Scathing ad released by Ron Paul about Gingrich:
But am I alone here in asking why no one is going after Romney? Bachmann gets hot, the media and her competitors hack away. Perry gets hot, and they hack away. Cain gets hot….bam! Now we’re on to Gingrich but who the hell is hacking away at Romney? Mighty curious.
As for the ad itself, it’s definitely information people should mull over before pulling the lever for Newt but I’m with Ace’s rant here (always long winded but well worth the read)
….our choices suck:
…We don’t have a Pure Conservative in the race. (Possibly the unelectable Bachmann, but only because she’s only been in office since shortly before the outbreak of the Tea Party, and really has never been asked to do anything except play to the Tea Party. And, meanwhile, she and her husband’s clinics scooped up all the federal and state money they could.)
I guess I don’t have a point except to say I really don’t think it is useful or true to debate these guys in terms of “The True Conservative I Can Get Behind.”
None of them are that. None. So the Quest for the Pure True Conservative can and should end, and we should stop talking about such nonsense and start talking, seriously, about the imperfect candidates we have.
Gingrich would be an okay imperfect candidate. So, I guess, would Romney.
But this idea that someone here must be a True Conservative, because, gosh, someonemust be, is just plain wrong.
Ok, I’m not completely with Ace here since I don’t think Romney is an okay imperfect candidate. If it’s Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, I’m probably sitting home since it isn’t a choice. Romney is OLite, plain and simple. And don’t even bring up Ron Paul because I would rather get punched in the testicles than vote for that nutcase.
So where does that leave us?
Screwed.
anticsrocks
congratulation, you had to jump over MATA, to get it, you must have held your breath hoping for her to finish desperately ,
bye
@ Gary G. Swenchonis:
Hi Gary, I tend to get ticked off during the GOP primaries too. I have to tell you though, republicans have it bad compared to libs. We have no choice but to brutalize all of our primary candidates, because if they get the nomination without a good vetting, the LSM will destroy them. The libs need no brutal primary or vetting, the LSM will protect their candidate no matter what. Just look at Obama.
Ron Paul is holding his own, he’s just being vetted. My guy, Perry continues to disintegrate, although he did smack Romney around pretty good the other night. Newt has a lot of baggage, but he doesn’t seem to mind throwing it out there for everyone to go through. I thought he took care of Perry’s jab about cheating rather well.
I don’t know if Paul will make it to the finals, but if he does, I’ll vote for him over Obama in a New York minute. And if he doesn’t make it to the finals, I hope he supports the nominee and when that nominee wins, I hope he makes Paul Sec Treas. Could you imagine the collective cries of agony from the fed and the IRS when that announcement was made?
Aqua
hi,
I saw PERRY holding strong, even after that, what’s his name flake journalist surprised him with a flash on
him trying to remember the name of SOTOMYER JUDGE,,
PERRY took it like he can control his answers very well, saying that you cannot know all
the names of those people working there, he’s right, there is so many but it has no weight in leading skills, if AMERICANS could just get off the part of forgetting unimportant words, and names, they could focus on the best part of who he is as a leader, and his achivement there to see,
he is also very sincere, in what he want to do, and that is a lot for jobs creation, and the rest
there is a lot more positives to focus on. than stick on negatives, and look at the hair in the eyes,
and miss the good straw in front of it.
that flake journalist is out to hurt them, he did it to
MICHEL BACKMANN TOO,
FOX IS NOT GAINING ANYTHING GOOD WITH HIS STYLE
SNEAKY LIKE A SNAKE WITH MANY FLAKES SKIN
one could say PERRY FORGOT MY NAME BUT HE SURE GOT ME A JOB, AND EALY IN HIS PRESIDENCY,