21 Feb

Will He Hold On To Power? [Reader Post]

753-image_johnmccainedrawing

John McCain will again battle to remain a US Senator.

John McCain (the man) is a patriot and an American hero. Honored and respected by many Americans for what he endured as a prisoner of war for the USA. John McCain (the politician) is a maverick and an American icon. He knows the political machine inside-out in which he has been a part of for quite some time now. He is a knowledgeable and wise man that understands the concept of “out with the old, and in with the new”. He directly introduced to America Sarah Palin and indirectly help put Barack Obama into office. He also indirectly inspired the Tea Party movement and re-energized the conservative ideology. What an interesting person he has proven to be, even today!

My question is will this November election be his last?

Art thought to ponder:

“INSPIRED to become an American president he fell short and caused a conservative movement to become inspired!”
–Carlos Pijeira

Here is the artwork drawing that I did Ronald Reagan on Flickr. Enjoy!

       submit to reddit
This entry was posted in John McCain. Bookmark the permalink. Sunday, February 21st, 2010 at 2:00 pm
| 590 views

77 Responses to Will He Hold On To Power? [Reader Post]

  1. TexasFred says: 1

    John McCain IS the definition of RINO…

    I don’t know where you come from Carlos, but you lost ME right after the part about McCain’s military service, that was all I could think of to NOT criticize this poser for…

    My question is will this November election be his last? I certainly hope so…

    Pasture… McCain
    McCain… Pasture

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Rodney Graves says: 2

    I thank John S. McCain for his service and wish him the very best in his retirement from public life.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. SJ Reidhead says: 3

    This is disgusting.

    First, no one in their right mind would vote for J. D. Hayworth. The man is tainted, while probably not corrupt, has had is big toe in the dirty water with Abramoff to the point where he could not even be re-elected in his own Congressional district. Now, the conservative tea partying kool aid drinkers think Hayworth can carry the state? Someone needs to have their head examined.

    Something very nasty is going on in the far right conservative world that is infecting even those who can think straight. A loss for McCain is the loss of a Senate seat. I am more interested in defeating Obama and preserving what we have left of this country. I could care less about conservative “purity” which is nothing but a rank repudiation of everything Reagan ever believed in.

    If that makes me a RINO then so be it. I cannot fathom the irrational mind-set of people who are interested only in purity and libertarian, Glenn Beck inspired ideals.

    God help us all!

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. @TexasFred: I’m no big fan of McCain and have criticized his less than conservative positions to his face and at length.

    But I’m willing to cut him some slack. Lately he’s been a very strong and effective leader in opposition to Obama’s wrongheaded fiscal and national security policies.

    Would I be upset if J.D. Hayworth beats him in the primary? No. Every Senator deserves to have a strong primary fight every so often and McCain more than most.

    I also won’t be too upset if McCain wins the primary and goes on to be re-elected.

    And anyone who wants to call me a RINO better be loaded for bear because I am.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Serfer62 says: 5

    McNasty wasted his hero status decades ago. However he did
    1) stop President Bushe’s tax cut from being made perment.
    2) conspired with Finemen to limit Free Speech
    3) denied score of conservative candidates from becomes judges
    4) sank any hopes of drilling for our own oil in the US using the Gang of 14.
    5) attacked the GOP more venomently then the opposition in his POTUS run.
    .
    This man is not moraly fit ie his first wife, to be in the senate and NO opponent
    can be worse.
    One big benefit if he loses maybe he will tumble other rinos…such as Hatch

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Sam says: 6

    McCain is not my favorite but I do not think JD can win in the general.
    There is a very attractive veteran in Tucson the Ds will run against JD. McCain is not perfect but he would win in the general hands down.
    This is a vendetta for JD, there are plenty of Ds in Az he could have run against.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Dan Collins says: 7

    Forrest Mump.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Fantom says: 8

    To paraphrase Patton

    ““I would rather have a Democrat in front of me than McCain having my back.”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Rodney Graves says: 9

    Fantom @ 8

    Ayup.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. thebronze says: 10

    My question is will this November election be his last?

    I hope so.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. One thing is certain,this J.D. character ain’t no Marco Rubio,who I expect can far outshine Sarah by 2012.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. desertdweller says: 12

    JD Hayworth will be a great Senator for the State of Arizona! His positions on immigration, fiscal responsibility, radical Islam and federal government size are right on target.

