28 Jan

Laughing At The Presumptions Of Elites

Tim Thomas, the goalie for the Stanley Cup winning Boston Bruins, declined an invitation to the White House and the opportunity to gaze upon the royal Narcissist. Massachusetts is aghast at the nerve of a mere athlete making a political statement; especially when the statement is in direct contradiction of the state’s love of Socialism and their great hope for the future of the world.

Massachusetts Governor Patrick thought the grievous snub was a direct result of the public’s lack of courtesy and grace; although, goalies have never been known to be overly courteous, and their grace consists primarily of moves orchestrated to stop hundred mile an hour pucks and defending their nets with a ferocity that few of us can comprehend; however, Mr Thomas has exhibited qualities that mark him as an independent thinker and not the sort of sap that responds to the ultimate fan, who wants desperately to be among great athletes and cultivate a symbiotic mutual admiration.

Governor Patrick of Massachusetts expressed Liberal outrage at the official snub, but was willing to concede that Thomas has the right to his own opinion, and this is truly a notable concession from the Governor of a Socialist State. We should all be thankful that citizens living in Massachusetts still have the right to personal opinions and the right to refuse an invitation from a Socialist President.

“He’s a phenomenal hockey player and he’s entitled to his views,” Patrick said. “It just feels like we are losing in this country basic courtesy and grace.”

The governor said while he strongly disagreed with many of the policies of former President George W. Bush, a Republican, he was always respectful when they met.

“I always referred to him as Mr. President, I stood when he came into the room. There are rules to live by,” Patrick said.

The opinions of Thomas were well stated and reflected disappointment with the current president. He made an effective statement in a Liberal State that will probably make his tenure with the Bruins more difficult in the future.

I believe the Federal government has grown out of control, threatening the Rights, Liberties, and Property of the People.

This is being done at the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial level. This is in direct opposition to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers vision for the Federal government.

Because I believe this, today I exercised my right as a Free Citizen, and did not visit the White House. This was not about politics or party, as in my opinion both parties are responsible for the situation we are in as a country. This was about a choice I had to make as an INDIVIDUAL.

This is the only public statement I will be making on this topic.

Actually, not everyone is swept away by those who presume royal status, and many refuse to participate in the charade of political lunacy that supposedly honors those of great achievement so that they can stand in awe of those of outstanding mediocrity. Throughout Queen Elizabeth’s Reign, she has been snubbed by over 250 high achievers who refused to participate in receiving honors of dubious merit from a near meaningless monarchy. Many artists and writers: Lucian Freud, Henry Moore, Roald Dahl, CS Lewis, Francis Bacon, and my personal favorite Twentieth Century British author Aldous Huxley, have chosen to forego the honor of a personal audience and awards like the CBE, Commander of the Order of the British Empire.

The late author, JG Ballard, summed up his antipathy with the British Monarchy:

“The whole thing is a preposterous charade, thousands of medals are given out in the name of a non-existent empire. It makes us look like a laughing stock.”

Although Ballard and Thomas expressed different reasons for their aversion to participating in a silly charade; essentially, they both refused to be sucked in by the phony pomp and circumstance so typical among rulers attempting to define their own dubious relevance among individuals of merit. Congratulations Tim Thomas, you stand among many men of merit who have refused to be used by those who want to borrow your fame and accomplishments. Hopefully, you will play on several more Stanley Cup Teams in the future, regardless of their location.

       submit to reddit

About Skook

A professional horseman for over 40 years, Skook continues to work with horses. He is in an ongoing educational program, learning life's lessons from one of the world's greatest instructors, the horse.
This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, Barack Obama, Constitution, Culture, Freedom, Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome, United Kingdom and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Saturday, January 28th, 2012 at 2:11 am
| 1,173 views

88 Responses to Laughing At The Presumptions Of Elites

  1. jeff says: 2

    Good for Thomas. And good to see your insightful contributions to the fight again, Skookum.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  2. Disenchanted says: 3

    I do a lot of research. I have come across something that has not been talked about. I am making the assumption Barry and company want to keep this quiet

    UN agenda 21. – abolishment of all private property. On 9 June 2011 Barry signed executive order EO 13575 with direct orders to carry out agenda 21

    Don’t believe me? The sources are cited above. This man is extremely dangerous.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
  3. Poppa_T says: 4

    Good to see you gracing this site with yet another informative yarn Skook, I enjoyed it. It is funny though that our Narcissist was snubbed by England’s.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339315/President-Obama-snubbed-sources-reveal-invited-Prince-Williams-wedding.html

