26 Oct

A New Wave Of Islamic Terror, Courtesy Of Obama

                                       

Using the murky reasoning of Obama Logic, best described as an enigma, An Islamist Spring has been imposed upon the world with the aid and encouragement of Obama. In his latest attempt to impose freedom and mayhem on the people of Libya, Obama has used the American military to insure that the people of Libya could depose their despot and pave the way for a wave of terror and bloodshed, while they determine their own Islamic Fundamentalist destiny.

While Socialist revolutionaries praise the vision of Obama, there are others who are willing to realistically appraise what the Narcissist in Chief and his personal direction of the American military has accomplished with this latest foreign policy disaster.

Libya has some of the richest sweet crude reserves in the world. The crude is called sweet crude because it costs far less to refine than other crude oil. In the world of oil, on which the true economy of the world is based, an economy in which Obama wants America to be only a consumer of wealth and not a producer of wealth, this sweet crude is among the most valuable. Thus it will be a great generator of wealth for whatever Islamic Fundamentalist Strongman that forces his way into power.

It is the nature of Obama Logic that nothing he does is ever explained or needs to be explained: whether it is because he is incapable of explaining his actions or he refuses to explain because of wishing to maintain a self-imposed image of omnipotency or perhaps, he knows if the country knew his true intentions, he would need to deal with his own American uprising, we will never know.

If Islamic Fundamentalists kept their insanity and thirst for blood and mayhem within their own borders, the free world would be content to watch them commit atrocities and sodomize each other, under the name of Allah; unfortunately, the nature of the Islamic Fundamentalist requires them to export their madness and sexual perversities beyond their own borders to the free world. Consequently, Obama has decided, he needs to help these Islamic Fundamentalists spread their gospel throughout the world by indirectly providing them with the wealth of one of the most oil rich countries in the world. Now, they will be truly free to define their own brand of Islamic Fundamentalism throughout the world.

Thus when the blood stops flowing in Libya, they will be free to finance Jihad and liberate the free world of this demonic possession of personal and religious freedoms. This may well be the most enduring aspect of the Obama legacy. We will have Obama to thank for the new mindless wave of terror that will be unleashed upon the free world with the almost limitless funds to be provided to the new masters of terror, by Libya’s sweet crude and the helpful hand of Obama guiding the US military.

To show our gratitude towards Obama and his bizarre willingness to provide nearly limitless funding to Islamic nut sacks devoted to terror, this new wave of terror should be known as the Obama’s Terror and when the American military once again has to storm the shores of Tripoli to stop the mindless and bloody insanity, we should toast their sacrifice and praise the unfathomable lunacy of Obama Logic.

About Skook

A professional horseman for over 40 years, Skook continues to work with horses. He is in an ongoing educational program, learning life's lessons from one of the world's greatest instructors, the horse. Skook has a personal website skooksjournal.com featuring his personal writings and historical novel type stories.
This entry was posted in American Exceptionalism, Barack Obama, Constitution, Culture of Corruption, Disasters, Freedom, Libya, Obamanomics, Oil, Radical Relationships and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Wednesday, October 26th, 2011 at 6:39 am
| 383 views

19 Responses to A New Wave Of Islamic Terror, Courtesy Of Obama

  1. Nan G says: 1

    Skookum, you wrote:

    If Islamic Fundamentalists kept their insanity and thirst for blood and mayhem within their own borders, the free world would be content to watch them commit atrocities and sodomize each other, under the name of Allah; unfortunately, the nature of the Islamic Fundamentalist requires them to export their madness and sexual perversities beyond their own borders to the free world.

    But WHY does the ”nature of the Islamic Fundamentalist requires them to export their madness and sexual perversities beyond their own borders to the free world?”

    People are bound to ask this.
    When Mubarak (who may or may not be dead) was running Egypt one of his top ministers released a study of the work habits of government workers there.
    Remember, unless you are in with the in-crowd, you cannot get gov’t jobs in Egypt.
    So, no Coptics or other Christians, no atheists or agnostics…..
    No Jews…..
    No minority Muslim sects such as the Ahmadhi sect ….
    were among these government workers.

