Yup….you guessed it, they are all racist:

That President Obama lost roughly 40 percent of the vote in Democratic primaries in Arkansas, Kentucky and West Virginia over the last two weeks has drawn massive national headlines.

Those headlines have drawn a collective eyeroll from Democrats — and many others who closely follow national politics — who ascribe the underperformance by the incumbent to a very simple thing: racism.

No, none of these Democrats are willing to put their name to that allegation — either generally or for this story. But, it is, without question the prevalent viewpoint they hold privately.

…Former Texas Rep. Charlie Stenholm, a longtime conservative Democrat, acknowledged that “race is definitely a factor for some Texans but not the majority,” adding: “The most significant factor is the perception/reality that the Obama administration has leaned toward the ultra-left viewpoint on almost all issues.”

Oh, so race is a factor for “some” but he has also leaned ultra-left. That couldn’t be the reason could it?

According to the WaPo, it’s not because these states are mostly conservative (including the Democrats in those states) and they don’t like ultra-left candidates. No, it’s just racism.

Tom Cole, a Republican House Member, dismissed the idea of race as a major factor in opposition to Obama out of hand.

Said Cole:

“Obama fares poorly in states like Oklahoma, Kentucky and Arkansas because he has nothing in common with them. They are rural, he is urban. They are populist, he is elitist. And in case anyone hadn’t noticed, they are conservative while he is liberal. That isn’t just true of Republicans in these states. It is true of Democrats as well.”

Get outta here. We all know it’s because they are all a bunch of redneck racist hillbilly’s.

Sigh….

She obviously figures she owes her success to her ability to manipulate the victimization of America’s First Nation People to secure a teaching position at Harvard; since, according to Ms Warren, no one achieves success on their own.

I hear all this, you know, ‘Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever. No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody.

You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for.

You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.

Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.

What Delusion Does Warren Live In

Thus Warren justifies the theft of identity and her selfish use of another’s victimization by using her dubious claim of being 1/32 Cherokee. A boast that put her in the front of the line to be hired at Harvard by providing two minority Affirmative Action claims: that of being a woman and that of being a First Nation individual. Being part of the only minority group that is a majority, is not being disputed, since being a woman requires no prescribed amount of integrity, but this claim of being a blonde haired blue eyed Cherokee might raise a few eyebrows on the reservation.

Warren would have been more accurate by claiming to be a Marxist, such a claim would have been more believable after she exposed her Marxist beliefs than her claims of being the only blue eyed blonde Cherokee in the history of the Cherokee Nation.

Click here to view the embedded video.

In all fairness, let us not forget, it was as easy for Harvard personnel to recognize the ruse as it was for us, but they stood to promote their image by having the only blue eyed blonde Cherokee law professor in the world, they were obviously counting coup in the tribal lodge of academia.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Are you “Bow Tying White Boys” willing to Tolerate Reverse Racism from Fox News?

Are you being played for fools by a news channel trying to boost ratings?

MSNBC has used the ploy effectively by allowing the racist Al Sharpton his platform.

Jehmu Greene, a paid political contributor for Fox, was allowed to racially insult Tucker Carlson in a news discussion about Elizabeth Warren’s use of a dubious genetic connection to Native American heritage for placement and tenure at Harvard’s School of Law.

Is Fox seeking to create the sensationalism that Al Sharpton provides with his racist diatribes on MSNBC.

Click here to view the embedded video.

If you resent this blatant racism by the smug racist Jehmu Greene, it is imperative to email Fox and demand the firing of Greene and to insist that they purge the network of all racists. We Conservative have been labeled as racists for four years with little or no provocation for these insults. We must let Fox know we refuse to to listen to racist rants by racist provocateurs like Jehmu Greene and that the Fox viewer has higher standards that we must prescribe to; especially, under the present situation of continual charges of racism being hurled about by the Leftist propaganda bureaus and our government.

On February 10th Andrew Breitbart warned us all that the Obama administration and the media (one and the same) will start the race pandering soon as the election cycle heats up. How right he was:

ANDREW BREITBART: I’m just going to tell you right now, I want to end it on a media bashing note because that will uplift me like a Dionne Warwick final rendition. We’re watching you to play the race card MSNBC. We saw how you cynically placed the Reverend Sharpton in a position of absurdist power. This is Dadaism, I learned that in college, that they would allow for this guy to have a show. This is Dadaism. It’s freaky. It’s Andy Kaufman. It doesn’t make sense unless you understand what they’re doing.

