Lady Caroline Lamb

Remember thee! remember thee!
Till Lethe quench life’s burning stream
Remorse and shame shall cling to thee,
And haunt thee like a feverish dream!

Remember thee! Aye, doubt it not.
Thy husband too shall think of thee:
By neither shalt thou be forgot,
Thou false to him, thou fiend to me!

For the hopeless romantic or the fawning Obama sycophant these lines are the stuff of legend: the rest of us can appreciate them in context as endearing verse.

A tip of my Western hat to Nan G for pointing out the LA Times article.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, AKA The Great Seducer

The secret is not so well kept, there are women who are attracted to men in power. The drive is probably biological, so we need not be too hard on these pathetic weaklings who feed the egos of hedonists by compromising their bodies and their self-respect. At least, there is a measure of consent at some point. In the end, a woman feels empowered and a man feels the hubris of Caesar as he spread his seed over ancient Europe. Eventually, there is the realization that they have betrayed the trust of those who believed in them, but more importantly, they have betrayed themselves to trade integrity and dignity for a few moments of lust.

If you know a man who has served in Washington, well enough for him to trust you, he will tell you about the young women who are political groupies and throw themselves at men of power, who would otherwise be all alone in a two dollar brothel with a twenty dollar bill in their hand. Their indiscretions cause pain and misery that is self-inflicted among both groupies and politicians without bias and we do well to pity them rather than scorn them.

Unfortunately, as sexual fantasies and egos among men of power are allowed to grow and be enriched with the fawning of young females, the male psyche, particularly that of the Socialist Elite, becomes malignant with feelings of power and entitlement.

A few months ago, we endured the self-assured image of Al Gore assaulting a massage therapist for sexual gratification. The story of the international humanitarian, who is overly concerned with the welfare of people and of the earth, but is unconcerned with the health of one woman when he feels the need to have his ashes hauled is not considered newsworthy by the Socialist Media. Still the picture of the entitled leader who has dominance over women is one that Socialists have a hard time explaining; after all, the woman toiled among those for whom the Elites dedicate their lives and they should be willing to recognize the needs of Elites and be willing to sacrifice for the good of the cause.

The stories of Hillary’s husband are too numerous to mention, but his sense of entitlement includes the feminine charms on display around him and they are obviously there to be enjoyed. He is an Elite who is more than willing to share his noble seed with women, whether they are willing or not, such is his sense of dedication and generosity to those less fortunate who are or will be beneath him.

Now, we are once again exposed to the selfless generosity of the Socialist head of the International Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who was thoughtful enough to give the maid, at a $3,000 night hotel, the chance to partake in his glory and to know the seed of modern day royalty. Unfortunately, the maid was unaware of the Socialist Entitlement benefits that extended to her and she considered his bequeathing nothing more than rape, sodomy, and sexual assault. Now, he is in jail, without bond, over a simple misunderstanding. He was totally unaware of wrong doing, since he was on the runway in first class section of a jet headed to France, when he was arrested. Apparently, similar indiscretions in the past, where women were confused as to his generosity, have been excused by the IMF.

Strauss-Kahn is scheduled to run for President of France under the Socialist banner and the French Press is already excusing his behavior and making the assertion that his abilities far outweigh the hysterical pleadings of a common maid. From Claude Askolovitch, editor of Le Journal du Dimanche:

The affair may well be ridiculous compared with the destiny of the world, but it touches the heart of the culture of the American government and the IMF, It is less about sexual puritanism . . . than a deep horror of lies and conflict of interest.

Now there are even more extenuating circumstances that contribute to the hypocrisy. The IMF has been lecturing Greece and other states dedicated to profligacy, about the need to cut back and live according to their means. Some Europeans might find it a little odd that members of the IMF stay in $3,000 night hotels and fly first class on trans Atlantic flights are lecturing the lower classes on how to live within their means; the egalitarian mask of central planning is becoming transparent and the ugliness beneath is rooted in corruption and entitlement. Self-indulgent Greeks who were considering austerity, will now be considering default as a logical option; especially, when they consider the hypocritical behavior of those who lecture restraint.

From a high ranking French government official:

Strauss-Kahn is viewed as accomplished, smart and very capable. Because of that, the prevailing view seems to be, ‘Let’s hope this turns out to be nothing, because the IMF and the world really needs this guy to come through.

This sickness among leaders of the left is shared by the media and those who want to ignore the corruption; much like the family, who hides and protects the pedophile who preys on his own relatives. At this point, it becomes an all encompassing sickness of the Left.

