4 Sep

The question to which the media dares not seek an answer [Reader Post]

                                       

Barack Obama has had one unchanging personal goal- to alter America. He wants to change America

Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.

He wants to remake America:

“we’ve begun the work of remaking America.”

Most frightening of all, Obama wants to “transform America”

“We are 5 days from fundamentally transforming America”

YouTube Preview Image

Change America. Transform America. Remake America.

The question is- into what?

It is the question the answer to which the media dares not seek.

And the answer, as noted by Dinesh D’Sousa, is into a socialist state- regardless of what Obama asserts.

In his movie 2016 D’Sousa notes with no small irony that Obama’s book is titled Dreams From My Father, not Dreams Of My Father. This strongly suggests that the father’s dreams are the dreams of the son. Barack Obama Sr. was a Marxist.

All of Obama Jr.’s mentors were Communists, Marxists and Socialists: Frank Marshall Davis, Roberto Unger, Bill Ayers, Edward Said.

A murderer’s row of anti-Americans.

One cannot possibly be steeped in such an anti-American milieu for so long and not have it soak into your soul.
Yet you can mask it with a smile. That smile allows the main stream media to deny what is right before their eyes- this country elected its first socialist while thinking it was making a cultural statement. Obama knew he was playing them and all he had to do was smile.

The media ignored his history. They ignored his upbringing. They ignored his environment. They saw what they wanted to see- a racial Messiah.

YouTube Preview Image

They are still in denial. Were they to ask the proper questions now would be to expose themselves to the racism assault that greets every single criticism of Obama.

Obamacare was not so much a reform of health care as it is government control of 17% of the economy.

It’s all there- the slogan “Forward” was adopted from Stalin, “spread it around,” “fairness” (Lenin’s campaign theme).

Obama said it himself:

“You know, if you look at the victories and failures of the civil-rights movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it, I’d be okay, but the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.

And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from that.”

The Framers decided what government could not do to you, but Obama wants the opposite- he wants government to be able to force you to do things.

And here it is again

You know, I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. The institution just isn’t structured that way. [snip] You start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues, you know, in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time. You know, the court is just not very good at it, and politically, it’s just very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard.

So I think that, although you can craft theoretical justifications for it, legally, you know, I think any three of us sitting here could come up with a rationale for bringing about economic change through the courts.”

Redistributive change.

Socialism.

Liberals are drooling at the possibility of seeing the fruits of those who work on their dinner table but without the work- liberals such as Peggy Joseph:

YouTube Preview Image

Bankers? They’re Obama’s financial useful idiots.

In 2016 Dinesh D’Sousa interviewed an elderly man from Barack Obama Sr’s village- a man who knew both Obama Sr. and Obama Jr. When asked if they shared the same philosophies, the man held up his hand with one forefinger extended and said

“They are one.”

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on America.

About DrJohn

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.
This entry was posted in Anti-Americanism, Ayers, Barack Obama, Deception and Lies, Liberal Idiots, Media, MSM Bias, Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome, Politics, Socialism, Socialized Health Care and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Tuesday, September 4th, 2012 at 7:00 am
| 815 views

13 Responses to The question to which the media dares not seek an answer [Reader Post]

  1. mathman says: 1

    Of course the media does not want this question answered.
    The members of the media are unable to understand that Obama has made their profession a client of White House politics. The members of the media are not journalists anymore. They are just news readers for the 5 AM note from Axelrod.
    To answer this question would require admitting their own bias. And the representatives of the media are progressive. They are believers. They think government solves all ills. They are ignorant of history, and have no idea how the United States became great. They think the US became great because of government programs. They give no credit whatever to individual initiative. By and large, the members of the media are unfamiliar with private enterprise. They do not start businesses. They do not act as entrepreneurs.
    To the members of the media this is a non-question, because the answer is obvious.
    Of course history is also obvious: big government always fails. Every time. 4,000 years of failure.
    But it is impossible to argue with true believers.

    ReplyReply
  2. Nan G says: 2

    When Obama has to he mouths the words, ”I will work more WITH the Republicans to get things done.”
    But, look at the context.
    Even in the same speeches where Obama says things like that he adds that he is more prepared than ever before to ”workaround” the Legislative Branch to get his own agenda foisted on the people.
    http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/30/what-he-knows-now-obama-on-popularity-partisanship-and-getting-things-done-in-washington/

    Obama’s own past and his own words even now condemn him as the redistributionist he really always was.
    But note from his own personal example that Animal Farm tendency: Some animals are more equal than others….
    Obama always used to take those extra tokes when the spliff was going around.
    Obama has never spared himself either fine foods or fine trips on our dime, either.
    His cut of the redistribution pie will always be quite a bit bigger than poor ”useful idiot” Peggy who just wants her bills paid.