This is going to be the dog whistle election cycle. They tested them in 2011, so he and his pal Toure and that punk Tim Jacob Wise and Ed and Maddow can sit there and call everyone who’s Caucasian racist. “I heard it. He used ‘is’ instead of ‘are.’ He’s a racist. That’s a dog whistle.’”

Ignore it when Congressman [Carson] does it against Allen West. No more. We’re going to go after you. I bought a dog whistle. I bought a dog whistle factory, and I’m giving you dog whistles. And we’re going to listen to every word that comes out of your mouth, and we’re going to hold you to the same standard that you hold us which is an impossible one, and you’re going to have a hell of a time in 2012 because America’s finally woken to your Saul Alinsky bullshit tactics, and we’re coming to get you.

They're bringing out the dog whistles

Since then Sharpton and his pals in the media have brought out the dog whistles for the Trayvon shooting. They are doing their best to concoct false accusations of racism to divide everyone in this country. And it worked. You better believe they are waiting on pins and needles for the next story to start making waves so they can pound the drums of racism again and again and again.

Meanwhile Obama is pandering for the hispanic vote since he didn’t do what he said he would do for that segment of the population. When called on this fact by Univision he pandered:

“I can promise that I will try to do it in the first year of my second term,” Obama said in an interview with Univision set to air on Sunday. “I want to try this year. The challenge we’ve got on immigration reform is very simple. I’ve got a majority of Democrats who are prepared to vote for it, and I’ve got no Republicans who are prepared to vote for it. …

“So what we need is a change either of Congress or we need Republicans to change their mind, and I think this has to be an important debate during – throughout the country. …

“And so I’m just going to keep on pushing as hard as I can, and what I’m going to be encouraging is the Latino community continue to ask every member of Congress where they stand on these issues, but the one thing that I think everybody needs to understand is that this is something I care deeply about. It’s personal to me, and I will do everything that I can to try to get it done. But ultimately I’m going to need Congress to help me.”

Of course he had both houses during his first year in office…you know, the time he said he WAS going to do something about immigration reform. But instead he whines that there will be gridlock for any legislation he put forth so eh’…why try?

What an inspirational leader this man is

Sigh….

Oh, and to top off this day of pandering we get the cherry on top:

The Obama campaign’s “Latinos for Obama” theme will begin April 18, with a synchronized set of house parties featuring a conference call with comedian George Lopez . (George Lopez? What time’s he on, again?)

The rollout will come just after Obama used his attendance at the Summit of the Americas in Colombia to showcase his support among prominent Latinos, such as Columbian singer Shakira, and to tout his repeated promise to win passage of conditional amnesty for illegal immigrants.

“This is something I care deeply about … It’s personal to me,” he told the Spanish-language TV network Univision.

Since he has NO accomplishments to highlight for Hispanics he is now reduced to rolling out celebrities for a circus show.

Did I already say ‘what a leader’?

In February, 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder said that the United States was “a nation of cowards” on matters of race, and that most Americans avoid discussions of racial issues. Holder said, “Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.”

Holder said after his speech, “If we’re going to ever make progress, we’re going to have to have the guts, we have to have the determination, to be honest with each other. It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified.”

Holder’s speech reinforced President Barack Hussein Obama’s speech in 2008 on race relations. Obama urged the nation to break “a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years” and bemoaned the “chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.”

Now John Derbyshire, after writing “The Talk: Nonblack Version at Taki’s Magazine, was fired from National Review for writing an article that Holder and Obama advocated. And National Review” has fired yet another contributor over the same issue: University of Illinois professor emeritus Robert Weissberg. Honesty or cowardice?

In “The Talk: Nonblack Version:”

In paragraph (7), Derbyshire says, “Of most importance to your personal safety are the very different means for antisocial behavior, which you will see reflected in, for instance, school disciplinary measures, political corruption, and criminal convictions.”

Regarding school disciplinary measures, this University of Kansas study reinforces his conclusion: Positive Behavior Support demonstrated significant reductions in disciplinary actions and suspensions.

Regarding political corruption, this University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee study also reinforces his conclusion: We find that corruption is associated with historical/cultural forces.

