Surprise Is A Near Sighted Porcupine Falling In Love With A Cactus
Cowboy Proverb

I remember hearing my creative writing instructor say, we should write about things we are familiar with and understand. I repeat this advice to myself at least once a week; my old writing instructor’s words have served well as a guide, but they have never been humorous until today.

When You Got Nothin To Lose, Try Anything
Cowboy Proverb

Robin Abcarian was probably excited about the prospect of covering the horsey story of Ann Romney, while trying to gain political traction for the failed presidency of Barack Obama; however, writing an article on a minnow in the shark tank and trying to expose the secrets of life in the shark world is laughable.

Apparently, Ann Romney sold a horse and the horse turned up lame at a later date. Does Robin know how many advanced Dressage Horses turn up lame at some point. I’ll let you in on a little secret, Robin, nearly all of them. Lameness finishes up all the careers of dressage, jumpers, hunters, and three day event horses; it is not a question of “will” or “if”, it is a question of “when”.

It was the end of a long day in a stuffy Simi Valley office building. Ann Romney had been under oath for more than four hours, testifying in a sometimes contentious deposition about a pricey horse she sold that may or may not have been afflicted with a condition that made him unrideable.

In the airless room, Romney was getting annoyed.

“That really is — that really is irritating,” she said when the opposing attorney implied she didn’t know who looked after her horse in Moorpark when she was at her home in Boston. “Of course I know who was looking after my horse. You’re just trying to irritate me.”

Stupidity and overwork on the part of a rider or trainer can lead to premature lameness, but if a horse continues to advance and compete, they will eventually become lame. (Ask any human athlete at the upper levels if he has lameness) There are a few “iron horses” that never display lameness, but they are approximately one in a thousand.

Is Dressage an Elitist Sport? It can be, especially, if you ride in Sullivan Canyon, Beverly Hills, Malibu, Calabasas, Thousand Oaks, Hidden Valley, and Moorpark; however, there are low scale operations in those areas, where the riding is comparatively inexpensive. Although, I must report, some of the Liberals’ biggest and wealthiest donors and fat cats are horse owners who live in these areas and their horse stories of indulgence would make delightful reading material for many Americans. I am sure they would gain far more traction than Ann Romney’s deposition over a horse deal that went south. (Not an uncommon event by the way, but when someone feels like a fool in California, someone else should pay.)

When we speak of spending excessive amounts of money on equine indulgences, comparing the Libs in Sullivan Canyon and Malibu, to Ann Romney in Moorpark, would be like running a race between a freight train and a fat man. The LA Times might call some of the Lib Fat Cats with horses and ask if they mind having their horse indulgences opened up to the internet. Ask if they want the public to know of luxury bathrooms in barns that cost more than most homes in California or if they want to hear of wood from Africa and South America being used to build stalls for their horses. Luxury digs for horses within twenty or thirty miles of people living in the drug infested squalor of the ghettos of LA. The same ghetto dwellers for whom they pretend to care for so self-righteously.

Do Not Tamper With The Natural Ignorance Of A Greenhorn
Cowboy Proverb

Ann Romney says she loves her horses and I believe her; although, I have never worked for her and I don’t know her, but I recognize her compassion for animals, for people like her, people with genuine or real compassion for horses, generally have the same compassion for humans.

Many horse owners have no compassion for horses when they can no longer perform, they become more like inanimate objects; to be frank, they become disposable, they become devoid of value when they no longer allow the limelight to shine upon the rider. They are discarded with extreme indifference, for they have served their purpose. This is the real story, a story of cold callous cruelty, especially, among those who wear false compassion on their sleeve.

“It’s like children,” Romney, a mother of five, testified about Super Hit, the horse at the center of the lawsuit. “You don’t … say one is better than the other, but I loved him.”

Ann Romney spends her own money on her horses, she feels they are therapeutic and for those of you who have read my articles on horses, you probably know, I agree with her.

Romney, who rode horses as a girl, began riding seriously as an adult after being diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1998. “I was losing most of the function of my right side,” she testified at her deposition on June 3, 2010. “And I decided I needed to go back and do what I loved before I couldn’t do it anymore.”

