5 Dec

Democrats: All your base are belong to us [Reader Post]


It is not just a happenstance that the last four letter in “Democrats” are “rats.”

At a recent new conference Claire McCaskill (D-MO) let us know what Democrats really believe. McCaskill is the loathesome scumqueen who spit on the earpiece she handed to Mitt Romney.

It wasn’t simply that she called for violence if tax cuts are not ended for those making more than $250,000 per year.

Amid the posturing and hard bargaining in Washington over extending tax cuts, McCaskill, D-Mo., said this afternoon that if Republicans sacrifice the middle class in order to protect the wealthy “it really is time for people in America to take up pitchforks.”

A Democrat calls for violence against lawmakers. Hmmm. It seems like only yesterday that Democrats were aghast at the possibility of violence against lawmakers.

Pelosi was careful to avoid blaming Republicans directly for inciting the harassment, though she said that words “weigh a ton.” Such threats of retaliation “have no place in a civil debate in our country,” she said.

It also seems like only a few days ago when a certain President issued his own threat of violence.

But, President Obama cut them off.

“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks,” the president told them.

And it seems like only a few days later when a certain President referred to some Americans as “enemies.”

This argument is wrong on a number of levels, not the least of which is who these tax increases really impact. Those in the $250-750,000 range are generally hard working employers. They are doing well but they put in many hours and have done so for a long time. They are the job creators. They are the employers. Tax increases will hit them hard and will not help job creation.

McCaskill referred to the really high level wealthy and inadvertently made a good point. There are some, like the Kerry’s and the Buffett’s and the Kohl’s and the Rockefeller’s whose money is largely untouchable. Sometimes I really want to punch Warren Buffett in the mouth. He says that really wealthy Americans should pay more in taxes.

‘But I think that people at the high end — people like myself — should be paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better than we’ve ever had it.’

But Buffett doesn’t pay more. He is free to cut a larger check any time he wants to but he doesn’t do it.

Why? Why don’t these execrable creatures put their money where their mouths are? Why don’t the Kerry’s and the Kohl’s and the Rockefeller’s pay more when they can?

These hypocrites are the best and proper targets for your pitchforks.

To put it clearly, they suck.

But we still haven’t yet exposed the Democrat psyche. We need to get back to McCaskill. Take this in carefully.

“…they’re gonna pout if we don’t give more money to millionaires…”

“if we give more money…”

And there it is.

All your base are belong to us.

Democrats think it’s all their money. It’s not yours. When you go to work and earn money, you are earning their money. You are working for them. They own it all. It’s not yours.

But I have news for McCaskill.

Its not your money!

It’s our money!

This explains the mindset of Democrats who never seem to care that with each new law they pass they cause the creation of countless new agencies with more employees who add nothing to the economy. Those new employees will demand benefits and pensions and the costs of each agency will double each twenty years as people retire. But Democrats don’t care- they think it’s all their money. They think it’s their money they’re handing over to illegals with their DREAM act. The problem is, they’re DREAMING.

It’s my money, Claire. MINE.

Tell you what, though. If they extend the tax breaks, I’m going to get into the business of making pitchforks.

You have no chance to survive. Make your time.

About DrJohn

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Bush Exceptionalism, Dem Congress Reckoning, Liberal Idiots, Obamanomics, Politics, POWER GRAB! and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Sunday, December 5th, 2010 at 9:46 am

12 Responses to Democrats: All your base are belong to us [Reader Post]

  1. blogforce one says: 1

    Claire McCaskill Will be retired in 2012. NOT SOON ENOUGH! She is Toast and she knows it. People like Claire McCaskill would be quite comfortable The fourth estate was taken over by the Obommunnists like herself and run like Granma in Cuba.

  2. Wm T Sherman says: 2

    Fourth sentence should read “she called for violence if tax cuts are not ended for those making more than $250,000 per year.”

    Remember the movie Waterworld? I think of Eclaire as one of the minions riding out from the moribund supertanker to rob the little people; a big fat flabby minion, riding low in the water. She’s proud to be a loyal obedient attack dog.

