16 Aug

Peddle it Somewhere Else

We are a week into Ramadan; yet what Americans are unaware of amidst all this hype and hysteria about the potential for a 13 story community center (with a mosque) conceived by Muslims, being built 2 blocks away from Ground Zero as opposed to 10 blocks away (which is about how far away Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf has been holding congregations for years, serving the community of Lower Manhattan for 27 yrs), is that Ground Zero has been invaded by symbolic flags of Islamic conquest for years, now:

Breaking: Halal food carts spotted ON Ground Zero!

A reader writes in to sound the alarm about another sacrilege that we’ve all somehow overlooked:

One thing I haven’t seen anyone write about is the presence of Muslim food carts MUCH closer to Ground Zero. There are at least two, depending on the time of day, along West Broadway between Vesey and Park Place. One is practically on top of the Ground Zero construction site, outside the Path station. Aren’t they an “affront,” a “provocation”? Muslims engaging in in-your-face commerce on sacred ground, with the word HALAL prominently displayed on their carts! Where’s Palin when we need her??

This is an outrage! It’s a slap in the face to all Americans. Would we have let udon noodle stands open shop at Pearl Harbor? Or allow sushi to be served aboard the USS Nevada just 9 years after the day that lives on in infamy?

Why isn’t this “creeping diarrhea” making frontpage headline news?! I am so sick of the media bias!

Granted, they most likely have the proper mobile food vendor’s license, and aren’t breaking any laws (Can we get some lawyers on this, right away, just to be sure? Perhaps find a loophole…). So we are appealing to Muslim food peddlers’ sensitivities here and demand: Go peddle the halal somewhere else. It is inappropriate and distasteful.

Especially during the month of Ramadan.

       submit to reddit
This entry was posted in Ground Zero "Mosque", Humor. Bookmark the permalink. Monday, August 16th, 2010 at 10:00 pm
| 1,217 views

254 Responses to Peddle it Somewhere Else

  1. Wordsmith says: 1

    Of course, this “Islamization” of America’s food isn’t limited to Ground Zero. This takeover is happening all across the country!



    Stop the Islamization of American food!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Monkey King says: 2

    Ramadan…no wonder the BLT taste so damn good this time of year…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. CHill says: 3

    I am sure you guys really believe in this . . . what is it that liberals do so well – moral equivalence.

    Nice try. The more you write the more ignorant you appear.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Smorgasbord says: 4

    Unfortunately, it is legal. We can all do what you are doing and let others know what it is. I just found out from your post. If I see the word “halal” I will know not to give them my business, just like I don’t give China any more of my business than I have to.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. DrJohn says: 5

    I’ll say what I said in my post. Some people have a difficult time discerning eating food from practicing religion.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. CHill says: 6

    Having spent a lot of time in the Middle East, I will eat Halal as often as I can find it. I love it and also Kosher food I had in Israel.

    Seems some people do not understand clearly what I am writing. In previous comments, I compared the extremist writings with that of the National Socialist writing of WWII. If documents are written as principles of a group of people, then I suggested strongly that one must believe the documents ARE the principles of that group. The Nazis stated clearly their intentions. Only a small group of “fear mongers and alamists” pointed this reality out. Over 95% of the population of Europe refused to heed the warnings.

    And so it goes with what is happening among our fellow liberal citizens. To warn about the writings and the documents in front of one’s face which are easily accessible to anyone who looks is to be a racist. History speaks clearly about how Islam interacts with infidels. TRUE ISLAM cannot, will not coexist with another religion in a peaceful manner. The moderates of Islam are silent for one of two reasons – fear of reprisals or sympathy and support for what is happening. Either way the truth is not pretty.

    My comment about the sarcastic blog above was a slam to the writer of the blog who was trying to play the moral equivalence card as if one is equal to the other. If one thinks the Muslim mosque is inappropriate, then phoney logic would mean that eating or selling Muslim food would also be inappropriate. You insult us with such sarcasm.

    No one that I know of would say that the Muslims do not have a right to build a mosque wherever they see fit according to local laws. Freedom comes with responsibilities and IMHO, these Muslims who are pushing this center, have refused to accept these responsibilities. Follow the money trail and what has been documented about the person pushing this center. Tolerance is not the name of the game.

    If the majority of people in the area believe such a mosque is inappropriate for whatever reason, then in the name of tolerance (which historical Islam does not have) these Muslims should not be intolerant to these peoples wishes in order to exercise their rights to build and worship. I would be completely in support of such a center if there were places for Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs and Jews to worship alongside Muslims. How do you spell FAT CHANCE. It is phoney and has nothing to do with inter-religious tolerance. Follow the money and read the writings of those who would build such a place.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Donald Bly says: 7

    The initiator of this thread seems to be hell bent on being the voice of Islam on this site. An apparent attempt to goad people into conflict. He just can’t seem to let it go.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Missy says: 8

    The author of this blog is not attempting the evil he is being accused of, very sad form of debate and I know you all are better than that.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. CHill says: 9

    We did not write the blog but simply responded to a sarcastic attack using moral equivalency as a means to get his very obvious message across. Dare voice disagreement with his views with honestly held reasons and logic and be sarcastically accused of also being against selling Muslim food at the questioned location. This is a very liberal style of attack and it is I who thought this site was better than that. Not a person I know would dare make such a dumb attempt at sarcasm.

    I say leave it alone once and for all. I, for one, am totally convinced the whole mosque thing is a sham just as the Flight 93 memorial is a sham. This is exactly how followers of true Islam proceed IMHO.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. drjohn says: 10

    Germany recently closed a mosque because it was used for Jihadist activity:

    Paris – German authorities today closed a Hamburg mosque once frequented by Mohammad Atta, a Sept. 11 pilot and planner – saying the mosque, located behind Hamburg’s main rail station and next to a fitness center, remained a “central attraction for the jihadist scene.”

    They have apparently not shut down any pushcarts.

    All this post does is make clear that it is not Muslims themselves that are objectionable.

    Thanks for the opportunity to clear the air.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. drjohn says: 11

    Rauf won’t answer his phone any more. He won’t answer questions. Perhaps if he thew open the door and opened his books to allow all to see how this mosque is being financed many people would feel better. The silence and secrecy only adds to the mystery.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Granny says: 12

    This is a spoof post, right?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Wordsmith says: 13

    Yes, Granny.

    @CHill:

    My comment about the sarcastic blog above was a slam to the writer of the blog who was trying to play the moral equivalence card as if one is equal to the other. If one thinks the Muslim mosque is inappropriate, then phoney logic would mean that eating or selling Muslim food would also be inappropriate. You insult us with such sarcasm.

    Jesus Christ…relax! This was tongue-in-cheek humor.

    No one that I know of would say that the Muslims do not have a right to build a mosque wherever they see fit according to local laws.

    Maybe none you know personally. But wake up and smell the qahwa.

    Freedom comes with responsibilities and IMHO, these Muslims who are pushing this center, have refused to accept these responsibilities. Follow the money trail and what has been documented about the person pushing this center.

    That’s been covered pretty extensively by Mata.

    If the majority of people in the area believe such a mosque is inappropriate for whatever reason, then in the name of tolerance (which historical Islam does not have) these Muslims should not be intolerant to these peoples wishes in order to exercise their rights to build and worship.

    Throw a temper tandrum loud enough and even they might be capable of appeasement.

    I would be completely in support of such a center if there were places for Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs and Jews to worship alongside Muslims. How do you spell FAT CHANCE. It is phoney and has nothing to do with inter-religious tolerance.

    The man has a 27 year history of interfaith dialogue. He is supported by rabbis and priests who know him and have worked with him. The center is more than just “a mosque” and if it gets built, will be open to those of all faiths:

    My colleagues and I are the anti-terrorists. We are the people who want to embolden the vast majority of Muslims who hate terrorism to stand up to the radical rhetoric. Our purpose is to interweave America’s Muslim population into the mainstream society.

    People who are stakeholders in society, who believe they are welcomed as equal partners, do not want to destroy it. They want to build it. And there’s no better demonstration of our desire to build than the construction of this center. It will help revive lower Manhattan.

    The project has been mischaracterized, so I want to explain clearly what it would be. Our planned 13-story community center is intended for Park Place between Church St. and West Broadway. It is not a mosque, although it will include a space for Muslim prayer services. It will have a swimming pool, basketball court, meeting rooms, a 500-seat auditorium, banquet facilities and many other things a community needs to be healthy. The center will offer theatrical programming, art exhibitions and cooking classes. These are amenities missing now from this part of the city.

    And, yes, the center will have a public memorial to the victims of 9/11 as well as a meditation room where all will be welcome for quiet reflection. The center will support soul and body.

    The center will be open to all regardless of religion. Like a YMCA, the 92nd St. Y or the Jewish Community Center uptown, it will admit everyone. It will be a center for all New Yorkers.

    What grieves me most is the false reporting that leads some families of 9/11 victims to think this project somehow is designed by Muslims to gloat over the attack.

    That could not be further from the truth.

    My heart goes out to all of the victims of 9/11. They are all heroes. But I urge you to include in your sympathy the family of Mohammad Salman Hamdani. Born in Pakistan, his parents brought him to New York as a small child. He wanted nothing more than to be an American, and he was.

    A high school football player in Bayside, Queens, he graduated from Queens College. When he could not get into an American medical school, he became a part-time ambulance driver. He disappeared on 9/11; his body was found months later in the wreckage of the north tower. This 23-year-old Muslim died trying to save his fellow New Yorkers.

    Religion did not separate the victims on that terrible day. Whether Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists or any other faith, all of these people made up the fabric of New York. They all died together.

    Freedom of religion is something we hold dear. It is the core of what America is all about, and it is what people worldwide respect about our country. The Koran itself says compulsion in religion is wrong.

    American Muslims want to be both good Americans and good Muslims. They can be the best assets the United States has in combatting radicalism.

    They know that many American values – freedom of religion, human dignity and opportunity for prosperity – are also Muslim values.

    We believe that people of good faith can use the common core of their religions to find solutions to problems that will let them live together.

    I have been the imam at a mosque in Tribeca for 27 years. I am as much a part of this community as anyone else. Our mosque is as much a part of the neighborhood as any church, synagogue or surrounding business. My work is to make sure mosques are not recruiting grounds for radicals.

    To do that, Muslims must feel they are welcome in New York. Alienated people are open to cynicism and radicalism. Any group that believes it is under attack will breed rebellion. The proposed center is an attempt to prevent the next 9/11.

    What could be a better use for the citizens in lower Manhattan? What could be a better monument to the victims of that tragic day?

    Does that clarify his “insensitivity” for you guys? Not a great decision on his part; but perhaps not based on ill intentions? A desire to “gloat” over the 9/11 attacks?

    CHill writes:

    Follow the money and read the writings of those who would build such a place.

    We have been.

    @Donald Bly:

    The initiator of this thread seems to be hell bent on being the voice of Islam on this site. An apparent attempt to goad people into conflict. He just can’t seem to let it go.

    You must have the initiator of this thread confused with Dr. John and Mike’s America.

    But sure, the initiator of this thread is posting his opinions simply to “goad people into conflict”.

    Missy, thanks for #8.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Wordsmith says: 14

    @drjohn #10:

    I covered that one, remember?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Nuada says: 15

    Seems to me that this issue comes down to two things: rights and politics.

    The (proposed) builders rightfully own the property and are American citizens. To that end, in my opinion, it is dangerous for our government (federal, state or local) to infringe on their right to do with that property whatever they like. Such an act would set a precedent for property rights of other Americans to be similarly infringed whenever the government decided their planned building was distasteful.

    Politically, this is undeniably a slap in the face and an insensitive place to build a mosque. If the builders were genuinely interested in “bridge-building” (Rauf’s words), they would see that this plan to build a mosque in this location is inciting more angst than unity. If their goal was sincerely to bring people together, they would do it somewhere else.

    In my opinion, while I find the idea of a mosque near ground zero to be very offensive, it should not be the government that prevents it from being built. Given how much traction the public outcry against this building has already gotten, for the planners/builders to go through with it will surely expose their agenda for what it is: a symbol of conquest and indifference to the American people they claim they wish to endear themselves to.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. @drjohn:

    All this post does is make clear that it is not Muslims themselves that are objectionable.

    Unfortunately, there are comments posted all over this blog that are making the exact opposite point:

    I still think it is proper to reject the right of Islam to exist in the US because Muslims are, a priori, disloyal to the USA. They are, by definition, traitors, and have no place in American society.

    snip

    I loathe them and don’t trust any of them – don’t care what they say. Take a look at England & some of the other countries who have large Muslim populations – it is not good. Their aim here is to infiltrate and take over IF we let them.

    snip

    So its not just a religous question… building this mosque is like allowing the Government of another country to put a political office, court, church, and propoganda ministry, in the heart of New York.

    snip

    I go along with how you feel. Islam should be declared a threat to the world. All anyone has to do is read their Koran.

    snip

    For all you naive Christians and Jews out there in Never Never Land, MUSLIMS WANT TO KILL YOU. If not sooner than later. There are no moderate muslims. The Koran tells them it’s OK to lie to infadels. What is needed is a Judeo/Christian jihad to rid the USA of Islam and its influence on this country. Just MHO.

    snip

    Am with mike and ret.Marine on this one. Islam and sharia have no place in this republic. Kinda like the marxists in our government.

    snip

    When there is a rewrite of the Quran dictating peace instead of killing, I might consider taking Islam and muslims in general off my personal enemies list.

    snip

    I take it you support people and institutions that advocate for the overthrow of the government and the installation of a Caliphate …. how patriotic of you.

    snip

    why are we islamaphobic or anti constitutional or against the rule of law becuase we wan to make life difficult for the people who want to open the mosque?

    snip

    I stand on the side of right, regardless of the rule of law. (snip) If you are an Islamic apologist, then you don’t deserve to be my countryman.

    snip

    I’d just as soon kill as many of them the lord provides me the time to accomplish.

    snip

    In my opinion, a Constitutional amendment is needed to prevent the sale of any US land to any foreign national. it should allow foreign nationals who own US land a period of 30 years to divest, without right of inheritance.

    There are those here who have stated unequivocally that all Muslims are the same and that, by extension, all mosques are the same.

    Shameful broad brush swiping is what it is.

    Absolutely shameful.

    Strangely, the number of people here who are willing to stand against such bigotry and stereotyping is very slim.

    This is not the first time a religion has been targeted for extermination in our country.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. drjohn says: 17

    @Word

    Sure I do. It’s recall provided a little background for the contrast.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Flyovercountry says: 18

    Wordsmith,

    This is a little off topic, but I am working on the homework assignment you gave me in a previous thread. Here is an answer I received from Investor’s Business Daily regarding a poll conducted by IBD/Tipp concerning the attitudes of Muslims worldwide on the subject of the use of terror.

    Title: What is the IBD/TIPP Poll?
    Link: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1041

    Title: What mistakes and pitfalls can I avoid as an investor?
    Link: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/296

    Title: How do stock options work?
    Link: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/449

    Title: How do I identify a cup-with-handle chart pattern?
    Link: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/292

    Title: What is IBD® TV?
    Link: http://investdaily.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1008

    Customer By Web Form 08/14/2010 03:40 PM
    To whom it may concern,

    Is it possible to research poll results conducted as late as 2006 to 2008? I am interested in a poll conducted which highlights attitudes of Muslims in regards to the use of terror. Specifically, what percentage of Muslims feel use of jihad to spread Islam is an acceptable means to that end.

    [---001:000910:23108---]

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. Donald Bly says: 19

    I rest my case… since the “initiator” of this thread openly admits it is an effort to goad the readers into conflict.

    From Wordsmith’s Post #13

    But sure, the initiator of this thread is posting his opinions simply to “goad people into conflict”

    There are plenty of other topics we could spend time discussing/debating, I wonder to what end is the purposeful use of this blog to create conflict amongst the readers.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. Minuteman26 says: 20

    According to Bloviating Zepplelin’s blog this AM, it appears that public pressure has the muslim world rethinking about building the GZM. Going to move to another site in a gesture of reconcilation.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. drjohn says: 21

    David Paterson offered an alternative site and was refused.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. skat says: 22

    @wordsmith,
    If no one gets your attempt at humor, maybe it wasn’t funny. Maybe people don’t need to “lighten up”, maybe you just weren’t funny. If the writer has to explain the humorous/sarcastic post it’s poor writing, not poor reading.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. Granny says: 23

    Skat, I have to agree. Truthfully, I at first thought the site had been hacked by some lunatic leftie until I recognized the name of the author.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. A_Nonny_Mouse says: 24

    Quick note:

    The blog author shows his “halal food cart” article as being filed under “HUMOR”.

    It’s really OK to sell foreign food at Ground Zero. Falafel is non-denominational. Also, tasty.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. skat says: 25

    @A_Nonny_Mouse, Granny,
    A blog tag of “humor” shows the author’s intention, but it doesn’t mean readers will actually get his sarcasm. I doubt many people read the tags before reading the post. Even if they do they still may not think it’s funny. I know I didn’t/don’t. The poster’s moniker is “wordsmith” which infers real writing/communication excellence – this fell flat.
    As an aside, as a Christian I take offense at Christ’s name being used profanely.

    @Chill,
    Thumbs up!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. Romeo13 says: 26

    Alienated people are open to cynicism and radicalism. Any group that believes it is under attack will breed rebellion. The proposed center is an attempt to prevent the next 9/11.

    Now, take this statement… and think about us normal Freedom loving Whitebread Americans… and understand that WE see this mosque as part of the creeping attack of the stealth Jihad…

    Kind of puts this in a bit different perspective…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Pingback: Tweets that mention Peddle it Somewhere Else -- Topsy.com

  28. Smorgasbord says: 27

    @Aye Chihuahua: I have said for some time that Islam should be declared a terrorist organization. There are only two things I need to know about the Koran to base my decision:

    (1) Muslims are REQUIRED to kill or convert the world. If they can’t convert me, they are REQUIRED to kill me.

    (2) If anyone leaves the Muslim religion, they are to be killed.

    Try again to convince me that this isn’t a terrorist organization.

    The countries who are mostly Muslim have areas that infidels are not allowed because we are considered worse than the sweat off of a pig, and a pig is their most unholy critter.

    What we should do in Iraq and Afghanistan is spray water with pig blood in it over enemy territory on a regular basis to match how long it takes a Muslim to cleans themselves after toughing any part of a pig. They believe that if they die while “unclean” that they won’t go to heaven and get their 72 virgins. Keep them unclean and they won’t dare fight until they are clean.

    I remember one story where one country returned the body of one of the Muslims in the skin of a pig. This meant he couldn’t go to heaven because he was “unclean” and would go the other way.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  29. Patvann says: 28

    Even these Moslems, you ignorant fool?

    http://www.aifdemocracy.org/

    http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/27/time-to-take-sides/

    And your last little historical story was never true, but was used to motivate Jihadist killers.

    You and your idiot-ilk are giving ammo to the Islamics. Those who are working to do EXACTLY what Jews and Christians did with their horrific biblical entries are NOT helped by the likes of you. Wanna see my big ol list of hateful crap in the Bible? I gotta LOT of em.

    Can you say A B R O G A T E ? Google it.

    You know NOTHING about Islam, nor the struggle going on within it to modernize and counter those who continue to preach hate. The battle lines of which are right here in America.

    You (and millions of others) need to educate yourselves, or you are doing nothing but helping the radicals with your ignorant rantings; “See! They hate you!” is the cry of the day, and their bullying continues unabated.

    There are indeed Wahib-based Imams running too many Mosques in this country, (and within the government itself) and until you know who the players are, you would help most by shutting up, and getting out of the way.

    When and IF you ever grab a hold of your senses, and wish to actually LEARN something about this titanic struggle, just ask.

    Some of us actually read/ask/learn.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  30. Patvann says: 30

    @Susiepuma

    That’s a good site for people to bookmark. Not only for timely news, but for Persian/Iranian history as well.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  31. Smorgasbord says: 31

    @Patvann: @Patvann: If there are peace loving Muslims, they should branch off from the radical Muslims and form their own sect. They would have to declare they do not have the “convert or kill” mentality, that anyone can leave their sect without being killed, that non-Muslims are not infidels, that there is no such thing as “honor killings” in their sect, that men and women are equal, they let us into their places of worship without having to join their sect first, and their women can dress they way they want, then I will believe that that sect is at least trying to look like a peace loving religion.

    Until that time, they are still terrorists who want to kill me. Someone who is a member of the Hell’s Angels, but doesn’t like some of the things they do, is still a Hell’s Angels.

    People like you who say the Muslim religion is OK are like the people in some scary movies who see nothing wrong with someone or critter even though everyone else does. Later on the person or critter kills or eats that individual. Maybe when you see their open jaws coming at you, you will see them for what they are. Just like the movies, it will probably be too late. But, at least you knew them for what they are before you died.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  32. Patvann says: 32

    You better run!

    Here comes the scary Moslem monster!!!!

    http://guyism.com/2010/08/miss-usa-rima-fakih.html

    But But But ALL MOSLEM’S WEAR BURKHA’S!!!