    It was a disgrace to have my HR district go to Harry Mitchell. The true definition of a bought out democrat politician.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Pat says: 13

    Yes, time for Maverick to mosey out to pasture.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Iconoclast says: 14

    With his voting record over the past generation, somehow I can’t see how a McAmnesty win much serves anyone in the GOP, to say nothing of conservatives. Don’t forget, this is the guy who was in negotiations with the dimocraps to bolt the Republican party in 2001, only to lose the brass ring of posh committee assignments to jumpin’ jim jeffords. Don’t forget, this is the “Republican” Senator who votes with the lefties at least half the time.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. skat says: 15

    Iconoclast,
    How often do you think the Democrat would vote with the Democrats?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  16. Rodney Graves says: 16

    skat @ 15, Inconclast @ 14

    That’s a problem for the Democratic whip. As far as the Republican’s go, McCain needs to.

    Thank you for your service, John S. McCain, and enjoy your retirement from public life.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. mlajoie2 says: 17

    You got to take your help when and where you can get it! I know McCain has fallen short on several issues; ideally we shouldn’t have to work with someone like him when he has such obvious blind spots. But he has shown some true testicular fortitude at certain key times on certain patriotic necessities, especially lately. By the same logic, we should not have supported Scott Brown – and we would have lost a priceless opportunity. For one thing, any man who has been 100% pro-life, at some times when it was very hard to be so, has earned my respect as a man of conscience and someone you can work with. My assessment last year was that he was an old school man of character, at least, and filled with patriotic impulses unlike the One we ended up with! Go ahead and point out where he’s gone wrong loudly; heckle him if you want, but don’t hand the Democrats a free seat!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. Rodney Graves says: 18

    Influential and consistently un-reliable is as good as in the enemy camp.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  19. @Rodney Graves: He’s not consistently un-reliable. In fact, all this year he’s been VERY reliable.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  20. Athos says: 20

    John McShamnesty epitomizes what’s been wrong with the clueless, spineless Republicans over the past 10 years. If Obama had been a Republican (hard to imagine) and McCain had been the Democrat (not a stretch), Obama would have STILL won!

    McShamnesty is dependable given he will always sell out conservative values. He’ll bluster with righteous indignation over our soldiers, than vote to give away our freedoms over some DC knows best entitlement.

    JD, just keep reminding folks that Johnny Mac suspended his campaign last fall to go “fix the economy”. $850 billion later, he gave us TARP.

    Let Goldman Sachs give him a job next December. They owe the man.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  21. Wordsmith says: 21

    I don’t enjoy defending McCain, but seriously, folks? Apparently McCain Derangement Syndrome is a real affliction.

    @Serfer62 #5:

    1) stop President Bushe’s tax cut from being made perment.

    Something worth considering:

    This is one of those issues where the whole story and context is important. From Kevin Stach of the Wall Street Journal:

    In 2001, with the bitter primary battle still fresh, Mr. McCain voted against the final Bush tax-cut package. Why would he deviate from a pro-growth, tax-cutting position, built up over 17 years in Congress and dozens of votes, even after running on a tax-cut plan himself in 2000?Mr. McCain’s protest that he wanted spending cuts to accompany the Bush tax cuts has persuaded few conservatives. But what is not remembered is that, two weeks earlier, Mr. McCain voted to approve the final version of the Budget Resolution — the blueprint used by congressional committees for spending and tax bills — which included $1.35 trillion in tax cuts (the Bush proposal) coupled with a $661 billion cap on discretionary spending. When the promised spending cap never materialized, Mr. McCain denounced the wasteful earmarks and pork-barrel spending that he felt jeopardized the budget, and lodged the now famous protest vote against the tax cuts.

    To not recognize the reason why, is to distort his record when it comes to tax cuts. In his 25 years serving in the Senate, he has never voted for a tax increase. And he has pledged to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. Nothing in his record should indicate he is untrustworthy on this.

    2) conspired with Finemen to limit Free Speech

    Medved:

    McCain-Feingold was a piece of useless, misguided legislation but it’s done no serious damage to the country, the constitution or the conservative pro-life cause. After nearly seven years on the books, robust and impassioned discussion of political issues and candidates is more vibrant and free-wheeling than ever. The pro-life movement (with McCain’s enthusiastic support) has made substantial progress in the last seven years, changing minds and hearts and driving abortion rates to their lowest point in 29 years—unimpeded by McCain-Feingold. More people are involved in donating to candidates and causes than before the legislation, and there’s been an increase in the broadcast of campaign ads and distribution of political materials, not a reduction. Does any American – particularly those in key primary states – honestly believe we now have a shortage of political ads on TV? Those who say that McCain-Feingold took away free speech make no more sense than leftists who claim that the Patriot Act destroyed civil liberties or crushed dissent: their arguments remain utterly disconnected from the real world experience of every American. Hard-hitting, free wheeling debate is alive and well in the land of the free. McCain favored counterweights to lobbyist influence and the corrupting impact of money in politics because he saw that commercial involvement as a powerful force toward corporate welfare and government expansion—betraying the small government ideals he has always embraced.