    Eclaire’s pitchfork talk is shallow sleazy demagoguery, not a serious call to violence. Ah, who knows, maybe some nutcase will be inspired by it, but I doubt it. Ironically, a pitchfork is used for hard labor, and people who voted for her would be unlikely to own one.

    Let’s keep our pitchforks sharpened for Republicans who start going squishy on small government principles. Eclaire is a problem that’s taking care of itself. She’ll be gone in 2012, along with her owner. She is making sure of it with this kind of behavior. She’s writing her opponent’s campaign ads for him. The ads will be inexpensive to produce — just a caption, then video of Eclaire in her own words, then maybe that standard recording of her opponent saying “I’m _____, and I endorse this self-beclowning” at the end.

  3. another vet says: 3

    That side of the aisle seems to be talking very tough. Olbermann was out there trashing 20 year old Bristol Palin recently for trying to educate kids not to make the same mistake she did when she was a teenager. Pretty tough person there picking on a 20 year old girl. Then POTUS is out there talking about hitting or punching people twice as hard who opposed his healthcare bill or threatening to “kick ass” when he first went to see the BP oil spill etc, etc. For a bunch of people who have never been in war before or probably not even a fight, they sure seem to talk tough. Perhaps one of these days they will have the opportunity to make good on their threats to those of us they threaten. Chances are they will cower away.

  4. oil guy from Alberta says: 4

    23 of the 33 seats are Dims up for reelection in 2012. 13 are vulnerable. I know that McCaskill and Conrad in N Dakota are toast. If done right( pun intended) the conservative Senate could be filubuster proof. Plenty of work to do for conservative Americans and tea party patriots. Oh, I’m still laughing at the Tequila Party and Coffee Party failures. Tea Parties and Sarah Palin make the lefties crap their pants.

  5. Richard Aubrey says: 5

    Libs talking violence against conservatives????
    I do recall, forty-plus years ago on campus, the weedy, ectomorphic hippies trying to start trouble always wanted to recruit the football players.

  6. Pingback: It’s Not Your Goddamn Money! | The Magic Negro

  7. Old One says: 6

    Add HasBeen Nelson of Nebraska to the sure toast list. He can’t show his face in a restuarant without a hostile crowd of voters verbally lambasting him to the extent that Has Been feels the need to cut and run away.

  8. tarpon says: 7

    The thing Democrats always forget … What goes around comes around … and hits harder when it does.

  9. just me 95 says: 8

    I think Maxine Waters’ comments would fit here nicely, too.

    “And guess what this liberal would be all about? This liberal would be all about socializ… ah um… would be about… basically… taking over… um the government running all of your companies.”

    The RepubliCANs while the DemoRATS.

  10. ono says: 9

    What a moron. She’s peeved cause she wants to end tax cuts for the rich as political posturing but her rich arse is exempt anyway.
    All congress creeps DO NOT pay any taxes. They collect their bribes with money that’s paid into the system by lowly taxpayers and they do no report it as income or pay taxes on it.
    Why should tax cuts matter to the demon rats? So they can collect more bribe money?

    Who voted her in there? Sheesh. She can’t tell the difference between her arse from a hole in the ground.

    Didn’t she get paid off for helping steal the primary election in her state for “the won”?

    She is soooo crooked and unbecoming. If all women were like her, Hetero men would kill themselves.

    She got away with inciting violence which is against the law.

    They make laws for the ‘little people’ that they do not have to adhere to. What’s that all about?

    It smells :twisted:

  11. Missy says: 10

    We will be living in Missouri in time to vote against McCaskill. Sent her an e-mail after her pitchfork comment telling her just that and to use that pitchfork to shovel out her DC office. Wonder if we will be greeted with an audit. 8-O

  12. oil guy from Alberta says: 11

    Read in the Washington Compost that Republican challengers are lining up like the Chinese Army to contest the primaries and challenge McCaskill, the 2 Nelsons, Conrad, Tester in Ohio, etc. The shelf life of these Democrats is past due and watch for meaningless voting to deflect their socialism. Start helping because I know i will.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>