15 Jan

Muslims Acting as “Human Shields”

Since the events of 9/11, the question has often been asked, “Where are the moderate Muslims who condemn Islamic extremism/terrorism?

In the wake of a New Year’s Eve suicide bombing of the Church of the Two Saints in Alexandria, which left 23 Coptic Christians dead, tensions have been running even higher in Egypt between its Christian minority (9%) and Muslim majority (90%), although the Bishop of the Church downplays the sectarian tensions.

January 7th Coptic Christians celebrated their Christmas; and in a show of solidarity, a number of Muslims showed up to Christmas services to serve as “human shields”:

Egypt’s majority Muslim population stuck to its word Thursday night. What had been a promise of solidarity to the weary Coptic community, was honoured, when thousands of Muslims showed up at Coptic Christmas eve mass services in churches around the country and at candle light vigils held outside.

From the well-known to the unknown, Muslims had offered their bodies as “human shields” for last night’s mass, making a pledge to collectively fight the threat of Islamic militants and towards an Egypt free from sectarian strife.

“We either live together, or we die together,” was the sloganeering genius of Mohamed El-Sawy, a Muslim arts tycoon whose cultural centre distributed flyers at churches in Cairo Thursday night, and who has been credited with first floating the “human shield” idea.

Among those shields were movie stars Adel Imam and Yousra, popular Muslim televangelist and preacher Amr Khaled, the two sons of President Hosni Mubarak, and thousands of citizens who have said they consider the attack one on Egypt as a whole.

“This is not about us and them,” said Dalia Mustafa, a student who attended mass at Virgin Mary Church on Maraashly Street. “We are one. This was an attack on Egypt as a whole, and I am standing with the Copts because the only way things will change in this country is if we come together.”

The article goes on to claim that millions of Egyptians apparently have updated their FB profiles to reflect an image of a cross within a crescent- the symbol of an “Egypt for All”. Banners depicting mosques and churches, crosses and crescents in unity have also gone up around Alexandria.

Last Tuesday, 6 more Christians were shot- 1 fatally- by a deputy policeman claiming, “There is no God, but God.”

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in Egypt, Fanatical Islam, Islam, War On Terror. Bookmark the permalink. Saturday, January 15th, 2011 at 7:46 am
| 967 views

20 Responses to Muslims Acting as “Human Shields”

  1. Moral outrage over events that kill innocents should not be limited to those who lost fellow Americans, Human Beings, and Christians, but also those who claim to be peace loving moderates who overtly display the same outrage whenever a life is lost for a cause they profess to be in condemnation of…cb

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Nan G says: 2

    Most Egyptian Muslims are poor.
    They recognize the vital role Christian Copts play in their society.
    The Copts are their garbage men.
    Barred from any official education or job papers, the Copts live in homemade slums and collect all of the nation’s garbage everyday.
    Before Swine Flu the Copts used to have pigs that would eat all edible garbage.
    Then the Copts wuld sort the rest and recycle.
    That was how they made ends meet.
    But the Egyptian leadership used the Swine flu as an excuse (it can’t go from pig-to-human) to destroy all pigs in Egypt.
    Now the Copts still sort the garbage, but with a lot more difficulty.
    While the transition to working without pigs was worked out, the Egyptian poor got a taste of what life would be like without those Christian garbage men.
    Not good.
    So, I am not surprised that some Muslim Egyptians see the value of keeping a few Coptics alive.
    And, unless they want to be the next garbage men for the Egyptian wealthy class, they had better act as protectors for the Coptics among them.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Nan G says: 3

