Boy is it getting ugly.
As democrat candidates lose ground, they become more desperate and vicious. Wendy Davis has already derided Greg Abbott for being in a wheelchair and now she slides right into the gutter:
Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis earlier this month was pilloried in the press for her attack ad that prominently highlighted the fact that her Republican opponent Attorney General Greg Abbott uses a wheelchair. Davis took her attacks to a new level on Monday by strongly implying Abbott would support an interracial marriage ban, despite the fact that Abbott is married to a Latina. But less than three hours later, Davis again topped herself by forwarding an attack on Abbott about an unlikely issue: dildos.
In an emailed press release, Wendy Davis For Governor passed along an article from progressive magazine The Texas Observer entitled “Greg Abbott: Dildos? Against ‘em. Interracial Marriage? No Comment.” The piece attacks Abbott for his supposed reluctance to say whether he’d defend interracial marriage and his defense of Texas’ ban on the sale of sex toys.
Meanwhile, the Kay Hagan campaign has pumped out some campaign leaflets that suggest should she lose the election Barack Obama will be lynched:
The race in North Carolina for Senate is well on its way to being the most expensive Senate race in history, expected to top $100 million by the time it’s over. The contest between incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican challenger Thom Tillis is also turning incredibly ugly.
Churchgoers in Fayetteville returned to their cars Sunday to find a political flyer on their windshield — which is to be expected 16 days before an election. But this flyer was different from the normal “Vote for candidate X” or “Oppose ballot question Y” fliers people are used to. This flyer was a picture of the lynching of a black man by a white crowd with the words “Kay Hagan Doesn’t WIN! Obama’s IMPEACHMENT Will Begin! Vote in 2014.”
Both campaigns seem to be disintegrating, but the Hagan campaign puts on the front page the contempt it has for the intelligence of black voters. Both she and Davis deserve to lose. Badly.
BTW, the mainstream media has little to no interest in any of this.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSr0BUXuTDA[/youtube]
image courtesy of Twtichy
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
The one and only problem is that this only offends those with the integrity not to vote for them in the first place. Those committed to voting for Democrats are committed to that for one reason: they are Democrats. The more racist and vulgar, the better. It’s what they’ve become.
By the way, the Davis campaign was bragging about voter registration fraud and has done nothing to reverse it, all while wondering why anyone would think we need postitive voter ID.
http://www.independentsentinel.com/bombshell-dems-trying-to-turn-texas-blue-are-committing-voter-fraud/
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/09/29/Exclusive-James-Okeefe-Releases-Second-Video-Expose-on-Battleground-Texas
Incumbent SENATOR Kay Hagan’s supporters need a lesson in how federal government works.
Impeachment is a function of the HOUSE.
IF House members wanted to bring articles of Impeachment on Obama they could do that now.
The Senate would not vote to convict, however.
After the election, IF the Senate switches to a Republican majority, articles of Impeachment might lead to conviction.
That’s the real difference.
At least Kay is hiding behind a PAC.
She’s smart enough not to be asked if she supports that ignorant message.
PS, sex toys have been legal in Texas since 2008.
It’s an ”urban legend” that they cannot be bought or sold there.
@Bill:
The Democrats rolled the dice on Abortion Barbie, and lost. Even before Davis’ infamous filibuster, objecting to laws that would protect women from abortionists like Kermit Gosnell, she had been contacted by Nancy Pelosi and Obama, himself. Her filibuster was planned by the DNC and D.C. Democrat operatives.
Prior to the filibuster, Craig’s List ran an add for protesters funded by Planned Parenthood that paid as much as $13.00/hr. On the day of the filibuster, there were protesters with signs that read “#StandWithWendy, #HailSatan” and people in #StandWithWendy t-shirts. These were all printed up, and distributed days before.
Wendy Davis was going to “turn Texas blue”, but in the primaries, she lost 19 counties to an obscure pro-life Hispanic from south Texas who didn’t even bother to campaign state wide and in 22 counties, the Democrats took not one vote in the primary for Governor. Out of 254 Texas counties, Davis bombed, and bombed badly, in 41 of them.
She’s a joke. In my small town, which leans heavily Democrat, I have found only one Wendy Davis yard sign. ONE. Even Texas Dems know she is a disaster. Her publicity manager, a left over from the Obama campaign, and sent to Texas to handle Davis, even tried to attack Abbott because Abbott would not answer how he would rule on established law of allowing bi-racial marriages. Abbott is married to a second generation Latina.
