2 Apr

Obama Attacks Supreme Court…Calls The Possible Overturning Of ObamaCare “Unprecedented”

                                       

Obama is attacking the Supreme Court again. Last time he accused them of “reversing a century of law” which would lead to special interests, including foreign companies, to spend without limit during our elections. You may remember this occasion because Obama uttered the lie during his State of the Union speech, in front of all the justices and in response Justice Alito mouthed the words “not true.”

Now he attacks them again:

“Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama told reporters today while speaking with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon.

Strong majority? Please.

It barely passed the house 219-212, hell…even 34 Democrats defected and voted against it and EVERY Republican voted against it as well.

So he lies once again.

Not only that, since it’s passing the public has been against it. No better proof of that then the 2010 election which saw 60 Democrats thrown out of office for supporting the unconstitutional law.

Exit quote: Obama won’t even defend DOMA in court, which got 85 votes in Senate (incl. Biden & Reid), 342 in House, signed by Clinton. O-care a far cry.

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Constitution, Law, Politics, Socialism, Socialized Health Care, Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink. Monday, April 2nd, 2012 at 3:03 pm
| 1,091 views

75 Responses to Obama Attacks Supreme Court…Calls The Possible Overturning Of ObamaCare “Unprecedented”

  1. John Cooper says: 1

    So is he planning to give the Breitbart treatment to Alito, Roberts, or Thomas?

    ReplyReply
  2. Comm0n Sense says: 2

    This is one of the most disgusting comments ever!! 0-bama must know his 0-bamacare will be found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States. It should have come as no surprise, the constitutionality of this loser has been in doubt from day one. If he thinks he can make a political issue about a Supreme Court Ruling it will backfire for certain. Besides activism would be more likely if it was found constitutional give his appointment of Kagan.

    ReplyReply
  3. another vet says: 3

    He’s out of control.

    Having your budget shot down in the House 414-0. Now that’s what you call an overwhelming majority.

    ReplyReply
  4. charliegee says: 4

    Pigs fly and pelicans wear briefs. Was this the grandstanding result of a leak from the SCOTUS or the narcissistic pomp of a delusional dotty double-faced douroucouli? Oh wait……one day late: for the April Fool !

    ReplyReply
  5. Spartan says: 5

    There is a blogger that speculates that Obama has been tipped off about the decision? It wouldn’t surprise me. But it says a great deal about the court system now and whether the Judicial branch can be trusted?

    http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/211739.php

    http://www.bluegrasspundit.com/2012/04/has-kagan-or-another-liberal-justice.html?utm_source=co2hog

    ReplyReply
  6. Nan G says: 6

    Obama called the third co-equal part of our three-cornered federal government, “an unelected group of people.”
    Whew!
    With all his czars Obama should keep his mouth shut.
    The ”constitutional law lecturer” seems to have completely gone off the rails.
    I wonder if he even had a question on one of his tests about what the concept separation of powers means.

    ReplyReply
  7. Comm0n Sense says: 7

    @Spartan: I agree, probably his appointee Kagan who he specifically put on the bench to be an activist tipped him off. 0-bama is out of control and what a laugh to refer to the traitors who passed this bill as a strong majority.

    ReplyReply
  8. Skookum says: 8

    Do you really think Kagan, the justice that should have recused herself from the case because of conflict of interest, could be so devoid of principles that she would tip off her benefactor regarding the decision. That would demean the integrity of the SCOTUS; she couldn’t be so partisan, no not Kagan.

    For a law to be reviewed by the Supreme Court, it must pass both houses with a majority. Surely Obama is aware of this fact.

    There would be very little for them to do otherwise.

    I wonder if Obama thinks that when Ginsberg helps a Solicitor General frame his argument, that such help from the bench could be considered judicial activism.

    ReplyReply
  9. oil guy from Alberta says: 9

    Pure bull$hit. The Supremes are there to see if the law follows the Constitution. This is exactly how the Supreme Court operates. Separation of Powers so that bad laws are struck down. Legislators can go back to the drawing board. Wasn’t this monster of a law devised by the Tides foundation and passed swiftly through Congress without it being read. Do your job the Supremes and strike down this Obamanation.

