2 Apr

Obama Attacks Supreme Court…Calls The Possible Overturning Of ObamaCare “Unprecedented”

                                       

Obama is attacking the Supreme Court again. Last time he accused them of “reversing a century of law” which would lead to special interests, including foreign companies, to spend without limit during our elections. You may remember this occasion because Obama uttered the lie during his State of the Union speech, in front of all the justices and in response Justice Alito mouthed the words “not true.”

Now he attacks them again:

“Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Obama told reporters today while speaking with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon.

Strong majority? Please.

It barely passed the house 219-212, hell…even 34 Democrats defected and voted against it and EVERY Republican voted against it as well.

So he lies once again.

Not only that, since it’s passing the public has been against it. No better proof of that then the 2010 election which saw 60 Democrats thrown out of office for supporting the unconstitutional law.

Exit quote: Obama won’t even defend DOMA in court, which got 85 votes in Senate (incl. Biden & Reid), 342 in House, signed by Clinton. O-care a far cry.

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Constitution, Law, Politics, Socialism, Socialized Health Care, Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink. Monday, April 2nd, 2012 at 3:03 pm
| 1,104 views

76 Responses to Obama Attacks Supreme Court…Calls The Possible Overturning Of ObamaCare “Unprecedented”

  1. Art says: 51

    @Nan G: Do you think Soros can have it written in time?

    ReplyReply
  2. Smorgasbord says: 52

    @Art: #1
    If Obama would be called to appear in front of the Supreme Court, he would have to have his TOTUS, or he would just be a babbling idiot, like he has been different times without it.

    ReplyReply
  3. Smorgasbord
    hi,
    what if the SUPREME COURT, CALL OBAMA TO APPEAR IN FRONT OF THEM
    WITH HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND SHERIFF JOE WITH HIS PROOF,
    I think OBAMA has met his SUPERIOR AUTHORITY, HE OPEN
    THE CAN OF WORMS ALL BY HIMSELF, AND HE WILL BE SHRINK TO A SIZE FIT FOR HIM.

    ReplyReply
  4. CURT
    HI,
    it’s like PELOSI SAID FOR THE 2000 PAPERS OF THE OBAMA CARE,
    WE HAVE TO PASS TO older comments,
    to see what’s in this POST,
    bye

    ReplyReply
  5. Smorgasbord says: 55

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #3
    That would make a great comedy skit. Obama in front of the Supreme Court and they won’t let him use his TOTUS when he tries to prove that his birth certificate is real and Sheriff Joe is trying not to laugh.

    ReplyReply
  6. Smorgasbord
    we know there are many people which are not fit to be given power over other, it’s well known,
    when we hear some one say, the POWER went to his head OR HER HEAD.
    SO IF WE WANT A LEADER, TH FIRST THING TO CHECK IS IF HE CAN STAY HUMBLE ENOUGH
    TO HANDLE THE POWER GIVEN, AND MUST HAVE THE WISDOM TO DISCERN HIS OWN MOVES
    TO BE JUST, OTHERWISE HE LOOSE THE FOCUS AND BECOME A DICTATOR IMPOSING HIS VIEW AGAINST THE WILL OF HIS PEOPLE HE COME TO CONSIDER INFERIOR,
    AND IT’S ALSO IMPORTANT TO CHOOSE HIS CLOSE ADVISERS NOT BECAUSE THEY WILL AGREE WITH HIM, BUT BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE GUTS TO TELL THE TRUTH IF HE IS WRONG, AND HE SHOULD LISTEN, AND OBAMA was told many times by the TEA PARTY ASSEMBLING TO TELL THE TRUTH,
    AND HE CHOOSE TO HATE THEM AND HIS CLOSE ALLIES DEMONIZE THE TEA PARTY,
    IN MANY INSULTS, HE HAD A CHANCE TO LISTEN AND HE REFUSE, AND FAIL ALL THE WAY.
    HE ALSO HAD LOTS OF TIME TO AMEND, BUT DID NOT.
    DON’T YOU THINK?

    ReplyReply
  7. Smorgasbord says: 57

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #6
    Even when the “right person” gets into a position where they are over others, even just 10 or 12, too many times that person lets it go to their head and they want more power over more people.

    HE ALSO HAD LOTS OF TIME TO AMEND, BUT DID NOT.
    DON’T YOU THINK?

    When his goal is to make the USA a socialist or a dictatorship type country, he only has THAT focus and isn’t going to change until he changes the USA to what he and those pulling his puppet strings want. One Tea Party sign said, “Change Obama’s Change.” I like that idea and am trying to help accomplish it.

    ReplyReply
  8. Smorgasbord
    yes, and I remember WORDSMITH MENTIONED ON ONE OF HIS COMMENT, THAT HE CAN ACHIEVE MANY TASKS AT THE SAME TIME, AND I remember telling him that not everyone has the ability to do that, and it is another needed gift to become president of such big AMERICA, WHICH REQUIRE MANY TASKS AT THE SAME TIME, WHICH OBAMA BY FOCUSING ONLY ON HIS SOCIALIST AGENDA, HAS LOST THE REST WHICH IS LACKING AND WILL TAKE A LOT TO BE FIX ENOUGH TO WORK AGAIN LIKE THE JOBS NEEDED WHICH WAS SUPPOSE TO BE PRIORITY, AND NEGLECTED

    ReplyReply
  9. Smorgasbord says: 59

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #8
    Sheriff Joe will fix our problem with Obama. I donated to Joe, even though I don’t live in Arizona, to help him keep going after our illegal president.