She soon fell in love with dressage, a fussy Olympic sport that is also called “horse ballet.” In dressage, a horse moves in delicate, dance-like steps to music as the rider, formally clad in top hat and tails, imperceptibly guides the animal.

Because it requires tremendous muscle control, dressage also provided Romney unexpected therapeutic benefits.

“Riding exhilarated me; it gave me a joy and a purpose,” Romney told the Chronicle of the Horse magazine in 2008. “When I was so fatigued that I couldn’t move, the excitement of going to the barn and getting my foot in the stirrup would make me crawl out of bed.”

So now, we know why Romney is not suited for the presidency. His wife sold a horse that became lame and during a deposition she became annoyed with a lawyer or maybe it is because she has a healthy hobby, a hobby she pays for with her own money, instead of flying around on vacations at taxpayer’s expense with an entourage. Oh excuse me, Michelle’s vacations are to promote good will around the world and show poor people how the Obamas can spend money on indulgences like separate jets to vacation hot spots, now there is an indulgence.

I would rather write about more significant political ideas, but if the LA Times wants to continue trying to smear Ann Romney over senseless and inane horse trivia, they might be surprised at the some of the secrets of the elite equestrian world.

Sybil Tries The Wild Look of James Brown To Draw Attention

A fading actress and empty vessel has exposed more than her genitalia to the public, Cybil Shepherd known for her appearances in “The Last Picture Show” and for a nude photo session in Playboy, launched into a semi-coherent rant on straw men and GOP bullies who plan to take away her “Constitutional” right to abortions and condoms, during an appearance on “CBS This Morning”.

She has vowed to stand up to these straw men (?) and put her life on the line to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of abortion on demand and government provided condoms and contraception, for those moments when a girl loses control of her emotions and can no longer accept responsibility for her actions. She has become the geriatric fluke for those countless women who can’t keep their legs crossed when someone whispers sweet promises of roles or advantages in their ear or tickles their fancy with wild and ruthless abandon.

“Abortion is our constitutional right,”

She then told the world about her plan to march on Washington wearing a bullet proof vest, in a one woman march. She informed the audience that both she and her mother fear for her life over her defiance and courageous willingness to stand up to the straw men of the GOP. She worries that they will strike her down, before she has a chance to speak out on her feelings.

“I’m not going to wear a bulletproof vest. My mother’s scared for me,”

Oh Cybil, the world admires your selfless struggle for the right to kill fetuses on demand and your right to demand free condoms and pills that allow you to fornicate on demand to avoid all those inconvenient pregnancies and having to endure so many abortions, but before you are fitted for a custom kevlar vest that will exploit your feminine charms to their best advantage, please take the time to explain where in the Constitution you have the right to abortions on demand and free contraception.

I’m sure you will draw a lot of attention to your cause and the election of the Third World dog eater in the White House by cavorting down Pennsylvania Avenue with nothing on but your pink kevlar vest with its plunging neckline and your ample cleavage peeking out so shyly, but while exposing your ass once again to the world, please share with us your vast and intimate knowledge of the Constitution. Not in the biblical sense of knowing, for even Hollywood Elites with hinges on their heels will find it hard to know the Constitution by sleeping with it; just try to explain why the rest of us are responsible for your poor decisions and willingness to engage in a degenerate life-style.

Cybil in all seriousness, your concern about being the next to be “taken out” or in reality the first one to be taken out, I suggest you seek professional help, for such paranoia is most often attributed to illicit drugs or psychosis; either way, you should seek treatment rather than leading other simple minded souls astray with your senseless rants. I realize that actors are judged by their ability to lead others beyond the realm of reality, but you have no script and you are reading from your own delusions. Do the world a favor and accept the fact that young, beautiful, empty headed actresses can command attention, but middle aged, empty headed actresses will never re-inflate their sagging careers and body parts with senseless rants and self-serving theatrical heroics when no danger exists.

