The Mitt Romney Obama’s lapdog press doesn’t want you to know [Reader Post]

Loading

Mitt Romney has been called a “vulture capitalist” and even a “murderer” by Obama sycophants and the press does little to disabuse voters of it. CJ gave us ten reasons for liberals to hate Mitt Romney and I’d like to expand even more on that. There’s a lot more to Mitt Romney than the Obama press allows.


The Bain Story
– the real one

Given the political controversy over private equity and Mitt Romney’s tenure at Bain Capital, it’s worth taking time to ask, how did Bain Capital perform for its investors?

To get some perspective, it’s first worth acknowledging that the average private equity firm has delivered better returns to its investors than those investors would have earned in the stock market. In a recent paper, Bob Harris, Tim Jenkinson, and I estimate that $1 invested in a private equity fund delivered 20 percent more than $1 invested in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.1 In our sample alone, the outperformance works out to more than $120 billion in additional value to investors. This performance benefited the pension funds, endowments, and other limited partners that invested over this period.

Even in an industry with such strong performance, Bain Capital stood out. During Romney’s tenure, the firm raised five private equity or buyout funds. All five outperformed the typical private equity fund. Four of the five were well into the top quartile of performance.

In other words, Bain Capital and Romney delivered strong results for their customers, better than other private equity firms that on average outperformed the public markets. Today, those customers include the California State Teachers’ Retirement System and the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.

Bain Capital also made venture capital investments from other funds in start-ups and other earlier stage companies that are not included in the performance measure mentioned above. Those venture capital investments included successful investments in Staples, Sports Authority, and Gartner Group.

How many jobs did Bain create?

Among Bain Capital’s investments under Romney, the large job creators are clearly Staples and Sports Authority. Both of these were small, young companies when Bain Capital invested in them. Bain invested in Staples when it had only one store, so there were likely fewer than 200 employees at the time. Bain appears to have invested in the Sports Authority when it had fewer than ten stores. Unfortunately, there are no public data to say how many people were employed at that time. At the end of 1998, Staples had more than 42,000 employees, Sports Authority had almost 14,000, Gartner Group had almost 3,000, and Steel Dynamics had over 500. So at the beginning of 1999, when Romney left Bain Capital, these four companies alone employed almost 60,000 total employees. While some of the job growth at Sports Authority came from acquisitions, there is no doubt that these four companies created tens of thousands of jobs over the period.

Fast forward to today. By the end of 2011, Staples had about 89,000 employees. Sports Authority is now a private company. The last time it reported employee numbers, in 2006, it had 14,300 employees. In addition, Gartner Group had over 4,400 and Steel Dynamics had over 6,000 employees. Using the most recently available data, these four companies alone employed almost 125,000 total employees.

Bain Capital also successfully turned around several existing businesses during Romney’s tenure. For example, Bain Capital bought Wesley Jessen Vision Care for $6 million in 1994. It had been a division of Schering Plough and was not profitable. Bain Capital and a new CEO turned it around and sold it to Ciba Geigy for over $300 million in 2001. When it was sold, it appears to have had 2,600 employees. Today, the company is part of Ciba Vision.

Overall, then, the companies Bain Capital funded under Romney have created tens of thousands of jobs using any measure.

Mitt Romney gave away his entire inheritance to charity

When Mitt Romney’s father passed away in 1995, he left an inheritance to Mitt totaling $1 million. Romney turned around and donated that inheritance money to Brigham Young University for the George W. Romney School of Public Management. This is an institute of public management that helps young people learn about government and about serving in public service.

The money goes to economically disadvantaged students wishing to purse a higher education in the field of public management and government.

Romney took no salary as Governor of Massachusetts

When Romney was asked by state leaders and prominent member in the state of Mass. to run for governor because their state had a $3 BILLION deficit while having the highest unemployment rate in the country; Romney not only said he would take on the task, but when he did win the election he refused to take the $135,000 annual salary his entire term as governor.

