28 Sep

Benghazi And The Lies Of Obama

                                       

Another Bump In The Road For Obama

Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Senator John Kerry, have circulated a bipartisan letter asking for “an accounting of the attacks against U.S. missions in Egypt, Libya, and Yemen,” from President Obama. The Senators also want to know what advance warnings the administration had of the attacks and whether the administration shared that information with the personnel involved in the attacks.

They are also asking why the administration refused to acknowledge that the attacks were planned by Al Qaeda for several days after the attacks.

This is significant, because of it being the first time Democrats have questioned the administration’s foreign policy and its integrity.

YouTube Preview Image

Soon after the attack, the administration’s intel picked up the celebratory announcements of al Qaeda as they reported the successful attack on the consulate in Benghazi.

In the hours following the 9/11 anniversary attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, U.S. intelligence agencies monitored communications from jihadists affiliated with the group that led the attack and members of Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), the group’s North African affiliate.

In the communications, members of Ansar al-Sharia (AAS) bragged about their successful attack against the American consulate and the U.S. ambassador, according to three U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to The Daily Beast anonymously because they were not authorized to talk to the press.

Soon afterward Jay Carney and Ambassador Rice were lying to the public to protect the president’s image so close to the election and after saying he had neutralized al Qaeda after the assassination of Bin Ladin and multiple successful drone strikes.

Is this enough to swamp the presidency of Obama, who referred to attacks and deaths of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans as bumps in the road?

Are the American people willing to live behind a curtain of deceit, fabricated solely to make Obama look good. This seems to be the level of truth in the Obama Administration, everything is equivocated on how it makes Obama appear to the public.

Without a doubt Americans died and Obama lied, along with Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Jay Carney. The president has steadfastly maintains the attacks were provoked by an anti-Islam film made by a dubious Coptic Christian, even though he knew his accusations were lies.

Obama And Clinton Support Each Other As The Bodies Of Americans Return HomeAnd They Rehearse Their Lies

The president fanned the flames of hatred and outrage by telling the world that the U.S. condemned the film, to the extent of buying air-time in Pakistan for his apology.

In his apology was the implication that American principles were up for negotiation in regard to free speech and religion, especially the religion of Islam, by saying the freedom of speech does not give you the right to insult religion, unless it is Christianity or the Jewish religion.

Despite The Reassurances and Lies of Obama, We Are Still Vulnerable To Terrorists

As details continue to be exposed, it is obvious the president has no intention of telling the American people the truth, nor can we believe Hilary Clinton, Susan Rice, or Jay Carney. The lies are being told and retold for political reasons, to help insure Obama’s reelection; there is no pretense of national security at stake, therefore the lies give even more cause for alarm.

The administration feels there is no danger in living and telling lies, because the MSM is essentially a state-directed propaganda service for the president. Refusing to call the Fort Hood shootings of Major Hassan a terrorist attack and having a compliant media has only enabled this president and his lies. The Underwear Bomber with its security failures was once again an example of a compliant press covering for their propaganda director. His reactions and callousness toward terror leads Americans to believe, as he has said regarding the attack and deaths in Benghazi, that terror is more of an inconvenience, a series of bumps in the road.

The common deception, shared by Obama, the media, and the Left is that Obama is universally loved around the world and especially in the Middle East. This self-inflicted deceit is one of the primary reasons Obama’s foreign policy is a complete and utter failure in the Middle East.

Appeasing our enemies in the Middle East and negotiating from weakness rather than strength only emboldens our enemies and makes our allies reassess their positions.

About Skook

A professional horseman for over 40 years, Skook continues to work with horses. He is in an ongoing educational program, learning life's lessons from one of the world's greatest instructors, the horse. Skook has a personal website skooksjournal.com featuring his personal writings and historical novel type stories.
This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 9/11, Africa, American Intelligence, Barack Obama, Benghazi Attack, Egypt, Foreign Policy, Libya, Media, MSM Bias, Politics, War On Terror, Yemen and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Friday, September 28th, 2012 at 1:54 am
| 517 views

14 Responses to Benghazi And The Lies Of Obama

  1. joetote says: 1

    As I said on an earlier post today, even today here in Vegas, news radio stations ( I believe ABC in this case) ar still putting forth the narrative of “the video” being the cause, even in Libya! The lies keep coming, yet people will keel haul folks like me who equate this President, his Co-opted media and the sad sack politicians of both stripe to the Hitler or for that matter any leftist regime (USSR) for example that openly tells the lie over and over until it is regarded as truth! One always should look at 1984 as a good example of what is to come as the lies keep coming.