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  4. Skookum says: 5

    Antics: The cat is an excellent analogy, but for more reasons than the obvious: as HRH the Royal Narcissist, a rejection, especially a rejection by one of his heroes, an athlete, is felt like a slash across the face by the recumbent, and seemingly harmless cat. Yes, the Narcissist would like to give this uppity goalie a royal tongue lashing, much like the implied warning to Governor Brewer and thereby instruct him on an athlete’s protocol and responsibility when summoned by the chief royal personage of this country. Alas, Goalie Thomas remains even more aloof than Governor Brewer, and like the pictured cat, a publicized royal snit will likely produce an even more grievous wound than the perceived “high clawing” penalty across the face.

    We must remember, our president is extremely thin skinned and his royal snubbing in November may literally be not only his Waterloo, but be his complete undoing; since, there has never been such an outstanding mediocrity, achieve so much by accomplishing so little. Thus the daring young trapeze artist flies so high without the skills and foundation required for such influential positions; thus the fall will be tragic for the man for whom calls to end term limits of the presidency reverberated across this vast nation. Indeed, the calls to repeal that Amendment that stands in defiance of tyranny and Socialist domination died out as Americans realized they had bought little more than a pig in a poke, and now rather than worrying over being declared president for life, he is struggling against the odds to survive the next election.

    Woe to the mighty and vain who fall, for his descent will be his personal tragedy, but our redemption. For in this final act, of this play of meteoric rise of an outstanding mediocrity and his precipitous failure, will be the recovery of our economy, but more importantly our liberty.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
  5. Poppa_T says: 6

    @Disenchanted:

    It’s not just President Obama, Gov. Romney is a strong supporter of Agenda 21 as well, with the Massachusetts
    Climate Protection Plan he committed his State to adhering to it.

    http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2004/07/01/massachusetts-gov-romney-unveils-climate-protection-plan

    http://www.salon.com/2006/01/28/muckraker_29/

    Speaker Newt has said both yes and no about supporting it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6n_-wB154

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVD_R2WQOVw

    Santorum has not made any comment about it one way or another

    Only Ron Paul has steadfastly said it was wrong.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGhGn9E7Vso

    Sorry for getting of topic Skook.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
  6. joetote says: 7

    Skook,

    Great as always. My slant? Yesterday here in Vegas, a radio station was asking if you would have your picture taken with the President whether you liked him or not. I said no because I feel he is such an embarrassment to the office and the country that I could not remotely stand by someone who I feel is against everything I and our founding fathers hold dear! Great job Tim Thomas1 Practicing one’s right to Freedom of Speech and expression takes a lot of guts in this PC age of idiocy, especially considering one now becomes an enemy of the state in doing so!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
  7. Donald Bly says: 8

    @Skook…. Post #5… very well said… and eloquently so!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  8. Bruce says: 9

    Hopefully more states will invoke the eligibility issue on NObama like GA is doing, and the ‘one’ will be disqualified in several states this fall!

    If the states can prove he is ineligible for office, everything he has done can be overturned!

    We can pray this will happen. The truth will eventually set us all free!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
  9. MataHarley says: 10

    Fact check on aisle… er, comment… #6.

    The only candidate who has been actively starting/mentioning Agenda 21 on the campaign trail and in debates is Newt, as even the not so conservative US News and Report mentioned last Novemenber.

    CNN was dissing Newt for placing any emphasis on the UN agenda at the same time inthat debate.

    Fears of Agenda 21 cropped up at a meeting of the Carroll County Board of Commissioners in Maryland in August (2011).

    “Everywhere I go today people, particularly in the tea party, are very worried about Agenda 21,” Gingrich told a tea party crowd in July (2011).

    “It’s part of a general problem of the United Nations and other international bureaucracies that are seeking to create an extra constitutional control over us. And I reject that model totally,” he added.

    …snip…

    On the campaign trail in Iowa earlier in the week, Gingrich acknowledged to reporters Agenda 21 is not legally binding.

    “It is part of a treaty that has never been endorsed by the (U.S.) Senate and I don’t think the federal government should be in the process of implementing something that the Senate has not approved,” he said.

    So why bring it up?

    “Because it’s being implemented at the local level,” Gingrich responded.

    Climate change is a touchy subject for Gingrich. In 2008, he appeared in an ad with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to deliver a call for national action to combat global warming. In his run for the GOP presidential nomination, Gingrich has told reporters the ad was a mistake.