    Furthermore, for someone who is supposedly responsible for a vast assault on our free speech, McCain introduced the “Broadcaster Freedom Act”, as a valiant effort to protect talk radio- the medium that has been mercilessly unrelenting in their witch-hunt-styled hysteria to disown him as a true consevative- from Democratic Party attempts to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.

    3) denied score of conservative candidates from becomes judges

    Senator McCain has supported every conservative judge who has ever come up for nomination, including in the lower courts. And he strongly supported voting to have Alito confirmed. What about the “Gang of 14″?

    John McCain organized “The Gang of Fourteen” to win- not to block -the Confirmation of Conservative Judges, and his efforts succeeded in the Senate.

    This group of seven Republicans and Seven Democrats (representing a full 14% of the US Senate, obviously) ultimately broke the logjam that had delayed confirmation of some of the most conservative nominees of President Bush. Because of McCain’s leadership, Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito won Supreme Court confirmation without filibuster from the Democrats. He also secured the previously blocked confirmations of Appellate Judges William Pryor, Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla Owen, and Brett Kavanaugh, previously filibustered by Democrats. At the same time, McCain and his “gang” managed to protect the right to filibuster – an important tool with obvious value now that Republicans find themselves in the minority. McCain has never opposed a Republican nominee for the Supreme Court; unlike some of his prominent fellow Republicans, he actively supported the nomination of Judge Robert Bork. His disagreement with Senate Republican leader Bill Frist on the “Gang of Fourteen” issues involved questions of tactics, not the goal of securing a judiciary that honors the principles of strict construction.

    5) attacked the GOP more venomently then the opposition in his POTUS run.

    Please be specific: How did he attack the GOP “more venemously/vehemently” than the opposition in 2008?

    @Iconoclast #14:

    Don’t forget, this is the guy who was in negotiations with the dimocraps to bolt the Republican party in 2001,

    .

    Only because you probably want to believe the worst about him. Truth is: He didn’t bolt from the Republican party now, did he?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  22. Mr. Irons says: 22

    I, for one, do not support nor love McCain’s political policies towards Boeing Aircraft. His assaults on Boeing in the past over various issues, most recent being the Air Force Tanker contract, have cost Kansas and Washington state critical industry to sustain the local economies of both States. I am sickened by this man for being bribed by AirBus to charter and promote that piece of worthless hunk of metal for an airplane maker within our borders while local businesses are treated like urchins. This man does not earn my respect, no matter how much he’s seen, “the conservative” light of things now. He’ll give lip service to only sweeten the ears of would be voters and businessmen, and should be viewed onto with caution.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  23. Iconoclast says: 23

    @ Wordsmith # 21

    With respect, sir, your linked reference is to an event which occurred nearly four years after that which I addressed. The clinton “endorsement” was a statement about her personally, blurted in response to an unanticipated inquiry, not one of principle or policy.

    During the 2000 NH Primary, the Senator was my preferred candidate and, to my shame, garnered my vote . . . by, literally, lying to my face (although I don’t recall if he exposed his disingenuity a few months further in the primary process or it was later). So, originally, at least, I had a very high opionion of him, ‘K?

    You are correct, “he didn’t bolt.” But *ONLY* because jeffords beat him to it . . . *NOT* because of principle. He may in fact be true to his principles; I don’t know. What I *do* know is that his overall record is one of voting with the dimocraps roughly as often with his own party – and frequently on the wrong side of issues which are of concern to me.

    I don’t trust him – for cause – and believe a large part of the problem we have in this nation is because of this sort of “Republican” dimocrap lite which so readily yields to / collaborates with the left. Could the people of AZ do worse? Absolutely – see, e.g., janet napolitano. But that doesn’t mean Hayworth might not be better or that Mr. “hands across the aisle” will do all that much to mitigate the disaster of liberalism.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. Inge says: 24

    In my heart I believe that McCain did his best to lose the election, going so far as to support attacks on Obama’s integrity, which turned out to be disastrous.
    He also allowed his campaign staff to trash Palin after the election for whatever reason, and did nothing to stop the slander.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  25. OLDPUPPYMAX says: 25

    John McCain has a deep, abiding contempt for the United States–the Nation which he holds responsible for his years of torture in Hanoi. In his perpetual attempt to “get even” with a country and people by whom he was “betrayed”, he has cheerfully led the way in undermining the Constitution and the individual rights and liberty of American citizens. Whether by the creation of 40 million “illegal” citizens, trampling on the Constitution via McCain/Feingold or helping to put a Marxist, America hating, traitor in the White House, McCain has not missed a beat in his arrogant, self-serving drive to fulfill a “you’ll be sorry” pledge made during his captivity. I genuinely believe this to be the case. McCain is a danger to this nation…virtually in the league of Obama and friends.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  26. Sam says: 26

    “while there are plenty of bad Republicans, there are no good Democrats”

    Ann Coulter

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  27. Sam,

    I find I must beg to differ both with you, and with Miss Coulter.