Ann and Mitt Romney have given tens of millions away:

Presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney amassed a fortune now worth an estimated $230 million during his career with Bain Capital. He would be wealthier still had he not set aside a trust for his five children in 1995, worth $100 million today. Also making a considerable dent in the former governor’s fortune has been his consistent charitable giving.

Mitt and Ann Romney have given over $13 million to their Tyler Foundation charity

Since the Tyler Foundation began making grants in 2000, its annual disbursements have averaged approximately $650,000 per year. The foundation’s most active years were 2003 and 2008, with approximately $2 million given away in each. In 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, the foundation hit its average, donating $650,000.

All told, Mitt and Ann Romney have doled out over $7 million via the Tyler Charitable Foundation. And although last year’s annual tax disclosure won’t be publicly available until this coming November, I would wager that the Romneys kept the pace in 2011, and that figure is now around $8 million. As of the 2010 disclosure, the Tyler Charitable Foundation had assets of more than $10 million.

So where does all the money go? From AIDs Action to the Wright Museum, Romney’s charities of choice are diverse; in fact, through 2010 the Tyler Foundation had made grants to nearly 100 distinct organizations. Many of the donations have gone to youth programs or health related charities. Of the bunch, the following are Mitt Romney’s top 10 favorite philanthropic targets in terms of total dollars awarded by the Tyler Foundation since 2000:

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints: $4,781,000
2. Brigham Young University: $525,000
3. The United Way: $177,000
4. Right to Play: $111,500
5. The George W. Bush Library: $100,000
6. Operation Kids: $85,000
7. Center For Treatment of Pediatric MS: $75,000
8. Harvard Business School: $70,000
9. City Year: $65,000
10. Deseret International: $50,000
11. Weber State University: $50,000

Romney has given away three times what Barack Obama is worth. Well, net worth, anyway.

Romney shut Bain down to search for a friend’s daughter

“As the days went by and her parents, Robert and Lynette Gay, grew more and more frantic, they finally told Mr. Gay’s partners at the private equity-investment firm Bain Capital. A few hours later, executives of the Boston-based firm were on the shuttle to New York for a huge volunteer effort, harnessing corporate manpower throughout the city and immersing professional baby boomers in a youth party culture many knew nothing about. …

“Bain Capital’s partners closed down the firm and drew on friendships and connections to find volunteers for the search. R.R. Donnelly, the firm’s printer, printed more than 300,000 fliers bearing Ms. Gay’s picture and last known whereabouts. Duane Reade, a drugstore chain in which Bain Capital is an investor, had clerks at 52 stores insert fliers in shopping bags. …”

The NY Times sort of forgot that Bain was Romney’s firm and sort of didn’t mention him, but Robert Gay, the father of the missing girl, didn’t forget Romney:

In an article in 2002, the Globe quoted Robert Gay as crediting Romney with organizing the search for his daughter.

“It was the most amazing thing, and I’ll never forget this to the day I die,” Gay told the Globe. “What he did was literally close down an entire business. He basically galvanized an entire industry that just doesn’t do this, and got them all on the streets for 48 hours.”

Romney once rescued capsized boaters:

Gov. Mitt Romney rode to the rescue over the weekend during a vacation trip — using his Jet Ski to help pluck a New Jersey family and their dog out of Lake Winnipesaukee after their boat sank.

The drama began at about 8:30 p.m. Saturday, as Romney and his family were relaxing at their lakeside summer home in Wolfeboro, N.H.

Gubernatorial son Josh Romney told the Herald yesterday that he and brother Craig were cleaning the beach while their father puttered in the garage when the quiet night air was pierced with screams.

“We heard a whole bunch of screaming,” said Josh Romney, who immediately hopped onto his Jet Ski. “We tore out of there and my dad hopped on the other Jet Ski and came out right after us.”