Regarding criminal convictions, The Sentencing Project reports that the national incarceration rate in 2005 the national rate is 5.6 blacks to one white.

In paragraph (10e), Derbyshire says, “If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.”

Here is what happened in August, 2011, at the Wisconsin State Fair: Norb Roffers, fairgoer, said, “It looked like they were just going after white guys, white people. They were attacking everybody for no reason whatsoever.” “It was 100% racial,” said Eric, an Iraq war veteran. A group of anywhere from 30 to 100 young black men descended on the Wisconsin State Fair, beating fairgoers and looting carnival games, in what witnesses said were racially-motivated attacks.

In paragraph (10f), Derbyshire says, “Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.”

Detroit’s mayor is Dave Bing. And here is the Detroit city council. Let’s look at what has happened in Detroit: Deeper deficit, Overestimated revenues, Running in the red, Cash crunch, and Debt rating downgrades.

In paragraph (11), Derbyshire says, “The mean intelligence of blacks is much lower than for whites. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. ‘Life is an IQ test’.”

Derbyshire provide sources to support his contentions. Regarding his every test statement, consider this from his source: “There is a huge academic literature on the gaps in cognitive test results, practically all of it converging on the fact that African American mean scores on cognitive tests fall below the white means by a tad more than one white standard deviation.”

Regarding his IQ test remark, a study of home mortgage foreclosures supports him. (see the graph at the bottom of page 2 of this pdf)

In paragraph (12), Derbyshire says, “There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher.”

Research again supports his conclusion. From Jain, Sloan, and Horowicz, we learn that the “strict top down” method [choosing the highest test scorer] method offered the highest quality workforce, but also the greatest adverse impact against low-scoring designated groups. (see page 97 of this source)

Regarding John Derbyshie, a further examination of his attitude and thoughts are, in my opinion, warranted. At the University of Pennsylvania Law School, on April 5, 2010, speaking at a Black Law Students’ Association meeting, he said, “I am here not to take one side or the other on the topic under debate [can government eliminate disparities caused by race], but to say that the topic, as written, is based on a false premise, and therefore has no satisfactory answer. I don’t believe the disparities under discussion can be eliminated. Debate about whether government should play a greater or lesser role in eliminating them is therefore, in my opinion, otiose.”

He continued, “…racial disparities in education and employment have their origin in biological differences between the human races. Those differences are facts in the natural world, like the orbits of the planets. They can’t be legislated out of existence; nor can they be ‘eliminated’ by social or political action. That there are natural, intractable differences between the human races seems apparent to me on both rational and empirical grounds”

He concludes, “Even at the things we are good at, most of us are not very good. I make my living by writing; yet I can name, in my own small personal acquaintance, a dozen people who are better writers than I am. That’s not even to mention the Shakespeares and Tolstoys. Most of us are hopeless at most things, and mediocre at the rest.

And yet — look! We don’t lose sleep over this. We don’t sink into rage and frustration at our own individual differences, or agitate for politicians to put balm on our psychic wounds. We accept our individual shortcomings with remarkable equanimity, playing the cards we’ve been dealt as best we can. That is the attitude of a healthy human being.”

My intent here is not to show and/or confirm that blacks are inferior – far from it. All I am trying to do here is to (1) illustrate that John Derbyshire is not some hate-spewing racist crackpot, and (2) that Holder and Obama did not mean what they said.

When Derbyshire tried to follow Holder’s advice, he got fired. And a little research shows Derbyshire to be correct!

But that’s just my opinion.

Michelle Williams, the Community Organizer Activist who just happens to be Chief of Staff of the Tampa New Black Panther Party made some really interesting comments a few days ago and it was captured in a video audio:

I just want to say to all the listeners on this phone call, that if you are having any doubt about getting suited, booted, and armed up for this race war that we’re in that has never ended, let me tell you somethin…the thing that’s about to happen these honkies, these crackers, these pigs, these people, these motherf*er…it has been long overdue.”

and

“My prize right now this evening … is gonna be the bounty, the arrest, dead or alive, for George Zimmerman. You feel me?”

and

“I’m kinda pissed off right now that the state of Florida ain’t on fire. This could not have happened in L.A. because them brothers up there are not scared to riot. This could not have happened in St. Petersburg Florida, where the black man over there are ain’t scared to kill a cracker.”

and

“Absolutely, we want the complete removal of capitalism. Why? Because capitalism sets up a class structure and a class society. As I said in the beginning of the “haves” and “have nots,” [the] pivotal point is racism, it is racism that keeps them perpetuating a capitalistic motion. So yes, we want capitalism completely eradicated, especially from the minds and hearts and dealings of black people.”

