10 May

Tactics Used By Bush Paved The Way To bin-Laden’s Death….So Why Not Continue Them?

                                       

It’s amazing. We found Osama bin-Laden because of the Enhanced Interrogation Techniques authorized by the prior administration. Because of the captured terrorists imprisoned at Gitmo. Because of the intelligence agents who worked tirelessly, using all the techniques authorized by Bush, to find Osama.

And to this day Obama has discontinued placing prisoners in Gitmo, discontinued EIT’s, and is investigating the agents who got the information that allowed Obama to order the execution of Osama.

Oh, but putting a few bullets into the head of the man is a-ok. Just don’t go waterboarding anyone.

“It is an outrage that we would go after the people who deserve the credit for keeping us safe for seven and a half years.”

Obama turned his back on his own supposed ideals and the supposed ideals of his followers by ordering the hit. Good for him. I fully support his decision and believe it was the one that should have been made.

But we know how it came to be, Enhanced Interrogation Techniques:

So if Obama can use the product of these interrogations, and ok the execution of Osama, then why not convince those same followers that we NEED Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. That we need those agents on the job instead of being investigated by Holder.

Well, I’ll tell you why. The left is a bit upset that Obama ok’d this and seeing as how the left has been on a crusade against the CIA and our intelligence apparatus for decades, there ain’t no way in hell they will allow Bush-light to ok EIT’s

Arthur Herman writing in August of 2009:

How posterity will view the CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation tactics during the anxious years of 2002 and 2003, when the real possibility of another 9/11 attack loomed, may depend less on what we learn about the results of the interrogations themselves than on the Obama administration’s conduct in determining their appropriateness and legality.

The appointment of a special prosecutor is just one of a series of administration attacks on the CIA. Those attacks have included the release—over the objections of his own CIA head, Leon Panetta—of the classified 2004 CIA Inspector General Report revealing which enhanced interrogation methods were actually used on which suspects (including threatening to seize members of one suspect’s family and intimidating another suspect with a power drill). The administration has also created a new “High Value Detainee Interrogation Group,” effectively stripping the CIA of responsibility for interrogating important terrorist suspects and handing it over to the vastly more constrained FBI.

This assault on the CIA might seem strange considering that just two years ago, Democrats and the media were expressing outrage over the Bush administration’s alleged “outing” of a supposedly covert operative named Valerie Plame. A special prosecutor was then tasked with finding out who had been so “un-American” (as Senator John Kerry termed it) as to leak the name of a CIA employee. Now we have a special prosecutor who may not only “out” CIA interrogators but also work hard to throw them into prison.1

So what if the 2004 Inspector General’s Report explicitly states that the waterboarding and other fully authorized techniques used on al-Qaeda detainees like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were effective and yielded valuable, actionable information that may have saved thousands of lives? Never mind that when Justice Department career lawyers scrutinized the Inspector General’s Report in 2006 looking for evidence of wrongdoing worthy of prosecution, they could find none. The argument that the United States and those in the government’s employ behaved in reprehensible ways in the aftermath of 9/11 deserving of legal sanction has become standard issue among Democrats and liberals, and when a Democratic liberal ascended to the White House, it was no longer an argument. It is now policy.

In all this, Obama and the Democrats are not just attempting to delegitimize the conduct of the past eight years. They are also reverting to type. For the past 35 years, American liberals have attacked and vilified the CIA with a fervency that borders on holy war.

Read the whole article because it’s an excellent history of the liberal assault against the CIA.

In one breath Obama thanks our intelligence agents

“We give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome.”

And then allows an investigation of those same professionals.

Hypocrites

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 24 years.
This entry was posted in 9/11, American Intelligence, Barack Obama, Baracks Broken Promises, Bush 43, Bush Derangement Syndrome, CIA interrogation program, Fanatical Islam, Guantanamo, Military, War On Terror. Bookmark the permalink. Tuesday, May 10th, 2011 at 9:00 am
| 239 views

3 Responses to Tactics Used By Bush Paved The Way To bin-Laden’s Death….So Why Not Continue Them?

  1. Esdraelon says: 2

    There can be no doubt that temporary discomfort inflicted upon a particular terrorist is justified when done to save thousands of lives. As reported in news accounts, waterboarding has done this. Certainly, pain is not the equivalent of life itself, so that even saving one life takes precedence over the pain of the terrorist.

    A moral society does not stand by, doing nothing, while an innocent person is about to be killed. It is our moral duty to stop those intent on killing innocent people, or those complicit and knowing of others who wish to kill, before the murder takes place. The “dignity” of the would-be murderer, his treatment, should be inconsequential to those in position to stop him. Indeed, by stopping the terrorist, through coercion, before he murders, we are saving the would-be murderer himself from the sin of murder.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/it_is_immoral_not_to_allow_enh.html

    Left-wing dilettantes notwithstanding, we have not become like the enemy; we remain in a category far above that practiced and preached by the jihadists. We should not allow our hands to be tied and needlessly sacrifice American lives. Enhanced interrogation is moral and consistent with the principles of our Constitution.

    It is becoming increasingly apparent that all of us were correct upon the extent of the hypocrite espoused by Barry Obi Wan Obama. The liberal mafia was in full-blown ass-kissing suck-up mode last week, knocking their foreheads on the bare earth over and over, to pay homage to His Imperial Highness Barack H. Obama.

    Again.

    They were practically exchanging bodily fluids right there in public. Last week was pure liberal porn. The world hasn’t seen this kind of abject idol-worshipping adulation from the American left since Uncle Joe Stalin ran the Soviet Empire.

    ReplyReply
  2. Pingback: Torture doesn’t work…ok, so where’s the disagreement? | Flopping Aces

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>