    Only strong Muslims were allowed to have these high paying, secure jobs.
    And the sign that a man is a strong Muslim is a ”raisin” or bruise on his forehead proving he bashes it down hard on his prayer rug up to 100 times a day during his 5 mandatory prayers.

    So, what is the work ethic of these strong Muslims?
    They put in only 24 minutes per day actually working.
    All the rest of their day (on the ”job,”) was devoting to abulations (ritualistic bathing) changing into and out of prayer clothing, going to and from their prayer room and doing their prayers.
    Oh, and lunch, too.

    24 minutes of work a day!
    No wonder they require a 2nd-class slave group to get the work done.
    Their form of worship, when practiced as laid out in their holy books, leaves them no extra time for work.
    Expansion and enslavement of non-Muslims is essential to their well-being as fundamentalist Muslims.
    This also explains why so many of them have relocated to the socialistic welfare states in Europe.

    ReplyReply
  2. joetote says: 2

    Skook,
    By now you pretty much know where I stand, especially with our racetrack backgrounds to boot. as usual, you are spot on in your analysis. One thing though that the MSM and most of the lefties in general (other than the Anti-Israeli blowhards at these protest fiascos) are happily ignoring reporting wise. Thanks to the Anti-Semite in the White House and his open policy of supporting hard core Islamic Radicalism, Israel is now effectively surrounded by her enemies (only a matter of time before Syria goes down the rest of the way). As one must guess that Israel will not stand still and defend herself as she should, one must also assume that the Nobel Prize winner for Peace (choke) has effectively assured there will in fact be an all out war in the Mideast with the radicals feeling assured there will be nothing but lip service from the fantasy land run by Obama and company. these are now scary times. You of course remember the soviet Nuclear scres in the fifties as do I. On one hand it was legitimate until we discovered they were not as far along as we though. Here we have the situation that in having a President who not only clearly sympathizes with the Radical Muslims and the destruction of not only Israel but apparently of Western Civilization as we know it, we are now on the edge of what could become a world war. I truly believe that.

    ReplyReply
  3. Liberal1 (objectivity) says: 3

    Actually, Libya is the main supplier of French and Italian oil. Now suppose Libya decided they were going to also supply China—and thereby limit their European clients’ supply, or increase their price. Wouldn’t you go to war too? Strange how some people put their own personal spin on issues, without really knowing the background of them. Stranger still, how many people believe them.

    ReplyReply
  4. James Raider says: 4

    Skook, . . . great rant – there is absolutely no doubt that Libya is heading for rule under Sharia Law, along with Tunisia and Egypt, which automatically puts supreme power in the hands of the religious elite – the Mullahs, who are dumber than rocks, but who are really good at feathering their own nests and concentrating their power / influence.

    This is NOT democracy. But, our brilliant MSM seems oblivious to this.

    BTW, did you notice that Hillary visited a GM plant built in Uzbekistan – a vicious and ruthless dictatorship where Slick Willy made financial deals with Islam Karimov, the Dictator for Life. Obama and Hillary have been providing this clown with ample arms to keep him in power.

    ReplyReply
  5. James Raider says: 5

    @Nan G: #1,

    So, what is the work ethic of these strong Muslims?
    They put in only 24 minutes per day actually working.
    All the rest of their day (on the ”job,”) was devoting to abulations (ritualistic bathing) changing into and out of prayer clothing, going to and from their prayer room and doing their prayers.
    Oh, and lunch, too.

    Excellent comment – you have nailed one of the core reasons why the Islamic countries controlled by the religious leaders will continue to fail. Only those who emigrate to other shores, have a chance of achieving anything. The Islamic world is locked in a box that is seems unable to climb out of.

    It’s a self-imposed exile from freedom of thought.

    ReplyReply
  6. Greg says: 6

    It’s strongly recommended that you stay indoors until after the 2012 elections. Don’t forget to apply duct tape around all your doors and windows.

    ReplyReply
  7. rich wheeler says: 7

    Greg #6 Roger that.Pretty damn frightening.