Well, she’s sorry.

“My words were out of anger. I did not incite, I did not promote, nor did I encourage anyone to go and pick up a gun.”

Uh huh.

Ms. Williams has an interesting history, which includes Aggravated Assault Handgun.

She doesn’t look so sorry here:

“My prize…is gonna be the bounty- the arrest, dead or alive, of George Zimmerman”

Click here to view the embedded video.

The NBPP has already put a bounty on the head of George Zimmerman. You have to think that such a “capture” would constitute kidnapping but capture is not likely the goal.

Click here to view the embedded video.

But as has been made clear, Muhammad has no intention of Zimmerman remaining alive.

Click here to view the embedded video.

So where is our illustrious Attorney General?

Where is the Community Organizer in Chief? Why isn’t he asking the NBPP to stand down?

We’re hearing about Neo-Nazis patrolling Sanford but we’re not going to hear about the NBPP from the left wing media.

George Zimmerman has been the victim of what has to be one of the most disgraceful examples of journalistic and government behavior in modern history. Newspapers, networks and talking heads have convicted and hung George Zimmerman without the benefit of the truth. Worst of all, our elected leaders have led the lynch mob. It’s hard to imagine a greater atrocity than those who have been chosen to represent the people of this country exhibit such gross disregard for the American justice system. George Zimmerman has been maligned, libeled and slandered. Without a doubt attorneys all over are licking their chops and George, when you’re ready to file the lawsuits, here’s a suggestion as to where you might want to start.

Michael Nutter, D-Mayor of Philadelphia.

Mayor Mike had this to say about Zimmerman:

“I’ve called this nothing short of an assassination,” Nutter said in a nationally televised interview with MSNBC’s Alex Witt, echoing earlier comments he had made in local television interviews.

“This individual Zimmerman followed Trayvon for some period of time. Trayvon was not doing anything . . . was not a threat based on all the information and evidence and 911 tapes that have been released,” Nutter said.

On the recording of a 911 call Zimmerman made before the shooting, he tells the dispatcher a teenager – who he said looked like “a real suspicious guy” – had started running. The dispatcher asked Zimmerman whether he was following the young man. When he said he was, the dispatcher told Zimmerman not to.

“Clearly, Zimmerman was told not to continue any kind of pursuit,” Nutter said on MSNBC. “In my view . . . he tracked him down. He followed him and then shot and killed him.”

Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Racebaiterville)

Rep. Frederica Wilson said this:

“Trayvon Was hunted down like a rabid dog. He was shot in the street. He was racially profiled.”

Her accusation is quite false. Zimmerman mentioned neither race nor clothing until specifically asked.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Fruitcake)

Rep. Maxine Waters talked about something being stiff:

“The evidence really points to a fact that you had a gung-ho so-called Neighborhood Watchman who wanted to be a cop, basically, who was following a young black man who was unarmed and had committed no crime,” Waters said. “That’s pretty stiff evidence that this is possibly a hate crime.”

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Communist)

She called the shooting a “modern day lynching.”

Schakowsky is a Marxist whodoesn’t believe you deserve to own your own property and is married to a felon.

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Twilight Zone)

Johnson said of Martin:

“He was executed for ‘WWB’ in a ‘GC.’ Walking While Black in a Gated Community.”

Johnson is the bright light who suggested that overpopulation could cause Guam to capsize:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Bill Maher (D-espicable)

Maher had this to say about Zimmerman:

“Aren’t we all convinced from that tape that this guy is a big, fat, fucking liar?”

One the excuses the left made for Maher’s comments disparaging of women was that he was a “comedian.” His description of Zimmerman as a “fat fucking liar” is certainly hilarious.

That Seasoned Guy from NBC

The “seasoned” producer from NBC who magically transformed this

ZIMMERMAN: This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

911 DISPATCHER: Okay, is this guy, is he white, black, or Hispanic?

ZIMMERMAN: He looks black.

into this:

“This guy looks like he’s up to no good … he looks black,” Zimmerman told a police dispatcher from his car.