    BTW, the very definition of the Islamic term, ”Dhimmi,” is ”protected ones.”
    When a class of people submit to living under Islamic rule (while NOT converting into Islam) they must accept many debasing rules of life.
    They must not live better than the lowliest Muslim.
    They must not build any new non-Muslim places of worship.
    Their testimony in a Sharia case is discounted.
    They must pay the Jizya (Dhimmi Tax) for being allowed to live at all.
    They must never break the terms of the Dhimmi rules.
    If one or a few of them do, all bets are off.
    Apparently some imams in Egypt convinced some Egyptian Muslims that the Coptics had broken their terms of agreement to stay Dhimmis.
    That is why some Egyptians felt free to kill Copts.
    Whether the Copts can debase themselves enough now to convince Egypt’s imams that they should NOT be targets is a whole other issue.
    These imams are not exactly led by logic.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. ogee says: 4

    OT/ What do you think about this? OPERATION BLACK SWAN.Help send it viral. This affects everyone and their children.
    http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/operation-black-swan-killing-birds-fish-people/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7c29E0NqnU&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. FAITH7 says: 5

    I was very moved by this profound act of Courage and Faith. I hope this is a new beginning, a shining light and hope for the world. The Coptic Christians in Egypt have had their fair share of oppression. God Bless those Courageous Muslims who acted as human shields….

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Tom says: 6

    So, I am not surprised that some Muslim Egyptians see the value of keeping a few Coptics alive.
    And, unless they want to be the next garbage men for the Egyptian wealthy class, they had better act as protectors for the Coptics among them.

    Or there are Muslims who don’t want to see people murdered. Or your idea.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Liberal1 (objectivity) says: 7

    I can’t believe it–a seemingly, objective, non-anti-Muslim story, without that typical ultra-right-wing bias. Will wonders ever cease. And, even more surprising–there are a few sympathetic comments posted, though not many.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. minuteman26 says: 8

    News Flash – There are no moderate muslims. As stated before, Islam is THE enemy of the Judeo/Christian world.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Nan G says: 9

    Yeah, I’m full of it, right?
    Is CNN?
    Jan 13th, CNN reported that the Egyptian GOVERNMENT (Muslims) shut off the area where Coptics are allowed to live.
    Journalists were not allowed in either, to see the way the GOVERNMENT got rid of the Coptics out of their homes.
    CNN reports that in 2009 the egyptian GOVERNMENT killed all the pigs used in the Coptic trash sorting and later, after a health crisis from trash all over the place, hired foreigners to be the country’s trash collectors.
    Now, the Coptics have no way to make a living in Egypt at all.
    And, as of this week, no homes, either.
    I hope they all leave their traditional homeland.
    Remember Egypt was a Coptic country before and then until well after Islam invaded it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Wordsmith says: 10

    @Nan G: For the most part, this is the same authoritarian Egyptian government that tortured and martyred Sayyid Qutb, the father of al Qaeda theology, imprisoning, torturing (Zawahiri among them), and killing countless other Islamists who oppose the government for, among other things, not being (puritanically) “Islamic enough”, as they understand Islam.

    @Nan G:

    BTW, the very definition of the Islamic term, ”Dhimmi,” is ”protected ones.”
    When a class of people submit to living under Islamic rule (while NOT converting into Islam) they must accept many debasing rules of life.
    They must not live better than the lowliest Muslim.
    They must not build any new non-Muslim places of worship.
    Their testimony in a Sharia case is discounted.
    They must pay the Jizya (Dhimmi Tax) for being allowed to live at all.

    Nan…does the Egyptian government require Coptic Christians to pay jizya to be “allowed to live at all”? Do your everyday Egyptian Muslims call them “Dhimmis”? Do no other nations have an underclass or minorities who are persecuted and treated less fairly?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Wordsmith says: 11

    @Nan G:

    Remember Egypt was a Coptic country before and then until well after Islam invaded it.