@Nanny G: Repubs at best will be 52-48 in Senate—at worst 50-50. Need 2/3 of Senators present voting to convict. Obviously, that’s not gonna happen. Waste of time even talking about it.
@Rich+Wheeler: Correct Rich!! I think Hagan is showing how desperate politicians act when they sense they my lose their seat. Impeachment will NOT happen when the Republicans take control of the Senate. But, at least some work will get done. I think our country does some good work when one Party controls the Whitehouse and the other the Legislature.
@Nanny G: Said:
Actually – they are probably not needed – heh heh heh
Everythings bigger (and better) in Texas!! — doan-cha know?
The Urban Legend sounds like something that would have started in San Fran-sicko (or maybe Austin)!
@Rich+Wheeler: That is probably correct – it would be great if the House impeached and then the Senate demo’s would be forced to put up or shut up and keep looking over their shoulders before they have to face re-election in 2016- heh heh heh
@Budvarakbar:No Dem. Senators would vote to impeach and a number of Repubs would vote no. Waste of time that would hurt Repubs. Repubs will beat each other up in 2016 primaries and make it much easier for Dem. Prez victory. Repubs may widen Senate lead by 2 or 3.
Dr. J Thanks for Beach Boys medley. Suggest “Don’t Worry Baby” incredibly beautiful harmony. They had a huge influence on The Beatles.
@Rich Wheeler:
You bet, Rich. How could I leave it out? 😉
I think my favorite was “In my room”
@Budvarakbar: There is actually a couple of store chains specializing in such things here in Texas. However, I doubt Democrats make any purchases. They vote their dildos into office.
@Bill:
LMAO
@Rich Wheeler:8
For the record: Senators don’t vote to impeach or not to impeach. They only vote to convict or not convict. The Representatives in the House vote to impeach or not to impeach.
@Rich Wheeler: We will see – We will see!
Not saying you are wrong!
@Redteam: Actually I had written convict (check your inbox before you erase it ) and changed it to impeach to bring you back.lol House votes by simple majority to impeach (indict). Senate needs 2/3 of members present voting to convict.
What’s your Senate prediction for imminent election?
I told you K.C slap hitters couldn’t handle Bumgartner.
@RICH WHEELER:
spelled incorrectly.
Senate 56 Repubs
I agree with the impeachment proceeding. It should be easy to impeach but high level to convict. Shouldn’t be partisan.
@RICH WHEELER:
the Senate requires 2/3 of the members, whether present or not, to vote to convict. 67 votes to be precise. 2/3 members present means he could be convicted if there were 2 members, out of 3 present, voting to convict.
Small technicality.
@Redteam:
That is why the impeachment has to be carried out and SENT to the senate — to make the demo-commies expose themselves —
Crying jonnie should have done the impeachment months ago and stuffed it down dingy Harry’s oatmeal tube to make these slimeball incumbent senators take a yay or nay side BEFORE THIS 2014 ELECTION in order for the sh-t for brains ding-a-lings to NOT be able to put any credible distance between them and the administration!
The “Here’s your shovel….” image is a perfect example of what obama and a lot of the democrats are doing. They dug themselves into a hole with some of the things they voted for, but instead of them stopping digging, they are asking for a bigger shovel, so they can did THEIR hole faster. I’m willing to contribute to a SHOVEL fund for the democrats. The bigger the shovel, the better.
@Redteam: I know how to spell Series MVP Bumgarner correctly. I enjoy toying with you–see #14.
Serious question. Will you be man enough, as was Ditto, to apologize to Tom for your false accusation?
@Rich Wheeler: from 14
Are you saying ‘something’ else changed the spelling. That’s not important anyhow, sorry I mentioned it. Too often phones or computers spell things the way they want to and it has nothing to do with the person typing it.
If and when I ever make a false accusation, I will. So far, that hasn’t happened.
So you’ve got it figured that Bumgarner will win game 4, KC will win 2 and 3 and 5 and 6? Sounds about right.
@Redteam: Actually—-Senate conviction requires vote of 2/3 of members present 2) and a quorum of a simple majority. Must be minimum of only 51 present in which case only 34 necessary to convict.
Bumgarner will win 2 or possibly 3 if it goes 7. I see Giants winning in 6 or less. Senate– Repubs. 52-48.