    ReplyReply
  10. Art says: 10

    It sounds just like an order to the ‘bummer from Sorryos, laughing all the way to his secret hideway, while the sorry ass puppet has no idea what the consequences are. When he finds out, it’ll be too late and his puppeteer will no longer be taking calls. Bill and Hillary will be LTAO! Nice.

    ReplyReply
  11. Randy says: 11

    Obama’s biggest fault is his arrogance. This is especially true with his great lack of experience in most any worldly occupation. He has never been in an environment where bluster and innuendo is of little importance. This didn’t just start when he ascended onto the throne at INVESCO Field in Denver. After the election, he truly believes he is King of the United States if not, the World. He believes there are no consequences for his actions and edicts.
    Instead of surrounding himself with knowledgeable people, he hired yes men and women. They bend over backwards to make sure the King’s agenda is accomplished by any means, after all, the liberal philosophy is the ends justifies the means. He hired the Court Jester as VP and an overly ambitious (anyway you can) Attorney General. Hillary got the DOS job to appease her and to prevent her from crying foul about the campaign funds and candidate legibility.
    A truly experienced leader would make sure there is always someone who has his back. Someone who has shown they can be trusted. Yes men cannot be trusted. Their first inclination is to say yes. While few liked Cheney, he was experienced and had the younger Bush’s back. Bush would never have made a bone head mistake like Obamacare with its Constitutional issues.
    The arrogance started with the return of the Churchill Bust to Great Britten followed closely with an IPOD containing the “Greatest hit Speeches of Barack Obama”. Then after his apology tour of the world, he wondered why he had no respect from the World leaders. He pulled a Carter by condemning the President of Egypt and lost another US supporter in the Arab World. Playing paddy cake with Iran has earned him the distrust of nearly all of our traditional allies. The Middle East has never been more volatile because of Obama’s unintended consequences.
    Obama’s foray into economics and business has been a total failure. Some diehard liberals will continue to claim that he saved GM and Chrysler. What he really did was to disenfranchise 10s of thousands of non union workers at the expense of union workers. Also, millions of retired people depending on the GM bonds that Obama vacated lost their retirement. His record in alternative energy companies is even worse if that is possible. Every day one or more of his subsidized companies file for bankruptcy of lay off workers. Name one other leader who would change the mission of the organization who placed a man on the moon to one of spreading the word to Islamic countries?
    Now, the undocumented president has the nerve to condemn the Supreme Court of this Nation because it doesn’t care for his edicts. I would not be surprised if sometime he confines them to the North Tower to await beheading at the King’s whim! If one could see behind the scenes, we would likely see the DOJ preparing presidential pardons for most of the Obama staff for their illegal activities like “fast and furious”, fund raising, violating the FAR procurement procedures, exerting undue influence on various corporations, and numerous unlawful actions. There will be plenty of witnesses against Obama and his chosen ones. After the King is dethroned, people will come out of the wood work to seek favor with the newest people in power. Obama needs to make sure they are all accommodated prior to his dethronement ceremony.

    ReplyReply
  12. Mr. Irons says: 12

    He can call it all he wants, but even the Judges he helped advocate for the Bench aren’t exactly siding in his Pocket over this matter. They didn’t really like being humilated infront of Congress during that State of the Union speech where Democrats did a standing ovation with Obama attacking the Surpeme Court. It doesn’t do well for forming alliances to embrass your own on National TV, Mister President.

    ReplyReply
  13. FAITH7 says: 13

    The mere thought of the Government “having that much control” over ‘every’ aspect of our lives is unprecedented!!!

    Wake up America!!!….this is NOT just about free health care….it is much deeper than that…. and the lure to hook you is the “free” ticket…

    There is no such animal called a “free lunch”…

    ReplyReply
  14. FAITH7 says: 14

    “Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama told reporters today while speaking with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon.”