There are facts of life Cybil, facts that are more important than one night stands and the indiscriminate but oh so important sessions on the casting couch, we all age Cybil, some of us age better than others, but if we travel through life relying on a transient beauty, we have much less dignity for the stretch run. Unfortunately, bimbos without a credible cerebral capacity have little or no relevancy in later life. Trying to be relevant when you have obviously compromised your intellect to fine tune the power in your loins, leaves you short on the skills required for life when no one is lusting for 3o minutes of wild and wooly humpy rumpy with you. You made your choices in life, your vacuous and paranoid rambling make it obvious to all but the most mindless drones. You should retire from public view, watch your old movies and dream of your former self, back when your sexuality made you relevant.

Tom Hanks has made a mockery of himself by participating in the Barack Obama ridicumentary “The Road Traveled.” The single most ludicrous phrase, arguably ever, uttered by Hanks was

“He would not dwell in blame”

Click here to view the embedded video.

Never mind that the movie is an obsequious love story. It’s also riddled with inaccuracies.

Never mind that.

“He would not dwell in blame.”

Good grief. It’s ALL Obama does. Brit Hume wondered how Hanks could blather those words without coughing. Obama lives to blame. He revels in blaming others. A Google search for “Obama blames Bush” yields 4,400,000 hits. Curiously, the first link that appears in a search that requests “Obama blames Bush” generates a Kos link that says “Romney blames President Obama for Bush-era law.” One wonders how that happens. But that’s for some other time.

Next try “Obama blames.” That’s good for 11,400,000 hits.

Some examples

Obama Blames “Loose Talk of War” With Iran for High Gas Prices …

Obama Blames High Gas Prices On Washington

Obama Blames Arab Springs And Tsunami In Japan For Slower Growth

And then there’s this one

Obama blamed troubles on Fox News, book says

It seems that George Bush may be finally escaping the dudgeon. A new target is in town. Obama lost white males not because of his left wing Alinsky/Bell-guided redistributionist philosophies, but because Fox News calls him a “Muslim” 24/7.

Corn writes that after the midterm elections, Obama told labor leaders in December 2010 that he held Fox partly responsible for him “losing white males.”

“…Fed by Fox News, they hear Obama is a Muslim 24/7, and it begins to seep in…The Republicans have been at this for 40 years. They have new resources, but the strategy is old,” Corn recounted Obama as saying.

Over at HuffPo, the locals have been challenged to provide any evidence for that and have nothing to offer.

Obama’s whining about Fox News is confusing, because he claimed that he doesn’t pay much attention to “cable chatter.” Neil Cavuto notes that contrary to what he says, Obama pays a lot of close attention to everything said about him:

So it’s nice to see when the usually unflappable start flapping. Like yesterday in Arizona, when the president got in Governor Jan Brewer’s face, apparently over an excerpt from her book — an excerpt.

But one the president never forgot and a slight so serious, that he couldn’t wait to discuss with her. And he did.

Usually the president getting in your face scares most folks. Not Governor Brewer, who as the picture shows, clearly had no problem getting back in his.

Seconds later Secret Service agents shot her. No, they didn’t, just wanted to see if you were paying attention.

But this “tiff at the tarmac” isn’t the issue. The president’s thin skin is.

I’ve seen it before. When he went after Bobby Jindal over the Louisiana governor’s criticism of his handling of the BP oil spill.

I’m telling you, Barack Obama never forgets. Just ask — I don’t know — anyone at Fox.

In response to the 24/7 Muslim accusation, Bret Baier took a moment to make a statement:

The Fox host added, “For the record, we found no examples of a host saying President Obama is a Muslim.”

Obama also hammered corporate executives for not seeing that Obama is a god:

And in a meeting with an adviser after the 2010 midterm elections, Obama slammed corporate executives for attacking him.

“I saved these guys when the economy was falling off a cliff,” Obama said, according to Corn. “Now I get nothing but their venom.”

“He would not dwell in blame”

Poor Barack. It’s never his fault. It’s always someone else’s fault. Why don’t Americans know that?

The President’s Pity Party is on. You’re all invited.

Obama sycophant Soledad O’Brien got into a tussle with Joel Pollak of Breitbart.com and had her head handed to her as she tried desperately to dissuade viewers of the truth- that Barack Obama was heavily influenced by the radical Bell.