@Rich+Wheeler:
I’ve looked into it a little more and can find the requirements both ways. So I guess the actual law is not definitive. One place says 2/3, the other says 2/3 of those present (without quorum being stipulated) so I assume that means if there are only 3 present and vote of 2 will do it. Don’t know why it’s not better defined. (Dimocrats probably wrote it) I found this:
Super majority of Senate is defined as 67 votes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajority#Two-thirds_majority
I don’t see Giants winning games 2,3,5,6, and that should about do it.
@Redteam: Re removal What I wrote is correct and actually makes sense.
Bumgarner more likely to pitch game 5 on 4 days rest than game 4 on 3 May pitch 4 if Royals win next 2. Most likely to me is they split the next 2, Giants win #4 at home and Bumgarner closes it out at home in game #5.
You give Repubs. 56??? That’s why you’re Redteam. Repubs 52-48
@Rich+Wheeler:
Provide me a link to something that interprets it ‘your’ way. The one I quoted seems to make it clear that it takes 67 votes.
Doesn’t make sense, then he’s only available for 2 games max. Has to go in game 4 to be avail for game 7. 56 is likely to optimistic, probable 54.
@Redteam: It only took you about 30 minutes to drop your drawers on your Senate prediction.Ye of little faith lol
4 days rest is normal—he’ll go on 3 only if deemed necessary–see#23 Peavy, Hudson, Vogelsong 2-3-4 You’ve shown nothing indicating 67 vote requirement—what if 3 or 4 0r more Senators unable to vote? Makes little sense—2/3 of quorum (51) min. present makes perfect sense.
@Budvarakbar: You’ve done a lot of insulting.
You got a name or two of Repubs. who can win the Nom and beat HRC?
I repeat. I’m not voting for her and would prefer Cuomo or highly decorated Marine Vet Webb.
@Redteam: Said you:
What do you expect from lawyers? – A rule to define the requirement(s) for this level of momentous decision from a legislative body of size = 2x number of states — currently 50 states === 100 senators despite the lunacy of the current POSPOTUS (57 – oh! the strains of the campaign!) is extremely simple:
(1st) One senate roll call vote – nationally televised period – no do-overs etc etc etc
(2nd) 2/3 of those PRESENT equals 67 -max – of the total!!! No absentee votes, no phoning in from some BS junket, campaign stop, bath house, massage parlor, or golf course!
(3rd) Of course the ‘minority’ party will usually have some hack like dingy Harry twisting arms to get people to not show up, abstain or vote ‘present’! Simple – subtract the number of no-shows, – for ANY reason including abstentions and ‘present’ votes- from the required 67!
How’s this for a scenario: After 2014 election – 53 Repub vs 47 demo-COMMUNISTS – 100 total – 67 required — at vote time dingy Harry has compromised and/or bribed 10 dufus demo’s into not showing up or ‘abstaining, three commie senators up for re-election in 2016 get cold feet and are in China on a fact-finding junket – led by Jen eff’n Kerrie, at last minute 3 two demo’s are sick with Obola and 1 RINO dufus has just died – no replacement yet!
Required for conviction: 67-10-3-3-1 = 50 votes! 83 to vote – Final vote count 52 to 31 – good bye Obie
At last seconds Harry manages to flip 5 of his toadies who happened to show up to vote. Required for conviction now 55 votes! Repub’s have 52 — requires 3 demo-COMMUNIST corruptocRATs to have ‘some’ character –!
Would be interesting to watch the demo-COMMUNISTs set themselves up for the 2016 election!
@Budvarakbar: Wild imagination Bud. Actually, solidifies why 2/3 vote of those present (assuming a quorum) makes the most sense. Don’t you think?
Any thoughts on my #26. Thanks
@Rich+Wheeler:
The RINO party is essentially toast and have been controlled by the same internationalists that control the demo’s since the 1950’s.
If she is nominated – HRC may be exactly what this country deserves!
Actually imho at this time and for the last few months – she has just been a stalking horse/smokescreen and she and BJ are just ginning up the base’s interest by keeping themselves in the news cycle – Monica is part of this scam – they are all trying to ingratiate themselves to the demo string pullers and stay on the fund raising circuit!
@Budvarakbar: Translation “I got nuthin”
You think Monica and Sarah might be an item?
@Rich+Wheeler: says:
What I wrote is a whole lot more than nuthin’! – the RINOs have ‘nuthin'” But since you asked!