    Ted Kennedy and John Murtha are both good Democrats.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  28. Adirondack Patriot says: 28

    While I would follow LCDR John McCain into harm’s way, I have no use for Sen. John McCain.

    Putting aside all of his lawless and unconstitutional positions on illegal aliens and campaign finance, I will never forgive him for running one of the worst Presidential campaigns in history.

    Really. Can anyone tell me what he stood for? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler?

    He didn’t learn from John Kerry that being a veteran and campaigning with your wife will get you through the primaries, but you must offer more in the General Election for the people to elect you to the most powerful elective office on the planet.

    He stands for nothing and he has no vision. That’s why in a mere four months, Sarah Palin stood out like a beacon in his foggy, lackluster campaign.

    He’s a maverick, but only against conservatives. He is never a “maverick” against liberals or the anti-American media. Maverick? Not so much.

    Good bye, John McCain. You took our support and squandered it for some non-existent, illusory concept of non-partisanship. Thanks to you, we now have President Obama.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  29. pat says: 29

    McCain derangement is alive and spreading. Too bad, he isn’t perfect. I live in AZ and I’m with all the ones who say JD will not prevail against a good Dem, McCain is a better chance. Arizona is no longer the bastion of hard-core Republicanism it once was. There are many Hispanics and they know JD has kissed up to Indians while saying throw the Mexicans out–they may remember that.

    Mac is an opportunist and a realist and consequently has talked to Dems. Oh the horror. I don’t believe at all that he is trying to destroy the country, though. You’re confused with Obama. JD was abrasive as a rep and never saw a piece of pork he didn’t like; McCain at least can be bullied into shame about the many, many times he’s complained about earmarks. I’m an independent so I can’t vote in the primary, but it wouldn’t be for JD. He should stay on the air and whip up conservative sentiment.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  30. skat says: 30

    Rodney Graves @16
    No, an Arizona Democrat Senator will be OUR problem! Any Democrat will be to the left of McCain on every issue, will vote with the Democrats on every issue and we will be left with less power and influence than we have now.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  31. skat @ 30,

    Better get yourself busy for McCain then. I already sent my contribution to JD.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  32. skat says: 32

    Inge@24
    Absolutlely, John McCain wanted to lose his bid for the presidency! McCain knew that if he let Obama win, John could win in 4 years, possibly setting himself up as president for life! Sarah Palin was in on the nefarious plot – promised a gig at Fox until she and McCain can take over as rulers.

    One problem, you guys can’t make up your minds if McCain helped Obama by being too easy on him or by being too hard on him.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  33. skat says: 33

    Rodney Graves@31,
    You might as well send it to Rodney Glassman, the Democrat candidate.

    Anyone notice that John Shadegg, Jeff Flake, and Trent Franks, all of whom are real conservatives and have worked with JD in the House, endorsed John McCain? Doesn’t that raise any flags for you? Please, please don’t even say they are RINOS or sell-outs!

    Sheriff Joe’s endorsement of JD doesn’t mean much. I agree with Sheriff Joe on his positions, but he endorsed Janet Napalitano over Matt Salmon for Arizona governor. His endorsement put Napalitano over the top. Why did he do that? Aripiao wanted to be the Republican gubernatorial candidate, plain and simple. Janet’s governorship didn’t work out too well for the sheriff.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  34. skat,

    Don’t much care about mutual backscratching. Don’t matter to me that Sarah Palin has repaid her debt by endorsing and campaigning for McCain.

    I thank John S. McCain for his service, and wish him well in retirement from public life.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  35. Athos says: 35

    On Drudge, McCain admits to being “misled” about the Tarp bailout. Really, John? It took you 15 months to figure that out all by yourself, did it?

    I’m sorry. 24 years is more than enough for this man to be Senator. What is it with these people that they continue on, for ever? Is Robert Byrd running again? Is he even got a pulse? It would be different if they brought sound judgment to the chamber. But this “I was misled” mea culpa? Shouldn’t there be some sort of shame, and admittance that he should go quietly into the night?