    And don’t ever respond to me unless you’ve actually read what I’ve posted and/or linked to…unless you actually DO enjoy looking like a ignorant hateful asshat.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  33. silvernana says: 33

    Please check out Breitbart’s Big Peace for the article by Christine Brim titled “Ground Zero Mosque’s Hidden Websites: Follow the Shariah”. It tells how many years this has been in the planning, by whom, and it’s purpose for the extra floors to be added on, which is to INSTITUTIONALIZE SHARIAH IN AMERICA!!!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  34. skat says: 34

    @Donald Bly #19,
    Whatever the purpose behind creating conflict, it seems to have led to calling Smorgasbord an idiot who knows nothing about Islam – unlike the extremely knowledgeable Patvann! I may not agree with all of his statements, but certainly many of Smorgasbord’s ideas are backed by Andy McCarthy @ NRO – apparently another no nothing would doesn’t want to educate himself about Islam.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/243899/tolerant-pose-andrew-c-mccarthy

    “In the United States, there is no threat to religious liberty . . . except where there are high concentrations of Muslims. Not high concentrations of al-Qaeda sympathizers — high concentrations of Muslims.”

    Oh, that we could ALL be as intelligent and knowledgeable as Patvann! Maybe Patvann can start tutoring Andy McCarthy!

    @Smorgasbord – You might enjoy Andy’s viewpoint if you haven’t already read it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  35. susiepuma; hi, next time you go to MCDONALD, try to say as fast as you can,
    I want a DITANGGUNG HALAL wraped up” .bye
    with a poker face

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  36. Smorgasbord says: 36

    @silvernana: Whenever you want someone to go to a link, just copy-and-paste it into your comment like this: http://bigpeace.com/cbrim/2010/08/17/ground-zero-mosques-hidden-websites-follow-the-shariah/

    It will automatically turn to a direct link to click and and take you there.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  37. Donald Bly says: 37

    There are deep seated viewpoints on this topic. Wordsmith doesn’t want to inflame Muslim sentiment against America yet makes a habit of continually creating threads that inflame the sensibilities of a large portion of the FA readership. This is creating an animosity amongst individuals that otherwise agree on 99.9% of issues.

    With 77 days left to rally the troops to deal a crippling blow to the progressive/socialist agenda, dividing our ranks by constantly foisting this subject to the forefront is counterproductive. If we don’t focus on the task at hand, worrying about radical Islam or even moderate Islam will be immaterial because we’ll be too focused on getting ourselves fitted for a new set of Mao Pajamas with an Obama Icon on one sleeve and a Hammer and Sickle on the the other.

    Wordsmith: Do us all a favor and drop the subject… at least until after Nov 2nd. and then if you still need to get the last word in, you, as an official author on this site will have ample opportunity to stoke the fires of dissension.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  38. MataHarley says: 38

    I’m sorry… but who began the mosque debate again, Donald Bly? And who actually kept inflaming it when the debate wasn’t an echo chamber?

    And who is the latest one trick monkey?

    Hint… wasn’t Wordsmith. Wasn’t me, since I’ve never created one post on it. Aye’s created only one himself… the comic aspect version.

    INRE dropping the subject. Dang… wanted this done from the onset because it’s not going to come out well. But with GOP candidates in their local districts, now using opposing their local mosques (i.e. NOT at ground zero) as a campaign point, the GOP has sealed their fate on this as an issue.

    In other words, your request comes too little, too late. Damage is done.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  39. Smorgasbord says: 39

    @skat: @skat: I ain’t no idiot, but I do confes to bein reel ignorunt in a hole lot of aireas. Islam is one of um. All I need to no bout it is, convurt or kill, leve it and ya shud be killed, and women are jest a pece of property to be used and killed at the will of men. No further lurnin neded.

    I read the article earlier. I had forgotten that I can’t go on certain Muslim property because I am unclean. I will cry myself to sleep for a long time over that.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  40. Donald Bly says: 40

    Gee Mata… who the hells name is at the top of this thread as the author… Let me give you a great big clue just in case your cataracts are interfering with your vision…..

    WORDSMITH – Doh!

    You make it sound like opposing the mosque being built there is a bad thing for the GOP.. well guess again, it isn’t. If you think losing the Muslim voters in this country is a big deal… you’re absolutely mistaken.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  41. Errr…far be it from me to be a contrarian :wink: but do I hear someone trying to push the barn door closed?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  42. Rob in Katy says: 42

    I cannot fathom how some claim to believe in the Constitution and yet defend Islam and the building of this mosque? This is like Nazis are bad but Hitler is a righteous dude and I am inviting him over for dinner. Islam strips away all the rights, privileges and freedoms enumerated in the Constitution. Rather than welcome it, we should be doing everything to kill off the vile beast. We already accept that the KKK is evil, as are the Nazis; now Islam should finally take it’s place along side those ideologies.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  43. SMORGASBORD: ULTRA funny, you should have your own show on FOX, bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  44. MataHarley says: 44

    @CHill: No one that I know of would say that the Muslims do not have a right to build a mosque wherever they see fit according to local laws.

    Then perhaps, CHill, you should “get out more” on the internet. First of all, the Muslim have the right to build Cordoba House according to local laws. That isn’t sitting well. Understandable. But it’s not just Cordoba House, as the local favorite conservative pundits like to say.

    How about TN, WI and Temecula, CA… places no where near ground zero?

    How about the Staten Island mosque they stopped, another Geller moment of triumph, and again no where near ground zero?

    Or how about NJ, GA and Morada, CA… not to mention Switzerland and other Euro nations?

    I’d say most of us recognize the conflict with Cordoba House. This does not adequately dismiss the other locations where mosques are under assault, when there is no conflict with 911 attacks.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  45. MataHarley says: 45

    @Donald Bly: Gee Mata… who the hells name is at the top of this thread as the author… Let me give you a great big clue just in case your cataracts are interfering with your vision…..

    Apparently my cataracts are far superior to your selective, senile memory, Donald Bly

    Mike’s America – 4 posts

    drjohn reader posts – 5 posts and one waiting in the wings

    Wordsmith – 4 posts (except for funnies, which you all changed to a mosque post, and his joke “drawing” in response to your taunt INRE “fear”)

    Curt – 1 post

    Aye – 1 post

    This makes for 9 + 1 (pending, which he’s triumphantly announced as coming soon) serious anti-Islam/mosque/Rauf posts by Mike’sA and Drjohn to Wordsmith’s 4 posts in counter. Curt’s post was neutral since it was about “evidence” that he put a question mark about as true. Aye’s was pure comic relief.

    What was your senile point again about who isn’t letting it go?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  46. Wordsmith says: 46

    @Donald Bly #19:

    I rest my case… since the “initiator” of this thread openly admits it is an effort to goad the readers into conflict.

    From Wordsmith’s Post #13

    But sure, the initiator of this thread is posting his opinions simply to “goad people into conflict”

    I was being sarcastic. :wink:

    It would have been nice if we could have had a civil debate, minus the condescension; minus the lecturing; minus the personal insults. But the tone was set early on and only degenerated from there. Tried to apologize to Mike. He himself didn’t own up to his own contribution to ad hominems, ridicule, and snide remarks. Even apologized to you (don’t remember you responding, so don’t know if you saw it or even cared).

    There are plenty of other topics we could spend time discussing/debating, I wonder to what end is the purposeful use of this blog to create conflict amongst the readers.

    Donald, my purpose isn’t to inflame readers and create a conservative eat conservative civil war. I just wanted to provide an alternative look at a situation, rather than fall in lockstep with an amen chorus, intolerant of anyone straying the path and challenging the majority view.

    @Donald Bly #37:

    Wordsmith: Do us all a favor and drop the subject… at least until after Nov 2nd. and then if you still need to get the last word in, you, as an official author on this site will have ample opportunity to stoke the fires of dissension.

    I’m not the one always trying to get the last word in. I have trouble enough as it is finding the time and energy to respond to the onslaught of angry commenters, as well as debate to those who wish to engage in it, rather than simple name-calling and insults. It takes two to tango, and you’ve been a more than willing dance partner.

    But I have weighed in the consideration of Nov 2nd, and would have loved to have refrained. But this is like asking me to look away when I see my friends doing something I consider to be wrong and harmful.

    Unfortunately, even though only about 19% of the country is paying attention to the story, it’s not going away, but is only heating up; especially after President Obama finally weighed in. It’s now entered the public mainstream. So should we ignore the news, or provide commentary on it? As far as I can tell, Dr. John’s done as much as I have to keep the issue alive on FA (and Mike before that, early on). My previous one took on a more neutral position, mostly to report what was news worthy- Obama commenting, finally.

    Polling indicates majority Americans are opposed to the GZM. In the short term, this might not be a political loser for the GOP. But I fear the long term consequences; and I don’t see the opposition as being in the right on the issue. I acknowledge that there are thoughtful, intelligent, non-bigoted people who disagree with me. But along with that, we get comments like #42, #27, and aye’s list in #16. Whenever it’s pointed out, with rare exception do I see any of those who oppose the GZM call out bigotry for what it is and distance yourselves from the rhetoric. Of course, you yourself are in agreement in regards to Islam being a “gutter” “religion”. None of us has to like Islam. But to take on this conspiratorial belief that all Muslims are being commanded to kill or convert and that Islam itself is the enemy….this becomes an automatic win for the global jihad movement, and we become pawns in al Qaeda’s master plan. They themselves failed to convince the Muslim world to rally to their side. Yet you’d never know it from listening to the conservative din on Islam.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  47. MataHarley says: 47

    @Donald Bly: You make it sound like opposing the mosque being built there is a bad thing for the GOP.. well guess again, it isn’t. If you think losing the Muslim voters in this country is a big deal… you’re absolutely mistaken.

    Opposing mosques being built everywhere, no where near ground zero, is just the fodder the lib/progs need to paint the tea party and conservative leaders (i.e. Newt, and now the revered Pamela Geller) as bigots. Congrats….

    Need clarification? See @my links above to CHill. You think this is good?

    … pardon me, but *you’re* mistaken.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  48. Wordsmith says: 48

    @skat #25:

    As an aside, as a Christian I take offense at Christ’s name being used profanely.

    Geez…cripes! :mrgreen:

    I appreciate that there are no Christian radicals who will be issuing a fatwa for my head.

    That said, if a non-radical Muslim takes offense and peacefully protests…say…Danish cartoons as opposed to engagement in violent rioting, would you be sympathetic and respectful of his belief in the Prophet Mohammad as opposed to, say, bin Laden’s belief in Mohammad?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  49. Donald Bly says: 49

    You two can have your “last word”. My request was to focus on other issues… apparently that isn’t going to happen as long as these threads keep getting created to fan the fire. It’s your blog, I’m simply a guest here so i will acquiesce to your wisdom and spend my time elsewhere trying to get conservatives elected to office.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  50. Patvann says: 50

    Andy and I have had numerous exchanges, and in every case of nuanced departure, I have gotten the upper hand. I am a big fan, and own all his books. It’s obvious that most of you have never heard of him before today. If you had, you would have remembered this from one of his recent columns:

    (snip) slam falls into the latter category. It exists. In many of its iterations — not just al-Qaeda’s ideology but Islamist ideology, which is quite mainstream — Islam means the West existential harm. This is why we are supportive of reformist Muslims, however pessimistic some of us may be about their prospects. The point, though, is that Islam is not going away. It is part of the hand we are dealt, like it or not. We don’t need to trash-talk it gratuitously, but neither should we pretend that it is an asset on our security ledger. It’s not.

    This is primarily because unlike some of you, he never tried to put words/deeds into my mouth, and spent the time to READ what I wrote him, and his words; I never miss an article.

    He, (and the rest of you) are 100% correct that Islam AS A HISTORIC WHOLE is exactly what you (and I, and Andy) say it is. 30 years of research and study made that one of the easy first-lessons…

    When we’ve discussed the budding abrogation movement that is happening here and elsewhere, and he and I came to 100% agreement, that these folks must be supported, and that whole-sale bigotry against 1.2 billion human beings is 100% wrong. some of you loudly disagree with that premise. To those, I will now more loudly exclaim; “You hateful IDIOTS!!!”

    I don’t think but 3 or 4 of you have truly bothered to look into what I’ve wrote, to get my “feeling” about this particular Mosque, it’s backers, and the constitutional constraints put upon us by those we all revere. To those people, I will break it down into simple terms;

    Proposed Mosque: Bad form, bad manners, bad place. Last place one should be, even if the Mosque is deleted from the plans.
    Mosque backers: Liars, apologist’s, and suspicious. Never trusted Rauf at all.
    First amendment: The most important one we have. Works well in both directions. More powerful than Islam.

    I fear no counter-posit by anyone in this regard, Andy included, and I will fight to my last breath against those who espouse bigotry and cant….Be they Moslem, or be they fellow TeaPartiers.

    I’ll make this my last words on the topic, unless one would like to learn, rather than emote.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  51. Wordsmith says: 51

    Donald, we would like what you want as well- getting conservatives elected into office. Not sure that Mata and I agree that the majority conservative stance on this issue is a clear political winner. But politics aside, I think she and I take the position we do because we feel that it is the right thing.

    This isn’t about “getting in the last word”. I don’t see how you think Mata, myself, Aye, Patvann…any of us who express a different voice from yours is “fanning the fire” and extending the debate. I suppose it’d be easier if FA were merely an echo chamber of amen choir boys and gals.

    I think that’s fortunately not the case.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  52. Wordsmith says: 52

    My latest McCarthy book is The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  53. Wordsmith says: 53

    @Smorgasbord #31: Are these Muslim women trying to convert or kill you? Or are they opposed to the Taliban’s puritanical Islamic extremism?

    Do you support our Muslim allies around the world- targets of the global jihad movement- or do you condemn them as the enemy, as well?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  54. I dont think it goes with the blog but I just want to mention that
    THE HALF MOON is bloody in color, a very unusual color. bye to all.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  55. skat says: 55

    Americans may be worried, I’m speculating, that Muslims are going to have special “rights” that exempt Muslims from “tolerant” behavior. “Moderate American” Muslims, if they exist, may not want some of those jihadi clerics coming to mosques in America. Maybe “moderate Muslims” don’t agree with Christians being attacked in Malaysia, but they never speak up – at least not to my knowledge.

    I was driving in London, proves I’m crazy, with 3 daughters. We were trying to get to York. We got lost and wound up in the “Muslim” part of London. The women were in burkas, following their “man”. It was a frightening experience, if that makes me a Islamaphobe, so be it. I’d say it makes me alert to a dangerous situation.
    By the Park Lane Hotel, in a Starbucks, 2 Muslim men having tea, cake, etc while a very pretty, miserable looking young wife sat by herself with a son about 3. They had NOTHING. She avoided all eye contact. Her husband did come over to chastise her while we were there.
    Muslim women are subject to sharia in England.
    I’m for tolerance and religious freedom, but I’m not for Muslims transforming America into a country with Muslim enclaves that don’t follow our laws and the Constitution.

    @Smorgsabord,
    You’s gots enuff lernin’ fer me!

    @Donald Bly,
    It seems that, for some reason, they want to denigrate Flopping Aces followers. Whether that is their intention, they are giving the impression that we are a bunch of ignorant, stupid, prejudiced hicks.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  56. MataHarley says: 56

    @Smorgasbord: Until that time, they are still terrorists who want to kill me. Someone who is a member of the Hell’s Angels, but doesn’t like some of the things they do, is still a Hell’s Angels.

    Whatsamatter, Smorgasbord… never made it beyond prospect status and feeling disgruntled? LOL

    Now, as a friendly word of advice, I wouldn’t be making broad class warfare against the Red’n'White. And that you do so as a tremendously poor analogy makes me wonder if you actually know any 1%’ers personally, or just decided to watch too many B movies late nights.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  57. Wordsmith says: 57

    @skat:

    Maybe “moderate Muslims” don’t agree with Christians being attacked in Malaysia, but they never speak up – at least not to my knowledge.

    Malaysia Muslims Denounce Church Attacks

    Wonder if you missed this post. Or this comment with link to 500 Muslim religious leaders who denounced the 2005 London bombs?

    Muslims do speak out. And they oppose and are slaughtered by extremists on a regular basis.

    I was driving in London, proves I’m crazy, with 3 daughters. We were trying to get to York. We got lost and wound up in the “Muslim” part of London. The women were in burkas, following their “man”. It was a frightening experience, if that makes me a Islamaphobe, so be it. I’d say it makes me alert to a dangerous situation.

    I don’t think anyone here cares to endorse burkas. But who really wears burkas?

    burkas, beheadings, honor killings, kill or convert….how many of the 1.5 billion actually live like this?

    By the Park Lane Hotel, in a Starbucks, 2 Muslim men having tea, cake, etc while a very pretty, miserable looking young wife sat by herself with a son about 3. They had NOTHING. She avoided all eye contact. Her husband did come over to chastise her while we were there.
    Muslim women are subject to sharia in England.
    I’m for tolerance and religious freedom, but I’m not for Muslims transforming America into a country with Muslim enclaves that don’t follow our laws and the Constitution.

    There’s much to deplore; and as inextricably tied as Islam is to culture, some of the practices can be traced back to regional cultural traditions and norms.

    And there is a bit of difference between European Muslim immigrants and American Muslim immigrants.

    @Donald Bly,
    It seems that, for some reason, they want to denigrate Flopping Aces followers. Whether that is their intention, they are giving the impression that we are a bunch of ignorant, stupid, prejudiced hicks.

    Sorry if that’s the impression I’ve given you. Insults, condescension, lecturing, and denigration has not been a one-way streak, however. From my perspective, the intolerance has been coming from your side of the farm. Neither Mata, Aye, nor myself have called all conservative opposition “Islamaphobic” and “bigoted”. However, we’ve been lumped together and lectured to as if we are in the “Islam is a religion of peace” politically correct camp of CAIR-lovers.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  58. CHill says: 58

    From Wikipedia:

    In sarcasm, ridicule or mockery is used harshly, often crudely and contemptuously, for destructive purposes.

    Sarcasm is rarely “tongue-in-cheek” humor. You simply blew the humor away.

    Patvann: Since I live under the NEW Dispensation called Christianity and not the OLD called Judaism, please relate all that “horrific biblical” stuff and a list of “hateful crap” you think exists that relates to Christians. Make sure you use it as moral equivalence to what is in the Quran. Idiot-ilks (this is often called name calling when is incapable of reasoned discussion) like me would truly like you to explain away the concept that love on one’s fellow man somehow relates to killing all the infidels one comes across or at least lying to them to get the upper hand.

    Wordsmith: Your sarcasm was read correctly by me and others as a slam against our disagreement with you and others desire to see the mosque built. Raul still believes that America itself was one of the causes of 9/11 and refuses to this day to declare Hamas as a terrorist organization. Compared to al Qaeda he is probably a moderate but then Mussolini compared to Hitler was also a moderate.

    I, for one, believe that Muslim have a right to live and worship as they see fit. They are also free to hold whatever hatred they have for their adopted country as long as they keep it to themselves. I have placed my life on the line numerous time in the Middle East to guarantee these freedoms. No one will be allowed to call me a bigot simply because I find the mosque offensive.

    The community has the right to determine what can be built and what can’t be built via local codes and restrictions. I am a capitalist but that does not mean Walmart has the right to build where ever it wants without the backing of the local community. Many places across America have rejected Walmart eventhough the land would have been private and not violated existing building codes. The communities have the final word.

    The President screwed up in a huge way by commenting on the issue. His press secretary had it right to begin with.

    A voice of wisdom they’ve never heard
    A vision of truth they left undisturbed
    Why is their what and who is their when?
    Evil so devastating again and again

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  59. Patvann says: 59

    @Mata

    LOL!

    Richard “Dicky” Smith (San Jose Chapter) used to live across the street from my folks…He would have the prospects mow the lawns, and take the garbage cans down for all the neighbors on the street. My mom dug the old dood, (after a while) and he sent me killer boxes of treats while I was away in the Navy. He died when I was away and I sure miss the old bastard!

    In a sense in was what Hamas does in Gaza, but in reality, he really did like all of us, and we him. He never asked for a thing, and he made it very clear to his boys that nothing “bad” (illegal or immoral) was to go down there…UNLIKE Hamas, who uses the civilians around them as shields, and associations as barter.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  60. Wordsmith says: 60

    @CHill:

    Wordsmith: Your sarcasm was read correctly by me and others as a slam against our disagreement with you and others desire to see the mosque built.

    Nope. You came in midstream into the debate. Click on the category and trace back to the comments sections. That’s what galvanized the post.

    I didn’t want to see the “mosque” built. But what I oppose is the view that Islam itself is the enemy. It’s the view that al Qaeda wants us to have, but one which Muslim majority rejected. Their indiscriminate violence is opposed even by radical Islamists and fundamentalists who have rejected jihad theorists. But rather than marginalize the extremists, some apparently want to do bin Laden and Zawahiri a favor and broaden the war.

    Raul still believes that America itself was one of the causes of 9/11

    So do Ron Paul and Rand Paul and Michael Scheuer. How does holding the “blowback” opinion on America’s foreign policy make Rauf a radical Islamic terror sympathizer? He may well be; but so far the “proof” and “evidence” is no more alarming than views commonly held by anti-war Howard Zinn-reading blame America first liberals, and isolationist/non-interventionist blame America firsters, like the Paul Bearers.