In her conversation with Pollak she at first appeared not to know what Critical Race Theory actually was while at the same time she was sure Pollak was wrong. From somewhere she came up with a definition that happened to be curiously similar to the one found in Wikipedia. Soon after the Wikipedia page for CRT was changed repeatedly and so often that it came under editorial lockdown.

TheDC also previously reported that an editorial lock was placed Monday on the Wikipedia article about Critical Race Theory itself, following a separate “edit war” which followed a CNN debate between O’Brien and a Breitbart.com editor. While O’Brien insisted on-air that Critical Race Theory was not a backlash against perceived “white supremacy,” the theory’s Wikipedia article mentioned white supremacy in two different sections — including a definition of Critical Race Theory from UCLA.

O’Brien was so flummoxed that she invited another liberal professor to attempt to rewrite history at CNN, which caught the eye of Skook.

There is nothing wrong with being a sycophantic fan of a writer, but the problem becomes apparent when the fan is passed off as an objective analyst; unfortunately, for Soledad, she was humiliated and became a laughingstock, along with her employer, the Obama Propaganda Bureau, CNN.

CNN has now decided to do battle with the forces that have no reservations against calling the racist Derrick Bell, a racist, by rewriting or blunting the message of the racist mentor of President Obama and trying once again to repackage the vile message of racism under a pretense of scholarly circumlocution.

The story of our president and the endemic racism of his associates is ongoing with many surprises.

Michelle Malkin asked the question “What’s the Matter with Soledad O’Brien?”

When viewers took to Twitter to pepper O’Brien with follow-up questions about critical race theory, the CNN star had a twit fit. She invited a liberal professor, Emory University’s Dorothy Brown, on her television show to back her up and then lashed out: “See? That was our critical race theory 101. Stop tweeting me. We have moved on, people.”

Not so fast, sister.

Turns out that O’Brien, a Harvard grad, has a rather emotional connection to Bell. As documented at my new Twitter curation/aggregation site Twitchy.com, O’Brien tweeted that it was a “rough day” for her when Bell passed away last fall. She wrote that she had “just started re-reading” one of his books and mourned again: “RIP Prof. Bell.” O’Brien also shared tributes to Bell from fellow Harvard prof and friend of Obama Charles Ogletree. That’s the same Professor Ogletree who bragged that he “hid” the Obama/Bell video during the 2008 campaign.

O’Brien failed to disclose her pro-Bell bias to viewers before her segments.

O’Brien also failed to disclose that the liberal prof who denied on her show that critical race theory had aaaaaanything to do with bashing America as a white supremacy-ruled government actually wrote the exact opposite. In one of her own books, Brown asserted that the purpose of CRT was to “highlight the ways in which the law is not neutral and objective, but designed to support White supremacy and the subordination of people of color.” Oops.

But this wasn’t the first time O’Brien tried to shield her viewers from the truth. Far from it.

In January she flailed away at Newt Gingrich when Gingrich tied Saul Alinsky to Barack Obama.

Click here to view the embedded video.

She actually has the audacity (to coin a term) to try to tie Alinsky to the Tea Party.

Transcript:

O’BRIEN: Ok first of all, nothing wrong with getting ideas at Harvard and Columbia by the way. But also people listening are like, “Huh, who is Saul Alinsky?” Well, the Speaker mentions Saul Alinsky often especially when he is talking about President Obama and what Speaker Gingrich believes to be his radical liberal beliefs.

So we wanted to ask, who’s Saul Alinsky? He’s a guy who was born in Chicago in 1909. He was a community organizer, just like a young Barack Obama in Chicago as well. He spent his life helping minorities in poor neighborhoods exert their political force by organizing them to get to the polls.

But Alinsky is probably best known for a book that he wrote which is called “Rules for Radicals.” And he is referring to Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and he wrote this, “The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the haves to hold power.” “Rules for Radicals”, his book is written for the have-nots on how to take it away.