The guy apparently has been fired, but George deserves to know his identity. And I want to hear Brian Williams apologize.

Barack Obama (Race monger in Chief)

Obama said:

“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

When Henry Gates was arrested, Obama immediately said the white cop “acted stupidly.”

When Muslim Nidal Hasan murdered 13 people at Fort Hood, Obama said:

“We don’t know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.”

Notice a pattern? He’s mighty quick to defend some but when it comes to the “white Hispanic”, not so much.

Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Black Panthers)

Rush wore a hoodie in the halls of Congress as an expression of solidarity with Trayvon Martin, as though the hoodie had anything to do with anything.

In a crass and cynical move, Barack Obama exploits the death of Trayvon Martin in selling hoodies as a means of raising campaign funds.

And we can’t let this go without mentioning what a jerk Joe Scarborough has become. With all the above going on, what did Scarborough say? It’s the right politicizing the death of Trayvon Martin.

Well, there you are George. I am sure there are more to add to the list, but this is a good place to begin.

Let’s look at the Martin/Zimmerman timeline.

First we have to audio clip that Mata provided for us.

Click here to view the embedded video.

And the transcript is here

The official audio can be downloaded here.

To begin with, Zimmerman is in his vehicle (1) as he speaks with the dispatcher. At 0:56 of the clip

“That’s the clubhouse, do you know what the- he’s near the clubhouse right now?”

“Yeah, now he’s coming towards me.”

It does sound as though Martin (2) is walking in a direction away from the clubhouse, toward Zimmerman. Zimmerman says Martin is near the clubhouse, but Zimmerman does not say that he is near the clubhouse. The clubhouse is near the main entrance on Oregon St.

Zimmerman expressed concern that Martin might be carrying something as he approaches:

“He has his hands in his waistband. He is a black male. Something’s wrong with him. Yep. He’s coming to check me out. He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is. Send officers over here.”

Zimmerman begins to give instructions as to his location when Martin begins to run and Zimmerman exclaims

“Shit, he’s running.”

At 2:10 of the audio recording, the vehicle door can be heard to open and at 2:14 it closes. By this time Martin has passed from near the clubhouse toward the area between the 13 and 28 buildings. Zimmerman begins to chase and you can hear the rustle of his clothing and his breathing at 2:19. The dispatcher ask if he is chasing Martin and Zimmerman acknowledges that he is. At 2:26 the dispatcher says:

“OK, we don’t need you to do that.”

Zimmerman says “OK” and the rustling ends at 2:42.

At 2:38 Zimmerman says “He ran” and apparently lost sight of Martin. Martin apparently escaped.

Zimmerman remains on the phone with the dispatcher until at least 4:12. During that time he describes his location and directs the dispatcher to the location of his parked car.

Zimmerman: If they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the club house, and uh, straight past the club house and make a left, and then they go past the mailboxes, that’s my truck…[unintelligible]

Dispatcher: What address are you parked in front of?

Zimmerman: I don’t know, it’s a cut through so I don’t know the address.

That puts Zimmerman’s vehicle on Twin Trees Lane. According to one report, near the bend. Martin apparently fled in between the 28 and 12 buildings toward his father’s girlfriend’s place, located near the back entrance of Twin Lakes. It is the direction Zimmerman described.

Dispatcher: “He’s running? Which way is he running?”

Zimmerman: “Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.”

Zimmerman’s phone call was received at 7:11:12. At 2:42 on the audio, Zimmerman stopped running and lost sight of Martin. That puts it at 7:13:54 or so. Zimmerman continues to speak to the dispatcher until at least 4:12 of the audio, or 7:15:24. It’s reported that the phone call to Brandy Green ended at 7:16. The fight and shooting took place between then and when the police arrived at 7:17.

This is the point the gaps exist.

Zimmerman is reportedly parked on Twin Trees Lane. He says Martin is coming toward him, and then he says Martin runs. Zimmerman says that Martin runs “towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.”(3) That is SE of Zimmerman’s position and it is in the direction of the home of Martin’s girlfriend. (4) Zimmerman begins chase, but then stands down when it was requested he do so and he apparently loses sight of Martin. The question is, which way did Martin run? If he ran down Twin Trees avoiding Zimmerman (5), Zimmerman could keep him in sight for some time. That would put Martin some distance from where the altercation occurred- in between 1321 and 2821, as described in the police report. (6) Martin was initially placed near the clubhouse. If he reversed course, say to head up to Retreat Circle (7), then Zimmerman would not have described him running toward the back entrance on South Oregon. If Martin ran toward the area in between buildings 28 and 12 passing near Zimmerman’s car and then turning the corner, Zimmerman would lose sight of him quickly.

