The President Is Going To Hunt Down The Killers, But Don’t Bother Him With Requests For Extra Security

Loading

President Obama is much better at dealing with disasters than preventing them. He now vows he will personally hunt the al-Qaeda homicidal maniacs and kill them or maybe give them a trial so that they will have American justice, but don’t bother him with meaningless details about security. Security is beneath his pay grade.

Jaye Carney

It is absolutely the case the President is intensely focused on and committed to bringing to justice those who killed four Americans. He is focused on the investigations continuing so that they can follow the facts all the way to the end so we know what happened and why. He is committed to ensuring that we take the appropriate actions after the Accountability Review Board to ensure that what happened in Benghazi does not happen again. What is also the case is that requests from the hundreds of diplomatic facilities around the country for security personnel or other related matters are made to the State Department. They are not made to the White House. And that’s just a simple statement of fact. It is certainly the case that this President believes that we need to assess what happened in Benghazi and we need to take action — appropriate action to ensure that it does not happen again.

Appearances on The View, celebrity soirees with Beyonce and JayZ, and fund raisers in Vegas while Americans are being butchered is okay, but again, don’t bother him unnecessarily with tedious details about ongoing attacks and requests for security; after all, President Obama is a busy man. It’s true the former SEALs who stepped in to provide cover for the Benghazi Consulate personnel, after the Obama Administration refused to provide security, were butchered by the same people Obama had declared defeated, but he has a rigid social schedule and security isn’t something he wants to be involved with. It’s not his problem that the other embassies decided it was too dangerous to be in Benghazi. The people of Benghazi love Obama, why should he jeopardize his image in Libya by providing his ambassador and diplomatic delegation security. If al-Qaeda saw armed guards it might provoke them into a confrontation. Obama knows the Muslims, he has confidence in his abilities to deal with them. We must learn to trust in his judgment.

Since Biden and Carney aren’t able to convince the American public that BHO is innocent of incompetence, The Obama Team is sending out the storm trooper, but this time she took her meds.

Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, last seen having a bizarre mental breakdown during the Democratic National Convention has now settled the issue of why the consulate in Benghazi was left without security and four Americans died, including Ambassador Stephens. She explained with her great sense of logic, that sense Benghazi was a “compound” it wasn’t eligible for security and that the requests for security were for the embassy in Tripoli. The administration must be familiar with throwing manure against the barn door, it doesn’t usually stick, but if you throw enough of it, eventually something will stick. Actually, the US embassy in Libya requested an extension of the Security Support Team, the group that provides security escorts. The request was denied by the Obama Administration.

Former Governor Jennifer Granholm:

“What was said at the debate is not inaccurate. There was testimony in Congress asking for more security, but that security that was requested was for Tripoli, which is the embassy, not for Benghazi — which is 400 miles away. The fact that the Romney team doesn’t distinguish between an embassy and a compound, I think, is indicative of their lack of information.”

It is interesting to note just who in the Obama Administration is trusted with the inside information. The truth is, if the administration would have spent a few minutes to provide the requested security, instead of a month of coverup to hide its mistake, Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans would still be alive.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Some poor sap is about to have a hellfire missile up their ass. They may or may not have had anything to do with the murder of the US Ambassador and staff, but what the hell the regine has vowed revenge to the progs on the View.

Obama cannot stay serious if it means his job.
Last ”debate prep,” found Obama taking off for vacation sight seeing at Hoover Dam and delivering pizza to his campaign volunteers.

This time, Obama is on the same track.

Obama took a break Sunday from studying and engaging in mock sessions with his staff at a five-star waterfront resort here to deliver pizzas to one of his nearby campaign offices and make a couple phone calls to supporters, just as he did while preparing for his first debate in Henderson, Nev., two weeks ago.
….
The president began prep sessions Sunday at 10 a.m. and in between has strolled along the grounds of the resort…..
[At the campaign office Obama] asked one woman to keep him in her prayers.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/10/14/obama-says-debate-prep-going-great/

Obama went to law school, he lectured about how to community organize.
He cannot imagine going after the Feb 17th Martyr’s Brigade or the al Qaeda segment in Libya now.
He got bin Ladin, that should be enough Muslim blood.
What’s the matter with us….are we bloodthirsty?