    What do you hope to accomplish with 6 more years, Juan McShamnisty?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  36. Athos,

    Indeed. If a 24 year veteran of the Senate is that easily misled, then he lacks the judgment to continue to serve. If he’s lying for political expediency, then he’s unworthy.

    Choose one and ride it, John, though I do thank you for your service and wish you the very best in your retirement from public life.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  37. skat says: 37

    Rodney Graves@34,
    Yes, I’m sure it all boils down to back scratching. Shadegg, Flake, Franks, Palin would never make a decision based on integrity or personal convictions. They want the worst candidate and senator, because they don’t care anything about America or Arizona. It’s all about who can do the most for them. Wow

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  38. DaveP. says: 38

    Yeah, because we need more of that leadership that John McCain showed in gifting America with the Amnesty bill, filibusters on judicial appointments, TARP, McCain-Feingold (AKA the George Soros Enabling Act), and his 2008 Presidential campaign: you know, the one where he showed that toal amateur Socialist from Chicago what was what.

    He’s done enough damage to America for one career. Time to go home, John,

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  39. skat,

    I thank John S. McCain for his service and wish him well in his retirement from public life.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  40. JustAl says: 40

    “Will He Hold On To Power? ”

    Nope. It isn’t his to hold onto. He didn’t even bother to run to the right in ’08, the only reason he’s doing it now is the tea party movement. For a party that has the elephant as a mascot some have a very short memory.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  41. Tom N says: 41

    I believe McCain will win and he is the best candidate to help defeat the libs.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  42. Rodney Graves says: 42

    Tom N @ 41,

    You may be right. Then again…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  43. TexasFred says: 43

    Come election time, McCain comes home and talks like a Conservative, then he goes back to Washington and votes like a liberal.

    @SJ Reidhead You may be a lot of things, I thought a Conservative HATER was more of a proper definition?? Should I break out that post from a while back?? The one you deleted after the TRUTH about you came out? The one that exposed your anti-Conservative views??

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  44. TexasFred says: 44

    Oh what the heck, everyone needs to share in this lunacy… Keep in mind, SJ Reidhead deleted the post a few weeks after she made it because she was taking MASSIVE heat from any and everyone that read this.. Enjoy:

    I HATE Conservatives – A Moonbat Exposed

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  45. Wow.

    More like PinkoFlamingo…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  46. SJ Reidhead says: 46

    That’s it.

    Dear Texas Fred:

    STOP LYING ABOUT ME.

    I did not delete any post. I do not delete posts. You do need to get a life, that post was so long ago. I don’t even remember when I wrote it. I think it was on the old blog. If so, it’s still there. I do not delete posts. I stand by my work.

    STOP LYING ABOUT ME.

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  47. PinkoFlamingo,

    Bad week to stop huffing?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  48. TexasFred says: 48

    OK Cindy, I guess that post not popping up is a code error… LMAO…

    And I know, when you rant that much it’s tough to remember, but I didn’t lie, and the words, direct quotes from your OLD blog, are there for ALL to see…

    The TRUTH hurts huh?? :P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  49. jackson51 says: 49

    @Sam: I saw Ann say this. She wants it on her tombstone.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  50. jackson51 says: 50

    I am so sick of McCain. Have been for years. It is way beyond time for him to go. I think November will be his last.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  51. TexasFred says: 51

    SJ Reidhead, the post did open, must have been a code error on MY part, nice re-write too… That’s only a partial of what WAS there… But that’s OK, it’s YOUR delusion and you HAVE been exposed!

    Again… :P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  52. TexasFred says: 52

    OK, I was wrong, SJ Reidhead did NOT delete the post nor edit it that I can find, it was taking that POS blog so long to load it was timing out, so, that’s GREAT, the original words ARE there, for all to see…

    Pinko Flamingo indeed… :P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  53. @TexasFred:

    @Rodney G. Graves:

    Yeah, the Pink Flamingo lady is more like a loon.

    I actually got her to admit in comment #3 here that the things she posts on her blog are based on her opinions, not on facts.

    This thread was interesting as well.

    It’s sad that she’s part of our group, but I guess every tent needs a freak show.

    PS…I have screen shots of other “interesting” threads and comments from her site as well like this one where she lied about Robert Stacy McCain. Even when the truth was repeatedly pointed out to her she refused to retract or correct it stating cryptically… “I have the links” but refusing to share them.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  54. TexasFred says: 54

    Aye Chihuahua: Yeah, the Pink Flamingo lady is more like a loon.

    LMAO… Seriously, LMAO… :P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  55. CARLO such talent in you the shades the eye brow all so perfect thank you.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  56. SJ Reidhead says: 56

    I do not mind you making fun of me. BUT – you are lying about my posts, and what I write.

    cease and desist

    I base my work on FACT.