President Obama has never said that he was influenced by Alinsky. In fact, he was 10 years old when Alinsky passed away. And in doing our research, we found this. Alinsky’s organizational tactics haven’t only influenced Democrats. In fact, his practices have been linked to some conservatives and his tactics have been used with great success by the Tea Party.

Former House Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey admits he has been influenced by Alinsky, saying, quote, “What I think of Alinsky is that he is very good at what he did, but what he did was not good.” And in an interview with “The Financial Times,” the head of FreedomWorks which is aligned with the Tea Party, said regarding Alinsky’s work, “We don’t organize people to turn up at these town hall meetings, but we tell them about the meetings and we suggest good questions they could asks – ask, I mean, not asks.

Sounds like something Alinsky might do. The problem, perhaps, that Newt Gingrich has with Alinsky and the reason he is trying to link him to President Obama wasn’t really Alinsky’s organizational skills but the book outlining how the have-nots could take power from the haves. So we will be sure to ask the former Speaker that next time we get a chance to talk to him about that.

Did you catch it?

“President Obama has never said that he was influenced by Alinsky.”

Duh.

Obama has never said he was influenced by Bill Ayers or Bernadine Dohrn either.

But the facts tell us otherwise:

• Obama first learned Alinsky’s rules in the 1980s, when Alinskyite radicals with the Chicago-based Alinsky group Gamaliel Foundation recruited, hired, trained and paid him as a community organizer in South Side Chicago. (Gamaliel’s website expressly states it grew out of the Alinsky movement.)

• In 1988, Obama even wrote a chapter for the book “After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois,” in which he lamented organizers’ “lack of power” in implementing change.

• Gamaliel board member John McKnight, a hard-core student of Alinsky, penned a letter for Obama to help him get into Harvard Law School.

• Obama took a break from his Harvard studies to travel to Los Angeles for eight days of intense training at Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, a station of the cross for acolytes.

• In turn, he trained other community organizers in Alinsky agitation tactics.

• Obama also taught Alinsky’s “Power Analysis” methods at the University of Chicago.

• During the presidential campaign, Obama hired one of his Gamaliel mentors, Mike Kruglik, to train young campaign workers in Alinsky tactics at “Camp Obama,” a school set up at Obama headquarters in Chicago. The tactics helped Obama capture the youth vote like no other president before him.

• Power would no longer be an issue, as Obama infiltrated the highest echelon of the political establishment — the White House — fulfilling Alinsky’s vision of a new “vanguard” of coat-and-tie radicals who “work inside the system” to change the system.

• After the election, his other Gamaliel mentor, Jerry Kellman (who hired him and whose identity Obama disguised in his memoir), helped the Obama administration establish Organizing for America, which mobilizes young supporters to agitate for Obama’s legislative agenda using “Rules for Radicals.”

• Obama’s favorite rule is No. 13: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.” You see that in his attacks on “fat cat bankers,” “greedy health insurers” and “millionaires and billionaires.” He also readily applies Alinsky’s fifth rule of “ridiculing” the opposition.

“Obama learned his lesson well,” said David Alinsky, son of the late socialist. “I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing.”

I did not know that Obama was specifically indoctrinated at an Alinsky re-education camp. That’s something people ought to know.

But he’s never said he was influenced by Alinsky, right, Soledad? Nothing to see here, just move along.
Except- if that’s the case, why are they hiding everything?

The videotape of Obama praising and hugging his America-bashing, Constitution-trashing law professor Derrick Bell isn’t the only evidence that’s been hidden from the public. A 1998 video of Obama praising the late Marxist agitator Saul “The Red” Alinsky alongside a panel of hard-core Chicago communists also exists. Yet it, too, has been withheld.

So has a 2003 video of Obama speaking at a Chicago dinner held in honor of former PLO spokesman Rashid Khalidi. Anger at Israel and U.S. foreign policy were expressed during the private banquet.

Why have Obama’s remarks and actions during the controversial event been suppressed? Perhaps it’s because the radical Khalidi — a close friend and neighbor of Obama, who held a 2000 political fundraiser in his home for him — has strongly defended the use of violence by Palestinians against Israel, while expressing clearly anti-American views.

