It happened about 80 years ago. In Germany.
Sensing the political firestorm coming, democrats scrambled to insert God and Jerusalem back into their platform, having intially rejecting them.
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — Needled by Mitt Romney and other Republicans, Democrats hurriedly rewrote their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare Jerusalem the capital of Israel after President Barack Obama intervened to order the changes.
The embarrassing reversal was compounded by chaos and uncertainty on the convention floor, requiring three votes before a ruling that the amendments had been approved. Many in the audience booed the decision.
The episode exposed tensions on Israel within the party, put Democrats on the defensive and created a public relations spectacle as Obama arrived in the convention city to claim his party’s nomination for a second term.
The language in the party platform — a political document — does not affect actual U.S. policy toward Israel. The administration has long said that determining Jerusalem’s status is an issue that should be decided in peace talks by Israelis and Palestinians.
Obama intervened directly to get the language changed both on Jerusalem and to reinstate God in the platform, according to campaign officials who insisted on anonymity to describe behind-the-scenes party negotiations. They said Obama’s reaction to the omission of God from the platform was to wonder why it was removed in the first place.
Lederman and Pace may have Obama wondering why the language was removed in the first place, but Obama apparently did know about it and raised no objection.
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Two platform planks sparked division at the Democratic National Convention here Wednesday.
Things got so bad that President Barack Obama was forced to personally intervene, ordering language mentioning God and naming Jerusalem as the rightful capital of Israel be added.
Obama had seen the language prior to the convention, a campaign source said, but did not seek to change it until after Republicans jumped on the omissions of God and Jerusalem late Wednesday. And even then, it had to be forced through a convention hall full of delegates who nearly shouted down the change.
This wasn’t done out of any belief system. democrats at the convention booed the change and they have made it clear that they want nothing to do with God or Israel.
It was Mitt Romney.
Mitt Romney on Wednesday slammed the Democratic Party’s initial decision to remove from its platform a passage affirming Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, calling it just “one more example of Israel being thrown under the bus by the president.”
Romney — in an interview filmed before the Democrats restored both the word “God” and the passage about Jerusalem to the platform — told Fox News’s Carl Cameron that the omission of Jerusalem was a “very troubling development.”
“The president and his party have now changed their position. They now say that they’re not certain what the capital of Israel might be,” Romney said. “I find that one more example of Israel being thrown under the bus by the president. I think it’s a very sad day.”
Watch Dick Durbin melt down in denial.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KorGpTUVLkw[/youtube]
America finally has the opportunity to see what the democrat party is all about and what they believe.
It ain’t pretty.
And speaking of alternate realities:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzylMpPC3PQ[/youtube]
I leave you with democrats on an escalator
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XivNwQ76mCs[/youtube]
But really- who needs God when you have Obama?
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Redteam:
“There is no evidence that Obama is an evil person, but there is plenty of evidence that he is attempting to destroy America.”
Anyone trying to destroy America is EVIL!!!!! The man in my opinion is a trator to everything we should hold dear from out founding fathers on! His open disdain for our ideals is evil!!!!
drjohn
yes, it could not be clearer than that, and not the only clear proof given by himself,
and no other, who have just observed and notifye the AMERICANS TO BE AWARE OF IT, BECAUSE HIS CLOSE FRIENDS ARE COVERING and even lie to cover HIS GODLESS INTENT WHICH THE ACTIONS BEGAN EARLY AFTER
HIS 2008 PRESIDENT YEARS, AND ESCALATED THERE ON,
ON ALL FRONTS TO ELIMINATE GOD,
THAT IS REAL, and all those little bits can amount to the facts
I refer back to my earlier post along with what Drjohn says above in #108
“I have more than once likened this President to Hitler and his minions as well as his handlers in the Socialist left. I do this as I firmly believe he is every bit as rotten to the core as those people, just not at the point of genocide. One must always remember Hitler and others started out with rhetoric that people wanted to believe then in turn, threw the very people that first supported them under the bus, just as this President and his party have done here!”