    ReplyReply
  3. liberal1(objectivity) says: 3

    This is a ridiculous propaganda article, with so many errors (which is typical of propaganda) it would take too long to rationally critique, and wouldn’t be worth it since it’s questionable whether the people on this site can distinguish fact from fiction—if this kind of article is the style which the readership desires.

    ReplyReply
  4. Nan G says: 4

    Michelle Obama has created a ”grocery shopping 101″ page on some site.
    Seems she wants us to buy our frozen, cold and fresh stuff first THEN go around and get our canned goods, staples and soaps or other non-perishibles!
    Dumb!
    Especially dumb if you have to get them home on a bus or mass transit.
    She opines that you (YOU!) should avoid the cookie, soft drink and snacks aisles ”at all costs.”
    Now for the irony……
    The Obamas use professional shoppers.
    Barack Obama INSISTS on Coca Cola!
    See the last 4 paragraphs here:
    http://news.investors.com/politics-andrew-malcolm/090412-624395-michelle-obama-democratic-national-convention-speech.htm?p=2

    Does the mainstream media ever expose the utter hypocrisy of the ”do-as-I-say,-not-as-I-do,” Obamas?
    I don’t think Investor’s Business Daily qualifies as part of the Mainstream Media.
    So, waiting…..

    ReplyReply
  5. retire05 says: 5

    Dr. John, I have to disagree with you on one thing; the intent of the media.

    It was not that the media didn’t know Obama’s background, or his goal to “transform” America. They, the leftist press, knew, but to share it with the rest of the nation through their works would have cratered any hope of getting Obama elected, and that was the primary goal.

    Look at who reports the news for a great portion of the U.S., the alphabet networds, the tradionally left wing press like the NYSlimes and the LASlimes, weekly publications like Time. These are people who got where they are because they walked lockstep with their publishers, who are almost, to a person, far left wing. Pinch Sulzberger is a noted Fabian Socialist. For those that actually attended journalism school at universities, those journalism schools are hot beds of radical, left wing thought. Think Walter Duranty and Walter Cronkite.

    Years of the leftist press telling the American public that they deserve the fruits of another’s labor in spite of the fact that one does nothing to advance their own opportunities, had reached its goal of electing a man with a true Socialist/Communist background and who walked with that press in their own philosophy. Just like Walter Duranty hid the atrocities of Russia, while singing the praises of the Russian government, it has become the norm, not the exception.

    ReplyReply
  6. retire05 says: 6

    @liberal1(objectivity):

    Since you want to dispute what is actually in front of you, why don’t you prove what is wrong with the article? Or is it because you know that your position is so weak you cannot defend it? And of course, like all progressives, you decide that even if you did dispute the article with your own spin on it, conservatives are just too stupid to see the truth as you present it.

    Like I said before, you’re going to have a really hard time defending The Won this year. Even if past actions are not taken into account, Obama’s actions as POTUS show nothing but abstract failure on the part of a man who, although Constitutionally qualified for the office he now holds, was never personally qualified except that he fulfilled the dream of every left winged Socialist in the nation.

    ReplyReply
  7. Common Sense says: 7

    @liberal1(objectivity): OK idiot, point out the errors, I certainly won’t believe you because you said it.

    ReplyReply
  8. drjohn says: 8

    @liberal1(objectivity): Hey, feel free to find errors and not differences of opinion. Liberals confuse the two.

    But you know what really frightens me? Obama promising to ” finish” the job.

    ReplyReply
  9. retire05 says: 9

    Seems Liberal1 is doing his “disappearing man” act again.

    ReplyReply
  10. Randy says: 10

    Liberal 1 is just another Peggy! Anyone who read George Orwell’s Animal Farm can see the similarities. Orwell studied the creeping socialism into Europe and warned everyone with his novel. No one listened. The US still has a chance despite the “chickens” like Liberal 1! For those less read liberals, Orwell’silly chickens kept repeating thse meaningless slogans like “forward”, “Hope and Change”.

    ReplyReply
  11. Smorgasbord says: 11

    There’s a difference between “ignoring” something and being a part of it. When the media propagandizes for the democrats, they are a part of the socialist movement. Haven’t they figured out that if the liberals get what they want, the media will report what the government tells them? Then, the government will be the only thing we all belong to.

    ReplyReply
  12. Aqua says: 12

    @liberal1(objectivity):
    Usually I find that Dr. J tends to get a bit carried away in his articles. I didn’t see that in this article. It’s pretty tough to refute the information provided when it comes from Obama’s own words. I for one would certainly like to see you try.

    ReplyReply
  13. FAITH7 says: 13

    Liberal/Democratic/Progressive – Media = Useful Idiots….
    …..FOR the Liberal/Democratic/Progressive – Administration and Politicians living in the Washington DC Bubble….

    Obama and Company will kick them ALL to the curb just as soon as they are no longer “Useful”!!

    This is what happens when you hang with snake oil salesmen….or better yet – poisonous snakes…. they can and will “turn on you” in a heart beat…and will not feel any empathy….

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site