    DO NOT LIE OR SLANDER MY GOOD NAME

    Do not lie about my work.

    I do not mind your opinion, but do not slander my good name or my work.

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    P. S. Just for Texas Fred: I’ve posted the offending article at The Pink Flamingo. http://www.thepinkflamingoblog.com/?p=12340

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  57. TexasFred says: 57

    Cease and desist or what?

    You gonna sue the internet? The proof is posted, you’re nutty as a fruitcake… If that hurts, seek help, soon…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  58. @SJ Reidhead:

    Who is lying about your posts and what you write?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  59. SJ Reidhead says: 59

    Aye;

    You LIED about me.

    As a writer I MUST be careful about how I document my work. The field in which I work and specialize in requires documentation. I am extremely careful because I my reputation is only as good as my documentation.

    Yes, I write my opinion, but I also document what I write.

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  60. Aye;

    You LIED about me.

    Oh goody.

    Ms. FeatherHead, teh loon of the Interwebz thinks I lied about something.

    Really? Where, precisely?

    Show me.

    Be careful though. Be sure that you can prove that I “LIED” because that is what you’re claiming.

    Your claim. Your onus.

    And remember…I have your words documented.

    Of course you can feel free to retract your accusation in the absence of the necessary proof.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  61. SJ Reidhead says: 61

    Aye;

    You are truly amazing.

    I stand by my work.

    Are you still in a snit because I said something you did not like about R. S. McCain? Golly, get a life. The man was profiled by the SPLC. Yes, I know in the strange see no evil world of the the brain dead far right the SPLC is the ultimate evil, but sorry, the documentation is there.

    Yikes!

    Please, go ahead and say all the nasty stuff you want to say. I really don’t have time to play your little mind games.

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  62. Rodney Graves says: 62

    Aye @ 60,

    You forgot to demand the apology that goes along with being unable to prove such a scurrilous accusation.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  63. Iconoclast says: 63

    After reading the original material, it’s clear the author is, excuse the redundancy, a liberal loon. Not only is the content the usual gibbering babble of that species, she seems unacquainted with spell checking technology and the sort of advanced English grammar found in the typical G.E.D. curriculum. I suppose she might seem better for a while if she took heed of “the one’s” example and relied on a teleprompter to mask the core incompetence.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  64. @SJ Reidhead:

    I’m still waiting on you to show me specifically where I “LIED” about you.

    In all the drivel you posted in number 61 above you failed to provide that information.

    So, where is it?

    Where’s your proof? Your evidence? Your documentation?

    If indeed, I am guilty of that which you accuse me of, you could certainly prove it. Right?

    Right?

    Face it Ms. FeatherHead. You’re a lying liar and you’ve been called out over and over and over again about it with documented proof. Proof, I remind you again, that I screen captured and stored away for an occasion such as today.

    Now you’ve waddled yourself into my domain to accuse me of being a liar when you have no proof whatsoever to support your accusation because, after all is said and done, that accusation is nothing more than yet another falsehood that you are attempting to perpetuate.

    You see, you’re at a distinct disadvantage here.

    The readers of this site know nothing about you outside of the few words you’ve written here and those that you’ve spattered about at your poorly written, lightly trafficked, barely readable site.

    On the other hand, the readers here know me. They know my integrity. They know my dogged and relentless and unapologetic pursuit of the truth.

    They know that I don’t walk myself out onto a limb unless I have the documentation to prove my contentions.

    You said:

    Aye;

    You LIED about me.

    Again I’ll ask you:

    Where’s your proof? Your evidence? Your documentation?

    Of course I don’t really expect an answer…but by failing to respond and by not attempting to prove your contention you’ve shown all of us that your words are nothing more than guano.

    Exit question:

    When did lying and perpetuating myths about others become a “conservative value”?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  65. SallyVee says: 65

    Carlos, your drawing of John McCain is wonderful. And I just looked at some of your others. Your subjects’ eyes are simply stunning… you actually capture the character of each person and make him/her come alive. Your drawing of GWB is deeply moving. Even tho I am not a fan of Obama’s, your dwg of him is also stunning. Except I want to say you’ve put more empathy into his eyes than I’ve ever seen. But I am admittedly biased.