    ReplyReply
  10. another vet says: 60

    @Smorgasbord: The power of the MSM is underestimated. Have you ever asked people about Fast and Furious? Most have never heard of that either. So wonder they want to regulate the Internet and talk radio (which I don’t listen to).

    ReplyReply
  11. another vet says: 61

    A good commentary by Thomas Sowell on this topic. He pulls no punches.

    http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell040412.php3

    ReplyReply
  12. Smorgasbord says: 62

    @another vet: #10

    The power of the MSM is underestimated. Have you ever asked people about Fast and Furious? Most have never heard of that either.

    Ask your liberal friends to pay attention to two things when they listen to or read their propaganda media:

    (1) Do they call the USA the republic that it is? If not, why?
    (2) When a politician is accused of something, if it is a republican, that is mentioned right away. If it is a democrat, it either isn’t mentioned, or ,mentioned at the end. Why.

    So wonder they want to regulate the Internet and talk radio (which I don’t listen to).

    I listened to talk radio for many years as I drove down the radio. Liberal radio was ONLY hate republicans. I’m guessing that even liberals don’t want to hear hate republicans all the time. Conservative radio shows sometimes didn’t even mention politics. They would focus on things that have happened.

    ReplyReply
  13. Smorgasbord says: 63

    @another vet: #11
    Thomas Sowell said:

    One of the highly developed talents of President Barack Obama is the ability to say things that are demonstrably false, and make them sound not only plausible but inspiring.

    He should have said, “One of the highly developed talents of President Barack Obama is the ability to READ from the TOTUS and say things….

    It still amazes me how Obama reads without very much emotion at all. He’s doing better than he used to, but you can tell that he doesn’t rehearse the speeches. Does he even read them ahead of time. Remember when he read someone else’s speech all the way through and didn’t know it wasn’t his?

    ReplyReply
  14. Art says: 64

    @Smorgasbord: #5

    Hilarious to imagine

    ReplyReply
  15. another vet says: 65

    @Smorgasbord: The MSM would make Hitler’s and Stalin’s propaganda machines envious. As for libs not knowing the country is a republic, they don’t show much knowledge of the Constitution or history either. And if the facts don’t support their biases, change the facts.

    ReplyReply
  16. Smorgasbord says: 66

    @another vet: #15
    That’s why a good campaign slogan for the republican candidate for president would be, “Change Obama’s Change.”

    ReplyReply
  17. another vet says: 67

    @Smorgasbord: Since he’s become President that’s all I have is change. It used to be greenbacks.

    ReplyReply
  18. another vet
    hi,
    a new thing in CANADA, they will stop the penny, in the fall, because they find,
    it cost too much to make them, I knew the copper is very expansive since the last few years, and criminals have rob the pipes in lot or construction sites, so there will be no more pennys in the market,by fall season.
    so imagine every pennys collector in jar will go back in GOVERNMENT AS GETTING RID OF IT FROM ALL THE PEOPLE, AND THAT COPPER WILL HAVE A BIG GAIN FOR GOVERNMENT,
    THEY WILL SAVE FOR NOT MAKING ANY AND PROFIT BY GETTING BACK THE COPPER IN BIG AMOUNT
    BYE

    ReplyReply
  19. Larry Uloth says: 69

    I was listening to Fox earlier and Judge Napolitano was talking about the commentary/arguement between Obama and the Supreme court. In the middle of his comments he let slip something that so many of us have believed for over two years he said “Obama is skirting around the edge of Toltalitarinism”
    I feel that if he gets another four years, he will try to really destroy the Constitution and pull a Putin trick in order to try President for life…and folks don’t say it can’t happen….it can if we allow this mess to go on. It would split this country in so many ways and cause another civil war. God help us.

    ReplyReply
  20. another vet says: 70

    @ilovebeeswarzone: There has been talk in the past of getting rid of the penny before for convenience sake. They are a pain to deal with at times.

    ReplyReply
  21. another vet
    hi,
    that would reduce the debt it seems costly to produce at this time,
    bye

    ReplyReply
  22. Smorgasbord says: 73

    @Larry Uloth: #19
    That’s why I mentioned in one comment that, if it happens, Idaho will be one of the last states to fall, IF it falls, because we are very well armed. I am getting ready to by my first semi-automatic rifle, mostly because I have wanted one for many years, but also, JUST IN CASE.

    ReplyReply
  23. another vet says: 74

    @Smorgasbord: Hopefully I’ll be able to print that one off.

    ReplyReply
  24. Smorgasbord says: 75

    @another vet: #24
    All of my signs are made to be printed. I use a poster maker program that lets me make them any size I want with my printer, then I use a glue stick and glue the pages together. My sign holder is 40″ x 32″. At one rally I saw one man who made a sign holder out of PVC pipe and had it attached to his backpack, so I made one too. They are VERY noticeable, and I can carry it all day and not get muscle cramps.

    The referred to sign will be one I will be displaying at our Tax Day rally on April 15.

    ReplyReply
  25. Pingback: Obama v Supreme Court » Musings of the Angry Webmaster

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>