    On the flip side, Ron Paul has never brought it up as a debate subject… but he did respond to questions if posed last August by a tea party member. Not a peep out of him about it since then, and certainly not a specific debate point.

    Apparently not tops on his list, or he only waits for the crowd to bring it up. But, like Newt, he also has the correct response.

    INRE the “couch potato ad”, as I like to call it… two points. One, Gingrich admitted that was a mistake. OMG… an imperfect human who makes mistakes. Gasp! Sorta like the Heritage Foundations original support for a mandate in the late 80s/early 90s (which pulled a lot of conservative pols on board), but a reversal of that opinion when the mandate was analyzed as a Constitutional issue, and not solely an economic solution.

    OMG.. the Heritage Foundation was *wrong*! I’ll never trust them again! LOL Yes, that’s sarcasm…

    But the general thrust of the “couch potato” ad was a call to action for climate protection (not specific in legislation or devil in the details). Ergo, it could only incriminate Newt on whether he was an AGW believer or skeptic at that moment in time. Newt, I suspect, is not the only person to convert from AGW believer to skeptic.

    But the ad bears no resembles to a non binding treaty agreement that encompasses far more than just AGW beliefs.

    Second, as Newt deliberately broaches the subject on the campaign trail and in the televised debates, he notes it’s particularly heinous since it’s the federal government, acting on a treaty agreement that’s never been ratified, and implemented at the local level.

    Truth in campaigning… it’s important. Both Newt and Ron Paul are on the money for Agenda 21. But at least Newt’s bringing the subject up for debate. Hopefully Ron Paul will start doing the same, instead of only approaching it when asked.

    We return you to your originally scheduled topic.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
  10. John Cooper says: 11

    I sent Newt $100 this morning on general principles. I absolutely hate the way the GOP insiders and elite media (even Drudge) are treating the man. So in my case, all their slurs and slander backfired.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  11. Disenchanted says: 12

    @Poppa_T: Thanks I realize I was off topic but couldn’t find a better place for it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  12. James Raider says: 13

    Great picture, Skook. – “My, but doesn’t his suit fit well.” (Punchline to a very old joke. Couldn’t help it.)

    The current version of the Sun King has, from day one, brought to parties at the W.H., bus-loads of well-off admirers, sufficiently dipped in sycophancy, in order for them to pay homage. They could then return to whence they came and spread the word about how ‘personable’ and great Barry is. It’s amazing how many of these Holywood and sports doofusses have appeared on late night TV to repeat the refrain. This parade of uninformed coolaid drinkers is very reminiscent of Slick Willie’s parties and his ‘use’ of the Lincoln Bedroom.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  13. James Raider says: 14

    @Disenchanted: #3,

    . . . . Safe assumption.

    Everyone beholden to Obama will be on this new Council, even Timmy G. What an illustrious bunch. They will give their future monarch, control over all “food, fiber, and energy” in America.

    Obama has dreams of holding the newly created position of demi-god at the UN whenever he gets heaved from the White House. He will be crowned with help from Soros.

    His Executive Order buttressing Article 21, is a critical cornerstone of the edifice he is constructing for himself and Jarrett. A new world order in his mind is one thing, but the MSM and Congress letting it happen is another.

    Don’t just beat the drums lightly . . . .

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  14. Richard Wheeler says: 15

    Anticsrocks I think BHO would be more concened if it was an NBA or NFL player. Hockey, ain’t that a Canuck game (a goalie to boot)? lol

    Agenda 21 and the seizure of private property. That incessant whir of helicopters overhead.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  15. anticsrocks says: 16

    @Richard Wheeler: Helicopters?

    Watch this video, if you would:

    Agenda 21 for Dummies

    Peruse the documentation of Agenda 21, if you would:

    Agenda 21 Core Publications

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  16. Richard Wheeler says: 17

    Anticsrocks Thanks I’ll spend some time studying this.Remember however, I am a confirmed tree hugger. lol

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  17. SKOOKUM
    VERY GOOD NICE TO HAVE YOU BACK TOO.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  18. Disenchanted
    yes I think so too, and it seems to not have been seriously taken, and he knows the people find this too incredible to take it seriously, and that’s how he get away with it, we can read it right in front of our eyes and many would think the same thing, LIKE NEVER IN AMERICA,
    and one day like now, you find a change in this COUNTRY different, and broken down in hope and spirits and no jobs, is it another part of his agenda done with, and what is next,
    you are right, very dangerous, because no one believe he will do it, and he does,
    just like the gun running, the increase power of TSA, ecetera, people of good faith and mind are writing more books about the warning than never before.
    the JEWS, said it cannot happen here in GERMANY, WHILE THEY WHERE CARRIED IN TRAINS TO THE PRISON , OR FUMIGATED TO DEATH, THEY WHERE LURED WITH WORDS OF;’ IT’S TO PROTECT YOU’
    what’s the gap between ” never in AMERICA, IT CAN’T HAPPEN”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  19. anticsrocks says: 20