The Year is 1933, Von Hindenburg has just made Hitler the Chancellor and the games are about to begin

History once called on a Socialist to stand against a dictator, but it was hard for the most famous of such antagonists to go to war: there was a certain reluctance at least, for in truth, both were dictators and Socialists. Modern day Socialists regard one of them as a saint and they refuse to acknowledge the other one.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the Left’s preferred name for the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union, was a non-aggression treaty signed in Moscow between the National Socialists of Germany and the Soviets on August 23, 1939. The basic premise, according to Leftist history, was that each side agreed to stay neutral if the other nation was attacked by a third nation; however, the secretive nature of the agreement was far more insidious in nature and revealed the imperialist intentions of both the National Socialists and the Soviets. Written in the agreement was a secret protocol to divide Poland and for the acquisition of the countries of Northern and Eastern Europe through a plan of mutual and cooperative imperialism: it used the popular leftist practice of using benign sounding jingoism to politely refer to this naked aggression and imperialism as “territorial and political rearrangements”. It was in force until Germany launched an attack against the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941.

To mask his imperialist plans, one of Hitler’s early foreign policy initiatives was a non-aggression pact with Poland, during January 1934. An unpopular move, because Poland was given the German provinces of West Prussia, Pozan, and Upper Silesia through the Treaty of Versailles after World War I. For Hitler, the non-aggression pact was a device to decrease the possibility of a French Polish alliance towards Germany before Germany had the opportunity to rearm and attack.

Post World War Germany was angered and seething over the treaty of Versailles and resentment was building; thus the stage was arranged for the corporal who promised to make amends for Germany’s humiliation by the treaty of Versailles. France and England were sickened over the sacrifices of the Great War and wanted to avoid confrontation at all costs. By making limited concessions to German demands, they hoped to avoid a repeat of the great war. Thus while France and England hoped to avoid war, Germany continued to gear up for war and the conquest of land lost by the Treaty of Versailles plus infinitely more territory.

In 1938, neither France or Germany was prepared to go to war; yet, they acquiesced to Germany’s demands that it must rearm during the period of 1935 to 37. The desire of the French and British for peace and their willingness to appease Hitler gave confidence to the German people and led them to believe that England and France’s no longer had the stomach for war. They began to appreciate the former corporal who was restoring Germany’s honor among the nations of the world.

Britain and France essentially acquiesced to Germany’s rearmament (1935-1937), the remilitarization of the Rhineland (1936), and the annexation of Austria (March 1938). In September 1938, after signing away the Czech border regions, known as the Sudetenland, to Germany at the Munich conference, British and French leaders pressured France’s ally, Czechoslovakia, to yield to Germany’s demand for the incorporation of those regions. Despite Anglo-French guarantees of the integrity of rump Czechoslovakia, the Germans dismembered the Czechoslovak state in March 1939 in violation of the Munich agreement. Britain and France responded by guaranteeing the integrity of the Polish state. Hitler responded by negotiating a nonaggression pact with the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939. The German-Soviet Pact of August 1939, which stated that Poland was to be partitioned between the two powers, enabled Germany to attack Poland without the fear of Soviet intervention.

On September 1, 1939, Germany invaded Poland. The Polish army was defeated within weeks of the invasion. From East Prussia and Germany in the north and Silesia and Slovakia in the south, German units, with more than 2,000 tanks and over 1,000 planes, broke through Polish defenses along the border and advanced on Warsaw in a massive encirclement attack. After heavy shelling and bombing, Warsaw surrendered to the Germans on September 27, 1939. Britain and France, standing by their guarantee of Poland’s border, had declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939. The Soviet Union invaded eastern Poland on September 17, 1939. The demarcation line for the partition of German- and Soviet-occupied Poland was along the Bug River.

In October 1939, Germany directly annexed those former Polish territories along German’s eastern border: West Prussia, Poznan, Upper Silesia, and the former Free City of Danzig. The remainder of German-occupied Poland (including the cities of Warsaw, Krakow, Radom, and Lublin) was organized as the so-called Generalgouvernement (General Government) under a civilian governor general, the Nazi party lawyer Hans Frank.

Nazi Germany occupied the remainder of Poland when it invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941. Poland remained under German occupation until January 1945.

Poland was their first official act of mutual and beneficial acquisition through an act of planned aggression; the history books only mention the “Bad” National Socialists invasion of Poland on September 1, but those “Good” Socialists led by Josef Stalin invaded Poland on September 17 in their prearranged division of Poland.