    Some Jewish and Christian communities actually aided the Arabs in their conquests. Arthur Goldschmidt, A Concise History of the Middle East, pg 54:

    The disgruntled Syrian and Egyptian Christians viewed the Muslim Arabs as liberators from the Byzantine yoke and often welcomed them. The Copts, for example, turned Egypt over in 640 to Amr’s Arab force, which, even with reinforcements, numbered fewer than 10,000. Likewise, the Jews, numerous in Palestine and Syria, chose Muslim indifference over Byzantine persecution.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Nan G says: 12

    @Wordsmith:
    dhimmitude exists in all Islamic countries, Wordsmith.
    In Pakistan even some people WE would call Muslims are called non-Muslims BY LAW and forced to pay a dhimmi tax as well as to never refer to themselves as Muslims!
    The Buddhists in Thailand tried to cede four provinces to their Muslims in order to escape the Dhimmi tax (The King of Thailand’s extravagant lifestyle has left him personally enslaved to his Saudi lien holders.)
    But the Muslims in the south do not consider contol of their part of Thailand to be enough.
    They murder Buddhists at the rate of 4 or more a week…..teachers, food stand owners, workers on the rubber plantations, landowners.
    After the murder Muslims take over the land, the business, the job, whatever they were after.
    After all, no Dhimmi is allowed to live better than any Muslim.
    In some other Muslim-ruled African countries Christians are raped andmurdered and enslaved.
    The Christian churches are destroyed (sometimes with the worshipers inside.)
    Under Sharia no non-Muslim religious places of worship can be built unless the Sharia leaders say so.
    Just this past month:
    Christian churches have been bombed in Egypt, Iraq, Nigeria and the Philippines. In Indonesia a mob of Muslims burned down two Christian churches. In Iran, dozens of Christians have been arrested.
    Under Sharia, as we learned in Pakistan, a non-Muslim can be arrested and sentenced to DEATH for supposedly insulting Islam, Mohammad, Allah or even a Muslim.
    The rules of evidence you and I think of are not a part of Sharia.
    Think about DNA, for example.
    In a rape case, we use DNA to find and punish the rapist.
    Not in Sharia.
    If an infidel is raped by Muslims, no amount of proof is sufficient.
    Her word is less than that of a Muslim female (whose word is 1/4 of a man’s).
    And DNA never enters the picture.
    She is put to death for the crime of being a rape victim.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Nan G says: 13

    @Wordsmith:
    In the Western world, if one group aids another to take over an area it does not remain the 2nd-class slaves to the conquerors that the Egyptian Copts did from the victory of the Muslim Arabs over the Byzantinians.
    But the Copts sold themselves to their Muslim overlords and aided them.
    So, to this day they are still 2nd class slaves, not allowed to go to the schools, not allowed to hold government jobs, not allowed to meet in groups, not allowed to add converts and so on.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. KansasGirl says: 14

    Too little, too late.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. KansasGirl says: 15

    @minuteman26: Brevity is the soul of wit. I remember with moist eyes my father speaking those words. I smile knowing that he still has such an influence on my life. I miss my Dad. (sigh)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Wordsmith says: 16

    @Nan G: If there was no Islam, I believe that much of the conflicts and violence we see going on would still be happening. I think Islam itself plays a part in the dysfunction; however, there are concrete, practical issues of conflict that are not directly related to the religion itself. National and cultural outrages and identity is a driving factor as is geopolitics. Hostility toward bad governance and oppressive, authoritarian regimes (aided by the U.S.) will turn people toward alternative answers and powers. There is no single, monolithic Islamic identity and practice. Spencerian conservatives, however, prefer to see Islam as defined by the Taliban, wahhabis, salafists, Khomeinites, and Qutbists.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Nan G says: 18

    @Wordsmith:

    Did you closely read the NYTimes story?
    I noted that the sentence to death is contingent on a review by a Sharia council.
    It also is much more likely to be upheld because one of the murdered victims was a MUSLIM.
    Did you know there is no punishment under Sharia either for killing you own child OR for killing an ”infidel?”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Wordsmith says: 19

    @Nan G:

    Did you closely read the NYTimes story?

    Yes, it’s a news item. Like the one linked at the end of my blogpost. I’m not pushing a black and white opinion, here.