    One of bin Laden’s stated grievances against the U.S. was its presence on the Arabian peninsula.

    Now al Qaeda theology doesn’t need an excuse to hate the West and the U.S. But just because someone may wish to “understand” what motivates the Islamic terrorists and points to U.S. foreign policy as a culprit does not make one a radical nor a terrorist sympathizer. There are far more quotes of Rauf condemning the attacks of 9/11 and Islamic terrorism.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  61. CHill says: 61

    How was your view concerning moderate Muslims enhanced by your sarcasm toward those who were offended by the possibility of the mosque being built? I still do not understand the connection.

    I do not buy into the liberal concept that US actions or US citizens’ remarks will cause thousands of Muslims to join the ranks of al Qaeda as terrorists. This is pure fiction. A moderate Muslim is a moderate Muslim because of:

    1. his personal upbringing, his personal experiences and his training
    2. his intellectual and academic research into humanity

    Terrorists are terrorists because:

    1. training

    Check out the background of most of the terrorists. Like the National Socialists in Germany, the children were abused early with Nazi training. How long have Muslim kids all over the world been trained to become jihadist. Try three decades or so. A Muslim does not go to bed at night after reading the FloppingAces website and then wake up to become a terrorists. Most Muslims do not even read English, let alone what US citizens and others say. Terrorist trained Muslims have been trained since they were children to the concept of jihad and Jew and infidel hatred.

    One of my English professors once told the story of how she was working at a large New England university (Columbia, I think) and was working with ESL students who had not passed their TOEFL to get into the university. The students were asked to present a person who was their personal hero. A student from Oman, a sweet and beautiful young Muslim girl (according to the professor) did a presentation about how Hitler was her personal hero because he had killed all the Jews. She had never met a Jew, would not know a Jew if she saw one yet – training does wonders for young minds. The professor, BTW, was Jewish and the stupid little girl did not even know it.

    Terrorists are not born overnight. They have been trained meticulously for decades. What I write or believe has absolutely nothing to do with “making terrorists.”

    Also, I consider Truthers and the like to be extremists and not moderates. so your argument continues to fall flat.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  62. Patvann says: 62

    @CHill.

    Thank you for noticing that I said “Biblical”, not “Christian”. Now take that logic to the next step.

    Once you do that, it negates the rest of your straw-man argument against my stance.

    Just to head you off…I know full well the Jews have abrogated most of Deuteronomy, which is the same thing the reformers of Islam are trying to do in-between getting killed for it.

    As a Christian, I love them as I love myself, so I want to help them succeed. Is calling all 1.2 billion of them “inherently evil and unfit to be Americans”, as some impart, part of that equation?

    -Didn’t think so. Only an ignorant dolt would make such bigoted and un-Christian statements.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  63. MataHarley says: 63

    skat, obviously you are female and seem to suffer under the delusion that Muslim women crave servitude. Some may, some may not. In both the UK and in America, they have that choice. As suek and I have discussed on another thread, it was Muslim women that put the kabosh on Shariah in Canada because any extreme of that practice was anti women’s rights, as well as against the laws of the nation… and also was exactly what they fled to western countries to escape. Yet in the UK, where you became so terrified merely at the sight of women in burkas following men, the government prosecutes Shariah penalties outside of western law… i.e. stoning, beheading, honor killings, etal. Did this escape you?

    Yet here you are, automatically assuming that westernized Muslim women crave exactly what they were escaping. WTF?

    INRE those women in burkas… not required in many a Muslim/Shariah country, BTW… they had a choice. Just as Amish and Mormon women make their choices in relationships and religion. In Iran and other oppressive countries, they do not have a choice. Islam and Shariah are not practiced and reformed uniformly in all countries. Yet if they decide that is how they want to live out their lives, who are you to judge them?

    Instead you make it seem as if the US is suddenly going to become Iran because Cordoba House gets built. Please…. such hyperventilation and wild speculations do little to address our very real problem manifesting itself in our Congress and WH… creeping Euro-socialsim.

    INRE this:

    It seems that, for some reason, they want to denigrate Flopping Aces followers. Whether that is their intention, they are giving the impression that we are a bunch of ignorant, stupid, prejudiced hicks.

    This is a debate of a hotly contested issue, and for a myriad of nuanced reasons. No one on this site approves of Cordoba House. However more than a few – including GOP candidates running for office – disapprove of mosques being built all around the country…. no where close to ground zero. This is documented hyperbole, and now… because of bloggers and so called “conservative” leaders like Newt… it has become a losing campaign issue. We are all smeared by the extended hype of Cordoba House to all of Islam. For this, I have little forgiveness and hope the midterms damage from the fallout over the real issues of fiscal irresponsibility is minimal.

    As I pointed out above, there are 9 (+ 1 pending post) that are anti-Islam/mosque/Rauf. There are 4 posts that are “not all of Islam” counters. This is more than 2 to 1 balanced in your particular opinion’s flavor… and yet you still whine.

    If you can’t handle anything other than an echo chamber, without feeling personally assaulted, I suggest you’re hanging in the wrong venue. I might add that if you want to genuinely examine the “denigration”, I suggest you start reading the “ground zero mosque” category of both posts and commentary from the beginning, and ask yourself where the very liberal/Alinksy’esqe assault/ridicule INRE opinions originated. I believe that Donald Bly was shut down with his horse manure with the same facts, and decided to tell us we could have the “last word” as he put in his “last word.”

    In other words, he had no answer to the absolute facts he tried to muddy, and bolted the sand box with his tonka toys…. for now.

    If, after reading from June to today on all that has transpired, you continue to believe you … the majority opinion and post thrust here at FA… is still being assaulted as a “bunch of ignorant, stupid, prejudiced hicks”, then I guess you really don’t “…gots enuff lernin’ fer me!”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  64. MataHarley says: 64

    Neither Mata, Aye, nor myself have called all conservative opposition “Islamaphobic” and “bigoted”. However, we’ve been lumped together and lectured to as if we are in the “Islam is a religion of peace” politically correct camp of CAIR-lovers.”

    ‘scuuuuuuuse me, but that’s “Muzzie Teamster” to you, Word…. LOL

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  65. Smorgasbord says: 65

    @ilovebeeswarzone: I’ll wait until they make me an offer.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  66. Smorgasbord says: 66

    @Wordsmith: #53 Are these Muslim women trying to convert or kill you
    I clicked on your link with Firefox and Safari and neither one took me anywhere.

    “Do you support our Muslim allies around the world- targets of the global jihad movement- or do you condemn them as the enemy, as well?”

    During World War II our problem wasn’t with the German or Japanese people, it was with their leaders. They were dictatorships that brainwashed their people to do as they were told. It is the same in Muslim countries. It ain’t the people, it is their leaders.

    All I have said all along is that Islam was created to take over the world. Would you or anyone else support any of the other religions if they adopted the “convert or kill” mentality? By the way, that is how the Catholic church used to convert in other countries. That is all I need to know to not want anything to do with it. How many other countries will have to bow to their laws before you realize they go into a country with the idea of converting it to an Muslim State?

    I am one of those who thinks this has been covered enough. Nobody is going to change my mind and I ain’t going to change anybody else’s. I believe that conservatives can disagree on things like this and not have it effect our focus to get the libs out of office.

    If you have read my “Why is arguing with a truck driver like wrestling with a pig in the mud,” I think we have too many pigs wrestling in the mud here.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  67. Smorgasbord says: 67

    @MataHarley: #56 I’m going to show my lack of lernin again and guess that “Red’n’White” means the Hell’s Angels. If it was a bad choice, at least you got my meaning.

    I have no idea what you mean by, “…never made it beyond prospect status….”

    I’m guessing that “1%’ers” means Muslims. I have seen enough of how women are treated that I don’t like it. Try wearing the black burka in 100% temperature for a few minutes and see if you do. (No, I didn’t try it). I don’t sweat much and 80º is too much for me in shorts and short sleeve shirt. I even feel sorry for the cowboy movie women and their heavy clothing.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  68. twellsy says: 68

    One thing this post has caused me to do is remove flopping aces from my favorites, meaning I’ll never be back. All the sniping and name calling serves no useful purpose. When 2 or more people on a thread call someone else an idiot, I’m moving on. And when an author attempts to get readers to attack each other while they sit back and rub their hands together, it’s time to move on. One poster here had it right. If your attempt at sarcasm falls flat, maybe it was your writing and not the readers interpretation of it. And it did fall flat. Wordsmith indeed. Signing off.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  69. tewllsy: hi, MAY I say, that there is many posts that are completly diffrent from each others dealing with many subjects that you would surely be interested to survey:
    JUST to leave is most radicaly cut some habit that you uses to enjoy,
    I might say that with all the posts here,and they realy get them in, one after the other,
    YOU are sure to miss on the fun, as we get to be a group who enjoy being together and enjoy the new commer who share sames ideas: YOU should reconsider also because of the incoming
    important challenge, AMERICA will have to confront, and for this, we must stay together,as diffrent minds do for the same cause. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  70. Wordsmith says: 70

    @CHill:

    I do not buy into the liberal concept that US actions or US citizens’ remarks will cause thousands of Muslims to join the ranks of al Qaeda as terrorists. This is pure fiction. A moderate Muslim is a moderate Muslim because of:

    1. his personal upbringing, his personal experiences and his training
    2. his intellectual and academic research into humanity

    Terrorists are terrorists because:

    1. training

    Check out the background of most of the terrorists. Like the National Socialists in Germany, the children were abused early with Nazi training. How long have Muslim kids all over the world been trained to become jihadist. Try three decades or so. A Muslim does not go to bed at night after reading the FloppingAces website and then wake up to become a terrorists. Most Muslims do not even read English, let alone what US citizens and others say. Terrorist trained Muslims have been trained since they were children to the concept of jihad and Jew and infidel hatred.

    I agree that moderates aren’t going to align themselves with the jihad movement, even if they feel offense, insulted, or maligned by those who lump them in as indistinguishable from the kill or convert Islamic extremists.

    However, you certainly aren’t winning any “hearts and minds”, neither. Most of the committed, ideological jihadists come from middle-class to upper class backgrounds and are well-educated.

    Others are not so religiously devoted so much as attracted to a romanticized sense of political ideology against the great western imperial aggressor.

    Not all radical Islamists are a part of the jihadi movement. You have what David Kilcullen refers to as “the accidental guerrilla” where we are “creating more terrorists”. Do you think abu Ghraib (how it was perceived and propagandized) created more terrorists and global insurgents or not?

    I cited Kilcullen in the other post you responded in regarding how theology is not the driving factor when it comes to predicting violence. Kilcullen writes,

    Observers of the situation are often confused by their own category errors, for example, equating liberal politics with nominal theology and nonviolence, or fundamentalist theology with extremist politics and terrorism. These traits may in theory cluster together, but are not the same thing. In fact, Quintan Wiktorowicz has argued, theology is a poor predictor for political extremism and violence. He argues that though Salafist groups share a common religious perspective, political divisions emerge when they apply enduring religious principles to contemporary problems:

    Although Salafis share the same approach to religious jurisprudence, they often hold different interpretations about contemporary politics and conditions….The different contextual readings have produced three major factions in the community: the purists, the politicos, and the jihadis. The purists emphasize a focus on nonviolent methods of propagation, purification, and education. They view politics as a diversion that encourages deviancy. Politicos, in contrast, emphasize application of the Salafi creed to the political arena, which they view as particularly important because it dramatically impacts social justice and the right of God alone to legislate. Jihadis take a more militant position and argue that the current context calls for violence and revolution. All three factions share a common [theological] creed but offer different explanations of the contemporary world and its concomitant problems and thus propose different solutions. The splits are about contextual analysis, not belief.

    ~~~

    If theology is a poor predictor for violence, it follows that radicalization (which includes political or theological components, or both) is relevant to counterterrorism in its political, not its theological dimension. Indeed, a focus on Islamic beliefs (equating “radical” theology with violent extremism) may be an analytical sidetrack. Rather than theology, the evidence suggests, it may make more sense to focus on recognized behavioral and sociological indicators of propensity to violence. As Marc Sageman has shown, biographical, psychological, and sociological factors are more useful predictors for terrorist activity than religion. Membership in a subversive or revolutionary political group may also indicate that an individual is “primed” for violence if an appropriate catalyst emerges- but a trigger event is needed and, again, the driving factor is political, not theological.

    I’d say that there are those who fall into the camp of potentials for radicalization. They are vulnerable and “at risk” and are influenced by either our actions or the manipulating of perceptions of our actions (distortions, misperceptions, anti-U.S. propaganda). Some of these are also made to be “at risk” due to environmental factors of poverty, crime, and a sense of disenfranchisement and lack of acceptance and sense of identity-loss in immigrant communities. This creates opportunities for extremists to offer explanations for their miseries as well as a plan for a “way out”.

    One of my English professors once told the story of how she was working at a large New England university (Columbia, I think) and was working with ESL students who had not passed their TOEFL to get into the university. The students were asked to present a person who was their personal hero. A student from Oman, a sweet and beautiful young Muslim girl (according to the professor) did a presentation about how Hitler was her personal hero because he had killed all the Jews. She had never met a Jew, would not know a Jew if she saw one yet – training does wonders for young minds. The professor, BTW, was Jewish and the stupid little girl did not even know it.

    There are good deal of falsehoods and conspiracies (and “the narrative“) floating around in Arab nations.
    Magdi Khalil and like-minded Muslims provide a counter voice. But they are undermined by those who feed into the Arab paranoia and jihadi propaganda that the West is hell-bent on persecuting Muslims and Islam.

    Kilcullen further writes,

    in 2004, an International Crisis Group report found that Salafism and terrorism rarely occur together in Indonesia, and another report made the same finding in Saudi Arabia; earlier, Francois Burgat identified a similar pattern in North Africa. Many of the most violent Iraqi groups are primarily nationalist and only nominally Islamic, as are some of the most extreme Palestinian groups. And the Netherlands security service (AIVD) identified the same wide spectrum in European radical Muslim communities in 2003. Hence, regardless of theological or political categorization, field evidence suggest that Islamic theology as such has little functional relationship with violence. On the basis of this demonstrated analytical weakness of theology as a predictor for violence, Wiktorowicz argues that we “should focus on the competing political analyses and interpretations and not necessarily the specific [theological] content of jihadi beliefs.”

    CHill:

    Also, I consider Truthers and the like to be extremists and not moderates. so your argument continues to fall flat.

    That misses the point. Forget the Paul Bearers, then. Think in terms of holding political opinions. Does holding a political critique of U.S. foreign policy as a contributing factor automatically make one a terrorist-supporting radical?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  71. Wordsmith says: 71

    @twellsy:

    when an author attempts to get readers to attack each other while they sit back and rub their hands together,

    :-|

    Evidence, please.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  72. Wordsmith says: 72

    @Smorgasbord #66:

    I clicked on your link with Firefox and Safari and neither one took me anywhere.

    Try it now. Thanks.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  73. CHill says: 73

    Wordsmith:

    Doesn’t sound to me like you are the “baiting for trouble” kind of guy as your sarcastic remarks made me think you were.

    “However, you certainly aren’t winning any “hearts and minds”, neither. Most of the committed, ideological jihadists come from middle-class to upper class backgrounds and are well-educated.
    Others are not so religiously devoted so much as attracted to a romanticized sense of political ideology against the great western imperial aggressor.”

    Well-educated, you might have added, to become jihadist at a very early age. Bet you that each and every hard-core terrorist got the same education at the same age. Want to take me up on that bet? Most Arab nations now have schools that specialize in this kind of propaganda education. Again, the parallels between the National Socialists in Germany and the Islamist in the Middle East are remarkable. Historically, one can find a lot of “connect the dots” stuff from the Muftis visit to Germany in the 1930s and entire battalions of Muslim Nazi soldiers in the Balkans. The Nazis and these early jihadist shared the exact same agenda as far as Jews went. Compare the propaganda campaigns of the Nazis with those currently going on now among the population of Arabs and other Muslims. Same thing all over again.

    Have read some of Kilcullen and he obviously knows what he is talking about. His writings do not necessarily disagree with what I wrote. Accidental terrorist. Want to make a bet about these accidental terrorists and their education at an early age as well?

    Hearts and minds, you say. I have access to the heart and mind of one individual at a time. The majority of Muslims do not read English nor do they care what I or you write or think. I am in Thailand and I treat all people as a Christian would – with respect and charity. Go back to the latest article on your own blog and see who really cares about what is happening outside their own little life circle. Human nature – if it does not affect a human personally, priority drops immediately. The problem is the hard-core terrorist feeding the baby jihadists and accidental terrorists the same crap they were fed and fell for. Whose fault. The leadership of that particular country that allows and often supports such “brainwashing.” I strongly believe that the training has more to do with the budding terrorist than anything you or I or the whole Western world says. Matter of fact, we could probably all go to the Middle East with giant hugs and loving charity and the same amount of terrorist would show up to blow the crap out of all these huggers.

    Not sure I buy into the concept of theology being a poor indicator of terrorism. Guess it depends on one’s definition of “theology.” Was National Socialism a theology? Is Marxism a theology? Certainly jihadism is a theology and not even Kilcullen could argue otherwise.

    In the end, I believe that bigotry is an action and not a thought. To be a bigot one must act a bigot. Just because someone states that he or she does not like Muslims or does not trust Muslims does not make them a bigot. If, however, they treat a Muslim with disrespect based on these thoughts, then bigot they are. Just like that little Omani Muslim girl, clueless from her training as she actually was very attached to the English professor I wrote about who was a Jew who she professed to hate.

    Seems to me we are singing the same song from the same sheet of music. Your sarcasm still sucked big time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  74. Wordsmith says: 74

    CHill….can’t really see much in that last comment to disagree with….’cept the last: I still like the suckage of my sarcasm in this post.

    Not sure I buy into the concept of theology being a poor indicator of terrorism. Guess it depends on one’s definition of “theology.” Was National Socialism a theology? Is Marxism a theology? Certainly jihadism is a theology and not even Kilcullen could argue otherwise.

    The thing is, jihadism is an ideological offshoot from Islam. And what I disagree with others on is in regards to Islam as practiced by those who do not fall into the enemy camp of violent radicalists, convert or kill extremists, militants, and committed jihadists.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  75. minuteman 26 says: 75

    Personally, I believe Geert Wilders has the right take on Islam. Proof – They’re trying to kill him.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  76. @minuteman 26:

    Are they trying to kill you too?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  77. minuteman 26 says: 77

    Aye – Don’t know and don’t care. Just trying to get the word out that Islam is a threat to this nation and bust balls on ocasion.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  78. @minuteman 26:

    Don’t know and don’t care.

    Over and over you’ve tried to convince us here that Islam is the enemy and that all Muslims are the same…and that they’re eagerly awaiting the opportunity to kill or convert you.

    Yet you “don’t know and don’t care” that someone or a group of someones may be trying to kill you?

    Really?

    Basically your premise is that Geert has a position that has made him a target, your position is the same as Geert’s but you “don’t know and don’t care” if you’re a target…

    Seems your premise is flawed and that all muslims are not the same after all because, if they were, then you would be a target as well.

    And if you really believed all you’ve written here you’d “care” enough to “know” for sure.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  79. MataHarley says: 79

    @Smorgasbord, no problem. Be happy to give you the inside education on scooter trash terminology.

    Red’n'White is what we call Hell’s Angels. One point for you. :lol:

    Prospects are those being initiated into the clubs. Like Patvann pointed out, they are given the low down deeds and trash tasks by clubbers as part of their initiation. They can be easily ID’d by only have half the “rocker bars” on their jackets. Rocker bars meaning the curved patches at the top and bottom of their logos. Prospects will not have the bottom rocker patch until they are full fledged membership. If you are around the clubbers, it’s those you keep an eye on, since they will be sent out for any mischief or nefarious doin’s.

    1%ers are what we call all m’cycle clubs (or gangs, as many non riders like to call them). The phrase came into being because there was such a small percentage of those who ride who actually join clubs like these… Hell’s Angels, Vago, Mongols, etc.

    @twellsy: One thing this post has caused me to do is remove flopping aces from my favorites, meaning I’ll never be back. All the sniping and name calling serves no useful purpose. When 2 or more people on a thread call someone else an idiot, I’m moving on.

    Well, twellsy, we’ll be sorry to see you go, but you must have been desperate for an excuse. No one called anyone an “idiot” on this thread. Now Smorgasbord did get called an “asshat” :lol: … then again, he’s come up with some pretty extreme solutions. Besides, he’s been around a while and I’ve never seen him sulk away or not stand his ground… right or wrong… on his opinion. He’s not a thin skinned kind of guy.

    But Smorgasbord perceived himself being called an idiot (instead of asshat… LOL), and skat felt like she was being called part of a “bunch of ignorant, stupid, prejudiced hicks” Her words, and those have never been uttered by the rest of us.

    Sure can’t help if those being debated decide they’ve been personally insulted. But the name calling you are using as your moment to exit is not only sparse, but mostly a figment of imagination.