    Skook, as you well know, this President is in my mind a traitor to his countries and our basic ideals. His open disdain for our basic laws and the electorate in general is only magnified by the open brazenness he and his lackeys show in misleading the American public and the world! Yet even now, the MSM openly pushes the lie.

    ReplyReply
  2. Skookum says: 2

    Looking at this situation as an observer, it will be interesting to watch the media if there is catastrophic defeat for Obama. Will they all go down with the president and continue to spin lies on the infallibility of the “One” or will they turn tail to try and salvage credibility before the public realizes the MSM has been little more than Obama’s glee club.

    ReplyReply
  3. Zelsdorf Ragshaft III says: 3

    I would like to see video of President Barack Hussein Obama suffer the same fate as Abassador Stevens. That includeds the sodomy. I think Obama would not mind that part so much.

    ReplyReply
  4. Art says: 4

    When is Romney going to do something about this:

    I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn’t know why
    until I read this.

    This is 100% legit. I check it out at https://www.iardc.org/ Stands for
    Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It’s the
    official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very
    strict and mean as hell. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced
    age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my
    law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.
    Big surprise.

    Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up
    Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

    Consider this:

    1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is
    no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order
    to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary
    Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not
    really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your
    license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve
    been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your
    license five seconds before the state suspends you.

    2 Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993.
    after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her
    license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!

    3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady – who don’t
    actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
    Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

    4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is
    another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the
    University of Chicago.

    5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying
    Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law
    school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time,
    never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

    6. “He did not hold the title of Professor of Law,” said Marsha
    Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer
    in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

    Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
    ;

    7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S.
    Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address.
    Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of
    Independence … not the Constitution.

    8. The B-Cast posted the video:
    http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

    9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama
    said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the
    promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all
    created equal.

    10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr.
    President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders
    named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of
    Independence and it reads:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
    equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
    Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
    Happiness.

    11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments
    later in the same speech?

    When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

    Keep this moving — educate others.

    ReplyReply
  5. Art says: 5

    Go to https://www.iardc.org/ and enter Obama into search window. You will quickly see that neither of the Obamas are allowed to practice law.

    ReplyReply
  6. James Raider says: 6

    . . . . As the smoke puffed from the MSM distracts us, a critical truth surrounding this tragic event continues to smolder and should be recalled, Obama and Clinton were too absentminded and otherwise obsessed to consider the safety of America’s envoys, or to care.

    The Middle East, Libya in particular, was a cauldron. They knowingly left an Ambassador and his skeletal staff exposed. When will it become evident to his inattentive supporters and to the fence sitters that this President isn’t on the job?

    If Jarrett doesn’t care, it doesn’t get done.

    ReplyReply
  7. Zelsdorf Ragshaft III says: 7

    Someone explain why this is not treason.

    ReplyReply
  8. Skookum says: 8

    JR, fundraisers and get togethers with celebrities, there’s only so many hours in a day.

    ReplyReply
  9. james raider says: 9

    @Art: # 4,

    What a surprise, Obama, a part-time lecturer, . . . and still, a part-timer, only now it’s in the White House.

    In ’08, . . .

    ReplyReply
  10. In ’08, . . . the Media purposefully called Obama a PROFESSOR – which he was not.

    He had accomplished nothing, never held a job, no evidence that he could write, . . . why is he President?

    ReplyReply
  11. FAITH7 says: 11

    @Art#4 – Thank you Art! Excellent information!

    You should go to the Romney for President website and drop him a line in his comments section then mention this with the Link…he may not know about this and I am sure they would look into this…. more fuel for the liar fire…

    ReplyReply
  12. yes, now we know more, he is a fraud, and an impostor, and doesn’t care about the law,
    he told companies to break the law, that he would pay for their lawyers if they get sue,
    that is with tax payer money.

    ReplyReply
  13. Art says: 13

    @FAITH7: Done. I hope someone reads it and runs with it. Thanks

    ReplyReply
  14. Art
    you should watch tonight the debate,
    MITT ROMNEY MIGHT HIT HIM ON THE HEAD WITH IT,
    GREAT INFO,
    BYE

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site