This is all of significance because there was less than a minute in between the time Zimmerman ended the call to the police and the beginning of the altercation as the phone call from Martin to Green is said to have ended at 7:16 and Zimmerman was speaking to the dispatcher until 7:15:24. That’s about 30 seconds for Martin and Zimmerman to come together.

Zimmerman had no idea to where Martin was headed. Zimmerman did not catch Martin while Zimmerman was on the phone and Martin had a head start even if he only “walked fast” he still could outpace Zimmerman. Yet somehow they could not have been farther apart than about 30 seconds closure.

Then we come to some other questions. If Zimmerman was “hunting down” Martin as some have opined, why did he not simply shoot Martin upon encountering him? Why would Zimmerman get so close to Martin that Martin could punch Zimmerman in the face and knock him down if his intention was to kill Martin? (BTW, ABC News has had an epiphany. It has decided that George Zimmerman had injuries after all) Would a person bent on murder allow himself to be assaulted and still expect that he could reach and fire his gun? If Zimmerman was brandishing a gun what could possess Martin to attack him? No reasonable person is going to charge someone aiming a gun at one. Zimmerman agreed to meet with the police as they arrived. Why would he agree to meet them and then chase after Martin to kill him? Why would someone bent on murder hold Martin at gunpoint while he screamed for 40 seconds? Because he wanted witnesses to the murder? Why didn’t Zimmerman run if murder was the goal?

None of this makes any sense.

Now let’s consider what probably happened. Back to the NY Times

Soon, callers to 911 were describing the presence of police officers, and the beams of flashlights gliding over a section of grass a few dozen yards from Trayvon’s destination, where a boy inside was waiting for Skittles.

A few dozen yards. A few is about 3. Three dozen yards. 36-40 yards. 120 feet. George Zimmerman loses sight of Trayvon Martin at 2:38 of the call, or about 7:13:50. Martin has until 7:16 to cover the “few dozen yards” to make it to the safety of Brandy Green’s residence. Zimmerman remains on the phone until 7:15:24. Martin’s girlfriend said the phone call went “dead” at 7:16, but Martin and Zimmerman were already exchanging words. According to Martin’s girlfriend, the conversation was initiated by Martin. The window between the end of Zimmerman’s call to the SPD and the meeting is brief. Really brief.

Martin had over two minutes to reach Green residence. Why didn’t he go there? This suggests strongly that Martin did not go to the Green residence, but instead hid somewhere, waiting for Zimmerman, and then confronted Zimmerman. Martin spoke first to Zimmerman, not the other way around. I think Martin approached Zimmerman’s car from the direction of the clubhouse, passed the car and then bolted. Martin then rounded the corner and hid. Zimmerman pursued until being asked to stop but lost Martin. As Zimmerman turned to head back to his car, Martin came out of hiding and confronted Zimmerman. The rest is history.

Facts are stubborn things.

On one hand the media is actively trying George Zimmerman. NBC/MSNBC leads the way by falsifying reports to make George Zimmerman look racist:

In a published report bylined “msnbc.com Staff and NBC News,” a quote attributed to Trayvon Martin shooter George Zimmerman, appears to be purposefully distorted by the left to read as though Zimmerman is a racist. A full reading of the transcript of the quoted 911 call suggests nothing of the kind. Here’s what MSNBC staff and NBC News published.

“This guy looks like he’s up to no good … he looks black,” Zimmerman told a police dispatcher from his car. His father has said that Zimmerman is Hispanic, grew up in a multiracial family, and is not racist.

The quote gives the impression Zimmer was somehow equating the fact that Martin was black with his looking suspicious, or “up to no good.” Here is what MSNBC/NBC News left out thanks to a convenient ellipsis.

ZIMMERMAN: This guy looks like he’s up to no good, [begin ellipsis] or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

911 DISPATCHER: Okay, is this guy, is he white, black, or Hispanic? [end ellipsis]

ZIMMERMAN: He looks black.