Roughly 300 yards out onto the lake, six adult family members and their dog were floundering in the water, after their boat suddenly sprung a huge leak — sinking in less than 90 seconds, Josh said…

The governor pulled the two younger women aboard his three-seater Jet Ski and zoomed back to shore, while his sons helped the mother of the family onto their vehicle.

In the middle of the rescue, the governor actually took a dunking himself — thrown off the Jet Ski as one anxious boater scrambled aboard and tipped the craft off-balance.

Successful businessman, successful husband, father and philanthropist. Romney has created thousands of jobs. And sorry, Obama, but he did build that.

And did I mention that he saved the Olympics?

The only job Obama really ever held was teaching Alinsky- teaching not how to create wealth but rather only how to take wealth from others.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Excellent biographical sketch of Romney.
Obama is doing diversion upon diversion to keep the public from realizing just how far he has dismantled our American heritage.

Should hard work pay off?
America was founded on that proposition.
For 200 years it was a basic tenant of our shared heritage.
Romney is for it 100%.
Obama, given 4 more years, would destroy it in exchange for some mysterious thing called ”fairness.”

Why do I say it is a ”mysterious,” thing….fairness?

Fool Me Twice: Obama’s Shocking Plans for the Next Four Years Exposed,” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott uncovers the template for Obama’s next four years – the actual, extensive plans created by Obama’s own top advisers and progressive strategists……..

Obama has made “economic fairness” the centerpiece of his second term agenda. The president’s January 2012 State of the Union address called for “equal pay for equal work.” Fool Me Twice” uncovers the radical origins of the “economic fairness” mantra as well as Obama’s specific second term “fairness” plans.

Write Klein and Elliott: “One of the most deceptive tricks in Obama’s rhetorical arsenal is his use of the term economic fairness. A prime example of the progressives’ use, in general, of harmless-sounding rhetoric in their advancement of radical objectives, this ‘fairness’ derives directly from the Marxist conception of economic justice.”

Obama wants the government to use his executive orders as sweeping powers to require employers to compensate workers according to an artificial calculation of a job’s “value” rather than what the private market is willing to pay.

He would allow federal bureaucrats to decide which jobs are underpaid and would require employers to raise wages.

He would also determine whether “bias” or “discrimination” exists in “equivalent” – but not equal – jobs based on race, sex, sexual orientation and other determining factors.

Obama has already completely abandoned and betrayed the working class, along with small-business owners, in favor of a welfare class, and a progressive, liberal elite.
MORE:
http://www.paramuspost.com/article.php/20120808160502386

Commercials by and for Romney should focus with hard words on the facts about Obama’s socialist (Rules for Radicals) “Alinsky- teaching not how to create wealth but rather only how to take wealth from others.” The focus should be to publicly embarrass Obama and bring him down low. Let the people know that Obama is worthless — policies of socialism heading toward fascism.

Romney and Romney’s PACs have the money (Obama can hardly raise any more money — no more money for Obama) to saturate the radio, TV and alternative media with truth. Over and over again, the repetition and expose of Obama will bring him down; not that Obama isn’t panicked already about his poor performance — so much so, he doesn’t have anything positive to say about himself.

A recent study indicates that Mitt Romney’s tax plan would reduce taxes for the top 5 percent even further, while increasing the tax burden for everyone else.

How do all of the favorable personal anecdotes stack up against that one simple observation?

This article prompted me to do some research and gives the real facts about Romney:

Gave his entire inheritance to charity
Not quite. Half went to charities, half to he kids. According to Romney himself, “I gave what they gave to me away, half to my kids and half to charity.” http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/2011_1214romney_moneys_no_object_for_voters_in_prez_election
Besides, when you have hundreds of millions of dollars, giving a few million is inconsequential. Further, it’s a good tax write-off—plus it full-fills an obligation to the Church and paves his way to heaven.

Regarding the employment figures of those four companies
They didn’t do that, Romney did. Talk about cherry picking.