    Who are all the strange people in here who are obsessed with McCain bashing? I don’t understand that. It’s why I no longer listen to Rush Limbaugh or Hannity or most of the rest of the talkers. I am very proud of my vote for McCain and I happy I got to meet him and Cindy and shake John’s hand in Feb. 08. I do not understand the so-called conservatives who spend so much time going after officials with whom they agree probably 80-90% of the time. Yet these same people will be the first to tell us the Obama administration is the END OF THE WORLD. If they really believed that, they wouldn’t waste a second agitating within the Right spectrum. That’s why I think people like this are probably really Lefties, maybe even paid to do this kind of nonsense.

    Anyway, Carlos. I very much appreciate your kind words about Sen. McCain, and your exceptionally warm and skilled pencil work.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  66. SJ Reidhead says: 66

    Aye;

    I am still trying to figure out what the little bee in your bonnet is, not that I really care.

    There is a difference between “TRUTH” and “FACT” that can be documented. I like to use documented facts. If you are still in a guy crush thing over R. S. McCain because I referred to his nasty little associations, then deal with it. He has them. http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/01/17/the-house-cleaning-continues-at-the-washington-times/

    “…time assistant national editor Robert Stacy McCain resigned from The Washington Times. McCain was particularly close to managing editor Fran Coombs, who had assigned him to write the paper’s “Culture, Et Cetera” section.

    McCain, who was once a member of the neo-Confederate hate group League of the South, often filled these briefs with items from hate sites. A foe of interracial marriage, McCain regularly quoted neo-Confederate activists favorably in his stories. In 2005, stories freelanced by McCain to the website of the conservative newspaper Human Events were scrubbed after that publication’s editor, Thomas Winter, was given information by the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report about McCain’s racism.

    This Tuesday, Hatewatch contacted McCain for comment about the managerial changes at the Times. McCain, who then seemed upbeat, told Hatewatch that he felt that newly named executive editor John Solomon was a “stand-up guy.” McCain added, “Of course, the newsroom was shocked by the back-to-back announcements that both Wes Pruden and Fran Coombs were leaving,” and called both men “excellent newspapermen.” He especially praised Coombs — who has his own history of ties to white supremacy — for being “the cog that turned the wheel, the straw that stirred the drink” at the Times….”

    I guess this is what you are trying to find.

    SJR
    The Pink Flamingo

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  67. TexasFred says: 67

    Well, I went and read the comment at The Pinko Flamingo, and it looks to me like the Pinko loon said, “I really am tired of you questioning me about the way I am looking at things. I don’t think I’ve stated that I am presenting absolute facts, but my opinion. There’s a difference.”

    Now that is a direct copy and paste from The Pinko Flamingo Blog…

    But, I’m sure that we’re taking it out of context, not reading it properly or just made it fit OUR own devices…

    SJ Reidhead has been telling people for a long while now that I too lied on her and misquoted her, even though I used copy and paste of her exact words.

    SJ Reidhead has been had, and I’m sorry for stirring a firestorm but you folks just had to see this past screed from the truly delusional wannabe blogger known as The Pink Flamingo…

    Cease and desist… I am still LMAO over that one… Kind of like a 5 year old that can’t get their way, “You better stop it or I’m gonna tell on you… ”

    Thanks for the laughs Cindy, I had forgotten just how far out in Looneyville you really were… :P

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  68. @SJ Reidhead:

    Do try and remain focused.

    Here, again, is what you said:

    Aye;

    You LIED about me.

    I’ll ask again, like I’ve asked multiple times already:

    Where’s your proof? Your evidence? Your documentation?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  69. @TexasFred:

    Yep. That’s right Fred.

    That’s exactly what she said:




    View at EasyCaptures.com

    Sheer loonacy.

    That’s what it is.

    Sheer loonacy.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  70. Mr. Irons says: 70

    @SallyVee #65 post.

    I do not think you can remotely understand the sheer anger the word, “McCain” brings out in the American Air Craft industry due to his massive support of AirBus and his assaults on Boeing in the past over different issues. Millions of dollars of industry has been lost to local businesses due to previous treatments of Boeing by McCain and the general fallout of such actions on private jet industries within America’s Borders such as Cessna and Hawker Beechcraft. The fallout damages to the stalling of the fueltanker deal for the Air Force has given Wichita’s unemployement numbers a running head start at expanding before the rest of the nation, while giving AirBus the ablity to move into Wichita cheaply due to building foreclosures as businesses slowly shut down due to declining purchasing power of laid off workers. And to add insult to injury, AirBus is using a dirty practice of business by either shipping in its labor force or hiring exculsively out of the Nation and shipping in most of its labor force to avoid the wages Boeing paid to its labor force before lay off.