    Weren’t a lot of these Strong Majority Votes actually “Bribes”… back room deals – to get this thing passed? Does STIMULUS MONEY ring any bells???

    ReplyReply
  15. another vet says: 15

    @Randy: Perhaps he can get Jimmy “take those sonofabitches out” Hoffa to send some of da’ boys over there to lean on the Justices. Maybe kneecapping Justice Thomas or telling Justice Kennedy that he may never see his family again will do the trick.

    ReplyReply
  16. David Brickner says: 16

    Obama is really really out of order on this one!!! BAAAD form commenting on a pending Supreme Court decision! He musta got a heads up bad feeling on this. What’s he gonna do next……..goose the Queen of England! Waddya mean he already did….??

    ReplyReply
  17. Smorgasbord says: 17

    This guy is so wrapped up in himself that he even thinks that he can scold the Supreme Court in front of the nation, then do it again, then expect them to do what he tells them to do like a parent expects their kids to obey them.

    We have to keep in mind that the justices could stand in his way of trashing the US Constitution. If someone made toilet paper with the Constitution printed on it, I am sure he would order a lifetime supply.

    ReplyReply
  18. DiveCon says: 18

    if you follow the twisted logic he just displayed, dred scott and the jim crow laws were overturned by an activist court

    ReplyReply
  19. Sounds like somebody’s worried

    But SCOTUS is just enforcing the Constitutional law of the land as laid down by the Founding Fathers

    All of this exists primarily to protect the country from power-drunk radicals like yourself, Barry- no wonder you’re so bummed out

    ReplyReply
  20. anticsrocks says: 20

    @another vet: Aw, c’mon AV, Obama did say he would unite the parties, thus ending the partisan divide in Washington, D. C.

    414 – 0

    Can’t get more united than that.
    .
    .

    ReplyReply
  21. Nan G says: 21

    @FAITH7:
    “……..the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama said.
    Who remembers that final vote tally?
    In the House the vote was 219-212, with 34 Democrats joining ALL of the Republicans on the NO side.
    I’d say SCOTUS shouldn’t have much qualm of conscience over that partisan of a bill.

    ReplyReply
  22. Smorgasbord says: 22

    @Nan G: #21
    I’m guessing that Obama guesses that the justices don’t go to any conservative blogs, or watch any conservative TV shows, or listen to any conservative radio shows. He is hoping that he is the only source of information for them. Maybe two of them, but not all nine.

    ReplyReply
  23. bikemike says: 23

    after his butt is tossed out next year, the books that will come out from the White House staff will be something to look forward to.

    ReplyReply
  24. VoteOutIncumbents says: 24

    This guy is real trouble…note how he has jumped on the Zimmerman case. He smacks the Catholic church in the chops…revokes, or at least rewrites the establishment clause…then says he is protecting women. When the Church responds with justified indignation…he friends at ABC/NBC start the meme that Republicans want to take away a women’s right to birth control.

    What garbage this guy professes. Wait for the White House attacks on Romney. They are going to call him a racist because of his religion. Let’s see how the Obama media lets that playout. For a former professor of Contitutional Law…Obama doesn’t seem to know much about how the SCOTUS is supposed to work. I actually wonder if he has even read Marbury v Madison?

    ReplyReply
  25. mathman says: 25

    Judicial Activism (JA) is the writing of law by judges. See Roe v. Wade.
    The striking down of laws which do not comply with the Constitution is the defined job of the Supreme Court. See Marbury v. Madison (1808).
    So Zippy is incorrect about JA.
    That is nothing new. He is factually incorrect in a disconcertingly large number of his public utterances.
    It is his expressed opinion that the Constitution is flawed; this is an utterance which is on record. Apparently he is the Supreme Court all on his lonesome, and able to tell us what is and what is not legal. Gosh. What a concept. Divine Right of Ones.
    Apparently the hunger for a King never dies out. Folk lust for someone to tell them how to live their lives. Unfortunately kings have a regrettable history; tyrants somehow make life miserable for all. Unless you can name a Monarch who has actually improved the lot of all of his people. I cannot name such a person.
    And King Putt is right up there with Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and all the rest of the tyrants.
    They begin badly and end worse.