Let’s expound on this just a bit more. Hitler was a great orator! He was able to mesmerize and dupe the German population. As it went his lies and deceit led to one of the most horrible occurrences in history, the Holacast. (and no, I’m not saying Obama is that evil, at least not yet). Obama is at times a great orator. He was able to meseorize a brain dead American electorate with openly blatant lies and the help of a co-opted media. Again just like Hitler and many other dictators. He and his party have openly shown their disdain towards not only Israel but in fact the basic ideals this country was founded on.
The Big Lie? Hitler! What do we have now? Barak Obama openly lying to the public, be it as to job figures, covering up in the Fast and Furious scadnal, Solyndra or whatever (and please note. Followers of this site know I rail against all scum politicians as to the lies).
He and his followers have openly embraced “a truth squad” to report to tehm bad things said about them. Sounds like the SS to me!
I could go on for hours here, but the point is a comparison to Hitler is what it is. FACT! In any of those comparisons I have seen surfing the web, I have yet to see one that compares Obama to Hitler as to the genocide he committed. So I really think the hoity toity “we are above this kind of rhetoric” need to get off their high horses.
The very fabric of our country is being destroyed by a leftist lackey (whether one likes it or not, who you surround yourself with along with one’s words and actions defines you!) who if one would get their heads out of the clouds and really look is using the same tactics countless dictators and leftist hacks have done in the past. The comparisons to Hitler are apt! Get used to it!
Anyone who accepts the lies and the course this country is being taken in is blind to reality. This man is every bit as dangerous as Hitler was! And as I said in my earlier post. If anyone is stupid enough to believe his embrace of the anti-Jewish sentiment being shown around the world is not going to come to their doorstep, then we are in fact done as the Greatest country ever. Lemmings awlays lose!!!
American Jews will never forget that the social CONSERVATIVES of BOTH parties refused to help them before WW II began. American Jews are one of the foirm bases of the modern Democratic Party. American Jews are liberals, and we all know how much the Right Wing hates liberals
@drjohn: I certainly have no use for Obama, except as a symbol of what we don’t need in this country.
@joetote: It’s all in definitions. He is certainly not a good person.
Who said Jews were smart? They’re helping da Furhrer (sp?) and when he completes his Islamification of America, guess what’s gonna happen. Oy vey! Oh, they know that? That’s part of their self-flagellation? Oh, OK, sorry.
JOHN
THE JEWISH AMERICANS ARE BETTER MOVE THEIR BUTTS AND RETHINK THEIR LIBERALISM VOTES, BECAUSE THEY CANNOT EXPECT NOTHING FROM THE DEMOCRATS WHO DON’T LIKE THEM,
AS OPPOSE TO THE REPUBLICANS DON’T LIKE THEIR VOTING FOR THE DEMOCRATS
THE REPUBLICANS DO NOT HATE THEM AS A PERSON,
THAT’S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEMOCRATS AND THE REPUBLICANS.
JUST LOOKING AT THE 3 TIMES ASKING THE PEOPLE IF THEY WANT TO INCLUDE GOD AND ISRAEL,
AND 3 TIMES ANSWERS, HALF DIVIDED,
THE JEWS ARE MORE SECURE TO VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY BECAUSE THE MARKET WILL OPEN AND THE USA WILL GET A GREAT BOOST WHICH WILL MAKE MANY COMPANIES TO COME BACK WHEN THEY KNOW TO BE DELIVERED FROM OBAMA AND AGENCIES AND LAWYERS WHO NOW ARE GETTING RICH WITH OBAMA , BY THE NEED OF THEM ON BOTH SIDE TO SETTLE A BREACKAGE OF HIS SO MULTIPLE REGULATION THAT IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO NOT BREAK SOME AND GET CAUGHT
BY THOSE AGENT HUNTING THE BUSYNESS AND THE PEOPLE FOR ANY TRANSGRESSION TO THEIR COMMUNIST IMPLEMENTATION.