    @Richard Wheeler: Well, at least you will take a look at it; which is a much better response than the eye rolling “helicopter” comment. Don’t you think?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  20. Snerd Gronk says: 21

    Yes … without governmental controls, Newt and Timmy could have all them poor kids cleaning their toilets.

    Snerd

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  21. Smorgasbord says: 22

    @Disenchanted: #3
    From articles I have read, the Kyoto Protocol will turn all Federal property over to UN control. This would include Federal buildings, the White House, Congress, military bases, etc. Obama wants to sign it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  22. Smorgasbord
    are we there yet?
    if not this tell me we are very close,
    when you will see the COMPANIES get out fast leaving a shadow front only,
    IT then will be too late to run, and the poors will start to starve, the checks won’t be coming back,
    and there won’t be anywhere to go for them, because they won’t have any money to buy their tickets,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  23. SKOOKUM
    we can already see businesses having trouble, when they hire animal to advertise their product,
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Snerd Gronk says: 25

    @ilovebeeswarzone:
    Hey … Quite the buffet of pa(R)anoia. Just how far removed from empirical reality does one have to be, to start to see things this conspiratorially … ?

    Snerd

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  25. Snerd Gronk says: 26

    @Smorgasbord:

    Your ‘thinking’ sounds un-controlled … with fea(R) substituting for facts …

    Snerd

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  26. Snerd Gronk
    yes that is the best way to get them to think properly, is to teach them to clean their s..t
    who need regulation for that,
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  27. Snerd Gronk
    what did I said again for you to send me a boomerang?
    did you mentioned paramiopharnoa?
    I can assure you it’s real,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  28. Richard Wheeler says: 29

    Snerd Gronk Smorg, who prides himself on “Studying closely” before making decisions, is a birther.

    Nuff Said

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  29. Snerd Gronk says: 30

    @ilovebeeswarzone:
    I am just talking about your thinking … the ‘thing’ that presumably gets you to your conclusion.

    This we’re signing the deed over to the UN is just ridiculous.

    The biggest threat to citizen democracy (one citizen, one vote), is dollar democracy (one dollar one vote, many dollars many votes), which by the way came outta your (R) SCOTUS, which sees $$$ as free speech and co(R)po(R)ations as people (but ‘special’ people since it still grants them limited liability).

    You want something to fear, start with empirical reality, that’s actually happening …

    Snerd

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  30. Smorgasbord says: 31

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #23
    Don’t worry. The government will always be there to bail businesses out. LOL

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  31. Smorgasbord says: 32

    @Snerd Gronk: 26
    YOU SAID
    Your ‘thinking’ sounds un-controlled …

    REPLY
    Thank you for the compliment. I don’t want to have CONTROLLED thinking. I want the FREEDOM to think for myself. If you were allowed to think for yourself, do you have any idea what you would think about?

    YOU SAID
    …with fea(R) substituting for facts …

    REPLY
    I FEAR where our country is going. That is why I joined the Tea Party movement. Unlike the organizations that you might belong to, the Tea Party is thousands of INDEPENDENT groups fighting to stop the increasing size of government, increasing taxes, increasing number of our freedoms that are disappearing, and other things that the US Constitution says we can have that the politicians don’t want us to have any more.

    The R or D doesn’t apply to me. I don’t belong to any party and I want ALL politicians thrown out and to start over.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  32. Smorgasbord says: 33

    @Richard Wheeler: #29
    YOU SAID
    …who prides himself on “Studying closely” before making decisions, is a birther.

    REPLY
    I became a birther AFTER “studying closely,” and studying a lot of things for a long time. I have an open mind and want to know the truth. If Obama can disprove the things being said about his birth certificate and Social Security number, why doesn’t he?