If there’s nothing to hide, why keep these tapes under wraps? Why not release them?

Obama’s supporters pretend there’s nothing all that radioactive about Khalidi or Alinsky, who authored the Left’s bible, “Rules for Radicals.”

But if Alinsky is not a problem, why did Obama disguise the name of his radical Alinsky trainer Jerry Kellman in his memoir? And why did he also try to shield from readers the identity of his Alinsky mentor John McKnight, who wrote him a letter of recommendation to Harvard?

If his Alinskyite indoctrination is of no concern, why did Obama leave out his weeks-long training at Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation in Los Angeles? This station of the cross for Alinsky acolytes is strangely missing from all 500 pages of his tediously detailed memoir.

For that matter, the late Alinsky is not cited by name in either of the president’s autobiographies, even though leftist activists confess this father of community organizing had a powerful influence on Obama.

Moreover, if communist Frank Marshall Davis wasn’t a controversial factor in Obama’s life, why did Obama also mask his identity in his first memoir? If listening, spellbound, at the feet of a known subversive isn’t a red flag, why keep his real profile a secret?

Obama also couldn’t find room in “Dreams From My Father” to mention the most striking thing about his father’s politics. Obama Sr. was a pro-Soviet socialist, who as a government economist wrote a communist tract for Kenya in 1965.

The folks at Investors.com have it nailed:

Some argue that linking him to this vast underground network of radicals is “guilt by association.” Actually, it’s guilt by participation.

Obama at one point was an employee of the radical shakedown group Acorn, and later trained its goons in Alinsky agitation tactics. He also worked with Pentagon-bombing Marxist Bill Ayers on the board of the Woods Fund, where the two comrades doled out cash to other radical groups.

In other words, Obama didn’t just rub elbows with radicals, he operated as a one. It’s now plain he and his fellow travelers are intentionally suppressing information that could provide the voting public a clearer link between the incumbent and radicalism.

Obama’s new campaign infomercial, ironically titled “The Road We’ve Traveled,” is just another attempt to suspend disbelief before the election.

Darn right. This next election is a litmus test of the intelligence of this country. Soledad O’Brien has already failed.

A Previous Subtle Effort By The Same Obama Propagandists

How symbolic, the red and blue spheres merge and the resultant color is a deeper shade of blue. Propaganda is considered effective if it is subtle and delivers a covert or subliminal message without the subject being aware of the intent. In this image, the profile of Obama was superimposed over the merging of Conservatism and Socialism with the profile of Obama and the result is a deeper shade of blue; picturesque and convenient, Obama brings the country together and we are united under a deeper shade of Marxism. It was created by the same team that made the Chrysler commercial; it hasn’t achieved fruition, but not for a lack of effort by Obama and his lackeys.

Our public school systems have been infiltrated with the Leftist Part Line for decades. At first the message was so vague, we thought it was merely coincidences, teachers and text writers surely couldn’t be so blatant and obvious with their political agenda; oh, but think back, while we refused to call liars and Socialists as such, they increased their efforts and relied on terrorists like Bill Ayers, confidant to our president, for the Leftist message now in our children’s text books.

Now, either Eastwood has allowed himself to be duped like a moron or he is a part of the deception; regardless of his intent, he has been used as a key element in the Leftist propaganda movement. Unfortunately, we have all been played for dupes by the creative schemers of the Left for while Eastwood tells America we are at the halftime of the recovery, during the halftime of the largest event in television history, the insidious message is implied that America needs to give Obama four more years to complete his anemic recovery, that seems to elude everyone but billionaires, bankers, and others on the dole.

The fact that Chrysler is staging a fart, stumble, fall type recovery based mainly on enriching Obama cronies and unions with our taxpayer money is pushed from our consciousness; since, we receive the subliminal message to equate the auto maker’s efforts with our fight against terrorism, the struggle of Obama to win reelection, and the struggle of the two athletic teams. In the excitement of the neo-gladitorial struggle portrayed on the boob tube, we are supposed to lose ourselves in the excitement and intellectual numbness of the game, much like the games in Rome that staged to entertain the masses or the mob in Rome to keep them content and less likely to riot. Thus in a similar way, we are played for fools by the people who stage our games; no they aren’t staged to prevent us from rioting, but what an excellent time to exploit our self-imposed stupor to insinuate a covert message to reelect our failed president by one of his corporate acquisitions, with a percentage of Obama’s funny stash money, more commonly known as tax payer money.