    Had you done what I suggested to skat above, and go back thru the ground zero category of posts and comments, you’ll find that the group assault/ridicule originated with the more outspoken anti-Islam/mosque/Rauf crowd…. first labeling anyone who disagreed as “Muzzie Teamsters” or Muslim apologists. Then claiming erroneously that we had labeled everyone who opposed as Islamaphobes. I might add that we were also all accused of being “dense”, “naive” and completely uneducated to Islam in general.

    Therefore the hypersensitivity and exaggerations being bandied about are all of their own (the anti-Islam/mosque/Rauf group) making. Apparently it was their actions which, as you claim, have driven you away. So if you are leaving, it would be quite nice for you to accurately identify just which group was being demeaning.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  80. Ron H. says: 80

    To all:
    Wow what an exciting thread. Now this is why I love Flopping Aces. I’m not personally interested in any sort of echo chamber where everyone agrees without any sort of dissent.

    Oh and Wordsmith, I think your article was funny and I got that you were just being a bit of a smart ass! Hah

    Ron. H

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  81. minuteman 26 says: 81

    Aye – I’ve been shot at before (2 tours in Vietnam) and can handle that part of it. My concern is more for this country than anything personal. I still play with things that go bang and have a permit to carry. Living in South Texas, drug gangs are a more imediate threat, however there are many like myself that will not allow Islam to do to this country, what it is now doing to Europe and other parts of the world.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  82. skat says: 82

    @wordsmith,
    Agreed that some, very few Muslims speak out against violence against Christians or against other Muslims. Is it because of fear of reprisal? If the vast majority of Muslims disagree with the fanatics, the fanatics wouldn’t be Imams, revered, etc. If the vast majority of Muslims are moderates, just wanting to peacefully co-exist, they have the power to take back their religion, at least in America and England.
    I don’t see evidence that Muslim American immigrants are different than Muslim English immigrants were. I really doubt Brits ever expected Muslim women to be wearing burkas, be subjected to sharia courts, etc. It’s a slow progression – just as Muslims explain. When the President gives speeches praising Muslim women clothing (Cairo) he’s sending the wrong message.
    Without a doubt, if Americans weren’t afraid of offending Muslims, no one would support this mosque at GZ. Reaching out is one thing, I’m sure everyone supports that. Different rules for Muslims is entirely different – that’s what this mosque represents.
    @CHill61,
    I agree with you. I don’t think Americans are creating terrorists by opposing the Mosque.

    I did see the other posts @ the time they were posted. WOW! The hateful comments, insults between Flopping Aces bloggers, obviously FA bloggers insulting each other, and followers were flying. So it’s strange, to me, that FA would again stir up animosity with such a sarcastic post. In my opinion, the tone of the bloggers towards followers has sounded like elected Democrats lecturing their dumb-dumb constituents – not towards me, but towards some of the others. I don’t think it serves a useful purpose, but it’s your call. Flopping Aces has been a great site.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  83. Ron H: hi, I bett, it must hurt to be smart, sometimes, SPECIALY when you dont want to be. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  84. Ron H. says: 85

    To ilovebeeswarzone:
    I must admit that I didn’t understand your post:

    “hi, I bett, it must hurt to be smart, sometimes, SPECIALY when you dont want to be. bye”

    Was that an insult or a compliment? I realize that there is a language barrier but the way you phrased your post sounded a bit insulting. If this is not the case then I apologize for misconstruing what you said.

    Ron H.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  85. Curt says: 86

    @twellsy: While I would hate to lose any reader the last thing I want this blog to become is an echo chamber of “right on!” “your right!” and so on. While every author on here has conservatism in common, its all on different levels…which is just what I was striving for when starting FA.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  86. Ron,

    A total side note.

    It’s good to see you around.

    Don’t make yourself so scarce.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  87. Ron H. says: 88

    Thanks Aye!
    I read FA daily but don’t always comment because truthfully it can be a bit intimidating to tread the waters here. You are all so knowledgeable and quick on the draw so I feel as though I really have nothing of substance to add. I will however chime in just to let you guys know that I’m still around and “lurking”.

    I love this site!

    Take Care

    Ron H.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  88. suek says: 89

    Heh. Just tried to edit the comment above, since I see that the “bigpeace” link had already been posted. I did the “click to edit”, and it said I didn’t have permission to edit. ????? (213+ minutes left)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  89. Donald Bly says: 90

    Since Muslims are exempted from Obamacare for religious reasons, as it is, from my understanding, against their faith to purchase insurance because they considered it a form of gambling; are they exempted from having to carry automobile insurance and homeowners insurance also?

    Or… since driving is a privilege not a right, if they carry auto insurance in order to afford themselves the convenience of automotive transportation, would they then also be able to claim religious conviction in order to opt out of Obamacare?

    It is my understanding that those that claim religious conviction as a tool for opting out of Obamacare are exempt from the penalties for not carrying health insurance. If, at some point they become extremely ill and then choose to opt in to a pre-existing condition plan… would any penalties that they had previously been exempted from be retroactively collectible? Or… will they simply be considered a special class?

    Just curious….

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  90. Ron H: hi, I surely did not say that to insult, sorry if it sounded that way,
    I LIKED your comment SO I meant that WORDSMITH is VERY smart and , HE gave us so many comments, that sometimes he must have feel tired of us, and just wanting to drop everything.
    I apologyse for not being more clear before. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  91. skat says: 92

    A moderate Muslim speaks:

    we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel.

    Do they not understand that building a mosque at Ground Zero is equivalent to permitting a Serbian Orthodox church near the killing fields of Srebrenica where 8,000 Muslim men and boys were slaughtered?

    As for those teary-eyed, bleeding-heart liberals such as New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and much of the media, who are blind to the Islamist agenda in North America, we understand their goodwill.

    Unfortunately for us, their stand is based on ignorance and guilt, and they will never in their lives have to face the tyranny of Islamism that targets, kills and maims Muslims worldwide, and is using liberalism itself to destroy liberal secular democratic societies from within.

    Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Mischief+Manhattan/3370303/story.html#ixzz0wzDdzs6e

    @ Mataharley 63,
    No, I suffer no such “delusions”. Some women may chose to wear a burka, but many are forced to wear one. Muslims women may want to escape sharia, but that isn’t happening for many because Western governments are being “tolerant” allowing Muslims to engage in activities that no one – Christians, non-Christians, etc, would be allowed to engage in. It isn’t only the Muslim “women” unable to escape Islamism when Americans, French, Brits cave in – it’s also Muslim men. It’s just much more visible for women with the burkas.

    At any rate, somewhere, it may have been on O’Reilly, the author of the above article said that “political correctness” regarding Islam since 9-11 has made life in the West much harder for “moderate Muslims.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  92. Toothfairy says: 93

    @Donald Bly #90:

    Are they exempted from carrying automobile insurance…?

    Several years ago one of them ran into my car twice in the same parking lot. (He was unable to back up his car within the allotted space.) When I asked to see his license, he produced a Virginia license with an Hispanic name on it. He was no Hispanic, and neither was the woman in the car with him. He ordered her to get back in the car in a language other than English or Spanish, and she meekly complied. When I asked to see his insurance card, he first gave me an optical insurance card. When I asked to see his car insurance, he gave me another card. I did not recognize the name of the company, but I wrote down all the information while he watched. Later I informed my insurance company of the accident and gave them the man’s insurance info. They called me back and informed me there was no such company. I called the number myself and it just rang off the wall. Sooo. It seems that at least some of them have paperwork, but it’s bogus.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  93. Patvann says: 94

    @Skat

    At any rate, somewhere, it may have been on O’Reilly, the author of the above article said that “political correctness” regarding Islam since 9-11 has made life in the West much harder for “moderate Muslims.

    WoooP!! THERE IT IS!!!

    If it wasn’t for all the damn lefties on the planet, none of this “creeping” Sharia would be happening. Along with them supporting the terrorist-side of the “Palestinian issue” since the 60′s, and too-many folks-to-list keeping us on the middle-east oil teet (don’t drill here! No nukes! No coal!)

    -It’s no wonder they feel more emboldened after every step…and richer.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  94. skatblue says: 95

    @ Mataharley,
    It’s irrelevant whether “British Muslim women” want to wear burkas. Do Muslims want to be “British”? Do Muslims want to be “American”? If they do, it’s understood that some “customs” are unacceptable. I might want to move to Saudi Arabia and become a citizen for any number of reasons, but I’d have to expect to wear non-American clothing. I also object to burkas for security reasons. Muslims can wear it all except the head covering with little slits for eyes. If they want to wear a burka, go to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, etc. What if some religious group suddenly had a revelation they always had to wear ski masks?

    Since I so obviously think like a woman, I’ll say I doubt Muslim women want to wear that garb – not the burka. How many of those women are free to say what they want? How many of those women just picked up and moved to England on their own so they could exalt in their new found freedom and wear a burka?

    @Patvann#94
    Agreed!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  95. Smorgasbord says: 96

    @Wordsmith: #53 All I get is a message saying the page can’t be found. Women never have wanted to talk to me. I guess Muslim women are the same.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  96. Donald Bly says: 97

    Thanks for the reply Toothfairy… I realize your account is anecdotal but it does seem that the “protected classes” can exploit the system without a great deal of outcry from the greater population because the devil is in the details and when bills are 2500 pages long and no one has read them before they get passed… a lot of injustice can be accomplished in a single sentence.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  97. MataHarley says: 98

    skatblue, sometimes with a debate that has gone on since June, we end up having to repeat things we said in the past. So it’s like playing catch for someone who walks into a movie halfway thru, and wants to know what the plot is. And in this instance, I have said in the past that I am against the banning of any clothing in the US (not Saudia Arabia or other nations… *my* country). But with that are some caveats where face coverings should be banned for security… check points, perhaps universities as that Shariah loving country, Syria, is doing to their own Muslim population for safety, courtrooms, police stations, etc.

    I also fail to see why you’d compare you going to Saudia Arabia, and accepting the fact you have to adopt your clothing as that is a good thing. Or that we should adopt the same attitudes. It is why Muslims escape these oppressive rules by coming to the western countries. Daisy Khan, and most American muslim women do not wear burkas, hijabs or other 3rd world Muslim country clothing. But for some reason, everyone thinks that Shariah councils means everyone… not only Muslims… are all the sudden going to be forced into burkas. This is truly absurd. Look at Egypt, Pakistan, Kuwait… and number of Muslim countries where their population dresses in modern clothing, albeit not as suggestive as here in the States. Hang, even the Iranians… most certainly under oppressive religious rule… don’t have a nation of women in burkas. So sometimes I have to wonder where all this BS comes from when it so contradicts with reality.

    I think that should answer your next question, about how many women and their families did escape to Canada, US and other nations to escape this. Suek and I went back on forth on this women wanting oppressive Shariah after escaping oppressive nations on another thread. You may find it interesting to read that exchange all the way thru, starting with this comment that started it all. Please note that one of the links she, herself, had provided when trying to prove women were victims and oppressed in the UK had… in the same article… the fact that the Canadian Muslim women were instrumental in putting the kabosh on a Shariah parallel law system there.

    I did not support the Archbishops advocation of Shariah in the UK in 2008, and still don’t. I don’t support it here. But then, it really depends upon what they are asking, doesn’t it? Obviously… as suek and I agree… no Shariah council or arbitration/mediation system can decide and implement something that is against our nation’s rule of law. So I don’t fear that stoning, beheading and honor killings are suddenly legal in the US. Hang, they aren’t legal in the UK either. But I do see where they need to resolve some civil differences, such as divorce settlements. This isn’t much different than the Jewish courts we have here in the US.

    But people hear “shariah”, and all they can think about is Afghanistan. Shariah and Islam are implemented differently in every country. In the UK, the women can choose not to have an issue settled in Shariah councils, and use the British system instead. It requires voluntary participation by both parties, just as arbitration/mediation panels do here in the US. They are not without options. However they have to decide if their freedom to take that option is more important than remaining under an oppressive spouse.

    And as I pointed out in the other thread, there is little difference in fearing death or abuse from a Muslim husband and a battered non Muslim wife who has to make the same choice. Choose life and freedom, or servitude and/or death or injury. In our country, in Canda and the UK, Muslim women have that choice. But in other countries, they do not have the alternatives.

    I don’t anticipate the US becoming Afghanistan/Shariah, and would be armed and ready if anyone ever tried. That would take a Muslim violent overthrow in this country they’d never survive.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  98. Greg says: 99

    @Donald Bly: “Since Muslims are exempted from Obamacare for religious reasons, as it is, from my understanding, against their faith to purchase insurance because they considered it a form of gambling; are they exempted from having to carry automobile insurance and homeowners insurance also?”

    The Amish and Mennonites can also be exempted from the mandatory health insurance requirement on religious grounds. (The same insurance/gambling issue.)

    Some Mennonites do drive automobiles. In Georgia, a recent bill would allow them the option of self-insuring instead of purchasing auto insurance policies.

    http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2010/04/bill-to-permit-mennonites-to-self.html

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  99. suek says: 100

    skatblue…

    Be aware that Mata is blind to the intent of those muslims who wish to impose islam on the rest of the world. To argue is pointless. She chooses to ignore reality when she says “I think that should answer your next question, about how many women and their families did escape to Canada, US and other nations to escape this.” in spite of the fact that _no_ women and their families “escape” to Canada, the US and other nations. No woman can leave a muslim country without her male “escort” whether it’s father, brother or husband. In fact, she can’t even leave her home without an attendant male. She has no family – the children, after a certain age ( I don’t know what it is) belong to the father, and she cannot take them away – even if he divorces her. Mata wears rose colored glasses. So women cannot escape _to_ Canada or anywhere else. _Maybe_ once they’re in Canada etc, they might be able to escape – though I doubt it. She is certain that all muslim women will reject the demands of shariah as soon as the political system in which they find themselves will permit it, and that will move muslim males to accept a reformed islam.

    In fact, Mata…if what you say is true, then it is even more important that we support those you claim are moderates who are trying to break away from traditional islam by recognizing what it is that they are trying to escape from, and supporting them by proclaiming loudly and clearly that we will never tolerate islamic “justice”.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  100. Patvann says: 101

    @Mate

    INRE to your last 3 paragraphs.

    Ya know I luv-ya-baby, but there has been a couple of instances where some leftist judge has indeed “left it to custom” while ignoring our own laws. Fortunately, the appeals process worked, and the cases were adjudicated in a manner consistent with actual American law.

    (“Law! What a concept!”, he spits)

    It was in New Jersey and another, and I owe ya a link, but if left to leftist’s, the camel will poke it’s nose into our tent very far. It’s the leftist’s that we must remain focused on, not Islam. For it is they who enable the Islamofacist.

    Here’s something that is maybe being overlooked in all this GoundZeroMosqueStuff. ™

    If the left is so damn adamant about separating church from state (thank you Hon. Black, you KKK-member, SOB) then why is the Obama/Clinton State Dept paying Rauf to hobnob with whom ever he’s hobnobbing with, in absolute secrecy?

    What in the H, E, Double toothpicks is he doing/saying while acting as a de-facto representative of this country?

    Now THERE’S a question that the Right ought to be screaming about!

    Or are we now OK with using tax money to send the Archbishop of L.A. to Poland and Mexico under a press blackout to do whatever he deems needs doing, done? (untangles tongue)

    (This comment sponsored by: Rhetoric R Us.)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  101. Smorgasbord says: 102

    @minuteman 26: The religion of peace doesn’t want to kill anybody. They are just playing with him. They really have quite a sense of humor, don’t they?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  102. Patvann says: 103

    @Minuteman # 26

    So do I, (CC in Cali is still allowed) and when that day comes. I’ll be right in front of you.

    I served, too, and my son does now. Please don’t think that I am blind to any threat that may be brewing.

    @Smorg.

    Too many do want to kill. Over 15,500 dead by their hand since 9/11. Learn that most don’t, and that over half of that sad number were other Moslems. Learn also that over 80% of all “Moslem countries” don’t speak/read Arabic, and that in most of those same countries, the only “official” Koran is written in Arabic.

    YOU might know more about Islamic history than most Moslems.

    Honestly think about that.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  103. skatblue says: 104

    @suek 100,
    Got it. Time to move on – thanks for the info.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  104. Curt says: 105

    Skat…please use either skat or skatblue as your username, not both. Thanks.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  105. Greg says: 106

    Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a Sufi Muslim–not exactly the sort whose cultural center would likely serve as a front for Islamic extremism.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  106. suek says: 107

    >>The Amish and Mennonites can also be exempted from the mandatory health insurance requirement on religious grounds.>>

    So…what do you have to do to get the exemption?

    (I feel a conversion coming on…!)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  107. suek says: 108

    >>Time to move on – thanks for the info.>>

    No need to move on – just wanted to catch you up on the situation. The ground has been plowed _multiple_ times, and to mix a metaphor or two, our positions are pretty well cast in concrete. Plows don’t do much with concrete… except maybe push it around a bit!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  108. MataHarley says: 109

    Be aware that Mata is blind to the intent of those muslims who wish to impose islam on the rest of the world. To argue is pointless. She chooses to ignore reality when she says “I think that should answer your next question, about how many women and their families did escape to Canada, US and other nations to escape this.” in spite of the fact that _no_ women and their families “escape” to Canada, the US and other nations. No woman can leave a muslim country without her male “escort” whether it’s father, brother or husband.

    suek, shame on you for your demeaning commentary, and chutzpah presumption to speak for me. Apparently, dialogue with you is fruitless, and you continue to misrepresent not only my views, but insult me as to my involvement with researching the global Islamic jihad movements for almost a decade.

    I am not “blind” to anything, save perhaps to my assumptions that you actually comprehend a dang thing I debate with you one on one. I assure you, I won’t give you the benefit of that doubt again.

    The differences between you and I is I am well aware of the minority jihad goals, and also well aware of the Muslims (especially women and more modern westernized families) endeavoring to reform Islam.

    And I have no idea where you come up with the “no women and their families can escape” commentary. You back that up extreme “no women can…” with what source? Are you unaware of movements similar to Civil War railroad underground that do this every day? Are you aware of even the small numbers of American women, married to Muslim men that attempt to implement oppressive anti-American rights, that do this battle daily?

    Where there is a will, there is a way. And westernized women are not the only Muslims that want reform. They are present here, and in other western nations. They are not clamoring for those nations to revert to Afghanistan…. save in your limited views and fruitful imagination. Worse yet, you even ignore their own successful battles, merely to spread your blanket victim mentality.

    In fact, Mata…if what you say is true, then it is even more important that we support those you claim are moderates who are trying to break away from traditional islam by recognizing what it is that they are trying to escape from, and supporting them by proclaiming loudly and clearly that we will never tolerate islamic “justice”.

    Yes, it is important. So where are you on this issue? I’ll tell you where…. you manage to smear them, and their chosen religious beliefs, with your every comment. You impose your own infidel “scholarly” knowledge as arrogantly superior, by painting all Muslims as terrorists and craving oppression.

    You will win no friends amongst them with your pervasive ignorance on the implementation of Shariah councils or their laws from country to country. It’s a one size fits all mentality with you, and no amount of evidence alters that.

    And your demands they hurdle hoops to meet your satisfaction are equally reprehensible. If you said, “Mata, prove to me you agree with me, or believe this, by doing …. or I don’t believe you… tagiyya”, I’d personally say, screw you. I need to prove nothing to you. I wouldn’t care if we were in 100% agreement. Your demands for performance are nothing short of personally offensive.

    And do me a favor. If you don’t quote my words exactly, and provide the links, never presume you have the power to present how I think to anyone again.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  109. suek says: 110

    >>Time to move on � thanks for the info.>>

    No need to move on – just wanted to catch you up on the situation. The ground has been plowed _multiple_ times, and to mix a metaphor or two, our positions are pretty well cast in concrete. Plows don’t do much with concrete… except maybe push it around a bit!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  110. Patvann says: 111

    Except that his claim to “Sufi-hood” is not backed up by a traceable timeline.

    -His vitiae is not public, except where and when he want’s it to be, and his past commentary leaves much to be desired. Especially if one was indeed a true force for spiritual-only Islam.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  111. Smorgasbord says: 112

    @Aye Chihuahua:
    Aye Chihuahua #76
    “Are they trying to kill you too?”

    Let’s try an experiment. Write a letter to the Muslim organization telling them that you will never be converted to the Muslim religion and include the Mohammad turbon head picture and let’s see what response you get.

    Look how many people were killed over that picture. The way I understand it, the countries the people were killed in, the press didn’t print the picture. What’s your next defense for the “religion of peace?”

    If somebody new to FA started reading the posts on this story, I am guessing they would think that FA is a Muslim web sight.

    I still don’t see why you and the others at FA have a problem with people believing the way they want to about the Muslim religion. I have mentioned several times that I am not a church goer, but you haven’t tried to get me to join one. Are you trying to convert me to Muslim. I think it is fair here to ask what your religious preference is, if you have one, and also the ones who seem to be trying to convert us to Muslims.

    Why can’t we stop the bickering and let each person have their own opinion? My mom was one who always had to argue with people who disagreed with her. She would go on and on about the littlest things she disagreed with, to the point that not many people wanted to be around her. I hope that isn’t what’s going on here.

