Special Op Forces & Intelligence Officials Speak Out Against Obama’s Intelligence Leaks

Loading

Brand new video out from those who really DID kill Osama:

“Mr. President, you did not kill Osama bin Laden, America did. The work that the American military has done killed Osama bin Laden. You did not,”

“As a citizen, it is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking information to the enemy, it will get Americans killed.”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-Xfti7qtT0[/youtube]

Not one iota of information should of been leaked. Not the unit name, not the unit type. Not even the branch involved. I doubt even Carter or Clinton would of done this but to this narcissistic loser and his pals it’s no big deal. Eh, what if it gets people killed. ‘It still makes me look cool’

They have every right to be angry.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
63 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Greg:On other threads in the past you said “he kicked OBL out of this world” or “he took out OBL when Bush had 8 years to do it” etc., but on this thread you admitted he was playing golf. Which is it?

Osama bin Laden was eliminated, and Obama successfully performed the part of that that goes with a Commander in Chief’s job description. So says the Navy Commander who was central to the mission. That’s good enough for me.

@Greg: Just like I said: You lefties believe that the end always justifies the means. You simplify issues and then are always surprised at the unintended consequences that arise. A good CIC tries to minimize the unintended consequences because the people he is trying to protect or lead usually get hurt when he doesn’t consider those unintended consequences. This whole thread has been about Obama as the CIC failing to live up to the responsibilities of his job as CIC by considering the unintended consequences of using the OBL leak and other leaks for personal political. I hope Greg that you live long enough to understand this principle. With the popularity of simple solutions to complex problems, it is likely you will one day be a victim of the liberal unintended consequences.

@Greg:

Umm yeah. I recall you blasting Bush for ignoring the advice of his generals. Then you accuse Romney of draft dodging. Again you show how willing you are to lie and say anything to defend the left. I would call you a dem whore, but whores do it for money and even they have limits and self respect—-unlike you.

@Greg:

Of course I have. On numerous occasions I have described in graphic detail how Obama dropped down a line from a hovering helicopter with a KA-BAR clenched between his teeth, and bested Osama bin Laden in a single combat match to the death.

Without spoiling the plot, does he appear in “The Expendables 2”?

@ Greg
The real problem the Left has is that EVERYTHING that can be used to further an agenda will be used. The Left has never bought in to the Global War on Terror. Renaming it doesn’t change either its scope or its threat to the West. Gen.Jones put up with the amateurish and petty sophomoric behavior of Obama’s inner circle as long as he could before resigning. In the wake of Gen. Jones’ departure, Tom Donilon, lifer Demo party hack with no, absolutely NO experience outside of counting heads for the Carter and Mondale campaigns and the looting of Fannie Mae, is running the NSA. His comments to the press after the Bin Laden raid compelled an angered SECDEF Gates to confront Donilon in front of staff and emphatically tell him to STFU. Like the rest of the Obama WH, Donilon is not qualified to hear, much less determine policy involving a shooting war. The stupidity, arrogance and complete disregard for the safety of one of America’s greatest assets, its Special Operations Command, beggars description. That he should be involved in further leaks effecting the security of the war effort is criminal and reeks of perfidy and treason.

@brian winkler, #56:

So how do we explain Admiral McRaven’s totally different assessment? Is Admiral McRaven some sort of incompetent, left-leaning hack, who’s totally unmindful of the Obama administration’s “stupidity, arrogance and complete disregard for the safety of one of America’s greatest assets”–that asset being the very one that McRaven himself commands?

I don’t think so.

Donilon, by the way, isn’t running the NSA. Donilon is the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor. The head of the NSA is always a high ranking military officer.

@Liberal1 (objectivity): ………Liberal1 (objectivity) says:15 @Sua Sponte: Sorry to mention this, but you’re talking to a war vet right now. …….Playing Call of Duty doesn’t count…

@ Greg
Adm.McRaven’s statements are like those of any ranking officer, tempered by political consideration. Mullins,Petraeus,Casey, Allen all made statements supportive of the WH. Gen. McChrystal did the opposite. Flag grade officers are all subject to politics within the culture of their branch of service and elected government. Donilon had and has unfettered access to the POTUS and undermined Gen. Jones. Gen. Jones was trying to operate effectively and was sandbagged by the Obama’s inner circle civilian advisors. He was relegated to figure head status while the four or five advisors closest to Obama RAN the NSA through their input and proximity to Obama. Donilon is no different than the rest of Obama’s cadre. Personal political philosophy and loyalty to Obama are of greater value than actual, real world experience. What real world experience qualifies Power,Tomlinson, Brennan, Jarrett and Donilon et al. to formulate policy decisions that send the military into harm’s way.

@brian winkler: Well Greg? Looks like your credability is on the line again. Woops, what credability!

Gen. Jones was trying to operate effectively and was sandbagged by the Obama’s inner circle civilian advisors. He was relegated to figure head status while the four or five advisors closest to Obama RAN the NSA through their input and proximity to Obama.

General Jones was never charged with running the NSA either.

The NSA is the National Security Agency. Not to be confused with National Security Advisor, a position in the Executive Branch, which was the job that General Jones held. The National Security Advisor is appointed by the President, requires no confirmation vote, and remains only so long as the President wishes. As the title suggests, he or she works in an advisory capacity. Appointment does not confer decision making authority, either in the DoD or the Department of State.

@Greg: Only a fool fails to listen to advisors. Guess who is a fool!

General McChrystal’s staff thought that General Jones fit that description, as I recall. I believe the description they used was “a clown”.

An advisor gives advice. A president makes the decisions.