    Aren’t you the least bit curious about why he isn’t responding to the accusations? Doesn’t it bother you that he is using another person’s Social Security card and that the birth certificate has been proven fake? Remember George Bush’s fake military papers the propaganda media came up with. Dan Rather lost his job over it. As I remember, you said they were fake. Why wouldn’t the propaganda media try fake papers again? They just need to hire better fakers.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  33. anticsrocks
    wow, will you follow up on it, I hope, but what about the election, what do we do now,
    maybe NEWT should be alert, hope CURT AND SKOOKUM READ IT,
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  34. Smorgasbord says: 36

    @anticsrocks: #33
    World Net Daily has been reporting on all if the issues brought up in the case. I suggest you sign on for their emails. You should have pasted some of the proceedings for all to read, especially the libs. I especially liked the following:

    DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

    She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

    Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

    Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  35. Smorgasbord
    what do you think will follow

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  36. MITT ROMNEY is quite arrogant toward NEWT GINGRICH,I hope FLORIDA NOTICE IT, THE GAP OF MONEY is to his [ROMNEY ] advantage, and he is not a gracious person, to take advantage of that surplus over NEWT BY having messages over messages to hurt his opponent with lies which wont stop,
    he look more like OBAMA AS HE GOES,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  37. Smorgasbord says: 39

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #36
    Things that will happen if Obama is declared ineligible to run for president:
    (1) I will get the biggest steak dinner paid for by my financial planner. He won’t complain since Obama won’t be running again.
    (2) If he doesn’t qualify this election, he didn’t qualify in the last election. This means that every appointment, executive order, contracts and laws signed into law, etc., are voided.
    (3) The democratic party will be investigated.
    (4) King Obama and a lot of his court will move from the White House to the Big House.
    (5) The democratic party will disappear.
    (6) We will get all of the money and freedoms back that Obama took from us. (Let me dream this one for a while)

    The only two bad things I see if Obama is declared illegal are:
    (1) Joe Biden takes over.
    (2) Joe pardons Obama and his court, but they have to be convicted first to be pardoned.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  38. Smorgasbord
    yes but what happen with the election, It has to happen and
    before
    that should be kept under until the time for the last debate comes in order to kill 2 birds at the same time so the conservatives get to come in, and I think the judge will figure that one too.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  39. Smorgasbord says: 41

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #39
    It all depends on how long the trial will last. Without Obama or his lawyer there, it shouldn’t take long. We will just have to wait and see what happens. Have you ever seen a big building implode. They are fun to watch. I wonder how long it will take for this building to implode.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  40. Smorgasbord
    I’m thinking of the dangers, very possible too and lives threatening for citizens,some on his side rising up to prevent the justice to happen every steps will have to be coordinated by the FBI, one at a time,
    to be figured out the related dangers possible, so to be ready to counter it,
    you just have to check the OAKLAND 400 rioting and causing many police officers to be wounded while arresting them. that give an idea, and you know they where incited by SOROS and friends,
    that is telling a lot,
    who knows it might even be related, to that as a pre scenario, which was thought of, who can tell.
    they know it’s coming, they surely have an exit planned,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  41. anticsrocks says: 43

    @Smorgasbord: I found the proceedings fascinating for two reasons.

    1. Of course, the MSM will ignore and bury this story until they have no choice.
    2. Now everything is officially part of a court record, which Obama will eventually have to address.

    The upcoming election should be interesting.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  42. Smorgasbord says: 44

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #41
    That is why I am glad that I live in the part of Idaho that I do. Most people I talk to in my area are conservative and have several guns and plenty of ammo if they need it.

    My biggest concern is that if Obama feels that he is going to be found out, what is to keep him from secretly getting on Air Force One and going to a Muslim country or China and giving them the plane?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  43. Smorgasbord says: 45

    @anticsrocks: #42
    Thanks for the link. I will try to follow the story on the web sight. If the case goes against Obama and he is proven to not be qualified to be president, and if the Supreme Court refuses to hear any more cases like this, then they are admitting they know he is an illegal and but still want him as president.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  44. Smorgasbord
    I always read that the USA a NATION of LAW, and how would it be accepted,
    if the civilians
    get punish by the law then if he is found illegal and was leading for 4 years, this is so much more.
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  45. Donald Bly says: 47

    @Snerd Gronk: I remember as a kid… the 6th graders did the school crossing chores before and after school.. I also remember in the 90′s those same kids being replaced by PAID school crossing guards… stupid is as stupid does… let the kids guard the crossings… and maybe now and then sweep the f’ing floor.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  46. Richard Wheeler says: 48

    Anticsrocks Top of the morning to ya, I notticed you were up late with your new best friend Smorg.
    Shame you and Dr. John had a fallout Seems you couldn’t handle his reasoned assessment that Romney would be a much better choice against BHO than Gingrich.
    He seems a nice enough chap,an obviously proud Birther, and a strong believer that BHO is a Muslim.Do you agree?
    Are you close enough to Idaho that you might share his arsenal of weapons as needed?
    After “Obama’s trial and conviction and his escape in Air Force One to a Muslim country” no telling the need.
    I’m looking forward to further tales from you guys.Exciting stuff.
    BTW Smorg You mentioned Obama would give Air Force One to a Muslim country. Think maybe he could sell it for enough to continue his elitist lifestyle? just a thought.Keep em’ coming. Your lucky to have an ally like anticsrocks.