    MataHarley #79
    I grew up in small town USA, and glad I did. I also grew up a loaner and am still far behind the lingo of almost everything. Some of it I wish I hadn’t learned.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  112. suek says: 113

    >>Are you unaware of movements similar to Civil War railroad underground that do this every day?>>

    >> Are you aware of even the small numbers of American women, married to Muslim men that attempt to implement oppressive anti-American rights, that do this battle daily?>>

    No. I am not aware of either such actions.

    Links. _PLEASE_.

    As for the rest – I’ll let others form their own opinions and judgments.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  113. Toothfairy says: 114

    @Donald Bly: Here’s some more info on Muslims and car insurance. On IslamQA.com there is an article titled “Ruling on car insurance.” It is also identified as “fatwa No. 102969.” (I’d include a link, but they didn’t provide one.) The ruling declares:

    Car insurance is not permissible because it insures one against accidents involving others, and this kind of insurance comes under the heading of commercial insurance which is forbidden in sharee’ah, because it is based on uncertainty and consuming people’s wealth unlawfully….But if it is compulsory insurance and one has no choice, then it is permissible to take out car insurance…and the sin is on those who forced others to do it.

    In the UK, however, they seem to have figured out how to come up with halal insurance. An article printed in the Daily Mail on August 16, 2008, provides the details. You can read it at:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1045959/Sharia-car-insurance-For-time-Muslims-buy-policies-line-Islamic-lawhtml.

    I couldn’t find any info on Islam car insurance in the US. Maybe Salaam Hala Insurance will open a US branch.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  114. MataHarley says: 115

    suek: As for the rest – I’ll let others form their own opinions and judgments.

    Exactly… and that means reading the linked cyber conversation… which you did not include in your presumptuous summary… themselves.

    I, however, provided the link to the conversation. A “we report, you decide” moment which, apparently, you decided to usurp with your comment, and skat decided to blindly accept as accurate.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  115. MataHarley says: 116

    oh yes… as to the prior… of which you are blissfully unaware… do your own dang homework this time. I’m done doing it for you.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  116. Toothfairy says: 117

    Correction #114: Make that “Salaam Halal Insurance.” (I tried to edit the spelling on the previous post but the text jumped up and down like a demented rabbit, so it was impossible to put the cursor where I wanted it.)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  117. suek says: 118

    Mata…

    I _think_ I’ve read every comment you’ve made in any of the related threads. I _think_ I’ve checked out all the links you’ve provided. Perhaps not. I’ll try to go back and check. But. I have _never_ seen one that indicated what you claim. I even asked you specifically for some suggestions for reading what you feel is a more “balanced” view of islam – but you declined to provide any names, links or any other info. Surely it wouldn’t take that much to copy and paste. If for some reason you don’t want to do so on a public forum, I’m sure my email addy is available to you.

    Request is still in the air. Certainly I’m not the only one here who would appreciate seeing info that would clarify to us why you hold the positions you do.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  118. Patvann says: 119

    @Smorg.

    (Please Aye…Lemme have this one)

    In regards to your first paragraph..,.Do you really wanna do this? You might have the trucker mentality, but you have just met an immovable object. Old stubborn SeAL’s don’t move very easy.

    Let’s play out that scenario for real, shall we?

    Go to: http://www.aifdemocracy.org/contact.php

    Enter in your “challenge”, and direct it to the attn. of M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D.

    Refer to this post, and in particular YOUR comment/challenge. Hell, post the question itself, and if ya need a image, I got 6 ready.

    You have 24 hours to do so. If you do not verify that you have submitted it, I will submit it within the context of your posit. I’ll post the text of my query for you to approve beforehand, but I’ll submit it regardless, if you do not respond within 4 hours.
    I’ll be happy to make any changes you want, but only during that 4 hour window.

    Are you up to the challenge?

    In reality, this last comment by you PROVES that you never bothered to read what I’ve posted, even after I gave you the link many comments ago. Yet you still persist. A link that is connected to those you refuse to admit actually exist.

    I will repeat. You have met an immovable object, and ya shoulda learned something from your mom, other than spending your life fighting to be out from her psychological maladies.

    Keep pushin…Please. It tickles.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  119. @Smorgasbord:

    Let’s try an experiment.

    Actually my experiment and the testing of Minuteman’s hypothesis has already been conducted. His hypothesis was found lacking because if all Muslims were the same, and all Islam/Muslims are the enemy, as he claims then he would have already been targeted in the same fashion that Wilders has.

    Not only has his hypothesis been proven to be faulty he demonstrated through his “don’t know and don’t care” statement that everything he’s been typing all this time was nothing more than just words.

    If somebody new to FA started reading the posts on this story, I am guessing they would think that FA is a Muslim web sight.

    Hyperbolic much?

    This site is full of a wide variety of topics ranging from politics to current events.

    If FA were indeed a “Muslim site” do you think for one second that the hateful, vile, bigoted things that have been written here about Islam would still be visible for all to see?

    I still don’t see why you and the others at FA have a problem with people believing the way they want to about the Muslim religion.

    You are certainly entitled to whatever opinion you wish to have about Islam or any other topic. No one is depriving you of that.

    Of course, if you choose to post your opinion on Islam or any other topic then you should be willing and prepared to have your viewpoints challenged.

    If you don’t want to be challenged on your opinions then you’re certainly welcome to keep them to yourself.

    I have mentioned several times that I am not a church goer, but you haven’t tried to get me to join one.

    No, I haven’t. I don’t figure that it’s my place to proselytize you here on a public forum to try and get you to go to a church.

    Now, if I knew you in real life I may invite you to come to church but I certainly would never force my beliefs on you or anyone else.

    Are you trying to convert me to Muslim.

    Sorry, but I had to literally laugh out loud at that one.

    Trying to convert you to Muslim? Really?

    Have I tried to kill you or convert you? Have I subjugated you or threatened you?

    Of course if all the things written on these pages about all Muslims being the same and all of Islam being eeeeviilllll then one or more of those things would have happened already right?

    I think it is fair here to ask what your religious preference is, if you have one, and also the ones who seem to be trying to convert us to Muslims.

    Well, if you feel the compelling need to know, I am Southern Baptist. I grew up in a Southern Baptist family, and my family and I are active in our local Baptist church. I’ve posted that information once already.

    No one here is trying to convert you to Islam any more than we are trying to proselytize you to become a Baptist or Jehovah’s Witness or Rastafarian or anything else.

    That’s an absurd argument with absolutely zero foundation in fact.

    Why can’t we stop the bickering and let each person have their own opinion?

    Again, you’re entitled to whatever opinion you wish to have.

    If you don’t want your opinions challenged on this topic, or any other, then don’t post them for public consumption.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  120. MataHarley says: 121

    suek, you have never asked me for a “more balanced view” of Islam reading. But I can tell you that Wordsmith has provided those at every opportunity.

    But INRE women, which is where you and I have focused our comments, again I refuse to do your homework. Sorry… but for this 48 to 72 hours, I have no time to do it for you. But I will say at least three names for you to do your own.

    Shirin Neshat, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Rifqa Bary … the last of which even the notable tea party leader ‘phobe, Pamela Geller, has worked to capitalize on for her 15 minutes of fame, as if it were her own achievement. All women to be applauded for seizing the opportunities of escape. The first one even brought it to Hollywood to appeal to the most base of education levels.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  121. Well, I see that during the time it took me to compose my response in #120 PatVann pretty much wore you down to a bloody stump.

    You may need to catch your breath for a little bit before you respond and that’s understandable.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  122. MataHarley says: 123

    @Smorgasbord: If somebody new to FA started reading the posts on this story, I am guessing they would think that FA is a Muslim web sight.

    Evidently, Smorgasbord, you are as math challenged in the Wm Ayers “social justice” public education curriculum as Donald Bly.

    As of 24-48 hours ago, the posts that were anti-Islam/Rauf/Cordoba house were one more post than 2 to 1 against the counters.

    What… no “echo chamber” to please you? Not enough “majority” to float your boat?

    Too bad…. go sulk over a brew somewhere, dude, and get over it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  123. MataHarley says: 124

    Oh… Smorgasbord… don’t forget that while you’re in that brew bar, watch for those half rocker bar prospects! You know how evil they are too… LOL

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  124. MataHarley says: 125

    @Patvann: Ya know I luv-ya-baby, but there has been a couple of instances where some leftist judge has indeed “left it to custom” while ignoring our own laws. Fortunately, the appeals process worked, and the cases were adjudicated in a manner consistent with actual American law.

    Yup… I know that, Patvann. We’ve been there, done that… suek and I. As I said, it’s no surprise that a lower court performed a travesty of justice. But that is why we have appellate courts.

    The genuine travesty… as I again said before… is if the higher courts upheld the lower court’s erroneous judgement. As our system worked as it should, I see no problem For two reasons:

    1: There is recourse all the way up to the SCOTUS and
    2: There are always robed ones who should be stripped of their robes, IMHO. The NJ judge was one. Suggest you talk to the Jersey’ites about that one. But he isn’t the first judge to issues a bad ruling, nor will he be the last. However there is another level available to us via our system. And so far, and in most instances, it is working as planned.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  125. suek says: 126

    >>suek, you have never asked me for a “more balanced view” of Islam reading. But I can tell you that Wordsmith has provided those at every opportunity.>>

    Not true. I’ll provide a link tomorrow. I too am out of time at the moment.

    Finished with thread #1. Gleaned one bookmark from Word on that thread. Which I will check. Also dug out one of my own – no that’s not true – someone else (unk at the moment) provided it. When I finish, I’ll provide a list.

    >>Shirin Neshat, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Rifqa Bary>>

    Of these three, I’m familiar with two. I don’t think you give Pam enough credit.
    I’ll research Shirin Neshat.

    That’s pretty slim pickin’s to rest your faith on…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  126. MataHarley says: 127

    suek, Geller has nothing to do with Rifqa… save trying to capitalize on her efforts for personal gain. Maybe… as I suggested before.. you should delve into Geller’s own efforts to stop an Arabic school and her involvement in stopping a mosque being built at Staten Island (just a sample of her personal views). For years, Geller considers all of Islam a threat, and doesn’t know how to separate Islam from jihad.

    It’s a common problem. But Geller makes a living exploiting it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  127. MataHarley says: 128

    BTW, suek… INRE this:

    Finished with thread #1. Gleaned one bookmark from Word on that thread. Which I will check. Also dug out one of my own – no that’s not true – someone else (unk at the moment) provided it. When I finish, I’ll provide a list

    My thanks for revising recent FA history and commentary. I appreciate your efforts. Genuinely.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  128. Smorgasbord says: 129

    @skat: “we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel.”

    So, us non-Muslims are still considered “infidels” to the “moderate” Muslim. What are “moderate” Muslims supposed to do with us “infidels” according to the Koran?

    After Muslims conquer a territory they build a mosque or convert the major government or religious building into a mosque. It is a symbol of there conquering that territory or country. They want to show the world that they conquered that part of the US territory. They are turning the Congress building into a mosque.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  129. Patvann says: 130

    @Mata

    It’s those facts that keep me optimistic, and on the side of what’s left of our constitution.

    The next (sooner rather than later) focus that the TeaParty (and the rest of us) eyes ought to be on, is judges. Closely followed by taking back the school districts.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  130. MataHarley says: 131

    Yup, Patvann..… me, too!

    Reality is that lower court decisions rarely give the desired result. You have to have the money to keep going to get justice. But that’s a whole other story. Ultimately, however, the planned system does work.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  131. Patvann says: 132

    @Smorg 129

    Maybe you thought I was being hyperbolic. That maybe I WASN’T calling you out on your “challenge”.

    That would be wrong. White on rice, stink on doo. I’m your new best-friend, buddy! Bored and retired, with nothing else to do.

    You read what I wrote in comment #119, where I took up your dare. And you come back to this thread and pick out a 37-comments-ago post to respond to?! (#92)

    Weak. Ya didn’t even have the stones to just say “Eff-off”.

    I want real bad to see how much weight you’ll REALLY give to your resolute and sacrosanct opinion…(#112) Ya know… that we are all supposed to simply accept your opinion without any bothersome questions. Like your mean-ol’-mom didn’t ever do.

    I just got my first hint, and ya got about 22 hours left.

    Any questions? Clarifications? Wanna see how I get when I don’t like ya?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  132. Toothfairy says: 133

    There’s an article on Yahoo today titled “Some Muslims Question Mosque Near Ground Zero.” You can read it at:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_ground_zero_mosque_us_muslims

    There are some new names here to add to the “moderates” list. It’s good to see that more of them are speaking out.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  133. Wordsmith says: 134

    @suek #126:

    >>suek, you have never asked me for a “more balanced view” of Islam reading. But I can tell you that Wordsmith has provided those at every opportunity.>>

    Not true. I’ll provide a link tomorrow.

    Not true what? A link to what? :-|

    @suek #118:

    Mata…

    I _think_ I’ve read every comment you’ve made in any of the related threads. I _think_ I’ve checked out all the links you’ve provided. Perhaps not. I’ll try to go back and check. But. I have _never_ seen one that indicated what you claim. I even asked you specifically for some suggestions for reading what you feel is a more “balanced” view of islam –

    suek, perhaps what Mata means about “do your own homework” is that a more “balanced” view, or perhaps one that is an alternate view, can be readily found if that’s something you seek in earnest.

    Go to your local bookstore and pick up Sumbul Ali-Karamali’s The Muslim Next Door. A book I’ve cited a couple of times, already. If you don’t wish to buy it, flip through to chapter 7 on Women in Islam and simply empty your cup for one brief moment; just suspend what you know or think you know and listen to a different perspective from someone who lives Islam and who does not feel oppressed by her faith; someone who is not an outsider looking in.

    Aside from Ali-Karamali’s book, I also cited this one for smorgasbord, but also taken to task by you:

    According to John Esposito’s The Future of Islam, pg 153, majorities in some of the most conservative Muslim countries support equal rights. Majorities of both men and women surveyed in a dozen Muslim countries believe women should have:

    *The same equal rights as men (61 percent of Saudis, 85 percent of Iranians, and in the 90 percent range in Indonesia, Turkey, Bangladesh, and Lebanon).

    *The right to work outside the home in any job for which they qualify (90 percent in Malaysia, 86 percent in Turkey, 85 percent in Egypt, and 69 percent in Saudi Arabia).

    *the right to vote without interference from family members (80 percent in Indonesia, 89 percent in Iran, 67 percent in Pakistan, 90 percent in Bangladesh, 76 percent in Jordan, 93 percent in Turkey, and 56 percent in Saudi Arabia).

    Not all Islamic societies force women to wear head or facial coverings. Women who wear coverings by choice might even tell you that they feel more liberated, not less:

    Syed maintains that when a woman is covered, men cannot judge her by her appearance but are forced to evaluate her by her personality, character, and morals. “I tell them that the hijab is not a responsibility, it’s a right given to me by my Creator who knows us best. It’s a benefit to me, so why not? It’s something every woman should strive to get and should want.”

    Muslim women might also tell you that they believe the Koran raised the status of women and puts them on an equal status with men. Disagree? Take it up with them. I’m not an Islamic scholar, but Sumbul Ali-Karamali argues the point in her book, The Muslim Next Door and cites passages from the Quran (Chapter7, Women in Islam) to support the claims.

    You dissented and I told you to take it up with her (a “cop out”) because she is pushing the argument. I’m not. She believes the oppression of Muslim women is not the result of Islam, but the result of 7th century development of Islamic law by religious male scholars who favored pre-Islamic cultural traditions and norms over the feminist reforms that the Quran had to offer.

    Pg 126, she writes:

    Just as wealthy Meccans had been resistant to Muhammad’s oversetting of their tribal system, the new Muslims, born of that same patriacrchal system, sometimes resisted the changes Muhammed and the Qur’an mandated. Umar, the unswervingly loyal companion to the Prophet and later the second of the Rashidun caliphs, resented the Prophet’s prohibiting men from beating their wives.

    Pg 122:

    In pre-nineteenth-century England, too, a woman had no property upon marriage because her husband automatically received full ownership of it. A wife’s infidelity constituted grounds for divorce, but a husband’s infidelity was acceptable, even expected. A wife had virtually no right to divorce, and even a man could obtain divorce only by an Act of Parliament. A man had every right to beat his wife, as long as he did not endanger her life.

    Given that the status of women all over the world until the last few centuries has been inferior, Islamic reforms concerning women in the seventh century were significant. Because of the Qur’an, women suddenly had a right to inherit property- daughters, wives, sisters, and mothers became mandatory heirs. Women could not be forced into marriage. They kept their property upon marriage. Women were parties to the marriage contract and no longer objects of sale. Husbands did not own their wives as property. Women could testify in court. Their husbands were not allowed to abuse them because the Prophet said the worst of his followers were those who beat their wives.

    ~~~

    But I think parts of the Muslim world have gone backward since then.

    She points to women in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan as examples of a few of the places where Muslim women are oppressed; and that some Islamic countries have a long way to go yet with respect to women’s rights but claims it is a cultural issue, not a religious one.

    Pg 127-8:

    The Sunni religious scholars could not bear to give up their male-dominated laws of inheritance that existed in pre-Islamic Arabia. It made absolute sense to them that men should get everything, and it made no sense to them that women should get anything. What had women to do with protecting the tribe, after all? But the Qur’an had commanded that women must inherit. What were they to do?

    They grafted Qur’anic inheritance reform (which were advantageous to women) onto the existing pre-Islamic law (which were disadvantageous to women) and used the pre-Islamic law as a default whenever the Qur’an was not absolutely specific. Sometimes they invented twisty, convoluted interpretations of inheritance verses with the sole purpose of clinging to their fondness of primogeniture (the practice of leaving the entire estate exclusively to the eldest son).

    In contrast, Shi’i religious scholars threw out the old pre-Islamic system of inheritance and built a completely new one based on the Qur’anic verses. Unsurprisingly. the Shi’i law of inheritance is more beneficial to women and closer to the Qur’an than Sunni law. That, too, however, bears the interpretive stamp of seventh-century men. The Qur’an did not cover every contingency, and that is where they could not help but impose their patriarchal worldview.

    ~~~

    The unfortunate, tragic, and frustrating thing is that some countries opporess women by using Islam as an excuse. That is culture, not religion, and largely the reason, I assume, that Islam is perceived as sexist. This perception is one of the hardest to overcome. When I told an acquaintance that Islam was not sexist, she asked sincerely, “Oh! Would you move to the Middle East then?”

    Well, no, I cannot think so. (And I did find it troubling that she expected me to move to the Middle East just because I was Muslim). But that is not because I think Islam is sexist. It is because the United States is my country. It is because many Muslim countries are still part of the developing world and I appreciate my American conveniences and my American civil liberties. Some countries do repress women in the name of Islam, and I unquestionably would balk at living in those. But this is because their cultures are sexist, not because Islam is sexist.

    Here’s something else to ponder over…And yes, I’m citing Juan Cole, someone who I generally disagree with on political and historical perspective. But read this:

    I am sure the 1.2 billion Muslims of the world will be startled to find out that they have all converted to Wahhabism or are committed members of al-Qaeda. Amis is uttering pure nonsense. Islam remains a big tent with many competing worldviews and the internal debate for the soul of Islam will no doubt continue well into the future. This debate is reflected in a robust fashion within the Arab world, which Amis and most other secularist pundits remains deaf to for some reason.

    This past summer I led a group of Americans to Morocco to learn more about Islam and to meet with Muslims. While there I watched the Arab and international media available in nearly every Morooccan home (satellite dishes appear on even the most humble shanty town homes). I watched a debate held in Doha, Qatar between Muslim liberals and fundamentalists on the role of women in society. In these debates, which are beamed throughout the Arab and Muslim world, the fundamentalists always appear as backward looking and inarticulate, and the Muslim liberals passionately advocate for serious reforms based on a more enlightened and liberal interpretation of the Koran and Islamic traditions. Liberal Muslim reformers have not won the day but neither have the fundamentalists. Fundamentalist Islam is not all that is going on in the Muslim world, and a strong case can be made that it is the radical fundamentalists who are in the minority position among Muslims.

    What Amis and his mentors on Islam (Sam Harris especially) seem, astonishingly enough, to miss, is that Osama bin Laden and Sayyid Qutb, the founder of the Muslim brotherhood, are just not representative of the 1.2 billion Muslims on the planet. Ahmadinajad in Iran along with his mulla backers is not representative of Iranian Shi’a en masse. My experiences in the Middle East are limited (living in Egypt 1983-84 and travels in Morocco in 2005 and 2006), but I can tell you that after living and traveling among Arabs my view of the Arab world is different from the picture painted by armchair analysts like Amis. The picture that Amis and others paint of Muslim culture (wife beating, anti-intellectual, not curious about the world beyond their borders, militant and religious authoritarian in style) just doesn’t jive with what I have experienced. What Amis does is not very subtle but no doubt effective for many of his readers. After asserting without any proof that radical Islamism has won the day, Amis informs us what this actually means when he provides a lengthy and often perceptive description of Sayyid Qutb, the intellectual force behind radical Islam:

    “. . . [Sayyid] Qutb is the father of Islamism. Here are the chief tenets he inspired: that America, and its clients, are jahiliyya (the word classically applied to pre-Muhammadan Arabia – barbarous and benighted); that America is controlled by Jews; that Americans are infidels, that they are animals, and, worse, arrogant animals, and are unworthy of life; that America promotes pride and promiscuity in the service of human degradation; that America seeks to ‘exterminate’ Islam – and that it will accomplish this not by conquest, not by colonial annexation, but by example.”