The Pinocchio Test—for Romney leadership
The new Romney ad claims the GOP challenger boasts the best Massachusetts jobs record in a decade, but it doesn’t account for the fact that his tenure fell between two national recessions that give him an advantage over the governors who directly preceded and succeeded him. Furthermore, the candidate’s lackluster employment numbers are far from best if you expand the timeline past 10 years.
The ad also failed to mention that Massachusetts had a higher unemployment rate than the rest of the nation by the time Romney left office and that it wasn’t keeping pace with other states during his tenure.
The campaign claims Romney balanced the Massachusetts budget without raising taxes, but he closed tax loopholes and raised fees to the tune of $750 million per year. It wasn’t all cuts and efficiencies that helped him close the gap.
Finally, the campaign exaggerated by suggesting that Romney worked in bipartisan fashion to cut through gridlock. The number of overturned vetoes during his tenure suggests he failed to reconcile differences with Democrats in hundreds upon hundreds of instances.
On balance, the Romney campaign earns two Pinocchios for its “Strong Leadership” ad.
Two Pinocchios

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/mitt-romneys-massachusetts-record-proof-of-strong-leadership/2012/06/12/gJQArQUQXV_blog.html

Pork Belly of Olympic Games

Romney maintains the Olympics were profitable.   He counts the help of the U.S. Senate, who directed $1.3 billion taxpayer money to the Salt Lake Games. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) called it a “fleecing” of the U.S. Treasury. The appropriation paid for security, future maintenance of Utah’s venues, sewage systems, transportation, weather forecasting, media housing, and horse adoption (we know the Romneys value horses given their London dressage competitor).
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Romney-s-Olympic-Secrets-B-by-Robert-Weiner-120730-37.html

Is This the Kind of Reputation You Want Representing America Abroad?
Interesting story last night on bloomberg – Mitt Romney is blacklisted by the Italian govt. following Bain’s purchase of an Italian phone directory company from the Govt, who Bain sold on for 25 times its value just 24 months later.

Mitt Romney personally made US$60 million from the deal and Bain didn’t pay a penny in Italian or US tax.

Romney is now unable to bid for any other government business or be on the board of an Italian public company , due to his questionable ‘ethics’ amid unproven allegations of fraud against former Government officials.

It must be bad when the Italians think you’re a croook.
http://www.stripersonline.com/t/858566/romney-unable-to-do-business-in-italy

Look what the press COULD do if it were not a lapdog for Obama:

Notice how each Obama supporter is fluent in ”the narrative?
Yet not one of them can handle a fact.

Caleb Bonham, doing the job of shredding Obama in each of these ladies’ minds.
Will they recover back into their hazy love for him or wake up?
They’ve each been ”mugged by reality!”

@DrJohn:
DrJohn, thanks for finding this.
What a great tidbit about Romney!

@DrJohn, #5:

The class warriors at the Tax Policy Center add all of this up and issue the headline-grabbing opinion that it is “mathematically impossible” to reduce tax rates and close loopholes in a way that raises the same amount of revenue. They do so in part by arbitrarily claiming that Mr. Romney would never eliminate certain loopholes (such as for municipal bond interest), though the candidate has said no such thing.

Sure, it’s possible. You close middle class tax “loopholes” such as the mortgage interest deduction, for example. You just don’t say anything about it before you’re elected.

The devil is in the missing details. Unless Romney provides specifics–which he has failed completely to do–people at places like the Tax Policy Center are left to speculate about his intentions.