    ReplyReply
  8. liberalmann says: 8

    Hmm…911 happened on Bush’s watch and Obama has killed more terrorist leaders than Bush ever dreamed of.

    ReplyReply
  9. MataHarley says: 9

    @Liberal1 (objectivity): Actually, Libya is the main supplier of French and Italian oil. Now suppose Libya decided they were going to also supply China—and thereby limit their European clients’ supply, or increase their price. Wouldn’t you go to war too? Strange how some people put their own personal spin on issues, without really knowing the background of them. Stranger still, how many people believe them.

    Well as I live and breathe… a liberal who believes in a war for oil! Who woulda thunk it. Almost gives me hope.

    ~~~

    Master Skook… you always weave a great tale. Even the times I may disagree with one of Skookum’s fables and their moral of the story, I always enjoy the read for the flow of the prose.

    In this case, it might be a stretch to pin the unrisings in the ME to Obama’s coattails. Remember that he is very careful to point out he was leading from behind, except in those moments when he wants to take credit for the outcome. I’m stunned that, considering the evidence of war crimes, he’s still so gung ho on that which he officially gave the nation’s stamp of approval (over the objection of so many of us…. including Congress.) It’s also amusing that his admin is eying the ME unfolding with such trepidation, that they actually were attempting to “occupy Iraq” for a longer period, and with a larger number of troops to maintain bases there. LOL

    Rather I would say I agree with your Aesop’ish moral of the story, but not by why he did. Instead of what he didn’t do. For a man that doesn’t believe the US should be the world’s police… but does… and that we should be concentrating on the problems at home… but doesn’t….he sure does a heckuva lot of meddling in other nation’s affairs.

    What Obama could have done was kept the US isolated from another Muslim nation’s civil wars.

    What Obama could have done was demonstrate that the US will not engage in deposing a quasi-ally Muslim friend – despite having problems with their past, but respecting the last decade of their support – and leave the Libyans problems to the Libyans.

    The perfect example of this push-pull relationship, and a wise diplomatic response that leaves the US out of it, goes back to Bush the younger and Musharraf’s problems in Pakistan. That nation did what it would do, and the US was quite clear that it appreciated relations with the nation, but what they chose to do was up to the Pakistanis.

    A lesson that Obama has yet to learn….

    Larry W has made the point, several times, that when our allies (France, Britain etal) decide to back even a wrong headed issue, we back them. While I agree in principle,depending upon how extreme the issue, that wasn’t how it came down. For it was Hillary, Susan Rice and Samantha Powers that advocated for the Libyan “no fly”/hidden assassination agenda to begin with. All are Obama appointees, and serve at the pleasure of the POTUS.

    This is hardly leading from behind when the US is the one, holding the drumsticks and mallets, pounding the initial drums of war. What it actually is constitutes being the head cheerleader, but then asking the squad to do all the heavy lifting.

    ReplyReply
  10. MataHarley says: 10

    @liberalmann… wanna compare that number to all terrorists now, libman? Or only “leaders” count with you?

    Test… how many “leaders” wear the bombs and carry out the missions? How many attempts were not stopped by Obama and his Homeland Security wizs, but instead by astute civilians?

    sigh… blind devotion is such an illness.

    ReplyReply
  11. Nan G says: 11

    @liberalmann:
    Willful ignorance is still ignorance.

    Asked in March of 2006: After three years, how are we doing?
    Of the 55 most-wanted members of Saddam’s terrorist regime, 45 have been killed or captured.
    That’s 82%.

    Later, in 2007, it was revealed in Focus on Terrorism, Vol 9 about al Qaeda leadership:
    “nearly half of all the known Al Qaeda leadership has been captured or killed.” Page 152.

    A later book, Waging the War on Terror and Winning, pointed out that 2/3rds of all senior al Qaeda, associated leaders, operational managers and facilitators tracked by the USA had either been killed or captured.
    Included are Mohammad Atef, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, Abu Zabaida, Ramzi Binalshibh, Hambali, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani and Abu Issa al-Hindi.

    God bless our troops who do the dirty work.