AND THE JEWS ARE NOT IMMUNE FROM IT,
rumcrook
hi, nice to have you visit. don’t be so distant between visits,
on the gun walking fast and furious, I think they won’t let them get away with it,
they are not going any where, they will continue using their power to go all the way,
it seems that they caught the one who kill him, there should be more interrogations done on him.
bye
joetote
hi,
I was thinking since I read your comment,
this election is not about the person being a DEMOCRAT, OR A LIBERAL, OR A PROGRESSIVE, OR AN INDEPENDANT , OR A REPUBLICAN , OR A TEA-PARTYER , OR A CONSERVATIVE, OR A LIBERTARIAN,
OR A MILITARY, OR A PENTAGONE GENERAL, OR A JEWISH AMERICAN, OR A CATHOLIC ,
OR AN EVANGELICAL, OR AN ATHEIST, OR A NATIVE, OR A WHITE , OR A BLACK, OR A LATINO,
OR A CUBAN, OR A POLISH, OR AN ITALIAN, OR A BRITISH, OR A FRENCH, OR A DUTCH, OR A GERMAN,
OR A ROMANIAN, OR A RUSSIAN , OR A AFRICAN, OR AN ARAB, AND SO ON AND SO ON
IF YOU ARE AMERICAN THE OTHER ADJECTIVE TO YOUR UPBRINGNING DOESN’T MATTER YOU HAVE TO VOTE FOR NOT YOU BUT FOR AMERICA,
AND THIS ELECTION IS THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTE OF NOT 4 YEARS, NOT FOR YOU ALONE BUT FOR AMERICA BETTERNESS, AND THIS IS ONE TIME SHOT THIS TIME,
IT WAS SO MUCH REPEATED BY THE SMART PEOPLE, THOSE WHO KNOW, THOSE WHO LOVE AMERICA AND SEE THE DOWNFALL BEGINNING TO RAVAGE THE NATION,
THEY OBSEVERD THESE LAST FOUR YEARS, SLOWLY DEMOLISHING THE SPIRIT OF AMERICA, THEY WARN ALL AMERICANS WHO LIVE IN AMERICA AND THOSE WHO LIVE ABROAD TO VOTE FOR THE RIGHT PERSON AND HE IS NOT OBAMA,
HE IS MITT ROMNEY, AND YOU SHOULD KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BY NOW, THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE ONE WHO CLAIM IGNORANCE, NOW YOU MUST LET THE ONE IN POWER, GO, SO TO SAVE AMERICA SHE ASK FOR MEN AND WOMAN OF GOOD FAITH, NOT MEN AND WOMAN OF DIFFERENT OTHER COUNTRIES, BUT MEN AND WOMAN OF AMERICA TO VOTE FOR HER, SHE HAS CHOSEN THE BEST FOR YOU ALL AND HE WILL BRING THE NEEDS SHE AMERICA HAS BEEN FOUNDED FOR,
THAT IS FOR MEN AND WOMAN OF GOOD FAITH WHO LOVE AMERICA MOST OF ALL, AND DON’T WANT TO SEE AMERICA FALL IN THE PRECIPICE OF THOSE WHO WANT HER TO FALL.
The current GOP would likely run attack ads calling the biblical Jesus as a leftist impersonator, run the poor out of town, and and turn the temple over to the money lenders.