The irony of history is that the beautiful marriage of the two forms of Socialism, that were both firmly rooted in genocide, was condemned to distrust and eventually came to dissolution or the splitting of the matrimonial sheets. Like most divorces, one side is portrayed as the most fair, even in the most perverse and diabolical unions: the Soviet Union has been cast as the blushing virtuous bride who was led down the garden path and ravaged by the National Socialist Workers Party, a brutish and evil rapist who doesn’t deserve to ever be called Socialist because of their inhumane and unrefined genocides. The Soviets could conduct their genocides with style and class and can wear the term Socialist with pride, especially their chief benefactor Josef Stalin. After the Winter War, the Soviet Union annexed Eastern Finland and followed up with acquisitions of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina, and Hertza region.

A Pernicious Veil Over The Truth

Although history was being written in favor of the Soviets by many Leftists, Franklin Delanor Roosevelt initiated the official bias for the Soviets partially because of a peculiar attraction for Stalin, a mid-twentieth century bromance that was probably a one sided love affair, for Stalin had FDR’s administration riddled with Soviet spies.

Whittaker Chambers, a former spy for Stalin, who became disillusioned after the purges and genocides, identified a multitude of Soviet spies within FDR’s administration including some of his most trusted advisors. His book, “Witness” was powerful enough to convince a New Deal Democrat to become a leading Conservative, that particular politician was Ronald Reagan.

Click here to view the embedded video.

(Watch the video and learn some of the truth about Socialism. The truth that our Socialist Union indoctrinators known as teachers are either ignorant of or participate willingly as part of the continuous cover-up of lies and deceit known as Socialism. I promise, there will be more in the near future to expose to your children and friends who have been duped by the Socialist brain washers.)

As Chambers wrote in “Witness”:

The simple fact is that when I took up my little sling and aimed at Communism, I also hit something else. What I hit was the forces of that great socialist revolution, which in the name of liberalism (emphasis added) spasmodically, incompletely, somewhat formlessly, but always in the same direction, has been inching its ice cap over the nation for two decades. This is not a charge. My opinion of that revolution is not at issue. It is a statement of fact that need startle no one who has voted for that revolution in whole or in part, and, consciously or unconsciously, a majority of the nation has so voted for years….

President Obama desperately needed a military campaign to boost his image as a strong leader who will stand up to oppression and to bolster the morale of a public saddened by the economy and the loss of America’s prestige and exceptionalism. North Korea and Iran are too formidable and either one would take a major commitment of money, American lives, and would drag on for at least the term of his next presidency. The perfect Vanity War would be a small dictator that America hates. Gaddahfi’s Libya seemed like the perfect conquest; there is a great deal of American enmity towards Gaddahfi; especially, after the Pan Am bombing and the public’s reaction to the freeing of the homicidal maniac who planned the murders along with the mounting evidence that Obama might have known all along about the trading of a killer for oil, it was time for Obama to make amends.

Gaddahfi had a Civil War in his country and threatened retribution: a perfect opportunity for Obama to regain prominence and become a hero to the world.

With diplomatic firmness tinged with capitulation, Obama demanded: Ceasefire or…we’ll do something. Gadahffi, after over forty years of totalitarian control, ignored Obama’s impotent threats.

Thankfully, there was support from Europe, so Obama could make speeches about how the US wouldn’t put boots on the ground and we would create a no-fly zone, that surprisingly includes bombing tanks, troop carriers, and presidential palaces, but the wily desert fox is still in power and Obama’s Vanity War drags on.

While Obama pontificates about the compassion of his Socialism, we are expected to ignore the millions of dead Ukrainians resulting from the Soviet Holdomor (genocide by starvation) long before Hitler’s black trains were painted. This is the seminal group that has formed the Socialist movement that has spawned the Obama Myth and the American Socialist movement. Not that we didn’t need their help defeating the National Socialists, 400,000 Soviets were killed fighting the Hitler Youth and old men defending Berlin, after defeat was inevitable and the war was over.

Today’s parallels with the history leading up to WW II are interesting and show a sign of macabre humor. An International Socialist president is confronting a tyrant who is for all purposes a National Socialist, they seemed to be good friends and then one turns on the other planning on a quick victory. The groundwork is laid for World War and the tyrant who is under attack is trying to encourage Christian versus Muslim world war if for no other reason than to take the pressure off his own neck.