    Semper Fi Maybe you can get Col. West or Sheriff Joe to lead your militia.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  47. Smorgasbord
    that is why, NEWT GINGRICH MUST BE THE WINNER, he won’t back down on this,
    he is the fighter, he know the inside game in all GOVERNMENTS CORNERS, HE CAN FIX IT,
    and return the COUNTRY to her normal, and get the culprits
    where they belong, and finish that page faster so to
    repair the damages of these years. he know how too,
    because he was there long enough, the other has more money, but money should not be the factor to have one win over the other, that is wrong if it come to that,
    but with what we see, there is so many other wrongs to fix, it wouldn’t be surprising if the one with money win.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  48. Richard Wheeler
    don’t try to get more info, their lips are sealed , you are not trusted there

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  49. Richard Wheeler says: 51

    Ms Bees #48 It’s too late.I tortured them mercilessly and they gave up all I needed to know.

    BTW Looks like Mitt’s bought a Fla. win. Maybe Newt can be our first Senator from the moon? Think you can yell over for Sarah’s help?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  50. Richard Wheeler
    don’t push it too far, because you might be thrown in the cling with those you support,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  51. Smorgasbord says: 53

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #46
    As more and more states are writing laws making it mandatory for a politician to prove they are legally qualified to run for the office they want to run for, I see more states that Obama can’t qualify for. This is why I have said for a long time that he won’t run again. The states won’t let him this time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  52. Smorgasbord says: 54

    @Richard Wheeler: #48
    I don’t have an arsenal of weapons, but I’m glad that a lot of people in my area do. Haven’t you wondered why, if Obama can prove he is legally qualified to be president, he doesn’t just give the Georgia court the info?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  53. Smorgasbord
    there is no two way to escape from it, you sure have the right questions
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  54. Smorgasbord says: 56

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #49
    I don’t belong to a political party, so I can’t vote for who will run. I personally want someone else to run, not politicians. I’m tired of politicians who only want to advance their own career.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  55. Donald Bly says: 57

    Colonization of the Moon is a brilliant idea and a worthy goal for NASA to pursue… it beats the hell out of their current mission… “make the Muslims feel good about their scientific achievement” (or lack thereof). Kennedy thought big too… And we made it to the moon while only having the computing power of a modern underpowered calculator.

    Thank you Newt for having the balls to propose worthwhile pursuits for our now idle space agency.

    Newt 2012 and the Moon by 2020

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  56. Smorgasbord says: 58

    @Snerd Gronk: #30
    YOU SAID
    This we’re signing the deed over to the UN is just ridiculous.

    RESPONSE
    It has already started. Bill Clinton signed a law that puts a lot of our Federal property under UN rules. I am guessing that if the UN changes the rules, we will have to go by the new rules, but that is just a guess. I have seen the plaque at Yellowstone National Park that says it is under US and UN control, but didn’t know what it meant at that time.

    http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA253.html

    The above link starts out saying: What do the Statue of Liberty, Independence Hall, Jefferson’s Monticello and Yellowstone National Park have in common? Each of these national treasures is regulated according to the dictates of foreign bureaucrats rather than according to the will of the American people.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  57. Snerd Gronk
    hi
    You know ,I’ve been thinking also, but it’s about your comment address to me,
    I cannot figure it out, IT might be to over my expertise of knowledge which I find limited at times, most of the time really, but I tend to get the feel of it usual, enough to debate a bit on the subject,
    but you got me speechless with the empiric fear, or was it to catcha me for your laugh? or what does it mean, what was the intent of your comment?
    I have to warn you, of my answer will be different depending of your explanation
    bye
    edit; empiric acting on observation and experiment not on theories; relying solely on experiment;quack, I just checked it, is it what is being done at high level now?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  58. Donald Bly
    you might think I’m racist, but can you see a MUSLIM BURY A IED ON THE MOON,
    SO no taking any of those on a colonies of the moon, can you see us down on earth, watching the moon and being always on stress that it might happen,can you see us forever MOONLESS, BECAUSE THEY BLEW IT UP

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  59. anticsrocks says: 61

    @Richard Wheeler: Oh Rich, you have a good name, because the yarns you spin are so very rich.