@joetote: joetote, and now that I’ve thought more about your comment, I got to thinking about ” Obama is at times a great orator.” well, yes and no. a person is perceived as a great orator if he makes a speech that is basically what the listener wants to hear. I can’t say he’s a great orator, or an orator of any type. an orator is defined as a person that delivers a speech. That would exclude almost everything I’ve seen Obama do. He gives public readings from a teleprompter. So I’d kinda put him in the ‘reader’ category, you determine if he is ‘great’ at that, or not. But, as to content. He says what the libs, radicals and far lefties want to hear. That’s why they think it’s ‘great’. and that is why I would feel it is anti-American. He says almost nothing that a patriotic American wants to hear. you said: ” He was able to meseorize a brain dead American electorate with openly blatant lies and the help of a co-opted media. ” I certainly agree with that. The co-opted media are complicit in the conspiracy, even today, that Obama is ahead in his bid to be re-elected. Much like in Wisconsin, when the media did all they could do to defeat Walker. It didn’t work, but they will work much harder to defeat Romney. The best thing Romney has going for him is that he is NOT Obama. I can not figure out why the media wants the demise of America. They will let Obama say any thing, make up lies and not point out any of them. In fact, they eagerly repeat what he says as if it is the truth. He will say that 350,000 people left the job market, and that 75,000 new jobs were created and that the unemployment rate went down. Is that believable? 275,000 less people working and unemployment went down? But that is only the tip of the iceberg. I could give those type examples all day long, but those that want to believe it will, and otherwise. So, whether it is fair to compare him with other dictators or not, the damage will be just as real. (issuing executive orders is dictatorial)
@Greg: Greg, so you’re trying to establish that it’s the GOP that is God-less, rather than the Dimocrats that openly decided they didn’t want God in their platform or lives. Do you work for the Lame stream media, by any chance? I don’t think Jesus was an advocate of stealing from your neighbor (as are the Dimocrats) (taking from them what they have earned without having anyone’s permission to do so, is stealing) Somehow, I don’t think if he were around today that Jesus would be on the side of the Dimocrats. He would advocate that persons attempt to help themselves, but not by stealing from their neighbors (as Dims believe)
Redteam
you know, I LOOK AGAIN ON FOX THE REPLAY OF 9/11, THEY ARE SEEING PEOPLE JUMP OUT,
AND CRASH TO THEIR DEATH, AND I’M SO ANGRY, WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THE MUSLIM TO COME IN AMERICA AND EMIGRATE AND BUILD MOSQUE RIGHT THERE,
WHAT WHERE YOU THINKING OBAMA? TO OPEN THE BORDERS FOR THEM.
LOOK WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO THE AMERICANS,
YOU DON’T DESERVE TO BE PRESIDENT,
AMERICA IS WOUNDED TO IT’S CORE, AND WILL NEVER RECOVER FROM THAT WOUND,
@Greg:
I take it that you went to the same religious seminary that Obama did? The one where Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, for he knows best how to spend your money and care for the poor.”
Ah, the Jesus would be a liberal meme.
Hey greg, he would be strongly against the murder of the unborn and the loose morals liberals display.
So spare us the spin even you know is BS.
@ilovebeeswarzone: Indeed, Bees.
@Hard Right, #124:
The Republican Jesus may have told his followers at what specific point a developing fetus becomes an ensouled human being, but the biblical Jesus never did. (In the days of our founding father’s, it was generally presumed to be at the point known as the quickening, not at the point of conception.)
He actually did have quite a lot to say about our obligations to the poor and about the extreme spiritual peril of devoting one’s life to the pursuit of money. Apparently many such clearly stated, unambiguous comments have been redacted from the Republican Jesus’s version of the New Testament.
Sometimes the right’s holier-than-thou certainty that their agenda is God’s own agenda wears a bit thin.
@Greg:
Did He talk about individual obligation to the poor or that of government and coerced help through wealth redistribution?
Are religious Christians in America more charitable or less charitable than secular liberals?
How about these Commandments:
Secular and liberal are not synonyms.
As has been mentioned previously, the right does not own religion; nor–contrary to a statement recently made at the Republican National Convention–does the right own America.
It might be well for those who seem to have raised capitalist doctrine to the level of holy text to consider the two commandments you’ve cited as well. Theft can be and frequently is accomplished while remaining within the letter of the law; coveting appears to be one of capitalism’s driving forces. Businesses spend billions of dollars annually encouraging people to covet.
@Greg: ” Secular and liberal are not synonyms.” Are you sure? I think liberal is the noun and secular is the adjective. and this: “, it was generally presumed to be at the point known as the quickening, not at the point of conception” so you think Jesus would split hairs? Let’s see, if that’s correct it wouldn’t matter if Mary was a virgin because the baby was created later on, not as a result of the union of the mother/father but as a totally independent act. How novel to think that humans are created as a result of quickening and not conception. Secular Libs can find all kinds of ways to justify killing babies, I don’t think Jesus would be so generous. and then this: “the right does not own religion” I agree, but they usually practice it regularly as differentiated from the radical libs. How many times has Obama been in a church since his buddy ”’God Damned America” ? How many Conservative ministers do you hear publicly damning America? Greg, this is one you’re not gonna win. And do you really want to prove that you are more secular than the average American?