Oh, but you say the message is vague and imprecise, how can you make the connection: sorry people, the message is supposed to be vague and imprecise, it is supposed to leave a subliminal impression that will encourage the mobs of unthinking drones to vote for Obama once again; after all, hasn’t he struggled valiantly to repay his contributors and unions with taxpayer money, at least when he can find time between golf games and vacations. The fact that the connection is obvious to those who are alert and cognizant means the message is there. If you want to deny it, like Eastwood who so gallantly gave his check to charity, but also willingly gave his image and voice to the Marxism of Obama, means you either endorse the Socialist cause or you are to dense to notice the ever deepening pool of Obama Socialism.

The “it’s racist” attacks for the 2012 election have begun….

Ok, I lie…they began awhile ago but here is the latest example, this time from tingles:

Chris Matthews says the way Newt Gingrich pronounced moderator Juan Williams’ name at last night’s debate was a racially charged moment. Matthews, who would later sum this up as a “dog whistle,” made his case that this is racist because some people will “clearly hear” it while others “don’t want to hear it.”

So let me get this straight. Those who WANT to hear racism will “clearly hear” it. Everyone else is just…just….just RACIST dammit! How dare you boo clear race-baiting! All you Republicans are racist so just admit it and get it over with.

Sigh….

Just a few days ago we get one MSNBC dummy claiming Romney is racist for helping someone out. Now we get tingles claiming Newt is racist for calling someone by their name.

This is all they have, and it’s pathetic.

And inconveniences the other passengers.

Alec Baldwin says he was kicked off an American Airlines flight on Tuesday for refusing to turn off his iPad while he played the Scrabble knockoff “Words With Friends.”

Immediately after getting the boot from his flight, Baldwin took to Twitter, saying, “Flight attendant on American reamed me out 4 playing WORDS W FRIENDS while we sat at the gate, not moving. #nowonderamericaairisbankrupt.”

Other passengers quickly took to Twitter to give their side of the story.

Activate founder Michael J. Wolf writes, “On an AA flight at LAX. Alec Baldwin removed from the plane We had to go back to the gate. Terrible that everyone had to wait.”

“They’re thoughtless pigs“, added Baldwin. Then after reconsidering, he clarified: “Wait a sec. That was my daughter.”

Michele Bachmann walked on the Jimmy Fallon show, while the band played the song “Lyin’ Ass Bitch” without the lyrics. The drummer was named as the scapegoat and no one has yet figured out how the band knew to play the song without knowing the title or who on the show approves the musical selections.

NBC maintains that the drummer, who bragged about the incident on his tweeter account, has since been grounded rather than fired. Like an adolescent, the drummer has been “grounded”? Does this mean the drummer received a tongue in cheek reprimand for committing gross disrespect for a presidential candidate.

The band took responsibility, with this anemic explanation:

“The performance was a tongue-in-cheek and spur-of-the-moment decision.”

So there you have an explanation that excuses the band of sexism and of disrespect, but let’s examine this a little closer, under a different microscope. If the drummer,

Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson

had been White, and the insult was directed at Michelle Obama, what would have been the reaction of the press and the public?

Would the drummer have been fired? If you say no, you are a “Lyin’ Ass Bitch” and you are perpetuating this double standard in the show business world, the MSM, and the propaganda business that seems to direct or control the first two.

In all fairness, Bachmann was oblivious to the dreadful insult implied with the song, until she learned of the band’s duplicity after the show, so while those who were familiar with the song and the lyrics were laughing their “asses” off, a presidential candidate was onstage and had no idea she was being humiliated.

No, if the incident would have been reversed and the other Michelle would have been humiliated in a racially charged situation, the drummer would not have been “severely reprimanded”; no let’s not kid ourselves, the band would have been fired and the show would be in jeopardy.