    The implications of Amis’s deceptive rhetoric is that since Islamism won the Muslim civil war and is now the guiding force behind what we now know as Islam, which means that the majority of Muslims believe that Americans are “infidels” and therefore “unworthy of life.” This is pure racial and religious prejudice of the extreme kind.

    I have spent endless hours talking with Muslims on the streets of Arab towns and never felt threatened or in harms way as an American visiting a Arab country; I have never spoken with Sunnis or Shi’is who feel that it is their religious duty to kill me or all non-Muslims because we are worse than animals. Muslims, from mosque preachers to garbage collectors, have never shown me the kinds of fanaticism that Amis leads us to believe are now pandemic in the Arab Muslim world. In my visits to the Arab world I have always been showered with kindness, hospitality, and enjoyed vigorous debates on religion.

    Amis runs out a true but deceptive fact to try and make a supporting point that Muslims are divorced from the modern world Muslims today due to a lack of curiosity of all things non-Islamic. Amis observes that, “Present-day Spain translates as many books into Spanish, annually, as the Arab world has translated into Arabic in the past 1,100 years.”

    I agree with Amis that the Arab world needs to open up to the West in many ways. However, my observation is that Americans seem much more insular and lacking in curiosity than Middle Eastern Muslims. In Morocco, everyone I spoke with was more informed about world affairs than most college grads here in the US. This whole issue about lack of translations into Arabic is just one part of the story. While in Fes, Morocco this past June attending the celebration of the World Sacred Music Festival put on by Muslims to celebrate the beauty and diversity of spiritual tradtions, I told my 15-year-old son that I wanted him to watch the news. We flipped through the channels and were able to view news from French, German, BBC, Al-Jazeera, Al-Arabiya, and Moroccan services. In Morocco I saw more news and information about Sri Lanka and Thailand in 7 days than I have seen in 40 years on American television. My teenager son was blown away not only by the breadth of information that was available on the Moroccan news but by the warmth and joie de vivre of the Moroccans. He plans to return to Morocco to study French and Arabic and to learn more about the world beyond the monolingual perspective of insular America. Typical were my conversations with Abdu’llah, who helped guide me through the maze of old Fes. Although he is dirt poor and has only a fifth grade education, Abdu’llah speaks 5 languages and could no doubt hold his own in political dialogue with Mr. Amis.

    What I do agree with Amis and others is that the Islamic fundamentalists need to be addressed constantly, that their views must be confronted and shown to be harmful to all. Islam stands in need of constant reform, as do all religious traditions. This is happening and what writers like Amis and Harris always ignore is the moderate and liberal mainstream of Islam.

    I agree with Amis that Islam is too often presented as a totalalizing and authoritarian system beyond reason. But, again, this is not universally so or even the predominate view. Furthermore, how different is that from Catholicism? Just as I don’t see Pope Benedict as the true voice of Catholicism vs. Hans Kung or Sister Joan Chittister, I don’t see Osama or the fundamentalist preachers as the true voice of Islam vs. people like Queen Noor, Hamza Yusuf, Omid Safi, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, Sheikh Ahmed Abaadi, and all the other moderate and liberal Muslim voices that can be heard around the world.

    What Amis in London and most Americans need to begin to understand is that battle for the soul of Islam is not over but just beginning. Moderate and liberal Muslims are engaged in creating an alternative to fundamentalist visions of Islam. It is happening in groups like Progressive Muslim Union, at the historic meetings of World Congress of Imams and Rabbis for Peace, and at countless events and in books and web sites where Muslims seek to bring about an Islamic renewal movement that sees no contradiction between belief in the Koran while opposing theocracy, supporting democracy, defense of the rights of women and non-Muslims in Islamic societies, defense of freedom of thought, and belief in the potential for human progress. These Muslims need the support of non-Muslims rather than the kind of distortions about what Islam is that Amis has offered. ‘

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  134. Wordsmith says: 135

    @Ron H. #80:

    Oh and Wordsmith, I think your article was funny and I got that you were just being a bit of a smart ass! Hah

    Ron. H

    Thank you, Ron! Glad someone could see humor in the post…even if it was tasteless humor. :wink:

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  135. Smorgasbord says: 136

    @suek: If you’re young enough, there’s a better way. Go to Mexico, become a Mexican citizen, sneak into the USA, and then you will qualify for a free education, free health care, and even get some of my Social Security money. You will also be exempt from some of our laws.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  136. Wordsmith says: 137

    @Smorgasbord #66:

    @Wordsmith: #53 Are these Muslim women trying to convert or kill you
    I clicked on your link with Firefox and Safari and neither one took me anywhere.

    I just fixed the link again and tested it this time. It should work. But if not, here it is:

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/08/15/women-fighting-the-taliban-115875-22488557/

    Thanks for letting me know.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  137. Patvann says: 138

    Nice-job, Mr. Word. Everyone needs to know who Sayyid Qutb was, and what seeds he laid.

    The other easy-one to research and remember is Khomeini of Iran. He used the Commies to take over and turn hundreds of years of historical tolerance on it’s head. (The Shia-Persian hero Cyrus lived in peace with Jews and Christians in his kingdom, and never treated them less than the Moslems.)

    Oh… Then Khomeini had the Commies killed, lest they wake up.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  138. Wordsmith says: 139

    Yes, and just think if Jimmy Carter had done a better job of supporting the Shah…where would we be today in regards to Iran and the nuclear threat? 1/2 of the rise of Islamic militancy we face today? There would not have been a reason for Rumsfeld to be caught shaking hands with Saddam.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  139. MataHarley says: 140

    @Patvann:… :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Perhaps Smorg is stuck somewhere, drinking his woes away under the watchful eye of a 1%er wannabe.

    Yo, Smorg…. word to the wise. Never enter one of these dangerous American haunts to drink away your inability to respond without knowing where where the back door exit is. Ya never know when one of those dangerous, take over America type m’cycle gang members lurk if you don’t know how to read their jackets, ya know.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  140. Smorgasbord says: 141

    @Patvann: “I’ll post the text of my query for you to approve beforehand, but I’ll submit it regardless, if you do not respond within 4 hours.”

    This sounds like something the liberals would say. Are you one of them. I might not be on the computer for a day or two, but you only give me four hours to respond? You are going to send it even if I don’t respond? Obama wants people like you on his team. I am a night person or I wouldn’t have read this before tomorrow afternoon.

    I am not “pushin” anybody. It almost sounds like you are challenging me to a fight. If so, you win. I have never been in a fight and don’t ever want to.

    You have just proven my point. If you do go through with your “threat,” what do you expect them do to me, and is that what your objective is? If they target me and kill me, then will you believe they are a terrorist organization? Will you attend my funeral, or send condolences to my family? Or will you be one of the ones celebrating?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  141. Smorgasbord says: 142

    @Aye Chihuahua: “This site is full of a wide variety of topics ranging from politics to current events.”

    My statement was:

    If somebody new to FA started reading the posts on this story, I am guessing they would think that FA is a Muslim web sight.

    I was referring to THIS story and comments. This is still my favorite blog because you all cover more issues that I feel like responding to.

    “If you don’t want your opinions challenged on this topic, or any other, then don’t post them for public consumption.”

    Believe it or not, I was just about ready to sign off on this story and just read the comments from the others. I am one who can talk about any subject as long as it is neutral. When both sides form their opinions and won’t budge, it is time to change the subject.

    I have to wait to see if Patvann turns me in to the Muslims, then I will be leaving the comments section.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  142. Wordsmith says: 143

    @skat #82:

    I don’t see evidence that Muslim American immigrants are different than Muslim English immigrants were.

    American Muslims are vastly different than European Muslim immigrants. Most American Muslims come highly educated, whereas European Muslims are primarily laborers and blue-collar workers. With this comes limited education and skills and limited upward social mobility. Europe has as much to blame on themselves as upon the immigrants for the lack of assimilation. It’s not simply a matter of them wanting to set up a “nation within a nation”. According to Gallup’s 2009 polling, 69% of Muslims living in France and 72% in the UK consider themselves struggling and only 23% in France and 7% in the UK say they are “thriving”. Many Muslims in Europe live in depressed areas of high unemployment and are treated as second-class citizens. They might share a certain amount of blame for the alienation; but the burden does not rest entirely with them.

    Pg 14, John Esposito’s The Future of Islam:

    Education is a priority for many Muslims, who, after Jews, are the most educated religious community surveyed in the United States. Forty percent of Muslims say they have a college degree or more, compared to 29 percent of Americans overall. Muslim women in America, unlike their Jewish counterparts, are statistically as likely as Muslim men to hold college or postgraduate degrees. Muslim women also report monthly household incomes more nearly as equal to men’s, compared with women and men in other faith groups.

    ~~~

    the vast majority of American Muslims have become economically and increasingly politically integrated into mainstream American society. Muslims resemble the rest of the U.S. population in terms of work. They represent men and women spanning the socioeconomic spectrum: professionals (doctors, lawyers, engineers, and educators), corporate executives, small business owners, or blue-collar workers and laborers. In fact, 70 percent of Muslim Americans report that they have a job (paid or unpaid) compared to 64 percent of Americans overall. However, a higher percentage (24 percent) are self-employed. Most significantly, among nonworking American Muslims, 31 percent are full-time students as compared to 10 percent in the general population.

    A look at Muslims globally illustrates the advantages enjoyed by American Muslims, who are much more able to find work. In contrast to the 70 percent of American Muslims who report having a job, the figures for Muslims in Europe show a radically different picture: 38 percent in the U.K., 45 percent in France, and 53 percent in Germany.

    ~~~

    American Muslims’ better employment position is reflected in the fact that a majority of American Muslims, 71 percent, agree that most people who want to get ahead in America can succeed if they are willing to work hard. This is a higher proportion than in the American public as a whole.

    ~~~

    The advantageous position of Musllims in America when compared to Muslims globally is also reflected in their satisfaction with their lives: 41 percent report that they are thriving, which is similar to Americans overall and much higher than Muslims in all other Western and Muslim countries except Germany and Saudi Arabia.

    56% say they are struggling, however, in a post-9/11 world where they are under increased scrutiny and suspicion.

    Gee…imagine that?

    Also…

    According to a Pew study a while back, most Muslim Americans appear to have integrated themselves into mainstream America. Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and falafels:

    The first-ever, nationwide, random sample survey of Muslim Americans finds them to be largely assimilated, happy with their lives, and moderate with respect to many of the issues that have divided Muslims and Westerners around the world.

    The Pew Research Center conducted more than 55,000 interviews to obtain a national sample of 1,050 Muslims living in the United States. Interviews were conducted in English, Arabic, Farsi and Urdu. The resulting study, which draws on Pew’s survey research among Muslims around the world, finds that Muslim Americans are a highly diverse population, one largely composed of immigrants. Nonetheless, they are decidedly American in their outlook, values and attitudes. This belief is reflected in Muslim American income and education levels, which generally mirror those of the public.

    Key findings include:

    * Overall, Muslim Americans have a generally positive view of the larger society. Most say their communities are excellent or good places to live.

    * A large majority of Muslim Americans believe that hard work pays off in this society. Fully 71% agree that most people who want to get ahead in the United States can make it if they are willing to work hard.

    * The survey shows that although many Muslims are relative newcomers to the U.S., they are highly assimilated into American society. On balance, they believe that Muslims coming to the U.S. should try and adopt American customs, rather than trying to remain distinct from the larger society. And by nearly two-to-one (63%-32%) Muslim Americans do not see a conflict between being a devout Muslim and living in a modern society.

    * Roughly two-thirds (65%) of adult Muslims in the U.S. were born elsewhere. A relatively large proportion of Muslim immigrants are from Arab countries, but many also come from Pakistan and other South Asian countries. Among native-born Muslims, roughly half are African American (20% of U.S. Muslims overall), many of whom are converts to Islam.

    * Based on data from this survey, along with available Census Bureau data on immigrants’ nativity and nationality, the Pew Research Center estimates the total population of Muslims in the United States at 2.35 million.

    There are a couple of points to be concerned with, however:

    * Muslim Americans reject Islamic extremism by larger margins than do Muslim minorities in Western European countries. However, there is somewhat more acceptance of Islamic extremism in some segments of the U.S. Muslim public than others. Fewer native-born African American Muslims than others completely condemn al Qaeda. In addition, younger Muslims in the U.S. are much more likely than older Muslim Americans to say that suicide bombing in the defense of Islam can be at least sometimes justified. Nonetheless, absolute levels of support for Islamic extremism among Muslim Americans are quite low, especially when compared with Muslims around the world.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  143. Smorgasbord says: 144

    @MataHarley: “Evidently, Smorgasbord, you are as math challengened in the Wm Ayers “social justice” public education curriculum as Donald Bly. As of 24-48 hours ago, the posts anti-Islam/Rauf/Cordoba house were one more post than 2 to 1 against the counters.”

    I was referring to the FA bloggers on this story. It seems that most of the FA team don’t see Islam as a threat to the USA. I do. I have to agree that I am math challenged. I only had general math in school.

    “…go sulk over a brew somewhere, dude, and get over it.”

    I don’t drink, but I might try a little extra soda or fruit juice.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  144. Hard Right says: 145

    Terrorists are poor and uneducated? Wow Word, it looks like you dropped a big load of BS with that one. I could have sworn that you yourself had stated in the past that many if not most terrorists are middle class or higher and well educated. The poor uneducated terrorist angle is one pushed by liberals, and we know how reality challenged they are. Am I reading the meaning of what you posted incorrectly?

    With the possibility of that part, I don’t disagree with the rest of your post.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  145. Wordsmith says: 146

    @Hard Right:

    Terrorists are poor and uneducated? Wow Word, it looks like you dropped a big load of BS with that one. I could have sworn that you yourself had stated in the past that many if not most terrorists are middle class or higher and well educated.

    I have and I did. HR, please re-read the comment(s) again.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  146. Wordsmith says: 147

    Comment #70

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  147. Skookum says: 148

    In regard to the article being tasteless, is this a condemnation of Halal cuisine? That is insensitive.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  148. Wordsmith says: 149

    How dare you call me a halalophobe!

    I just want it served somewhere else.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  149. Smorgasbord says: 150

    @MataHarley: “…watch for those half rocker bar prospects! You know how evil they are too…”

    Since I am a non-drinker I don’t do the bars. I don’t know what that means.
    Why all the hatred directed towards me? All I have been saying is that the Muslim religion is a terrorist organization from the time it was formed. No different than the different kinds of communism that some countries are under. All of them would rule the world if they could. Islam would too, if it could, and it is spreading.
    I don’t get mad at people who disagree with me. From your tone I am guessing you go along with Patvann turning me in to the Muslims, since you said:

    “Well, I see that during the time it took me to compose my response in #120 PatVann pretty much wore you down to a bloody stump.”

    This post is angling more towards violence. What is going on here? As I mentioned earlier, after Patvann lets me know if he has turned me in to the Muslims I will leave this one. Not because I am being beaten up on, but because I have suggested a time or two before that it is time to change the subject, and I had decided before I got the hate mail that I don’t want to read about the two sides not changing their minds any more.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  150. Wordsmith says: 151

    @Smorgasbord: Smorgasbord, what is remarkable to me is the question you ask in #112:

    Are you trying to convert me to Muslim.

    You mean Islam? :-|

    I think it is fair here to ask what your religious preference is, if you have one, and also the ones who seem to be trying to convert us to Muslims.

    Is this a serious question?! Or just a “slam”? (no pun there…no, really, there isn’t one).

    I think somewhere else you asked if I were Muslim. I took it as an attempt at an insult. But were you actually sincere and serious in posing the question?!!!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  151. Patvann says: 152

    Patvann turning me into the Muslims…

    Ya know…

    That’s just so sad, I’m gonna leave ya alone.

    *walks away dumbfounded*

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  152. Skookum says: 153

    de gustibus non est disputandum -In matters of taste, there is no argument.

    Halal is not exclusively a Ground Zero cuisine. It is being served in several cities across America already and no one has ever complained of it being tasteless. Unfounded and baseless criticism is in poor taste at the very least.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  153. Smorgasbord says: 154

    @Patvann: #132 You said you were going to do it anyway, so why comment? The challenge wasn’t meant for you in the first place.

    As I mentioned earlier, you have verified what I have been saying about the Muslim religion. What would happen if someone wrote to the Muslim headquarters and said they were not going to be converted and they included a picture of the cartoon of the Mohammed turban bomb? Is that what you are wishing on me?

    “Any questions? Clarifications? Wanna see how I get when I don’t like ya?”

    Is this how “Old stubborn SeAL’s” get even with people they don’t like? I just try not to have anything to do with them.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  154. MataHarley says: 155

    Smorgasbord:

    @MataHarley: “…watch for those half rocker bar prospects! You know how evil they are too…”

    Since I am a non-drinker I don’t do the bars. I don’t know what that means.
    Why all the hatred directed towards me? All I have been saying is that the Muslim religion is a terrorist organization from the time it was formed….. snip….

    OMG! Smorgasboard.. you’ve become pure liberal, water cooler PC, sans sense of humor, and pure victim! How sad, dude….

    First of all, there’s no “hatred”. You brung up Hell’s Angels and how evil they were, and I educated you to the Red’n'White plus prospects. The stuff you don’t know outside of late night B movies. I make a joke about it and I’m directing “hatred”?

    I’ll repeat what Patvann said…. “walks away dumfounded”…. WTF? Lighten up, dude. I see happier people on barbituates, and that ain’t an easy task.

    From your tone I am guessing you go along with Patvann turning me in to the Muslims, since you said:

    “Well, I see that during the time it took me to compose my response in #120 PatVann pretty much wore you down to a bloody stump.”

    You sure you don’t drink? Because I didn’t say that. Then again, I’ve heard Aye Chi and I “look alike”…. :0) Ms. Ukrainian me has never seen Mr. Hispanic Aye, so I’m not sure where that blood line crosses. Especially since my people didn’t immigrate from both Ukraine and Hungary since the early 1900′s.

    This post is angling more towards violence. What is going on here?

    I dunno… why don’t you ask Minuteman? He’s the guy ready to take up arms tomorrow on it all. “turning you into the Muslims”… that ought to give ‘em a laugh. Personally, Smorg, don’t think they’d care if you inhabited the planet or not. Something about small peanuts. But congratulations on finally admitting you have achieved full lib/prog “victim” status.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  155. Smorgasbord says: 156

    @Wordsmith: I agree that things are changing in some areas, and I am glad of it. One question I have is does the Afghanistan constitution have the same rule as Iraq’s does that Islam MUST be the national religion? What I would like to see is the Muslims that don’t believe in the killings and that women should at least have more rights than they do, form a separate sect of the Muslim religion, like several other religions have.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  156. CHill says: 157

    I love SEALS! They are Navy guys, right. Kinda reminds me of that former MN Governor, what was his name – Jessie “The Body” Adventure or some such.

    Hey, Smorgy, I will be on your side. In all the dissimilar air combat training the AF has done against our fellow departments of the military, we never lost. That is correct. One of my many AF pilot buddies used to tell me endless stories about “rope a doping” those TOP Gunners from the Navy. Easiest prey to take out in the world because they are so “immovable” in their approach to problems. Even pilots in AF training could take them out they were so “immoveable” in the way they fought.

    Ya, see Patvann, it is like this in the real world. You Navy guys have always fought a two dimensional war in the air. Don’t have to worry about what is behind you or beside you. You guys attack front and down ONLY. Now think about how AF goes about the business of winning wars. When one flies the air force way one worries about ALL dimensions at the same instant and all the time. USAF pilots are by far the finest pilots the world has ever seen. How do I know? Been there watched them.

    Immoveable means only one thing in war, in life and in spirit. You think you are never wrong and refuse to change your mind when proven wrong. Now don’t go flexing those powerful muscles of yours just yet. I did not say you were wrong, just hinted that you might be. This means you will have to flex what little brain power you have left from learning how to be Mr. immoveable object – THE SEAL.

    Yeh, I love those SEALS. Spent a whole year studying Hebrew with one in Washington DC. Got to know him real well. He is my friend as you are Mr. Patvann. Front and down on the ground means you win. But suggest strongly that you have a lot of intel types like me around to protect your rear and your sides. Together with my AF buddies up their in the sky – no one can beat us.

    Come along Smorgy. We are gonna have fun this week!