    ReplyReply
  26. anticsrocks
    he has a lack of anger control, and we get to know who he really is
    only when he get angry,
    or scare or challenged, and the best way is to make him mad,and
    keep him that way, that’s when he reveal his true self
    his way of saying this to the HIGHEST COURT OF THE USA
    IN FRONT OF 2 LEADERS OF CLOSE NEIGHBOR COUNTRIES WAS UN-CALL FOR, DISCUSSING US AFFAIRS WITH OTHERS COUNTRIES TO GET THEIR SUPPORT IS SHOWN HIS WEAKNESS,
    A LACK OF LEADERSHIP WHICH HE HAS DONE BEFORE FOR OTHER ISSUES, LIKE ARIZONA, TEXAS,AND OTHER ALWAYS
    BLAMING OTHER IN THE CONGRESS, IN THE SENATE ECETERA
    BLAMING AMERICANS , THE LAWS OF THE LANDS,ALSO,
    WEAK AND DANGEROUS

    ReplyReply
  27. another vet says: 27

    @anticsrocks: Perhaps he did make good on promise besides the one where he wanted to fundamentally transform the U.S.

    ReplyReply
  28. Disenchanted says: 28

    Barry is going into full melt down. Barry is a narcissist. A narcissist MUST have adoration 24 hours a day. He must never be questioned by no one, not anyone. No one must ever say ‘ no’ to him. A narcissist NEVER takes responsibility for his own actions and blames everyone else. Narcissists do not believe they could ever be flawed. barry is melting down as he cannot believe those who once fell at his feet and worshiped him from afar have strayed.

    P.S. I was once married to a narcissist so I have first hand knowledge what they are and how they act.

    ReplyReply
  29. jerrytombs says: 29

    buy more ammo we’er gonna need it

    ReplyReply
  30. jerrytombs
    it will be hard to find now, OBAMA STOP ANY GUN S TO GET IN TO USA,
    AND THE GUN STORES HAD STATED BEFORE, THEY WHERE RUNNING OUT OF THOSE, AND
    PEOPLE WHERE BUYING MORE NOW THAN AT ANY TIME BEFORE,
    BYE

    ReplyReply
  31. jerrytombs says: 31

    that why i make my own lol

    ReplyReply
  32. jerrytombs
    keep it for friends you know wont tell,
    if not they will stop you too
    bye

    ReplyReply
  33. DrJohn says: 33

    @Skookum: Skook

    I wonder if Kagan didn’t leak to Obama that the vote wasn’t going well to allow Obama to make a stink in advance.

    ReplyReply
  34. Today’s campaign speech from this supposed Constitutional Expert, was absolute proof that he neither understands the Constitution, nor have respect for the THIRD LEG of the balance of power. Reading the Constitution is NOT understanding it. Arrogance does not comprehend “balance of power.”

    His arrogance, locked in by his narcissism, is beyond comprehension. How is this still not evident to half the country? Oh, yah, the MSM protects him.

    A century ago, the headline in The Evening Sun declared, “ALL SAVED FROM TITANIC AFTER COLLISION” . . . . communications technology was their excuse. Today, the MSM led by the NYT has no such excuse. It’s in the room when Obama tells lies. This man is not only an ideologue, he’s also dumber than his acolytes and sycophants.

    ReplyReply
  35. Nan G says: 35

    The Court Strikes Back!!!!
    Obama has until noon Thursday to hand in a three page (or shorter) single-spaced paper proving his allegation that the courts do not have the right to overturn a law passed by Congress and signed by the President.
    5th circuit court is issuing the demand.

    ReplyReply
  36. another vet says: 36

    @Nan G: It seems as of late, more and more people are finally getting the courage to stand up to his bullying tactics. Let’s see how the press tries to cover this up like the 414-0 vote against his budget or probably the biggest threat to his presidency, Fast and Furious.