Fallon, being a class act in the shallow tradition of Hollywood, offered an apology on twitter, but Bachmann demanded an apology from NBC. Doug Vaughan, NBC’s senior vice-president, apologized in a letter, for the incident and stated that it was:

“not only unfortunate but also unacceptable”

Unfortunately, those responsible, still have their jobs, but NBC proudly proclaims:

“She accepted the apology,”

Therefore, they are resolved of guilt and all is forgotten.

Yes, Michele Bachmann is a nice woman and forgives in a Christian way, but the hatred and deceit that precipitated the event is still there beneath the surface; along with the attitude of the show’s writers, producers, and performers who have given their implied approval of such actions by not responding in an appropriate manner immediately. The public is left asking why Michele had to ask for an apology from NBC and why the band, if not the show is still on the air, instead of claiming an absolution of guilt because Michele accepted the apology she asked for.

Michele brought up the reference to Michelle Obama and the aftermath of such a vicious attack by a band:

“If that song had been played for Michelle Obama I have no doubt that NBC would’ve apologized to her and likely they could’ve fired the drummer or at least suspended him. None of that happened from NBC and this is clearly a form of the bias on the part of the Hollywood entertainment elite,”

The drummer bragged of the band’s planned attack on Bachmann’s character with this tweeter post, prior to the show:

“Aight late night walkon song devotees: you love it when we snark: this next one takes the cake. ask around cause i aint tweeting title.”

We are continually amazed at the mean-spiritness and general evil that seems to lurk in the party that pronounces its love for humanity; yet, actions speak much louder than words, and in this incident, the double standard, the hatred, and prejudice is screaming.

Orlando Jones may be best known for his days as a comedic TV pitchman. This latest suggestion, though, is no laughing matter.

The former soda slinger who spent years telling people to “Make 7 Up Yours” fired off a series of tweets on October 22nd following the death of deposed Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. After discussing Kanye West’s trip to Occupy Wall Street, Jones wrote, “Libyan Rebels kill Gaddafi, if American liberals want respect they better stop listening to Aretha & kill Sarah Palin(:”

[link]

No very funny. Especially in the light of these words:

“At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized – at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differentl­y than we do – it’s important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds,”

But sadly, you know they don’t mean a word of it.

But that’s not all.

Here’s a screencap of the HuffPo title on the front page

Notice that the HuffPo title reads:

“Actor Suggests Liberals Should Kill Sarah Palin, Angers Conservati­ves”

It implies that only conservatives are angered by the plea for murdering someone- as long as it is a conservative.

By the time you read this, it may already have gone down the memory hole.

One imagines that Jones will likely appear on the CBS Early Show or Today, followed by an appearance with Piers Morgan and then a visit to The View, where Joy Behar cannot comprehend why Jones’ words bother anybody.

Thus instead of Jones being properly ostracized, his flagging career is revived.

Which was probably the entire point of it all.

From Noel Sheppard over at Newsbusters

Once upon a time, when a Republican was President, the use of drones to kill terrorists was cowardly.

Now when a democrat named Obama is President things are waaaaay different:

BILL MAHER, HOST: Since 2005, I think, the number of drone missions has gone up by something like 1200 percent, and for good reason. You know, we can do it a lot cheaper. It’s cheaper, we can get closer to the target and therefore kill less civilians. They can stay up longer. I’m sold. I’m going down to the dealership tomorrow. I’m hoping they have a hybrid.

JOSHUA GREEN, BLOOMBERG: It was apparently a drone that got Gaddafi, or got Gaddafi’s convoy and sent him scurrying, scurrying into a hole.

MAHER: And I’ve heard people say, “Well, this is not good because, you know, this is like a video game.” Good. Why is that a bad thing that it’s like a video game? I don’t understand why it’s a bad thing. I know the argument is, “Well, you know, it makes us more likely to go to war if we don’t have to, you know, risk our troops.” How could we be more likely to go to war than we’ve already been?

Maher is just the most vulgar and disgusting piece of filth on TV, he is also the biggest hypocrite in the universe.

Or beyond.