    But on second thought, maybe you ought to change your name to Agitator, for it seems to suit you…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  60. Richard Wheeler says: 62

    Anticsrocks I was merely commenting on the yarns spun by Smorg. I LOVED THEM.
    Mata called me a pot stirrer and you consider me an agitator.

    Sounds like a Ron Paul supporter.I’M NOT but I do respect his ability to agitate and stir the pot.Don’t you?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  61. anticsrocks says: 63

    @Richard Wheeler: The only thing I respect about Ron Paul is his view of the Fed.

    Remember that line from that movie?

    “You had me at hello.”

    In this case, with Ron Paul I say,

    “You lost me at, ‘It’s okay for Iran to have nukes.’”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  62. Johngalt
    hi,
    come and check 16 and 34,
    very interesting, I would also like your opinion
    when you can
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  63. Smorgasbord says: 65

    @Donald Bly: #57
    NASA went to the moon with just 2 megabytes of memory. Most of my pictures use more. I’m all for going to the moon. Better us than Russia or China, but let’s fix our country first.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  64. Smorgasbord says: 66

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #60
    Bubs Bunny will keep the U-232 from being used.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  65. Smorgasbord says: 67

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #64
    This is the first I have heard of Agenda 21. I guess I should go back to the beginning of each story’s comments when I read an article that interests me.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  66. Smorgasbord
    I’m now the day after, any new developments on what we are working on? I wake thinking that we should advise the PENTAGONE, to prevent AIR FORCE 1 TO FLY, FROM NOW ON, so they can advise the PILOT to refuse any assignments out of the USA, just in case your concern is well founded,
    especially after we learned of agenda 21, it is our outmost duty to do it,
    bye
    edit; I know BUGS BUNNY, BUT WHO IS BUBS BUNNY
    IS HE WITH US

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  67. Smorgasbord says: 69

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #68
    Bubs Bunny is the name you get when you INTEND to type Bugs Bunny but hit the wrong key just one time and don’t notice the error. The weird thing is that I always try to go back and proof read my comments before I send them. This one slipped by me.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  68. Smorgasbord
    that was my excuse to say hi, which is a word too short to post comment
    bye
    edit; wow we are sitting duck with a multitude of ASTEROIDS orbiting the planet,a study from a japaneese physicist

    as if we don’t have enough problem on this earth planet of the universe
    edit2; yes both languages

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  69. Smorgasbord
    if you get joetote to give me the job, I WILL give you earmarks [what ever it is]
    seems to be goodies in the W.H.
    I would take some too.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  70. Smorgasbord says: 72

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #70
    I think King Obama and his court will have a worse impact on the planet than most of the asteroids out there. I don’t worry about them.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  71. Smorgasbord says: 73

    @ilovebeeswarzone: #71
    Earmarks are just another way for politicians to get more money. When a project is earmarked (like the bridge to nowhere in Alaska) the money is guaranteed, even if the project is never done. They are very seldom done, but the state gets the money anyway. It’s the normal, “I’ll vote for your pet project if you will vote for mine.”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  72. Hard Right says: 74

    Bubs Bunny is Bugs Bunny’s less successful brother. He was Bugs stunt double for some time, but an injury forced him to retire. They had a falling out years ago when Bubs wrote a tell all book about Bugs. Since then he’s been thru rehab multiple times for various pain medication addictions and had several brushes with the law.
    Last I heard he has a tiny hole in the ground somewhere in the country. Sad really.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  73. Hard Right
    hi, very interesting to read, thank you, I thought he was just a member of the cartoonist creativity.
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  74. anticsrocks says: 76

    @Hard Right: Come on now, HR. Bubs isn’t bad! He’s just drawn that way… :-P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  75. Smorgasbord says: 77

    @Hard Right: #74
    I always wondered how Bugs could take all of the stuff he did and not get hurt. Are you saying that that stuff didn’t really happen to him? It was all a fake? How could this be? Are there any other fake shows like this on TV.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  76. Hard Right,
    anticsrocks
    there was an ACE PILOT in the WWll call BUXI, he was famous for his actions in fighting the GERMAN’S PLANES.
    my spelling his name might not be correct,
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  77. Hard Right says: 79

    @Smorgasbord:
    Bugs was too valuable to risk injury, so they brought in Bubs. They look exactly alike, but the second he speaks, you know it isn’t Bugs.
    In case you want to read it, the book he wrote is called, ” I’m Not Your Doc.”
    Bubs claimed he wasn’t the only stunt double in Toon Town. In fact, he alleged that there was quite a body count racked up in the Road Runner cartoons- coyotes only of course. Warner Brothers denied the charge. Such dishing got him blackballed from the industry.
    I wish I hadn’t read the book. You wouldn’t belive what Elmer was into. It really taints childhood memories and leaves you more cynical. What’s next? The father on the Brady bunch wasn’t straight?