Granholm is a moron, the kind of person Democrats seem hell-bent on electing. A consulate is simply the smaller extension of the Embassy which is usually located in the capital city. But to call it a “compound” shows that she is just trying to minimize the Key Stone Cop operation this is turning into for Obama.

Nevermind that the FBI didn’t get to Benghazi for weeks. Now the excuse is that the FBI, and CIA, could not get visas. Got that? They couldn’t get visas from the Libyan government. And when they did finally arrive at Benghazi, they spent less than a day there, although there are sensitive documents laying everywhere in all the photos. (any document from our consulates/embassies are considered sensitive) Maybe the Oval Office could call CNN and ask them to pick those document up for it?

How can you conduct a war against terror when you deny the existence of terror and become an apologist for the homicidal maniacs who have killed our ambassador and three other Americans. Yes, denying their willingness and readiness to kill Americans is the same as being an apologist for our enemy. Obama uses an obscure video that no one in the world even noticed and launches an assault on the film and indirectly excuses the atrocities of our enemies.

Can you outline a war strategy if you don’t want to kill the enemy. Sorry folks, killing the enemy until he no longer wants kill your people is how you win wars against enemies who want to kill you.

Obama wants to win a war by be nice to illiterate homicidal maniacs. He wants to give them the impression that they can kill our ambassadors and diplomatic personnel and he wants to say, “What’s wrong, don’t you love us?”

Surprise! They hate us and want to kill us and can’t believe they have such a weakling in the White House. Expect ongoing atrocities, until someone exacts revenge.

We are now losing, and losing big time. The fanatics laugh at us and the rest of the world is worried that the US has lost its backbone.

The US hasn’t lost its backbone, we just have a president who is an incompetent fool with dubious loyalties.

Retire in commentary a few days ago, I sarcastically asked whether the FBI was having visa problems. Oh my God! I was right. What a total embarrassment that continues to portray the weakness and ineffectual Obama.

Obama has never had to really work for anything in his life and it shows. He isn’t even taking his debate prep seriously, voting present in that as well.

Ed Klein has revealed that after the first debate, Bill Clinton called the WH to offer his services for the next debate. No one in the Obama administration could even be bothered to return the call.

To say that Clinton is livid is an understatement. He was quoted as saying that Obama’s arrogance “knows no bounds.” Bill has since gotten high powered legal advice to keep the blame for Benghazi from being dumped on Hillary’s doorstep.

I am not a fan of Clinton’s but to not even acknowledge his offer of help is just another sign that this administration is clueless.

Sorry, I switched computers and my screen name got changed from anticsrocks to my first name, Don.

My apologies, Curt.

@Skookum:

Think about this for a minute: I live in the CST zone. Benghazi is 7 hours ahead of us, 6 hours ahead of Washington, D.C. The State Department has put out that the attack started around 9:40 p.m., Benghazi time. That would have been at 3:40 D.C. time. The State Department has also said that they watched the attack “in near” real time on video. Where the hell was our rapid response teams? Was AFRICOM or SOCOM notified and told to activate rapid response teams and do it NOW? The attack lasted, according to the State Department, six hours. It was reported that when informed of the attack, Obama went to bed.

Now, we can assume Obama didn’t go to bed at 4 in the afternoon. So, the attack is over, the consulate is destroyed, the whereabouts of Chris Stevens, and other American personnel, are unknown, we are aware the area is more than dangerous, and Obama goes to bed and nothing was done? Where the hell are the adults in this administration?

Gary Berntsen, love him or hate him, has earned his keep in foreign service. He told Judge Jeanine that no matter what, you get your people out. You don’t wait for the Libyan government to give you permission to save the lives of your people, and if there is a diplomatic problem, you deal with that later, but you do what you have to to get our people out of the fray, first and foremost. Obama didn’t.

Why did Obama go to bed? Did he know there was going to be an attack? Was there an alternet plan he was counting on instead of Chris Stevens being murdered? Joe Biden said during the debate that if Iran was close to getting nuclear weapons, he, and the president, would know it and they would know it because of intel. Yet, Biden claims there was no intel passed to the White House on the attacks in Benghazi? Really, Joe? We are supposed to believe you would have intel on Iran but you didn’t have intel on Libya? To quote Hillary’s smear against General Petraeus, that requires a willing suspension of disbelief.