They’re more inclined to give Romney’s tax plan the benefit of the doubt than I am. I don’t believe there are any intentions that add up to a workable system that has the effect of reducing deficits. I think it’s all a scam to extend and deepen upper level tax cuts, while simultaneously expanding the budgetary disfunctionality of hated social programs with the intention of expediting their total breakdown. Republicans aren’t about balancing spending cuts against revenue increases, which is what it would actually take to reduce and eliminate deficits. They’ll happily run debt even higher, provided it’s facilitating an additional upward transfer of wealth. Thus far increased debt hasn’t hurt them. It has, in fact, proven to be a very effective propaganda weapon to use against any other sort of redistribution. (Upward redistribution is good, and part of the natural order of things; downward redistribution is socialism, and obviously the work of the devil. )

This reality is treated as a state secret in Washington because it refutes Mr. Obama’s campaign theme that the rich are undertaxed. The same crowd that has been howling that the rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes now touts a study concluding that cutting taxes will only benefit the rich. Well, which is it?

It’s both. The rich are under-taxed, as Mitt Romney’s tax returns would no doubt graphically demonstrate, if they were available for examination. And if Romney has his way, people such as himself will be taxed even less.

Ronald Reagan never pushed for top end rates so low as at present, let alone lower still. Ronald Reagan openly opposed capital gains rates lower than regular income rates. (Since when is the money that one works and creates for less deserving of favor than money one makes by placing bets?) None of what we’re seeing is genuine conservatism. Fixing the game in favor of the wealthiest was never what traditional conservatism was all about.

Are the media Obama’s ”lapdog?”
Oh, Yeah!!!
Obama campaign aides ban voter interviews outside rally

Dave Davies has the audio and writes:

Presidential campaign events are always orchestrated stage shows, and reporters are used to campaigns doing their best to manipulate the media and control the day’s narrative.

But my experience Thursday at a Michelle Obama event in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania was a first.

Obama campaign operatives barred me from talking to voters outside the event, to the point of interfering with my interviews and grabbing my microphone.

During the two-hour wait for the rally to begin, I wanted to talk to some of the supporters attending the event. Since I couldn’t leave the media pen at the Upper Dublin High School gymnasium, I told press aide Devora Kaye I’d like to go and find some outside.

Kaye, who is exceptionally pleasant, said I could go out and come back in, but that I couldn’t talk to people waiting in line for the event. When I asked why, she mentioned security and crowd-control concerns, which honestly made no sense. Everyone coming into the building would have to go through security again anyway.

I went outside. The line was short and things were peaceful. The only members of the public around to talk to were the people in line to get into the rally, so that’s where I went.

Oh, no you don’t

I was speaking to a very enthusiastic Obama supporter named Corinne Dieterle, when I was interrupted by a young man wearing a campaign staff tag telling me I couldn’t be doing this.

This is outside, in front of a public high school.

“You can’t be doing this in line,” he said.

“Why is that?” I asked.

No answer. “I’m sorry,” I said. “I can’t do what in line?”

“You can’t be interviewing people in line,” he said.

I asked him repeatedly who he was and why interviews were banned.

Those inquiries were met with silence. At one point he grabbed my microphone, and released it when I asked him to.

I decided to try speaking to a couple who were approaching, but not yet in the line. A different campaign operative approached and the same thing happened. He also refused to identify himself.

Later, inside the gym, I was in the assigned media pen and chatting across the rope line with Dieterle, who I’d tried to interview earlier. Another Obama press aide, Desiree Peterkin Bell came and politely told me that wasn’t permitted.

Dieterle by the way was troubled by what had happened, and called the interference of campaign aides “un-American.”

When I asked Peterkin-Bell why I wasn’t allowed to talk to a member of the public across the rope line, she said that I know how these things work, or words to that effect.

More here:
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/off-mic/item/42734

Wow!
The ”un-American” word reared its head!
From an assumed Obama supporter, no less!
Did you know that, a few years ago, that term was considered THE MOST negative thing you could say about anyone?
I hope Dieterle thinks long and hard about what type of campaign Obama is mounting.

The “propaganda media” doesn’t care about “…the real story.”

One thing we have to give Obama credit for is destroying the USA in less than four years. No person, organization, or country has ever destroyed the USA.