During WW II, both Socialist leaders wanted to depopulate the world and replace the people with their own. In this struggle, many radical Muslims want to depopulate the world and replace them all with the Faithful. The killing is just getting started and as it escalates, it will illustrate the problem with electing a pop cult hero as opposed to electing a qualified leader.

At one time, the world respected America’s wrath and justice towards war criminals. Now our system of justice toward war criminals is a continuous joke among those who deal in evil, but seek justice in America’s civilian court system.

Click here to view the embedded video.

He’s a quiet man, barely five foot tall. He moves with the slow fluid movements of a horseman and I can vouch for him, he handles and cares for his horses well. His name is Adrian Menlee and he is from Puebla in Southern Mexico. He is a groom and it is his job to care for the horses of a wealthy patrona. There is pride in his voice as he speaks of his horses and their different personalities. The farm is cleaner than many homes and his horses are not afraid of humans, a fact that makes my job so much easier and attests to the fact that these horses are enjoying their life.

I always try to engage the grooms in conversation; many of them are from different areas of the world and it is interesting to hear of their lives and ambitions. You see these people are doing the work that Americans refuse to do. I know there are American grooms on the race track and on the traditional horse farms of Kentucky and the South, but there are logical reasons for these Americans working as grooms. The race track provides the opportunity of the insider gamble and possibility of the big score. This is often enough to keep Americans working as grooms, until one day they realize they have lived out their life and still haven’t made that big score. In Kentucky and places to the South, there are many Americans who love this beast we call horse and are willing to trade the allure of money and prestige to work with the horse as a career. I am one of these people, I can’t tell you why, but I have already spent a lifetime working with horses.

Consequently, I am more comfortable speaking with horsemen; as long as they don’t have inflated egos and the insecurities that force them to try and impress upon the world an inflated sense of self-worth and importance. Adrian is the exact opposite of this unpleasant type of horseman: humble and soft spoken, almost to a fault, he feels no need to inflict the all too common overly inflated ego upon the rest of the world. I was immediately intrigued with his command of the English language and his attitude and in between horses, I would rest my body and catch my breath to ask him about his life and ambitions.

His limited English was perfect, but we had to rely on my imperfect Spanish to round out the conversation at different points. When I complimented his command of English, he blushed and said, “Doctor Skook, I am educated and I attend English language school at night”.

I am not a doctor, but to the Mexican compesino, I am a special guy performing unique procedures. I treat them with respect; consequently, they are overly respectful and sometimes dangerously honest, in regard to their own security, not that I care to use their honesty against them and compromise my reputation among these hard working horsemen.

I asked to what level he had matriculated; with pride, he told me he had a high school education. Now, before you look down on a man who is proud of a high school education, you must realize that education is paid for in Mexico and many fathers are desperate to just feed their families; under such conditions, an education is extremely expensive.

I asked about his legal status and whether he has a Green Card. He explained very carefully, that he didn’t need a Green Card, because he was here on a five year visa that only allowed him to work on horses and to attend school. This was a bona fide Guest Worker, the kind that is discriminated against by our government: since an illegal worker applies to any job that suits him, the Guest Worker can only work at a job or discipline for which he is designated to perform.

I asked him if he planned to become a citizen some day and he looked at me as if I had made a grievous error, “Oh no, Doctor Skook, I have my family at home and a small farm, I have been here 3.5 years, I will return home in 1.5 years and go back to school to become a teacher. I have a future at home with my family.”

I asked if he was married and again he blushed and said he was only 26 and there was plenty of time to get married; hopefully, he aded, after becoming a teacher.

He didn’t say anything about the situation and I didn’t ask, but he insinuated that he preferred the traditional girls of Mexico rather than the Latinas of America.

Adrian renewed my faith in my fellow man and made me realize that many of these Mexican Nationals are up here legally and striving to live their life with dignity and integrity.

Rather than expand this Guest Worker program, our legislators in Washington choose to ignore this practical and traditional program and act as if they are overwhelmed with the complexity of the problem. Their idea of a solution is to assume that all the illegal aliens are here with the best intentions and to offer a blanket amnesty. Our current administration has seen fit to hire thousands of IRS agents to harass American citizens while ignoring the fact that expanding the Guest Worker program that is in place would solve the illegal alien problem that is taxing our education, welfare, prison, and health care systems. Requiring aliens to have papers, insurance, and a job would end a great deal of the abuse: abuse that allows Americans to use a version of slave labor and allows Democrats an ever increasing pool of potential voters.

Adrian should stand as an example of how the system can and should work without greed and deceit on the part of out slothful and corrupt politicians.