@Redteam, #129:
Presumably you realize that an Oath of Vengeance against the nation of the United States of America was an official part of the LDS endowment ritual until its removal in 1920.
@Redteam:
Re: Secular and liberal are not synonyms.
Actually, I’m going to have to agree with Greg on this one. One shouldn’t confuse the proper meaning of words with those who claim them as monikers.
Secular:
Liberal:
Democrats have given up on being liberal a long time ago to instead embrace a form of secular socialism, and as with many historical socialist movements, they have adopted an increasing open hostility towards religion. They are no longer worthy of being called “liberals” as they are decidedly illiberal with anything that is not compatible with their far-left ideology.
@Greg:
I agree; which is why I did not affirm that they are synonymous.
You mean like government stealing from the rich to redistribute to the poor?
But to covet what others have? To encourage jealousy? Wealth envy? To take from others? To take without earning? Are you sure?
“Covet” is not a word I’d use to describe a motivating factor of capitalism.
Greed and the pursuit of self-interest is good, btw. When wealth-makers are hurt- when they are less wealthy, how does that help “the poor and struggling”? How does it make lives better for everyone if there are less “rich folk” in the world?
The pursuit of self-interest does not require that one be greedy. Like selfishness–which some people wish to raise to the level of a virtue–greed is a character defect. These words describe attitudes that stand in the way of personal happiness, and lead to behaviors that decrease the general level of happiness in the world.
@Greg:
I see you have reduced yourself to bigotry. Your intolerance is showing.
What shows is that some people choose to ignore inconvenient details, and become angry and defensive when they’re mentioned.
An historical Oath of Vengeance against a nation, recent enough that it has yet to disappear from all living memory, for example; or the matter of an Oath of Allegiance that might constitute a conflict of interest . . .
Apparently one is a bigot for simply wondering if such things matter at all. Do they?
Greg, if you want an example of blatant greed, I suggest you look no farther than the Chicago Teacher’s Union who walked out on 400,000 kids today.
While the average salary in Chicago of person who holds a BA is $48,000K/yr, the extremely obese leader of the CTU, Karen Lewis, earned a base salary of $89,859.00 last year for 9 months work, and is actually insulted with a 16% increase in pay. You see, Chubby Karen thinks she is worth 30% over the next two years and another 20% for the two years after that.
If we were to look at the poor through your eyes, struggling just to put food on the table and work menial jobs to pay the rent, then we can only assume that Karen Lewis, devoted Democrat, is an example of what the Democrats really believe. She feels not the pain of those parents, although she will quickly tell you that she wants a 50% pay increase “for the children.”
The mask is coming off the left wing and what we are seeing, that has been hidden for so long by a complicit media, is not pretty.
@Ditto: yea,, whatever you said. I do basically agree that Liberals are not really liberal. I think socialist radicals is probably more accurate
@retire05: 05, excellent comments. Of course chubby Karen is doing it ‘for the good of the kids’. The city will fold, Emanuel is not about to tic off the union enough to turn against obama. (that’s not possible anyhow) This is just a public show and it is only a matter of time til the city caves and gives them even more than is now on the table.
Greg has certainly made the case for his bigotry. What does the doctrine of a legally organized church in the USA have to do with the philosophy of a presidential candidate? That’s just an attempt to use racism as a tool against Romney. Strange how it’s not supposed to apply to Obama and the Black Theology of his church. Greg said: “greed is a character defect.” and he’s correct and it certainly applies to those Socialist radicals in Chicago.
@Greg:
The 1920’s eh?
I believe that you Dims were openly supporting the KKK during that time period right?
The difference is, of course, that the Mormon church mended its’ ways.
The other difference is that there’s not one iota of evidence that Romney ever took, or subscribed to, such an oath. We do know for sure, however, that Obie has openly embraced and spoken positively about Rev Wright. We also know for sure that Obie sat in Wright’s church listening to his sermons for twenty plus years.