    Did you know there is no punishment under Sharia either for killing you own child OR for killing an ”infidel?”

    Mata’s comment on Sharia

    One of mine.

    Incorporating Sharia into legal systems:

    Sharia law in Egypt applies only in personal status issues – such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and custody of children. Otherwise the legal system is entirely a secular one, on the model of the French legal system.

    Egypt incorporates Islamic law into its constitution by making Islam the official religion of the country and Islamic jurisprudence the principal source of legislation.

    Sharia courts and judges, qadis, are run and licensed by the Egyptian Ministry of Justice, not by mosques.

    Islamists in Egypt are pressing for Sharia law to be applied in all areas of the legal system.

    A non-religious Supreme Court operates above the Sharia personal status courts and the secular criminal courts.

    Religious minorities in Egypt are governed under separate personal status laws and courts.

    Coptic Christians in Egypt marry under Christian law, and foreigners marry under the laws of their countries of origin.

    Sharia application in Egypt.

    In the last 100 years or so, most Muslim states have, voluntarily or involuntarily, adopted Western-type
    codes while paying lip service to their Islamic laws. In most cases, they have found it much easier to circumvent Islamic rules than to change them. It was under the impact of foreign occupation and Westernization that European codes replaced the Sharia in all but matters of personal status.

    In the post- World-War-II period, newly independent Muslim countries, seeking to assert their identity, included in their constitutions such provisions as “Islam is the official religion of the state,” or “the president of the republic must be a Muslim,” or “the principles of the Sharia are the primary sources of legislation,” without giving any consideration to whether their laws were consistent with Islamic principles. This did not go far enough to mollify Muslim fundamentalists, who see in the development of the modern state a threat to Islamic culture and values and who have been agitating for a true Islamic system.

    While Muslims have always aspired to live by their own laws, the present movement for the application of the Islamic Sharia is the product of new forces, political, economic and social, which give it a vitality
    whose unforeseen consequences are compounded by the fact that Islamic justifications and rhetoric are used to legitimize political aspirations.

    SHARIA APPLICATION IN
    EGYPT

    Egypt has always been in the vanguard of Islamic reform movements. Modernism, which aimed at adapting Islam to modern conditions, was articulated in the latter half of the nineteenth century by Egyptian jurists and scholars. It found its expression first in the adoption of Western codes and later in the codification of the Hanafi law of family and inheritance. Subsequent modernist legislation encroached on Islamic law, evoking the opposition of traditional scholars. This conflict is still going on to­
    day, and with much greater intensity

    Islam: Governing Under Sharia:

    There is significant debate over what the Quran sanctions and what practices were pulled from local customs and predate Islam. Those that seek to eliminate or at least modify these controversial practices cite the religious tenet of tajdid. The concept is one of renewal, where Islamic society must be reformed constantly to keep it in its purest form. “With the passage of time and changing circumstances since traditional classical jurisprudence was founded, people’s problems have changed and conversely, there must be new thought to address these changes and events,” says Dr. Abdul Fatah Idris, head of the comparative jurisprudence department at Al-Azhar University in Cairo. Though many scholars share this line of thought, there are those who consider the purest form of Islam to be the one practiced in the seventh century.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Nan G says: 20

    @Nan G:
    Sorry, my reference at #18
    was incorrect.
    It was NOT the NYTimes version.
    It was a Reuters version.
    Here’s a link.
    http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/news/international/Egypt_sentences_Muslim_to_death_for_Coptic_shooting.html?cid=29254014
    And the quotes:

    An Egyptian state security court on Sunday sentenced a Muslim man to death for killing six Coptic Christians and a Muslim police officer…….

    The judge said Hussein’s sentence would be sent to the Grand Mufti for confirmation, a reference to Egypt’s top religious authority who is called on to confirm death sentences.

    Secular?
    I don’t think so.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>