This goes much deeper than any of us might think. The Administration is playing a shell game wanting us to concentrate on the Benghazi attack while they try to lay the blame at anyone’s feet they can find; the State Department, CIA, HUMINT, anyone. But when Chris Wallace asked David Axelrod today if the President had attended a intel briefing the day after Benghazi, Axelrod tried to obfuscate the answer. In other words, no, Obama was concentrating on Vegas, baby, Vegas.

What is it that the Administration is REALLY trying to hide. Inquiring minds want to know.

Ask the Republicans why the defeated a bill the increases money for additional security for embassies?

@liberal1…….You’re an asshat…..State stated a week ago funding had nothing to do with it…If you’re going to perpetrate a lie, at least keep up with current events….

@Liberal1 (Objectivity):

Ask the Republicans why the defeated a bill the increases money for additional security for embassies?

In the House budget. Now, exactly what budget has been passed? NONE!! The Senate hasn’t passed a budget in over 1200 days. The government is working on continuing resolutions. Your comment reflects you ignorance.

@Liberal1 (Objectivity): First of all shoe me the Senate budget proposal that has the security spending in it. Secondly your comment is irrelevant. Are you really saying that what happened is the Republicans fault due to funding??

@Skook:
Good point about all the cars sent to our embassies on the State Dept dime.
At a time when we should be making cuts where ever possible we should NOT be buying electric cars for Ambassadors.
They need bullet proof cars.
So, apparently, do their staffs.
And then to try to shift the blame for not giving the Libyan Ambassador and his staff more security on Republicans because they want fiscal responsibility!
The Barbados Embassy had an entire US Marine contingent on 9-11-12.
Libya had none.
WHY????

@Skook#4 – Exactly and Amen to that!

As I have been saying, and it is a sorry position to the extent of the impact, but, it IS coming down to Kill or be killed….

Also, if we don’t invest in, and have a Military who will defend us….and on our own turf…? Oh, wait a minute, the Embassy in Benghazi WAS our own turf…

@Liberal1 (Objectivity): If those nasty Republicans cut funding where did Mother Clinton find the 10 billion that State used to contract security for the diplomatic service worldwide?8000 security personnel and double that in support and logistics. The hubris of this regime has reached criminality. Fidelity to a failed agenda and the foolish belief that symbolism confers reality cost four men their lives.This failure cannot be parsed,nuanced or minimized. Responsibility cannot be placed anywhere but the top tier of leadership. Pardon me if I believe I could just as soon ride a red assed ape to the moon as expect Obama and Clinton to voluntarily take responsibility for their incompetence.

@brian winkler: Looks like I have an ape to saddle.

President Obama is much better at dealing with disasters than preventing them. He now vows he will personally hunt the al-Qaeda homicidal maniacs and kill them or maybe give them a trial…

I don’t think the word “personally” means what Obama thinks it means. Or is he going to set aside the election and “go Rambo on their butts”? Sounds good to me. Send a film crew with him. I’d love to see how well Chicago style community organizing fares versus terrorists.

@Ditto: The only hand to hand combat Obama’s ever been in was when Rahm dropped the soap at Man’s Country.

@Ditto: You said:

Send a film crew with him. I’d love to see how well Chicago style community organizing fares versus terrorists.

I had to chuckle when I read that one. You are spot on.

From Rules for Radicals –

9) The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself (Alinsky 1972: 129). When Saul Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

I can just see it now…

Obama contacts the leaders of Al-Qaeda and says that if they don’t stop this needless killing, then he will make sure their bathrooms are flooded with poor people using them.

At first this is met with the icy stares of Al-Qaeda leaders. Then Obama confidently rises and leaves the room. As soon as the doors close, the assembled Al-Qaeda power brokers literally fall out of their chairs laughing.

Yep, community organizing ought to be the tool of choice when fighting terrorism.

anticsrocks
hi, nice to read your smart comment again,
we see tha overflow of the toilet in the WHITE HOUSE they have been splash with it
AND it will stick like glue for a long time,
do they expect us to let them forget their fail responsibility?
when we have 4 HERO GONE
best to you