@Aye, #140:
To be perfectly clear, I was referring to an Oath of Allegiance in connection with Mr. Romney.
The Vengeance Oath was removed from the LDS endowment ritual and hasn’t been sworn since 1919.
Greg, are you going to address the “greed” of the Chicago Teacher’s Union members? I thought you progressives were all about “for the children.”
Guess not.
@retire05: 05, I’m sure he’s working on his response as we wait. He sure backtracked on comment 141. Kinda hard to link someone to a policy that was in effect only up until 1919, just shortly after the Repubs did away with the Dimocrats slavery policy in 1865 (or thereabouts), but we can all be sure if the Repubs hadn’t done away with it, the dims would still be supporting it.
@Greg:
How true, how true.
Kind of like you ignoring that although Jesus did talk about helping and defending the poor, and indeed, came to us as a poor man himself, and remained one until his death, he did not advocate for government to take more and more from the people in order to help those poor.
Or that Jesus preached to defend those “who are the least amongst us”, and protect those who cannot protect themselves. While you may think you have some insight as to what Jesus would have said about abortion, the fact is that you haven’t a clue.
The irony of you blathering on about the “right” acting ‘holier than thou’, at the same time that you are presenting a ‘holier than thou’ attitude in your comments, is quite amusing. It is also typical of a liberal/progressive rant, accusing the opposition of doing exactly as they(or you) are doing.
@Greg:
And so, since it’s been gone since 1919 or so, you just randomly, coincidentally I’m sure, just happened to bring that matter up in conversation right? Mmm..hmmm… yeah…
The reality is that you were trying to smear and besmirch Romney by bringing up something negative about his religion.
You can always, always, always be counted on to bring up something negative about Romney’s religion. It’s your modus operandi and everyone here can see you coming from miles away.
Congratulations on that.
@Redteam, #143:
I only pointed out the fact that until 1919 Mitt Romney’s church included a formal Oath of Vengeance against the nation of the United States of America as part of its temple endowment ritual. I’m glad that doesn’t give you pause. I’m sure you’ll also be pleased to know that graphic references to throat cutting, tearing out of the heart, and disembowelment were removed from the Penalty Oaths from 1921 to 1927, and that the Death Oaths were eliminated entirely in–uh–1990.
The self-righteous right should really lay off the religious attacks on Obama and his supporters. We’re all living in glass houses of one sort or another, and stones thrown can always be thrown back.
@Greg:
Right on!
Wait. Is this like the “civility for thee, but not for me” that the left is always preaching about?
@Aye, #145:
Why, then, don’t people kindly refrain from belittling the religious views and religious sincerity of those on the left, and from attacking Obama on matters of religion? Such attacks seem to be running in regular rotation around here. The only thing at issue seems to be whether he’s into radical black liberation theology, or a secret Muslim extremist.
@Greg:
There’s a difference?
Seriously, though, Obama was part of Rev. Wright’s congregation. Romney wasn’t even born at the time you are criticizing the Mormon religion. You cannot even link the two ideas with any relevancy, and still claim to command integrity on the subject.
Then again, I cannot recall the last time you commanded any sort of integrity on a subject.
Greg the anti-religious bigot rears his head again.
You ducked the issue greg. Jesus would not be for the murder of the unborn and you know it.
Not at any point in the pregnancy. You and your ilk worship murder of the unborn since kids tend to get in the way of your selfishness and narcissism. Jesus would not be a leftist. Period.
@Greg: Ok Greg, “I only pointed out the fact that until 1919 Mitt Romney’s church included a formal Oath of Vengeance against the nation of the United States of America as part of its temple endowment ritual.” So I’ll remind you that until 1865 the Dimocrats had a United States Policy of slavery. Are you prepared to state that is equivalent to today’s dimocrats still favoring slavery? Seems as if you want to hold Romney accountable for a policy that was dead before he was even born, then you must also hold current Dimocrats responsible for something before they were born also. Do you also want to hold Obama accountable because the muslims have a destruction policy toward the US and, as far as we all know, Obama is now and has been a muslim? Seems fair. Do you think Romney is supporting a policy of throat cutting, tearing out hearts and disembowelments? If so, of whom? Do you think obama supports slavery? If so, for whom?
