Boy is it getting ugly.
As democrat candidates lose ground, they become more desperate and vicious. Wendy Davis has already derided Greg Abbott for being in a wheelchair and now she slides right into the gutter:
Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis earlier this month was pilloried in the press for her attack ad that prominently highlighted the fact that her Republican opponent Attorney General Greg Abbott uses a wheelchair. Davis took her attacks to a new level on Monday by strongly implying Abbott would support an interracial marriage ban, despite the fact that Abbott is married to a Latina. But less than three hours later, Davis again topped herself by forwarding an attack on Abbott about an unlikely issue: dildos.
In an emailed press release, Wendy Davis For Governor passed along an article from progressive magazine The Texas Observer entitled “Greg Abbott: Dildos? Against ‘em. Interracial Marriage? No Comment.” The piece attacks Abbott for his supposed reluctance to say whether he’d defend interracial marriage and his defense of Texas’ ban on the sale of sex toys.
Meanwhile, the Kay Hagan campaign has pumped out some campaign leaflets that suggest should she lose the election Barack Obama will be lynched:
The race in North Carolina for Senate is well on its way to being the most expensive Senate race in history, expected to top $100 million by the time it’s over. The contest between incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican challenger Thom Tillis is also turning incredibly ugly.
Churchgoers in Fayetteville returned to their cars Sunday to find a political flyer on their windshield — which is to be expected 16 days before an election. But this flyer was different from the normal “Vote for candidate X” or “Oppose ballot question Y” fliers people are used to. This flyer was a picture of the lynching of a black man by a white crowd with the words “Kay Hagan Doesn’t WIN! Obama’s IMPEACHMENT Will Begin! Vote in 2014.”
Both campaigns seem to be disintegrating, but the Hagan campaign puts on the front page the contempt it has for the intelligence of black voters. Both she and Davis deserve to lose. Badly.
BTW, the mainstream media has little to no interest in any of this.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSr0BUXuTDA[/youtube]
image courtesy of Twtichy
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Budvarakbar: bud,05 ,anyone. I’ve asked—who ya got?
@Rich+Wheeler:
What’s it to you?
@retire05: Typical–Your party has nobody that can beat a lousy candidate like HRC. Sad.
@Rich+Wheeler:
So, RW, will you sit the election out if HRC is the Dem nominee?
@retire05: I won’t vote for HRC but I’ve voted every 4 years since 68 and I’ll vote in 2016.
@Rich+Wheeler:
Are you saying you will vote for the Republican nominee if HRC is the Democrat nominee? Yes, or no?
@retire05: If it’s Marco Rubio===otherwise can’t say.
Jim Webb for Prez.
@Rich+Wheeler:
Rich, I notice Retire still likes to sling around words like “liar”. I’ve been away so perhaps I missed something, but do you think Retire was hallucinating when she wrote on the Columbus thread:
@Tom:
Are you hallucinating when you call anyone who doesn’t agree with your jaded view a “racist?” If anyone is an expert on slinging pejoratives, it’s you, Tommy Troll.
@retire05: She took off without apologizing for falsely accusing you of editing your post. Wordsmith set her straight.
She’s definitely a time bomb.
@Rich+Wheeler:
I’ll take that as a compliment from a guy who routinely craps on the uniform he once wore. (Yeah, that’s you, RW)
@Rich+Wheeler:
Ditto was clearly mistaken. Redteam was clearly confused. Retire was clearly lying. But we’ve known she’s a compulsive liar for a long time. Proof (descending from the hand of Wordsmith, like a gift from the gods) was certainly not necessary, but very welcome indeed!
But maybe it’s all a conspiracy. Someone at the NSA hacked into FA server. Someone is covering for me! I must be an important guy.
@retire05: Boom The old bag is going off. Stand back as the bile pours from her ugly mouth. How predictable.
@ Rich
Rich, hypothetically, if you lied about something you saw for the purposes of bearing false witness against another, and you were caught red handed, what would be the Christian thing to do?
Boom, Tom has finally found a friend.
Tommy Troll, ever the King Of Pejorative Throwing
@Tom:
Why are you asking Richard about Christian tenets? He abandoned them a long time ago just like he abandoned the oath he took when he donned the uniform of our nation.
@retire05:
I enjoy your lack of contrition. It means your pride regarding what a total stranger on the internet thinks is more important to you than your personal integrity, than your Christian morality. You bore false witness against me. We will both always have that memory to share.
@Tom:
I am not remotely concerned what some anonymous poster on a blog, especially a liberal one, thinks of anything, especially me. I am not that insecure.
Obviously, you are.
@retire05:
I just want you to tell us why you said I changed my post 88. Simple question.
@Tom:
Why are you so worried about what I said? Is your Acute Insecurity Syndrome kicking in again?
@retire05:
So good. I was actually worried you might apologize. That would have been awkward! Instead you’ve chosen to further disgrace your good name with these sad evasions of the truth. Feels like a win to me. Thank you.
@Tom:05 caught in a lie and a false accusation, confirmed by the author, slunk cowardly away.
@Tom:
I have no intention of apologizing to someone who called me a racist. Which you did. And I am not concerned in the least little bit about your insecurity problems. Now, when it comes to disgrace, you know a fair amount about that as well as you have disgraced yourself more than once on this blog. Please, continue to do so. Maybe you will get another left wing friend.
And if you think you have won anything, then well, I guess there is no end to your ability to delude yourself.
@Richard Wheeler:
Ha. Rich, in the future I think you will know what I mean if in reply to retire I simply write “#88”. It’s best to have a shorthand for commonly occurring events.
@Richard Wheeler:
You mean like you did from your oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution by voting for a man who has, more than any other president in our history, violated it?