    ReplyReply
  12. MataHarley says: 12

    @James Raider and @Nan G… Islamist countries don’t “fail”, unless you want to consider their 3rd world status as a failure. But then, that’s a western standard they would shun as a measure.

    But it does make you wonder if Islam is unionized…. LOL

    ReplyReply
  13. Nan G says: 13

    @MataHarley: But it does make you wonder if Islam is unionized…. LOL

    Eric Holder went to bat for a unionized Muslim woman, a public schoolteacher who decided she had to put her school year on hold and take a 3 month vacation to include her Hajj.
    The school fired her.
    Holder re-instated her with both back pay and extra pain and suffering cash for ”Islamophobia.”
    BTW, the actual Hajj only takes 1 month and needn’t break into your job.
    You can take it anytime in your entire life.

    Lawfare.

    ReplyReply
  14. anticsrocks says: 14

    @Liberal1 (objectivity): So you are in favor of going to war for oil, but falsely accused Bush of doing the same in Iraq.

    Your screen name really ought to be Liberal1 (hypocrisy)

    ReplyReply
  15. @MataHarley: #12,

    Ah, demanding clarity in terms used.

    Yup, you could say that Islamist countries have not failed, given most ME country borders have not been fluctuating and are mostly stable.

    I think, however, that in majority, ‘failure’ as I perceive or use it above, applies to a rather sluggish majority (people) in these societies, with a state-managed, consistent reliance on the sale of natural resources to developed/growing countries, rather than stimulation of internal growth. Whether in Libya or Saudi Arabia, there is a very fundamental stagnation. If the great unwashed get too educated, too confident, and too independent of mindset, they just might not need the self-appointed-for-life Mullahs, Ayatollahs or Royals.

    Morocco has made the most real progress. The others, not so much.

    But, umm, Islam – yup, it is absolutely the world’s most powerful union.

    ReplyReply
  16. Marine72 says: 16

    @Greg: Need some Windex?

    ReplyReply
  17. cali says: 17

    The way I see it is something like the following:
    Why would a man drop his american name, and adopt a muslim name? Is his hate towards the big satan so deep, that he no longer hides what he really thinks? Assassinations, supporting muslims, allowing the same to be in the White House, Homeland Security etc, importing enemies more than ever, allowing terrorists using the open border to gain entry to the USA etc, the examples are many to see a puzzle slowly completing itself, which becomes obvious that he is paying back the wrong he feels done against his grandfather, or the missus grievance against the mean ‘ol USA. Everything appears to be done on purpose – he came to destroy!
    By the way, Goldman Sachs – his supporters in campaign donations – lost 24+ billion dollars of Gaddafi’s money – anybody knows what happened to it??? Was this the reason, Gaddafi needed to go?

    ReplyReply
  18. cali
    I didn’t think It was that much, but 24 billion is making GOLDEN SACHS ‘s transactions
    with FRANCE AND BRITAIN AND WHOM OTHER, VERY REWARDING FOR THEM NOW,
    because the LYBIANS are killing the sons also to make sure they get it all back
    but that will need another revolution to get it back in his entire summes,
    a none ending story to come in the MEDIA as a shocker,
    bye

    ReplyReply
  19. ecks why says: 19

    what else to expect from closet-mooselimb obama ? his actions show his true colors, from not wearing a USA pin, taking down xnity symbols for his speeches, ignoring xnity holidays & recognizing islam holidays, his allegiance is obvious

    as for religious inspired violence from islam & muslims….

    informed rational freedom loving people have all the reasons in the world to fear islam…

    the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology….

    Mohamhead was a 7th century murdering warlord who rose to power on a river of blood surrounded by thugs and gangsters using intimidation, violence, deception and trickery to expand their criminal empire while mercilessly suppressing and killing their opponents and enriching themselves on stolen booty.

    The koran is a collection of sayings and speeches by this diabolical madman claiming divine guidance from some mythical sky-god which has inspired generations of crazed fanatics to abhorrent behavior resulting in historys worst ever crimes against humanity starting 1400 years ago and still continuing even today.

    Islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

    graphics version, great for emailing :)

    http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/1479/dangermoko.jpg

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>