Not only did Zimmerman not equate Martin’s skin color with his looking suspicious; he didn’t even initiate the comment. It was simply a response to the police dispatcher. What the full quote does seem to make certain is that at that period in time, Zimmerman wasn’t even positive as to what race Martin was. He was speculating based upon what he could determine at night in the rain to answer the police dispatcher.

ABC News doctored the Sanford PD video.

Mary Cutcher and Selma Lamilla saw…..something.

And Cutcher’s roommate said something that Zimmerman’s lawyer will want to pursue:

Lamilla said that after the shot was fired Zimmerman appeared to be pacing.

“He started walking back and forth like three times with his hand on the head and kind of, he was walking like kind of confused,” she said.

Lamilla said he was touching his head like “he was in shock.”

Hand on his head? Confused? Shock? Like maybe his head has been beaten?

Anderson Cooper has also joined the “lynch Zimmerman” gang.

Cooper interviewed Cutcher and Lamilla, who didn’t hear a thing. At 1:57

Cooper: “So you didn’t hear or see any altercation, any struggle?”

Both women shake their heads no. A neighbor two doors down from Cutcher and Lamilla did hear a fight and called the police but despite an open window Cutcher and Lamilla heard no fight. They heard “whimpering” before they gunshot. Cutcher doesn’t know whose voice she heard but she “feels” that it was Martin.

And catch the title from Mediaite:

Anderson Cooper Interviews Witnesses To Trayvon Martin Shooting

Curious, as neither was a witness to the shooting.

On March 19, Cutcher said this:

“This was not self-defense,” Cutcher says. “We heard no fighting, no wrestling, no punching. We heard a boy crying. As soon as the shot went off, it stopped, which tells me it was the child crying. If it had been Zimmerman crying, it wouldn’t have stopped. If you’re hurting, you’re hurting.”

Even though she saw none of the altercation she knows it wasn’t self-defense.

Cutcher said something else everyone has ignored”

Then I saw him with his hands over his head in the universal sign of: ‘Oh man, I messed up.’

Remorse. Zimmerman was gripped by remorse. This hardly sounds like a man coldly “hunting down” Trayvon Martin.

The Martin family lawyers heard two shots:

“You hear a shot, a clear shot, then you hear a 17-year-old boy begging for his life,” said Natalie Jackson, one of the family’s attorneys, “Then you hear a second shot.”

But three witnesses who have made public statements have been clear that they heard a single shot, and Trayvon was hit in the chest by a single bullet.

In one of the eight calls, screaming can be heard in the background as a woman tries to get help. That call is punctuated by two gunshots.

“You hear a shot, a clear shot, then you hear a 17-year-old boy begging for his life,” said Natalie Jackson, another family attorney. “Then you hear a second shot.”

On the other hand, another day brings another witness, this time witness to George Zimmerman’s wounds.

One of George Zimmerman’s neighbors is speaking out, saying looks can be deceiving.

Despite booking video from the Sanford Police Department that many say shows George Zimmerman largely unscathed from his encounter with Trayvon Martin, the neighbor said he saw Zimmerman with obvious injuries.

The neighbor is talking for the first time about what he saw on George Zimmerman’s face less than 24-hours after Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin.

“I saw George. He was banged up. His head had two big bandages, that weren’t flat, had a bump on them,” the neighbor, who did not want to be identified, said.

He described where the injuries were.

“I seen him have a big bandage on his nose and his nose swollen. On the side, where his eyes were at, it was swollen,” he said.

He points out exactly where on a picture.

“I seen the bandage right here, and this side of his nose and this side of his nose was swollen.

And he says the screaming voice is that of Zimmerman:

He says that the voice heard screaming on the 911 call is that of George Zimmerman.

“I hear his voice every single day, I talk to him every single day,” he said.

It’s been more than a month since the shooting- long enough for someone to determine whether there are grounds for some sort of charge. I hope this is resolved soon, before someone does find and kill George Zimmerman. You can’t help but wonder how different things would be had the victim been white and the accused shooter black and a white supremacist group was putting a bounty on the head of the accused and promising that it would administer justice if the government didn’t. How would everyone react to a white supremacist group’s spokesman saying “You kill one of mine I kill one of yours” as Mikhail Muhammad did?

Click here to view the embedded video.

Which CNN conveniently left out of their video.

It rapidly getting to the point that little to nothing that comes from the left wing media can even be trusted any more.