@retire05:
#88
@retire05: You are correct. For over a year I did fight for this country in Viet Nam. Awarded Navy Commendation Medal with Combat “V”
All you’ve done is rant and rave.
@Richard+Wheeler:
You have no idea what I have done in my lifetime. So for you to pretend you do, is simply another absurd assumption from a Loonafornia Liberal who is not smart, or informed, just arrogant.
I leave you to resume your love fest with Tommy Troll.
@Tom:
We know for sure that Tom is stupid. My total involvement in that deal was to ask RW about 6 times, since he said he read the original 88, to post it. He never did.
But that doesn’t change your level of stupid Tom.
@Tom:
So you’re desperate to know what a win feels like?
@Tom: 88 Tom, quit making a total ass of yourself. Aren’t you ashamed to act like a 5 year old child? You are not right about this and you’ve never been right about anything on this blog. (Lefties are seldom ‘right’ about anything)
No more responses tonight, going to bed.
Why mention dildos?
Because in Texas they were illegal
Abbott kept trying as Attorney General to keep them illegal and kept appealing the decision that said that law was unconstitutional
Apparently Dr J is also anti dildo
@John:
Perhaps he, like most, has no need for a dildo. Those with the need seem to be those concerned about their availability. Next we will have another Fluke before a Senate committee demanding we taxpayers pay for didos as well.
Sex toys were not illegal, but zoning ordinances kept such stores out of neighborhoods or near schools.
@Bill:
Be careful – you are destroying a narrative – heh heh heh
AS I said earlier re sex toys: Everything’s bigger in Texas!
@Redteam:
I suggest that you should use the word “correct” instead of “right”. It would be a “correct” use of the word! Otherwise mass confusion may occur!
Or maybe you have confused me — maybe you meant to say that Tom has never been “conservative” on this blog!
@Redteam: Tom’s #62 he says
Ditto was clearly mistaken— he admitted he was
Redteam was confused— yes you were. blame it on me if you like
Retire 05 was lying–re Tom altering his post—true as confirmed by the author Wordsmith
Your #81 is foolish. In what way is he “not right on this?”
BTW I’ll say again. Tom is a very smart young man that has more than held his own against you far right old timers.
@Redteam:
Here’s a handy little time line for you on Tom’s infamous comment #88
10/18 6:11 p.m. – Comment #88
10/19 12.:45 p.m. – RW joins conversation. 18 hours after Tom’s comment, and clearly enough time for Tom to edit #88
10/19 11:21 RW claims to know that Ditto is on line (tell me how that works)
10/20 10:19 RW asks Word to get involved
Word entered his first comment on that thread on 10/14 @ 7:00 a.m. so he would have been getting emailed updates. But since RW did not ask Word to get involved until two days after Tom’s comment #88, how many people would have kept those emails (considering how it would have loaded up Word’s inbox) for two days? Does Word (and perhaps he would like to tell us) have access to all posts in order to be able to backtrack and see what was originally posted on any thread? Is Word a site manager, or is Curt, or both? If Word checked Tom’s post from two days earlier, it would, at that point, contain any edits done by Tom.
@retire05: You still don’t understand Word’s explanation??He had Tom’s ORIGINAL post #88 and confirmed there was no change.
@Richard+Wheeler:
Excuse me, but I think I will wait for Word to tell me that he checked Tom’s #88 in near immediacy (within a hour of posting), not two days later, and compared it to the current post, as he said could be done.
And why do you feel the need to speak for Word?
@retire05: Word already told you that he saw Tom’s original post–are you now calling Word a liar? Word was brought on board by Ditto and myself to settle this. Ditto accepted he was wrong. You are unable to admit you were wrong, when you falsely accused Tom. You’re unbelievable o5 lol
Reread Word’s 179 and 182. That answered your question very clearly.
@Richard+Wheeler:
Nope. Just trying to clarify that Word checked Tom’s post #88 within a time frame that would not have allowed Tom to edit.
Again, why are you speaking for Word? He is much more articulate than you and quite capable of speaking for himself.
What is unbelievable is a former Marine who supports a party that supports a president who refuses to admit that Fort Hood was a terrorist attack (still sticking to the “workplace violence” meme) and who would also trade 5 high level Taliban for one deserter, violating the law to do it.
Guess “Hope and Change” means more to you than “Semper Fi.”
@retire05: The original post as received remains intact no matter how many changes take place and are later posted. Word told you this. See again #179 and #182.
I believe your buddy RT also clarified this for you.
I know you’re stubborn. Don’t be stupid. Nuf said
@retire05:
In other words, I will keep pestering Wordsmith with the same idiotic question phrased different ways until he doesn’t respond and then I can claim… what? That an adult doesn’t understand how computers work and that emails in peoples’ inboxes don’t magically change, or some other idiocy? What a great strategy. Run out the clock feigning (?) ignorance.
@Tom:
If you were so concerned about Word being pestered, you should have insisted your buddy, RW, leave Word out of the debate to begin with. But you didn’t, did you?
@retire05:
Why would I tell Rich what to do? And I’m pretty sure Ditto requested clarification from the website powers that be. Furthermore, Word wasn’t asked to join the debate, he was asked to clarity a point of fact. A point you refuse to concede.
@Richard+Wheeler: @retire05: @Richard Wheeler: @Tom: @retire05:
Hey — aren’t there any moderators out there to put a stop to this childish circle-jerk?
@Budvarakbar:
I have to admit, you have a great point. Let’s end this now. We all know retire lied, etc etc etc. thank you for being the voice of message board reason.
@Tom:
Yeah, right. Coming from the bastion of truth…..NOT!!!
@Tom:
But since he willing did join in, I don’t find it unreasonable for him to answer my questions. But I’m quite sure you do. You’re like all liberals; if you can’t stack the deck, you don’t want to play.