    Where there is a SEAL there’s a way
    eating up smorgasbords every day
    it’s how they face their projects
    remaining such immoveable objects

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  157. Smorgasbord says: 158

    @MataHarley: I’m reading my emails in the order they were received. Some have links that I go to and read. This is starting to sound like kids on the playground. Would you want your kids to talk like this to other kids? I also try to stay away from dangerous places, let alone enter them.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  158. MataHarley says: 159

    Smorgasbored…One question I have is does the Afghanistan constitution have the same rule as Iraq’s does that Islam MUST be the national religion? What I would like to see is the Muslims that don’t believe in the killings and that women should at least have more rights than they do, form a separate sect of the Muslim religion, like several other religions have.

    uh yeah… you mean that heinous place that has women elected to Iraqi parliament, and dare to walk around Iraq without being in burkas? And they already have demonimations in Islam… even if you aren’t aware of them. That education has been provided in past commentary. Time for a reread, guy. The archived category is above. Hint… called “ground zero mosque”

    They (Iraq) aren’t perfect. But they sure are the far cry from the picture you and ilk paint of what the US will be if Cordoba House is built.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  159. MataHarley says: 160

    Smorgabord: I’m reading my emails in the order they were received. …snip… This is starting to sound like kids on the playground. Would you want your kids to talk like this to other kids? I also try to stay away from dangerous places, let alone enter them.

    oooooo… yes… FA vewy scarwy place… perhaps you need CHill at your side. And if you don’t want your cyber body guard, stop casting the stones, dude.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  160. Patvann says: 161

    I stand, with my mouth agape.
    Slightly aghast at myself for slapping the loudmouth at the bar, (then finding out he’s autistic), while some drunk continues to egg him on.

    “Get up! Hit him with your face again!”

    @Chill
    Hebrew has always been taught at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center in Monterey California. The Washington school is reserved for very small classes of the more obscure languages, and for the diplomatic corps.

    It has been this way since the mid 40′s.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  161. Smorgasbord says: 162

    @Wordsmith: # 151 It was a serious question. The way several FA bloggers are defending the religion made me wonder. The way I understand it, Muslim and Islam are used to mean the same thing. I hear and read it both ways.

    I am getting a lot of comments directed at me about the moderates in Islam, but when I refer back to the Koran’s “convert or kill” and the fact that if someone leaves the religion they are supposed to be killed, I get a lot of flack about it.

    I have also said I believe the religion was started as a way to take over the world. The things I mentioned above verify that to me.

    Several of your bloggers have been trying to convince me it isn’t a terrorist organization, but it is one of those things that they have their opinion and I have mine and neither side will change their mind. I am trying to only respond to their comments now because I have said I am ready to change the subject and will stop reading the comments shortly.

    I believe everybody has the right to their own opinion, but when it gets to the point that each side is basically saying the same things over and over, it is time for a change.
    Keep up the good work. FA is still my favorite blog because you all post more things that I feel like commenting on than any other blog I go to.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  162. Smorgasbord says: 163

    @CHill: After I stopped laughing, you reminded me of the fighter pilot that came upon a cargo plane and did some fancy maneuvers and asked the cargo pilot what he thought of them. He said they were great and then said, “Watch this.”
    The cargo plane flew strait for about five minutes until the fighter pilot finally asked him what he did. The cargo pilot told him he stood up and stretched, went to the bathroom, and grabbed a cup of coffee and a roll.
    I’m one that says that anyone in the service is on the same side and doing the same thing: Keeping me free. I even have a problem with the old war movies that show different branches of the service and start fighting about which one does a better job. I hope stuff like that didn’t actually happen.

    A chain is only as good as its weakest link. All of the links are just as important as the other. The office workers are just as important as the front line fighters. They are all needed.

    There is one exception, my son is in the Air Force, so it is a little more important to me than the others.

    You mentioned how good our pilots are. During the first Gulf War a news report said that two of our planes took off on a bombing run, ran into two enemy Migs, switched to fighter mode, took out the Migs, switched back to bombing mode, and finished their mission.

    I almost forgot to mention that it is Jessie Ventura. My brother lives in MN and said he was glad to see Jessie go.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  163. Smorgasbord says: 164

    @MataHarley: I can’t even ask an honest question without being ridiculed. It wasn’t even you I asked. I don’t always read the complete comment every time. Some are pretty long, and if it seems that it is the same thing that has already been said, I skip the rest of it.

    As far as the demonimation of Iraq, I hope it will stay that way, but I will wait until we have been out of there for a while and see if it stays that way.

    I have said from the beginning that according to the law Cordoba House is legal to build. I don’t understand why the commission who decides what businesses are allowed would allow it that close to Ground Zero, especially since I found out that the Muslims like to build mosques on land they have captured.

    Just because it is legal now doesn’t mean it can’t be cancelled. One place that was approved for a casino in Jew Jersey was cancelled because enough of the residents complained. Maybe not enough New York City residents complained about it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  164. CHill says: 165

    As Patvann can attest, we are all on the same team. Good hearted ribbing is the name of the game. When I said I love our SEALS, it was not sarcasm. Those guys are very special and I would not want to have them as my enemies. They are simply the best at what they do. Likewise, the Navy pilots are simply the best at what they do which is fleet protection. We all have our own missions and strengths and weaknesses. Together, we make up the finest human beings I have ever known and worked with. Liberals can talk all they want about the military, but it is special to be a member of it and relying on brothers and sisters in uniform to cover one’s axx when the chips are down.

    My sister-in-law lives in Wayzata, MN, outside Minneapolis. Really nice place if it weren’t for all the weirdo liberals that live there. Reminds me of California – beautiful place but way too many fruits and nuts for my liking. Plus in Minnesota it is cold.

    What does your son do in the Air Force?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  165. Smorgasbord says: 166

    @MataHarley: “Never enter one of these dangerous American haunts to drink away your inability to respond without knowing where where the back door exit is.”

    What I meant was I don’t go into places that I know are dangerous. I ain’t a macho man and I don’t have anything to prove. I didn’t know that FA was a dangerous place for me to be. If that is the case, I will let as many people have my back as want to. The way I understand it, whenever soldiers on the ground come under fire, one of the first things they do is call for an air strike.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  166. Smorgasbord says: 167

    @Patvann: It wasn’t me you slapped in the bar. I don’t drink and haven’t been in one for years except if it was the only place open at night for a meal. You might not want to go back in the bar until you find out who it was you slapped.

    Your stooping to the liberal’s level when you start the name calling. Some of the things the Tea Party Patriots and other Tea Parties discourage is cussing, name calling, racism, and be particular what kind of sign you use. I am guessing you are not one of us.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  167. CHill says: 168

    Patvann: Is this the immoveable object coming at me again? Now I begin to wonder about who you really are.

    Let me make it perfectly clear and if you have doubts, suggest you do a Google search on Foreign Service Institute, Roslyn, Virginia. I studied there twice – Hebrew and Thai. My Chinese training came from DLI in Monterrey. In fact, Mr. Immoveable Object, I met my wife of 35 years while studying the Hebrew language. She was a hairdresser (Chinese-Thai) who worked in Fairfax. The Hebrew linguists (12 of us in my class) were housed at Andrews AFB with our records located at Ft. Myers.

    ALL diplomats are provided their language training at FSI. Hebrew has never been taught any where else. At the time I studied, the military called it Special Arabic. Now if you still want to show just how true my comments are about immoveable objects, I will be glad to send you a copy of my graduation certificate as an honor graduate from FSI with the word HEBREW on it. Better yet. quit being such an immoveable object.

    This is not a matter of opinion because you are dead wrong. Either that or I just developed dementia and am living in a dream world of my own making. Stand by one . . .

    Nope. I am right. My diploma states clearly – Foreign Service Institute.

    BTW, Anacostia (DLI East Coast) was closed shortly after the last Vietnamese linguists were trained there and whom lived with us at Andrews AFB. Duhhhh, do you suppose an AF linguist knows something about language training?

    Smorgy: How is that for close air support?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  168. Smorgasbord says: 169

    @CHill: #165 As you know, with each base change comes a new job. He will be transferring to Canada in January and I don’t know what he will be doing. One thing he has done is help with the logistics of getting supplies to the troops.

    While he was based in California he got airman of the year. He doesn’t brag much, and we had to find out about it from his wife.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  169. CHill says: 170

    Patvann: I had not done any Google searches on Hebrew since I moved to Thailand in 1992 after graduating from FSI in Thai. Had no need. What I sent was knowledge based on personal experience. Thus, I thought I might check it out to make sure of my own knowledge.

    Seems Hebrew has been taught at DLI in California since 1984 http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/2454/monterey-gis-master-hebrew-viewing-israeli-sitcoms/

    I graduated from FSI in 1974 in Hebrew and moved to the Middle East the following year. I happen to have known about NO HEBREW AT DLI at that time because I was stationed at Castle AFB, CA when selected to reenter the world of linguists. Thought I would only have to move a little over 100 miles to Monterrey but instead found I had to travel over 3000 miles in less than five days. I called DLI and found the news out a day before i got my final orders.

    Prior to 1984, no Hebrew was taught at DLI. All my colleagues graduated from FSI.

    Just thought you should know. One website does not make one knowledgeable about a subject even if that website is DLI.

    Shalom Alekha

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  170. Smorgasbord says: 171

    @CHill: The only thing I can add to that is that I graduated from high school. I’ll let you know if I need another air strike.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  171. PATVANN: YOU kow that I am your friend, I have to tell you that YOU are getting

    PHYSICLY GETTING into a QUARREL with OUR OTHER friends, INCLUDING threats,
    I surely hope that you will dismantle those, by telling SMoRGASBORD,that you wont do any of those agaisnt him: AS you know that TRHEAT would be treason against one of FA group that we also consider friend:
    THese SUBJECT bring the divide wittin us at FA to deep,
    each opinions belong to the one who send it, could be chalenge with a limit
    BECAUSE of that FACT, WE must not fall into the bait like rats,
    WE {not me], are too smart to fall in that trap, and we should know the limits of how far to challenge a buddy,which is diferent than challenging a opponant,which can go further, but also has its limits. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  172. Patvann says: 173

    @Chill

    RE: DLI

    Then I shall have to belay my last. I was there in the early 80′s, and the that was the history of the place as they taught us. (Spanish and later Russian for me.) I’m not sure what website you’re referring to.

    The AF Para-rescue trained with us. They are one group SeAL’s never rib, because they are the ones that evac us when things go bad. (In reality, I don’t recall ever us ribbing anyone, except the politicians of the day.) There is no group of SF that have as much physical, and mental training anywhere in the world….or as much respect by the Navy and Marine operators.

    They are indeed guardian angels, and I will never forget their efforts in Grenada to try and save ST-4.

    My “Immovable Object” was in regards to bigotry, (and you know it) and here I shall stand. It was not me that refused to open my mind to new information, it was the man you now so adamantly defend. If by defending that stance, you agree that all Moslems are some sort of ticking time-bomb of hate and violence, then I shall stand in YOUR way, too.

    -Just as I did when “all gooks are commies” was in vogue 30 years ago.

    @Smorg
    You’ve asked questions, we’ve given answers, history lessons, religious lessons, links and everything else in the book to satisfy even the thickest and most paranoid of heads.

    You had DEMANDED that we show you an example of reformist Islam and after providing you with the link and the name, your response (without ever going to the site) was that they are a “Muslim headquarters” that’s “ready to kill you” if I was to send them a picture of old uncle Mo with a bomb in his turban. How he would get your address, you don’t say, but that statement alone tells me that I need to leave you be. “Uncoachable” is the word I’ll use.

    -Sorry man, but there is nothing else to say to you regarding Islam.

    @Beez
    I threatened no one, and I will ALWAYS quarrel with people who hate and fear all persons of a particular group. Loudly and vigorously.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  173. minuteman 26 says: 174

    CHill – I have a friend living in Thailand you might know. Retired Army Major, nickname Zippo. Ever run into him. Would give some of the liberals here a run for their money.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  174. @Patvann:

    My “Immovable Object” was in regards to bigotry, (and you know it) and here I shall stand. It was not me that refused to open my mind to new information, it was the man you now so adamantly defend. If by defending that stance, you agree that all Moslems are some sort of ticking time-bomb of hate and violence, then I shall stand in YOUR way, too.

    You’d likely be interested in reading CHill’s pontifications on Islam:

    Islam is not now nor has ever been the Religion of Peace except when everyone on the planet is Muslim.

    There’s much more on that thread, but that gives you the essence.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  175. skat says: 176

    @ Curt,
    Strangely, I’m not aware that I was posting as both skat & skatblue. I haven’t changed anything, just put my comment in the little comment box. I did get a error message and I didn’t think my comment had posted. Sorry for any confusion, but whatever happened was unintentional. Hope this posts as skat.

    @suek,
    I like your mixed up metaphor, but I don’t have time to plow concrete.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  176. Donald Bly says: 177

    I’m only commenting to push this thread closer to #200… Then I’ll pounce on the privilege, assuming I’m quick enough, to make the 200th posting.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  177. DONALD BLY: hi, there is lots time,DONT count on it, I’ll beat you to it.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  178. Patvann says: 179

    I got the last 200, and I’ll get this one too! :-D

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  179. PATVANN you got the last one because I let you have it, WELL NOT THIS ONE,
    IT MINE,all mine, me myself and I OWN it, and the world[ the free world].

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  180. @Donald Bly:
    @Patvann:
    @ilovebeeswarzone:

    Wanna bet? 8)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  181. AYE CHIHUAHUA: hi, HOW much? bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  182. @ilovebeeswarzone:

    $2.00 which is, of course, 200 pennies.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  183. ok 18 divided by 3 give us 6 each, unless somone else cut our neck

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  184. HOW much in CANADIAN money. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  185. You can just send me two Canadian dollars when I win.

    No conversion necessary.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  186. we have loonies and tonies no paper below 5dollards.
    do you still have paper 1 dollard, and paper 2 dollard or metal loonies and metal tonies

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  187. patvann says: 188

    *strolls slowly past…kicks a pebble…whistles a little tune…*

    Hi guys!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  188. Smorgasbord says: 189

    @Patvann: #173 As I mentioned earlier, the problem isn’t with the people, it is the religion. That is all I am referring to. Most Muslims were born into it in a country that that was the only religion allowed. They were taught from childhood to hate infidels, just like the Japanese and Germans and others were taught to hate others for thousands of years.

    The link you sent was the comment page if a person wants to make comments. That is all the page was. There wasn’t anything else to read. You said you were going to send it in for me even if I didn’t. To me, that is a threat.

    If there are reformists in Islam, all I have said is that they should break away from the main religion and form a branch of it if they want to stay Muslim, otherwise they are worshiping from the Koran, and you know the rules in the Koran.

    I have seen different documentaries where soldiers of both sides were brought together to meet. One such one was the pilots who attacked Pearl Harbor and the sailors who were attacked. Both sides understood the pilots were only doing what their emperor told them to do. One thing I remember was that the pilots told the sailors that they were amazed how many planes they lost in the second wave.

    The United States has made friends out of enemies for many years: England, Germany, Japan, etc. Those countries had to be defeated first. I don’t see how we can be friends with Islam until they drop the Koran teaching of killing and treating women like they do. As I said earlier, the ones who want to change it need to separate themselves from the Koran and write another religious book. They can use the writing in the Koran and leave out the parts they don’t like. This is all that I have been saying all along.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  189. PATVANN, I have your back, if you let me run at the last minute,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  190. SMORGASBORD: hi, I see you here to get that 200 from us, and I’m the one who will
    take it. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  191. UNLESS MATA decide to cut in,
    or WORDSMITH, or CURT, or DR JOHN

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  192. AND my laptop is ALMOST in flames.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  193. @Smorgasbord:

    As I mentioned earlier, the problem isn’t with the people, it is the religion. That is all I am referring to. Most Muslims were born into it in a country that that was the only religion allowed. They were taught from childhood to hate infidels

    The religion is nothing without the people. The people give legs to the beliefs.

    The people also have the option to pick and choose what they do with the things that their holy books teach them. The Bible, for example, contains a set of standards and instructions. Do all Christians follow all of those instructions? The answer would be “NO”. If you’re not familiar with Biblical teaching I can illustrate a wide variety of things for you just off the top of my head.

    Just because it’s written in a book, or taught during worship etc, does not mean that all will follow it.

    Your repeated insistence that all of Islam is the same and all Muslims are evil is simply not based in fact or reality.

    If it were, then we would have seen exponentially increasing incidents of Muslim violence against non-Muslims within this country as their population has increased.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  194. You should power down that laptop so it can rest.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  195. Hard Right says: 196

    How dare you call me a halalophobe!

    I just want it served somewhere else.

    Your comment could easily be taken that you are calling people Islamophobes simply because they want it elsewhere while falsely claiming you are joking. Not saying you are doing that, but it could definitely be taken that way.
    Yes I understand you are kidding Word, but it also could be looked upon as the type of insult liberals deliver. They say something nasty and then claim they were just kidding. After seeing it so often, it can be felt where not intended.

    Thanks for the comment heads up. I knew something wasn’t right. The problem with these huge threads is that they are hard to keep up with if you get busy elsewhere.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  196. Missy says: 197

    Are you guys competing for 200? Hmmm, better do it in the middle of the night, I usually get up at 4:30, bwahahaha. …..3 more.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  197. Hard Right says: 198

    Nope. Someone else can have 200. I may hold out for # 300 tho. :wink:

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  198. It’s late here on the east coast…..

    time for bed.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  199. Oh, I forgot to say

    200

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  200. Patvann says: 201

    You bastage.

    New rule. No admins allowed.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  201. AYE CHIHUAHUA THAT”S why you sent me to cool my laptop ,I just reopen to miss it by a minute
    WHERE do I send your reward? congratulation it will be your last win,
    I’ll make sure of that, MISSY gave you a push, I know her game, she made me win one just like that before over DONALD BLY. bye
    PATVANN can you get over your lost and stay cool, I’ll help you on the next, I feel sorry to have drop your back, but my laptop was angry in fire, bye
    DONALD BLY: THE DINGO ett your stick again, I’ll get you another, bye
    SMORGASBORD ,we had no chance they would have beat us if we would have win. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  202. CHill says: 203

    Aye Chihuahua: And I also recall people here stating emphatically that no one calls us fourteenth responders names like bigot. Best go back and read your response to my “Islam is not now nor has ever been the Religion of Peace except when everyone on the planet is Muslim” status. I stand by that statement. It is not a bigoted statement but one of fact. Read the Quran and related books. A religion’s philosophical tenants define the religion. One of Christianity’s tenants is charity toward others. The love one’s neighbor as one loves oneself concept Just because Christians do not follow this tenant does not mean that the tenant is not part of Christianity. Bigot is as bigot does.

    How many Muslim friends do you have or have you had over the course of your life? How much time have you spent in the Middle East? Have you ever had students who were Shiite, Sunni or Sufi? Have you ever spent your spare time exchanging ideas with Muslim colleagues from Iraq and Iran on a daily basis? Have you ever traveled to areas where the Sufi were the predominate religious group interacting with them and enjoying their hospitality? Have you ever given a Muslim a gift that you picked up in Kashgar depicting the Ishtar Mosque on a beautiful silk scroll and then getting several books about Islam in return? You are more than welcome to call me what ever silly little name you like, it does not change the facts that Islam, as presented in its most revered writings can be depicted as I have depicted it. This, of course, has nothing to do with individual Muslims and how they choose to worship their religion.

    No one is called a bigot here, right?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  203. Skookum says: 204

    Could it be that tasteless remarks lack seasoning. Serve the Halal entente and you will have an interesting cuisine for the mind. Serving elsewhere indeed, we worry over Halal while the Marxists have us on the menu, is that tasteless?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  204. CHill says: 205

    Patvann #173: Having spent all that time with the SEAL, I knew you were also a linguist by trade (and an exterminator by hobby). As you saw, I quickly belayed my earlier comments about never to 1984 and onward. I have read your writings and agree with your way of thinking. Aye Chihuahua got carried away with his finger pointing. All the questions I posed to him are questions based on reality. I do not have to tell you what Islam doctrines are or are not. Anyone can read them. The problem is many people (especially liberals) read these doctrines then powder them up to look pretty and then turns around and denies they exist, calling anyone who points them out names that, of course, are not called on this website.

    I meet only one person at a time. My response has always been one of Christian charity and love. I love my fellow humans even with all the spite and ugly spots we all have. Some times people just project onto others the faults they themselves have. Maybe that is why we have several lurkers comment about the liberalism of this site. MMMM, I wonder!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  205. CHill says: 206

    minuteman #174: Is Major Mark Smith still living here! I have been living and working in China for the last three years (just returned here in July) so I have had no contacts with people I used to know.

    I guess this means I know Zippo, huh? Would be interested to know if he is still around. I will not be able to get out for the next three weeks because of my eye operation I had last week. I only have kept up with the guy who was checking my mail at the local military establishment.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  206. HARD RIGHT: hi, what is the problem?, DONT you like THE number 200, ? WHY not ?
    DOES it come GENETIC or from a wound on the head?, 200 is a ok number,did it done
    something against you?. NO I am sure. well ,this post wont make the 300comment, so you miss a chance to feel like a winner, it wont come back, because I’ll win the others one. bye
    NOW I’ll let go my build up anger all on you, because the others scare me. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  207. Patvann says: 208

    @Smorgs

    As I said earlier, the ones who want to change it need to separate themselves from the Koran and write another religious book. They can use the writing in the Koran and leave out the parts they don’t like. This is all that I have been saying all along.