Monica is just scamming — looking for a Hollywood and/or book deal
Sarah will most likely keep on keeping on with what she is doing for a few more years – then fading into an early retirement — I cannot see anyone trading the life in AK and AZ for the sewage pit of WA DC —
As far as “nuthin'” is concerned —
What do either have that the country needs? Beyond being democrats – which the country doesn’t need any more of?
@Rich+Wheeler: 25
I didn’t change my prediction, only stated an opinion. Prediction still 56.
From the same link provided above:
Do you deny that the US Senate has a ‘fixed membership’? A supermajority is required for cloture in the Senate and that is 67, based on 100 membership. The number doesn’t change, even if a Senator is not there because the membership is ‘fixed’. I did provide you with a link that has this information. You have provided zip.
@Rich+Wheeler:
which Cuomo, the current crook of New York? Marine Vet Webb? Don’t understand how a man such as he seems to be can be a Dimocrat.
Are you saying they’re gay? Which Monica and which Sarah?
@Redteam: What does cloture have to do with impeachment proceedings? I simply googled impeachment proceedings and got what I think makes perfect sense.Your link merely explained super majority–didn’t reference impeachment proceedings.
I amended 25 and gave you Giant pitchers scheduled to go in games 2-4. Think Bumgarner closes it out with his 2nd win in game 5.
@Budvarakbar:
Amen, Obozo has filled us to the brim.
@Rich+Wheeler:
Rich, I know you’re not stupid and you’re not required to play it for the Dimocrats.
I said that 67 is required for cloture. I was only stating that something as important as conviction on impeachment is at ‘least’ as important as cloture. You need to read the info at the link. It makes it clear that the Senate being an established fixed membership number of 100 requires 67 for a ‘supermajority’ which is required for conviction of impeachment. Very clear.
@Rich+Wheeler:
so give me a link to that ‘perfect sense’. If you simply googled impeachment proceedings, you got
and I don’t have time to check out that many so, if you would give me the link that ‘makes it clear’.
@Redteam: Read yours more closely–conviction requires 2/3 (SUPER MAJORITY) of members Present. Need Quorum–51
Jim Webb Va. Senator 2006-2012, didn’t seek re-election, who beat Allen in 06 to give Senate to Dems. Met him in V.N. great guy blue dog.
With Sara and Monica who knows—both are kinda dipsy.
Repubs. got ANYONE who can beat HRC–ANYONE???
@Rich+Wheeler:
My grandson has a cat that should do well against her. Really, is ANYONE in this country actually stupid enough to vote for her? Anyone?
@Rich+Wheeler: Can’t find anything that is definitive. Every place/thing I read differs in what is required. Must not be a ‘correct’ answer.
@Rich+Wheeler:
yeah, seems as if he doesn’t know what party he prefers, has been in both. Dims must be paying better right now.
@Redteam: Never said American voters were particularly smart–I guess we’ll see who survives the circular firing squad–er Repub.Primary.
Webb was a Repub. till he got smart.Thanks for that Jim–Believe he could get nom and win Prez. Don’t know if he’s still got the fire.
@Rich+Wheeler: What do you think about the reasons Shrillary was fired from the Watergate committee?
@Rich+Wheeler:
LOL, sure he did.
@Redteam: That was a million years ago–you tell me–does anyone care–Benghazi is a problem in my mind. Remember I’m not voting for her.
Think I’ll call up Jim Webb
Semper Fi
@Rich+Wheeler:
I’m quite sure Dims don’t.
@Redteam:
You can figure on at least 42% — add in the MSM effects, the RINO dufus effect and FALLING GAS PRICES – and you are pushing 50% – al ittle vote fraud here and there — delay and sabotage (lose) military absentees — and she will be IN!!
Some guy named Rich trolls through here — I’d bet he will vote for her – even though 5+ hours ago in his #26 he said:
@Budvarakbar: You are a strange Bird.
I’ve said many times I’m not voting for HRC. If you are an example of the average Repub. voter, the GOP is in deep trouble.
@Rich+Wheeler:
So, if Shillary is the Democrat nominee, will you vote for the Republican? Or will you (please) sit the election out?
@Rich+Wheeler: Sqwauk! sqwauk! sqwauk!
Soo — if the demo’s nominate the hildabeast — who are YOU going to vote for? Before you answer – remember the old adage — “A vote for an independent, third party or write in – or staying home – in order to spite your own favorite party ’cause you do not like their candidate == a vote for the OTHER main party!”
Sqwauk! Buddie wanna qwakkah!, Buddie wanna qwakkah! SQWAUK!