Greg may be very well aligned with Obama team member Laurence De Palma’s anti-Mormon whisper campaign.
This is not the first time that Democrats have tried to use anti-Mormon bigotry against Romney in a political campaign: Ted Kennedy’s Anti-Mormon Moment and Anti-Mormon campaign slams Romney
The Chronicle asks: “Will Obama and the Democrats Play the Mormon Card?” The answer (with Greg jumping on the bandwagon,) is clearly “Yes!”
Democrats Have Bigger Anti-Mormon Problem in Election Than GOP Has
Anti-Mormon bias persists, notably among Democrats
@Ditto: Ditto: shhhhh…. it’s supposed to be a whisper campaign….
GREG
who give you the right to judge the comments and equate it with vicious attacks,
you do that all the time and on anyone, you don’t comment but you look for an anti comment
to be the one who claim to balance the debate,
nobody gave you that job, and you forget that this is a conservative blog
and no one want to know about your negative comments
you are getting to comfortable and forget your limit,
this vengeance law is proving that you and your side will use the lowest reply to win, it make you all dangerous to be in charge of this USA FOR 4 MORE YEARS, BECAUSE OF THE ABUSE IN YOUR ACTIONS TO KEEP THE POWER WHICH HAS BEEN DELEGATE ON YOU OUT OF GOOD WILL BUT YOU TURNED THIS POWER IN TOTAL FAILURE AND DIVIDE THE GOOD PEOPLE WITH THE MOST NEGATIVE LAWS TO USE HATRED,WHICH THIS COUNTRY NEVER EXPERIENCE FROM WITHIN HIS BOUNDARIES
THIS ON ALL FRONT AND ISSUE,
THIS IS THE ANTI LEADERSHIP BECAUSE YOUR SIDE LACK
THE KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY TO KNOW THE TOOLS ON SERVING THIS COUNTRY, YOU HAVE NEGATIVELY FORCE THIS NATION INTO RULES AND REGULATIONS UNFIT FOR A FREE COUNTRY LIKE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
AND TO CONSOLIDATE YOUR POWER OVER THIS PEOPLE YOUR SIDE ALLOWED THE ENTRY OF HUMANS WHO HATE AMERICA SO TO JOIN YOUR SIDE AND TAKE THE PLACE OF THE AMERICAN SUBTLY BUT SURELY, LIKE A GIANT SNAKE CRAWLING IN AND EXPANDING HIS TERRITORY BY
DESTROYING THOSE IN THE WAY OF HIS AIM TO TAKE OVER THE WHOLE NATION, UNSEEN BUT GROWING
YOU PORTRAIT THE REAL INTENT OF YOUR SIDE THE OBAMA DEMOCRATS BY ALL YOUR REPLY HERE UNDERNEATH HIDDEN WORDS WHICH TELL ALL THE AGENDA ADVANCING THE DESTRUCTIVE END OF THIS AMERICA AS SHE WAS FOUNDED
BY THE FRAMERS, WHICH HAVE FOR-SEEN THIS DANGER AND MADE PROVISIONS IN THEIR CONSTITUTION TO FIGHT ANY ONE WHO WANT TO REDUCE THIS NATION INTO SLAVERY, AND GAVE THE ULTIMATE POWER TO THE PEOPLE TO VOTE THEM OUT IN A PEACEFUL REPAIR OF THE WAY
TO MAKE THE TYRAN USURPER GO DOWN AND NEVER BE ALLOWED TO RETURN,
ALL THIS BY THE POWER GIVEN TO THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE,
Redteam
hi,
we are back on track, our comments are coming home again,
thank you CURT AGAIN.
@ilovebeeswarzone: Thanks for your help with this. It’ll make it easier
Sorry bout that…I turned off the comment notifier a few days ago to help lessen the load on the server during a spike and forgot to turn it back on.
CURT
YOU must have been also busy at work, beside us at FA,
THANK’S AGAIN FOR FIXING IT FOR US,
BYE