    *sigh*

    I’m sorry sir, you have said no such thing at all. You have so far refused to accept that there are REFORMERS doing exactly what you now claim you want, and I and others spoke of it, many dozens of comments ago. You could have easily navigated to the Home-page of the site I posted to begin reading the columns and articles-of-position, but even now, you have not.

    But you just got a whole lot closer to understanding your own angst about Islam, and seeing 5 pretty good paragraphs of position coming out of you deserves an equally thought-out response…

    Let’s look at a snapshot of the Koran. There are a little over 100 entries calling for death to non-Moslems. There are about 60 that say nice things about other religions. Obviously that would be a good place to begin “trimming”.

    But should they? Or should they come to the reality that these bad-passages are now a threat to Islam?

    Like the Jews did.

    The Old Testament is essentially the Jewish religion. (I’m being simplistic here, so stay with me).

    Now it’s really easy to go read certain chapters that are STILL in the Bible, and find all the stuff about how to treat your slave, who you can screw, how to dress, what to plant, how to properly install a railing on your roof so your slaves don’t fall off…and on and on, up to and including war.

    Right?

    Do you see any Jews following that stuff? No! Not even the most hard-core traditionalist does any of that stuff. He would curse that Rabbi who would even suggest it!

    Yet it’s all still there, 3000 years later. Still shockingly “bad”.

    The Hebrew’s came to the realization that if they kept that crap up, they would either kill themselves, or get killed. They had LOT’S of wars back then amongst themselves, and with others. After they had had enough strife, and were on the verge of extinction, they modified and ABROGATED (and in many cases ignored) those old stories and laws. They chose to see those “bad” things as what they were…a product of their time. They kept it all in, so that later generations would learn from it.

    -Which is also why the Christians kept the Old Testament as well. But even then, the Catholic Church had to go through it’s own internal and external strife before getting it’s act together. That’s why history records the REFORMATION a few hundred years ago….the result of which, took power from the Popes, and created the Protestant versions of Christianity starting with the Lutherans (Martin Luther of Germany), and expanding into the dozen or so Christian “sects” we know today.

    -But they all still use the same Bible, with the same old-Testament “bad” stuff, don’t they?

    Granted, the Koran has a lot more to be abrogated and ignored, but it is being done. They have a long road to travel, and the pressure to stay violent is huge. Not only by those with the guns, but governments, and Leftists who have been stoking these flames for almost 100 years against the notion of America, and the freedom we represent for all men.

    WW1 was the end of the last Caliphate, and the re-emergence of violent Islamic thought. WW2 gave them the power to hook up with Hitler, and make it happen. The Leftist’s and opportunistic politicians have enabled them to this day.

    America is the only place left on the planet that can let that essential evolution happen, so let’s find them and cheer them on, instead of lumping them into a singular pot of hate, shall we?

    After-all. even after the “Shores of Tripoli” that cemented our beloved Marines into our collective psyche. Jefferson did not forbid Moslems from these shores.

    Let’s follow that lead, shall we?…Along with the lead the New Testament gave us about love conquering hate.

    We can do that by publicly supporting those reformers, loudly rejecting the multicultural crap by the liars of Islam and the Left, getting off Mideast oil asap, and killing lots of Jihadi’s.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  208. CHill says: 209

    #208: From now on thou shalt be known as Pat “The Logic” Vann. Now go up there to MN and run for governor!

    I will still be clapping as you leave the room.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  209. Patvann says: 210

    @Chill

    Actually, I am a dual-mastered engineer by trade, a father in practice, with science, history, and a 70 Camaro as hobbies. The SeAL’s were both the preparation for that life, and a culmination of swimming with the Santa Clara International Swim Club for 8 years.

    I’ve been an avid reader and writer since childhood, and had Catholic nuns for 12 years making sure that foundation was solid.

    I have several good Moslem friends, and have been to several of the ‘Stans for Uncle Sam after 911. Working in the semiconductor-equipment industry gave me a chance to visit many countries, without having to make a plan to kill any of them…
    Except for this one jerk manager at Samsung in Korea… :wink:

    (edit/added)
    P.S. And I hate Jesse with a passion. I’ve owned smarter goldfish.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  210. CHill says: 211

    Patvann: How about a tri-mastered retiree in foreign affairs, English and business administration who is recuperating from eye surgery before starting off on another adventure. Have been giving some thought to some of those Central Asian Newbie countries. My wife and I spend a month among the Sufi Muslims of Western China (Xinjiang) traveling the silk road. Talk about hospitality heaven! Mostly Uygars but also some Uzbeks, Tajiks and some really exciting kazakhs thrown in on horseback.

    We are addicted to travel. Lived three years in Cambodia back when it was pretty unsafe and now three years in China. MMMMM, USAF job switches average about three years each as well.

    China was truly eye-opening. Am just sitting back waiting for the “right” wrong article to come out about China to jump in and share some pretty great things we saw and did among the university students there. At my going away party, almost 100% of the students declared their disdain for Mao and the communist party. The universities are very open with the direction from the top to teach truth where ever it leads. Gotta do that to be competitive but . . . no surprise as to the outcome.

    Let me know when you run for governor and I will volunteer my services.

    edit also added: Jesse is really some kind of fruitcake, isn’t he? He probably thought that the WWF was the real deal as well.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  211. Patvann says: 212

    @Chill

    Nice!
    I’ve never been to the Mainland, but I’ve been to Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, and Japan a bunch of times each. From what I’ve heard from the Chinese I have worked with, it jibes with your observation. I smell a revolution within a decade or so within that pressure-cooker.

    Now…Can you build every aspect of a kitchen from scratch? :wink:

    http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu80/Patvann/DSC00196.jpg

    Far-view:
    http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu80/Patvann/DSC00195.jpg

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  212. CHill says: 213

    As I stated earlier: Front down and on the grown YOU WIN. Now I know who to call to help me finish my Chinese compound (hsiheyuan) in Hua Hin.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  213. Curt says: 214

    Chill, Pat…you need to put those experiences down on cyber paper and write a post or two about them. I know I would love to read them, and I bet a lot of FA readers would also.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  214. Patvann says: 215

    @Curt

    I don’t know…reading about home-remodeling is kind boring, and my white-papers pertaining to depositing metals onto silicon wafers in a vacuum will positively make eyes glaze right over.
    :lol:

    -I’ll have to think up something a bit more engaging.

    @Chill

    (hsiheyuan)

    -Gesundheit.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  215. Curt says: 216

    Yeah….just reading that description made my eyes glaze over, but I have a feeling there are some stories from your younger days…and hell, living abroad and your experiences there, that would make interesting reading.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  216. @CHill:

    Labels are certainly applied as they are applicable. I never claimed that they weren’t.

    If the shoe fits etc etc.

    I went back and re-read your posts on the thread where you entered this conversation. Your words are there for all to read and evaluate.

    You try and give yourself an escape valve by saying that you don’t actually act on your beliefs therefore the label doesn’t apply. However your thoughts and beliefs, expressed in your own words, fit the classic dictionary definition. Stereotyping would also be an appropriate descriptor.

    My opinion of your beliefs stands.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  217. CHill says: 218

    I laugh at your opinion as if someone as brilliantly moral as you has the right to hold such an opinion of another person. Ever heard what they say about opinions? Facts bite hard. Bigotry takes action and I will challenge you to find anyone on the planet who knows me and will call me a bigot. What I wrote was factual information concerning the documents that define the religion. But let us not have facts get in the way of name calling. Islam is what is Islam is. Only very ignorant or self-annointed liberals would say otherwise. Guess one does not have the right to criticize a religion here either, huh? Enjoy your opinion and make sure you get back to the other members of the authors here and tell them they are liars for saying no one does name calling.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  218. @CHill:

    I laugh at your opinion as if someone as brilliantly moral as you has the right to hold such an opinion of another person?

    Isn’t that precisely the position that you took regarding those who have chosen Islam as their religion.

    Why yes, I believe it is.

    You claim to only judge people as you meet them…yet you cast a wide net with your words regarding people that you specifically said that you have never met.

    Bigotry is not only beliefs put into action, but thought processes as well. Look it up. Heck, I even posted a link to an online dictionary to make it easy for you.

    Your escape hatch has failed and you’ve become enmeshed in your own words.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  219. CHill says: 220

    Aye: A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, irrationality, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern American English refers to persons hostile to those of differing race, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation and religion. (Wilkipedia}

    Read it carefully as bigotry involves more than just writing thoughts down on a blog. If you need help with the English, ask as I have a masters in English.

    I am not hostile to anyone but apparently you are.

    Enjoy your English lesson especially when you exhibit intolerance, irrationality and animosity to those with whom you disagree. Philosophizing about a religion based on the doctrines of that religion is not exactly casting a net on anyone.

    Let me guess – a liberal, right? Do you need a list of names that you can call me? Got lots of them if you can’t think of any. Go ahead. Get that last word in to make yourself feel powerful and in control.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  220. PATVANN: that’s why we’r engaging you here, if you want, we can step up the “engaging ”
    A few more notchs.
    I see that you spend the night here ,and put some glue on this post,
    I’m coming to the rescue. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  221. CHill says: 222

    One last point Mr. Aye:

    One of many sources for my statements(oh, I mean bigotry):

    http://www.politicalislam.com/principles/pages/five-principles/

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  222. Donald Bly says: 223

    Aw crap…. I go to bed and you folks not only steal my 200th post…. ya’ll go into over kill with an extra 22 on top of it.

    One cannot sleep around here! Or the dingos will ‘et your stick…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  223. Donald Bly says: 224

    @Patvann…. nice job on the kitchen… not everyone can build kitchen cabinets from scratch.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  224. Missy says: 225

    Pat, your kitchen is beautiful, nice job, a real wife pleaser! Bet your family leaves the house happy every morning, I would just want to sit there and enjoy it all day! :wink:

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  225. Donald Bly says: 226

    In my house…. the wife doesn’t even know that we have a kitchen… let alone where it is.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  226. PATVANN: I’m glad MISSY mentioned it, I would have miss that; It’s a unique style,
    Beautifuly made and designed, I love the color, very natural and appeasing,
    I could have been a good helper on that; I’m proud of you, fantastic job.
    HOW long did it take your spare time to do?. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  227. DONALD BLY: why did you have to hide the kitchen from your wife?
    IF you have a too big house, just cut it and rent the other side,
    BUT you’ll need some research to do on the tenant before, because once they are in
    they demand all kinds of rights, and you become hostage . bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  228. Donald Bly says: 229

    @Bees…. I didn’t have to hide the kitchen from the wife… she has some kind of genetic GPS system that guides her away from things like, stoves, sinks, and dishwashers. I also learned all about being a hostage over 25 years ago when I discovered that combining the words “I” and “do” instantly transform one from free bird to hostage.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  229. minuteman 26 says: 230

    CHill- Ref 206- Believe Zippo is living in Bangkok. Tell Curt to give you my e-mail and I’ll forward his info. Got an e-mail form him this am ref GZM. Doesn’t care much for commies and Islamists.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  230. Patvann says: 231

    @Chill

    Strange reaction I see here…Aye and I have been in lockstep this whole time, yet it is only my posit you’ve recently come around to accepting. I would ask that you to re-evaluate his words.

    RE: Kitchen

    The kitchen was built for my brother and his wife (99.98% for the wife) for their 20th wedding anniversary. It was a hideous mess before, and I stripped it down to the wall and ceiling-studs so that I could work with a “blank slate”.

    I designed the cabinets, routered the doors, and rough-cut the panels, but it was my brother in-law (who owns the specialty-tools needed), who did the final cutting for the flush-mounted hinges, and dovetailed drawers, final-cutting and such. Then I did the assembly, staining, hanging, mounting and other work to build in the dishwasher, trash-compactor, lazy-susan shelving (on sealed bearings) and a bunch of other little touches. I added low-voltage lighting under the cabinets, installed sun-tubes, raised part of the ceiling, put in can-lights and did all the tile/granite work after replacing all the wiring, plumbing, and wallboards, which is now water/fireproof Hardiebacker, and not drywall. The sink is cast iron, and extra deep, with a built-in soap dispenser. If you’ll notice, the “island” has no visible supports. That’s because I installed pre-stressed steel rods under the granite and substructure, in the same way bridges are made strong. The flooring was straight-forward, and the final touch.

    My brother’s wife was out-of state taking care of her mother who had become very ill. Her mom recovered, but she was despondent over missing their anniversary when she left. Ray wasn’t feeling too good about his situation either, because he had been out of work for 8 months.

    My wife was the one who came up with the brilliant idea of the surprise (and much of the lay-out and material choosing). Ray was the “ultimate distractor” (and helper) during her month away, while I “went to town” with the best skills I had to offer. She had no idea what-so-ever what she was coming home to.

    It cost them nothing but beer and munchies, (he bought the fridge, though) but I was paid the most I have ever been paid for any job, at any time in my life, when she came into that kitchen and promptly collapsed in joyous tears. She is still the envy of the neighborhood 5 years later.
    :-)

    (another view)

    http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu80/Patvann/DSC00193.jpg

    @Don.
    I could turn that now-wasted space into a private “man-cave”, for ya!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  231. @Patvann:

    Very, very nice job on the kitchen Pat.

    My wife is making noises now about the kitchen being the next major project on our list….the never ending list of things that need to be done in a house from 1880.

    I plan to build the cabinets myself and I hope I can do as nice a job as you.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  232. PATVANN; wow I also like the computer in the kitchen space.your brother did a good routing job ,so all classy.
    I also love MY DREMMEL router, I made some nice things with it, LIKE a 4 pannels divider with top and bottom OAKLEAVES carved in row of different one side by side,with my router,funny ,I took the design on a pillowcase; plus I woodburn designs taken from many children’s books, like one
    is a little boy with long ears pointed riding on a owl,and things like that, and on both sides, and
    I colord each one to his diffrent color, and last, I apply varnish to it 6 coats, it took me a year,
    I was stranded in the house because my husband sikness could not be left alone 24hrs, so this peace is along with music what prevent me to loose my sanity at this time which has past,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  233. Patvann says: 234

    @Beez

    That sounds beautiful! I like how you made a very-personal touch with the artwork! Ideas can be found everywhere!

    -I hope your husband is now with good health.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  234. PATVANN thank you, but HE is where there is no more suffering, and he wanted that, but I prolong his life so he would not himself end it. . bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  235. Patvann says: 236

    @Beez

    Oh I am so sorry… :cry:

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  236. PATVANN,thoses years are far away,and I HAVE died and reborn to follow a new direction completly different
    AND beyong my wildest dreams, just beginning for me. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  237. johngalt says: 238

    @Bees

    I think that I can speak for most of us here in telling you how sorry we are for your loss. We are also very fortunate to have your voice amongst ours. Thank you.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  238. Donald Bly says: 239

    Although my wife can’t find the kitchen… I’m an avid cook and a big fan of Thai food which I have been fortunate enough to become skilled in creating. A year in Thailand and eating cowpot cooked along side the road made a believer out of me…. a heaping plate of cowpot gai all for a quarter…. you just can’t beat eats like that. And it’s fast food… most dishes done in under 15 minutes from start to finish.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  239. johngalt, thank you, I WAS relathing to past years, THE tears have dried to make room
    for a shining beautifull renewal of my life which I accept as a gift and allow things to happen and follow the road to it, like a rebirt after having to fight with living hell itself for to many years.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  240. Smorgasbord says: 241

    @ilovebeeswarzone: Your Canadian $2.00 is worth about $1.91 compared to American $2.00 right now.

    We have loonies in the USA, but they are not currency. We call them democrats. Down here a crazy person sometimes is called a loon, and a mental institution is sometimes called the loony bin. Right now I think that would be the proper name for Congress because they have more loons than sane people.

    We have tonies, but they are awards for entertainers.

    When I visit another country one souvenir I try to get is one of each of that country’s coins. My favorite is your $2.00 coin with its metal within metal design.

    The first time I was in Canada the money was confusing because you use the same terms as we do: Dollar, quarter, etc. The first time I bought something I wondered if they use American money until I got the change. I had no idea how much the change was worth and trusted the waitress to give me the right amount. A person should know the exchange rate for any country they visit. They should also try to spend all of the currency they have from that country before they leave it because the neighboring country might not accept it.

    I didn’t think about that when I came back to the USA. I was talking about the Canadian money I had and someone said they would buy it, so I sold it to him. I hadn’t started saving country’s coins at that time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  241. DONALD BLY , hi, so you are the chef of the kitchen, those thai recipys include many veretables I think and would be cook in a wock and with oil?. sound good healthy food. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  242. SMORGASBORD: hi, IT would be a pleasure to send you and I must send one
    I owe now to CHIHUAHUA, but I have no where to send it.
    IS there a box at FA that I can send to a name? I dont know. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  243. @ilovebeeswarzone:

    You really don’t owe me a thing Ms. Bees.

    Just keep participating and making yourself a part of us here and that would be way better than anything else I could ask for.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  244. AYE CHIHUAHUA: thank you,for being so gracious, I made a deal and I will owe you until I find a way to send it, So if it take longer the interest will accumulate, bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  245. CURT did someone delete the comment to SHANNON from COMMONSENSE,I receiced it in my mail
    A while ago, I went to check and it’s not at SHANNON. bye

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  246. Donald Bly says: 247

    @Bees…. One cannot cook Thai without a bottle of fish oil… It is a must… extract of anchovy.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  247. Smorgasbord says: 248

    @ilovebeeswarzone: I forgot to mention that I have been in Canada several times and have several of each of your coins. If you still want to send me some Canadian money, that is fine with me. How much are we talking about?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  248. Smorgasbord says: 249

    @ilovebeeswarzone: If you don’t have the trash automatically delete the emails, it will still be there. I keep mine for at least one year for that reason. Just put “shannon” or “commonsense” in the trash search window and it will list all emails with those names.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  249. CHill says: 250

    Patvann #231: How can I reevaluate being called a bigot based on a response that starts out with “Islam is not a religion of peace and never has been.” Do believe the content is about the revered principles on which Islam was established and can be seen in the Quran, Hadith and other documents. I have not gone back and read what I wrote specifically but the intent was to point out how difficult it is to know who is following the these tenets and who is not.

    As I recall, I used the example of what happened in Iran in the 70s with the hostage taking and thousands of foreigners kicked out. My unit flew cover for the evacuation and I personally helped hundreds of families be comfortable as they waited on flights home from Athens. The stories they told were pretty consistent in that their Iranian friends turned on them and many stated they had been faking their friendship until the right time.

    Bigotry. I would say it is more like factual data.

    The kicker in this little episode and one in which even Mr. Aye will have trouble overcoming is when I asked him if Islam has specific requirements on how Muslims should treat infidels (and Kafirs) in their holy documents. He refused to answer the question (which is undeniably yes) and changed the subject to individual believers of the faith and their relationships. All I could do at that point was shrug my shoulders and realize he was clueless about what I was writing. Even he should have realized (especially since the subject sentence started out with Islam and not Muslims) that I was writing about philosophical and political Islam. I was picking oranges way up in the orange tree while he was applying manure to the ground around the tree.

    Suggest he refrain from calling people names in knee jerk fashion based on blog posts written in response to issues which are controversial. One should not have to parse words carefully at a conservative website. Such knee jerks can be found all day among liberals. Mr Aye reminded me of my dear brother in Oklahoma who looks hard to find things I write to use against me as a weapon of name calling. He, too, is a dedicated liberal.

    Twas not a very impressive show of restraint on his part and, of course, any misunderstanding on the content was my fault since as Wordsmith found out with this posting – the written word does not portray intent as well as the spoken word.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  250. @CHill:

    I have not gone back and read what I wrote specifically but the intent was to point out how difficult it is to know who is following the these tenets and who is not.

    Therein lies the problem.

    You haven’t even refreshed your memory regarding what you’ve written yet you insist that you’re correct.

    Hint: You got off on the wrong track in your very first post and it went spiraling down from there.

    Run along now Mr. Parchment Diploma. See if you too can discover what is abundantly clear.

    PS…. That definition of bigotry that you provided fits you perfectly. If you need help with the English, just let me know.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  251. CHill says: 252

    Aye: OOOOOH, such brilliant tactics to redeem thyself. You are truly an intellect of immense proportions.

    Do the holy books of Islam dictate how believers are to treat infidels (kafir)? Now it is your turn to get the gist of the content. Funny how you still refuse to answer the simple question and realize what it was all about. Why ask such a question?

    Parchments are nice things to achieve. Maybe it is time for you to try to achieve one.

    Nice place you have here – NOT!

    You obviously have not kept up with other bloggings.

    The definition also fits someone else as well. (You probably do not understand to whom I am referring)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  252. IT”S too regrettable, that this hot subject has succeed to divide SMART COMMENTERS who stand their ground on each side, but all belong to the same party, and same ideal,
    OF restoring AMERICA which is sinking deeper into debts from bad policys,
    AND destructives AIMS as to DIVIDE and HATEFULLY use the racist card , and the bullying tactic
    to insult the people who dont accept to be governed bye such incompetance..
    THERE is so much anger in a majority of AMERICANS, who must be patient until the time come du, to vote rightfully for RESTORING AMERICA.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>