    @ilovebeeswarzone:
    I recall Bugs tangling with a Gremlin in WWII. I can’t recall his war record tho. ;)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  78. Smorgasbord says: 80

    @Hard Right: #79
    I’m going to be crying myself to sleep tonight. Don’t you know how to break things like this gently? I’m glad I am retired so that I don’t have to go to work. I’d probably have to call in sick.

    Don’t tell me what Elmer was into, but I do have to know if that is what made him talk funny.

    Next time you want to tell some dirty secrets, please don’t start with something like a truck driver would: “You ain’t going to believe this, but….” Instead, start with something like, “Do you want to know why Elmer Fudd talks funny?” Then I can answer, “If it won’t keep me up at night.”

    Bugs was in the Army. It didn’t work out too well.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhuNwo-ZpWE

    He was in an Air Force plane, but not by choice.
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4wmuh_bugs-bunny-in-falling-hare_fun

    So, all the bad stuff that happened to Bugs, actually happened to Bubs? I can never watch another Bugs Bunny adventure movie again, because I know now that PARTS of them aren’t real.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  79. Hard Right says: 81

    @Smorgasbord:

    Sorry Smorg. I’m of the camp that bad news should be given like the removal of duct tape from someone’s face- quickly.
    Oh yes, what Elmer was into definitely affected his speech. Supposedly the stress of being typecast as the fool really got to him and led him to do…..stuff.

    Yes, it was all Bubs. Bugs was a megastar and you know they couldn’t risk him. Bubs paid quite a price for his brother’s fame. All that stuff about toons being almost indestructable is just industry lies. It allows them to cover up the mass casualties.

    Then there is Daffy. Per Bub he was actually a swan who underwent radical plastic surgery to become a duck since that is what Warner Brothers demanded. The surgery left him with neurological damage that effected his speech and behavior. Playing second bannana to Bugs didn’t help his behavior and neither did his speech impediment.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  80. Nan G says: 82

    Daffy in the service!
    Who else remembers his great job?
    He was ”testing” large bombs to see if they were duds by taking a hammer to their tip as they came by on an assembly line!
    Funniest cartoon ever!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  81. Hard Right says: 83

    @Nan G:

    I vaguely remember that one, but I’ll be darned if I can find it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  82. Smorgasbord says: 84

    @Hard Right: #81
    I’m not going to ask you how you know what it feels like to have duct tape jerked off of your face. I don’t want to know, so don’t tell me. You must be going through some body modifications too. I hope it turns out OK.

    I have learned a lot from FA, but some of it I wish I never had. There are so many situations where ignorance is bliss, and I am getting less and less blissful all the time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  83. Smorgasbord says: 85

    @Nan G: #82
    I loved it too. I feel sorry for today’s parents who want to raise there kids with high moral values. They don’t seem to be making just fun cartoons today. They seem to have a liberal agenda.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  84. Nan G says: 86

    @Smorgasbord: I don’t know about the ”high moral values” of old toons, Smorgasbord.

    I remember all those Betty Boop cartoons with Cab Calloway.
    Seems much of the plot went right over my young head….until I was MUCH older.
    LOL!

    Mighty Mouse seemed to always have to save his shapely girlfriend from the clutches of an S&M nutcase.
    Popeye and Bluto and Olive’s relationships all seemed messed up, too.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  85. Smorgasbord says: 87

    @Nan G: #86
    My generation’s world wasn’t perfect, but it didn’t have cartoons selling products, the bad guy NEVER won, and you never heard a cuss word on TV or radio. I don’t keep track of how the cartoons are now, but I didn’t care for them a few years back. The cartoons in my time were just to make you laugh, and they did.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  86. Michael Henkins
    you might be interested to check here on number 16 the link on agenda 21for dummies and the other link same number 16. on agenda 21 core publication.

    plus go on 34 link OBAMA ILIGIBILITY court case …blow by blow
    both on anticsrocks comments,
    it tell you of my answer on your POST about GEORGIA,
    bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>