    Ontop of this, he was one of the few Republicans to support the Democrat assault on Private aircraft usage by businesses during the fleeting days of the automakers flew in to Captial Hill to ask for a bailout. The damages onto the Aircraft Industry from this attack has left well 7,000 employees of Cessna unemployed within Wichita, me being one of them. When sales for Cessna and Beechcraft sharply dropped, parts vendors and tool suppliers soon found themselves out of a job which easily makes that number 12,000 or more. Stores that served these labor groups suddenly dried up also had to close due to lack of customers. It’s a domino effect that McCain’s political policies have helped generate, and for that I do not remotely support him. Infact I do think he’s on the blacklist for certain businesses here… a few private jet ones.

    I am not a Union loving person. I’m just trying to find a job in this labor dessert. I fear to see what it’s like for Boeing in Washington state for the Aircraft industry.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  71. @Mr. Irons:

    You should be aware that Sally Vee is one of Ms. FeatherHead’s very few comment contributors over at the bird cage.

    Notice how Sally Vee appeared here within mere moments of teh Interwebz loon getting her feathers plucked on this thread?

    The post you are responding to is the first and only time that Sally Vee has posted here.

    Strange isn’t it?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  72. Mr. Irons says: 72

    Strange indeed, and I cast doubt on such people calling themselves “conservative”, as they don’t yield (to what I deem to be) conservative values. It is rather odd that such “conservatives” are those used as examples by the Chris Matthews and the likes in their talking points…

    My gut feeling tells me that people like Matthews forge themselves such blog entries when not behind the camera to make a case of their talking points. It’s rather easy to do a, “friend of a friend of a friend of mine” said so case with blog entries in terms of passing off such sources as fact. But I’m just now rambling.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  73. CP says: 73

    @SallyVee

    Thank you very much for your kind words, Sally. And thank you for taking the time to look at my other artwork pieces.

    Flopping Aces has provided me with a wonderful opportunity for me to share my work with America and the rest of the world. I can only hope for more creative exposure in the near future!

    CP

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  74. SallyVee says: 74

    Good Lord, Chihuahua… living up to your identity of the yipping heel nipper. Go fetch or something will you.

    Mr. Irons, I find your story deeply distressing and cannot express sufficient empathy. I do not take a position because I’m not informed enough to dispute anything you say on the personal level. I recall a couple years ago reading a long and surprising piece on the Boeing-Airbus conflict – some might say conflagration. My impression then was that very smart & good people on both sides of the issue had persuasive but polar opposite ideas and views. Leaving me very much unsettled and out of my depth. Knowing your situation renews my interest. Do you think it’s fair to say that your industry was headed for tumult due to a variety of factors and shifting trends, other than political meddling?

    I do wish you all good fortune and opportunity. Have you looked at the rather robust aviation activity in Charlotte, NC which I’m told is a delightful place to live.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  75. @SallyVee:

    Good Lord, Chihuahua… living up to your identity of the yipping heel nipper. Go fetch or something will you.

    Oh! Looky, looky.

    Ms. FeatherHead’s cage mate has shown up full of fluff, bluster, and insult…but no value or substance.

    Of course I’m not surprised…birds of a feather and all that.

    Is there nothing at all in my posts you care to try and refute?

    No? I didn’t think so.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  76. Mr. Irons says: 76

    Sally, I care not for your pity nor your sheer ignorance of the matters of the Aircraft Industries. Public jet transports market globaly were in grave trouble for 2004 to 2007 fiscal years, of which is market share dominated by AirBus of which I must point out is suffering from faulty crafts. Boeing has maintained a status quo of meeting the “break even point” to maintain employement levels for the last few years to prevent the massive layoffs that have now happened by relying on private contracts and military contracts for Private Military Companies. Cessna’s sales figures for 2004 up to Janurary 1st of 2009 were rock solid and were climbing till investors and creditors of various buyers paniced that Congress would be pounding down their doors with regulations and audits after the Automobile bailout hearings. Even Bell Helicopter, a sister company of Cessna within Textron’s composite enterprise was fiscaly successful for even 2007 when the supposed “recession” started.

    If Boeing is rewarded the fueltanker deal with the Air Force, this would mean easily 50,000 jobs to be supplied to American workers in Washington, Utah, Kansas, Iowa, and a few other states that supply the raw materials and electronics used to create each tanker. McCain has made it rather clear he would rather see Airbus be rewarded with the contract and give jobs that are desperately needed for Americans to a foriegn nation of whom modern day allegiances rest on decaying ground.

    Do NOT mock me with your suggestion of AirBus hell that is N.C. It’s hardly smelling like a rose economicaly itself due to the recent failures of AirBus passenger liners in the news. As I said before, I do not need your ignorance.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  77. I’ll say one thing, Sally V really grabbed my attention with that heel biter remark!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>