    ReplyReply
  37. Randy says: 37

    @Nan G: Well, it looks like Judge Smith wants to get the political propoganda out in the open. I guess that means another Friday document dump by the administration to keep ignorant people ignorant.

    ReplyReply
  38. Nan G says: 38

    Obama just came out and said that he would respect the court’s opinion.
    Must be his ”white” half showing!
    He admitted, “the Supreme Court is the final say on our Constitution, and all of us have to respect it.”
    Yeah, real ”white” of him.

    ReplyReply
  39. John Cooper says: 39

    @Nan G: Does this situation remind anyone else of King John and the Magna Carta of 1215AD?

    The 1215 charter required King John of England to proclaim certain liberties, and accept that his will was not arbitrary, for example by explicitly accepting that no “freeman” (in the sense of non-serf) could be punished except through the law of the land, a right which is still in existence today.

    ReplyReply
  40. Keyser Söze says: 40

    @Nan G:

    The Court Strikes Back!!!!

    Nan…are you reading the comments in your posted link?

    POPCORN!

    ReplyReply
  41. BITEMIKE
    WHAT A PARTY IT WILL BE, AND WILL LAST FOR SUCH A LONG TIME,
    I can see HERMAN CAIN BRING HIS FAMOUS PIZZA, WITH THE SMILE HE CAN SHOW THE PEOPLE,
    I can see the people dancing on the streets, so happy to feel their FREEDOM, I can see the parade of AMERICANS EXPRESSING THEIR PRIDE FOR THE COUNTRY, THE MIGHTY WARRIORS COMING OUT AND SHOWING THEIR PRIDE TO KNOW THAT AMERICA HAS BEEN FREED WITHIN THE LAWS OF THE LAND, WOW WHAT I CAN SEE IS SO BEAUTIFUL,

    ReplyReply
  42. SpideyTerry says: 42

    an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law

    He’s a Constitutional scholar complete moron, ya know.

    ReplyReply
  43. Keyser Soze
    this is unprecedent is in it?
    and the tone is without any doubt meant for the letter
    to be apply in time and precise,
    bye

    ReplyReply
  44. Smorgasbord says: 44

    @bikemike: #23
    I never thought about that. Interesting.

    ReplyReply
  45. Smorgasbord says: 45

    @VoteOutIncumbents: #24
    He is training to be a king, not a president. He even wants us to use other country’s and the UN’s laws to decide cases within our own borders.

    ReplyReply
  46. Smorgasbord says: 46

    @mathman: #25

    He is factually incorrect in a disconcertingly large number of his public utterances.

    In short, you mean he lies a lot. Don’t be afraid to call it what it is.

    When the Supreme Court was created, was it set up so that they had to make a yes or no decision on EVERY case, or could they rule that there is no law covering an issue, and give no decision, then refer the matter to congress to write a law covering the issue?

    It seems wrong that when there is no law covering an issue, nine people in the entire country get to decide on the legality of it. When they make a decision, they should have to refer to the part of Federal law that thy used to make their decision.

    ReplyReply
  47. Smorgasbord says: 47

    @jerrytombs: #29
    I’m in the process now, and the things that make the ammo go bang.

    ReplyReply
  48. Smorgasbord says: 48

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #30
    We don’t have that problem in Idaho. The gun shops I have been in have the walls covered with them. I have never felt safer than after I moved here. Most people know that there could be a lot of concealed guns around them, so they have to be careful in choosing a target.

    ReplyReply
  49. Smorgasbord says: 49

    @DrJohn: #33
    Are you doubting the honesty of a Supreme Court judge?

    ReplyReply
  50. Smorgasbord says: 50

    @another vet: #36
    The propaganda media will cover it up the same way they are covering up the story of Sheriff Joe Arpaio declaring Obama’s birth certificate a fake: They will ignore it, then it will go away. Or will it?

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site