@Real American Patriot:

wow are you ever deluded, go back to rehab and stop smoking crack

Like or Dislike: 0  0

MATA, HI, FROM DECEMBER 30 IN 2010, AND HE is still trying to implement change,
getting closer and more of pushing his agenda ,not waiting for THE NEW ELECTED
TO ARRIVE AND START WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA AT LAST,
IT’S LIKE A FRENZIE IN THERE PASSING THOSE LAWS TO MAKE HIM LOOK GOOD WITH
SOVIET UNION,AND THEIR NEW PARTNER CHINA,
AND THERE IS MORE UNDERNEAT THAT WE DON’T KNOW YET,
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF 2011 FOR THE NEW CONSERVATIVES TO FOCUS ON ?
SHOULD THEY TAKLE ALL FRONTS THAT SHOULD BE REPEAL? OR TAKE IT ONE FINISH IT AND GRAB THE MORE URGENT NEXT ONE ,AND FIX IT AND SO ON. BYE

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Mata

Or this one:

[Mata musing: embedded for you, Mr. Patvann]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck&feature=player_embedded

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Aye

Yeah…He needs to come back soon, because my methane-based gaseous emanations are ready for more “discussion”, and it’s starting to get uncomfortable.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Well, Aye… let’s give billy bob a reminder as to who are the parties desiring to subvert the US Constitution by implementing policies and programs well outside the fundamental powers of Congress.

Can’t say as we weren’t warned all throughout his campaign. Just so many refused to believe it, using the Alinsky target and isolate those of us who would say *listen* to what he says… *look* as his “associates”, as he has invited us to do.

However the demonstrations in the streets INRE spending and an out of control Congress reveal that more than a few are now starting to finally hear… .and believe… his promises to destroy the US’s founding principles. Better late than never.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@MataHarley:

I’m still waiting for The Smartest Guy In the Room^TM to explain to all of us mouth-breathing, bottom-dwelling dolts exactly how “we are turning in the right direction”.

Oh yeah, we’re gonna need something more than a “friend” who supposedly said that the commercial real estate has miraculously come back to life.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

George W. Bush was a failure as a president because he did not enhance the military, technological, political and economic superiority of this country. Under no rational measure are we better off now than we were eight years before he took office.

Military increased equipment and manpower after years of Clinton/GOP Congress decline. The nation’s technological advances did not slow, nor are they in the hands of the POTUS. Politically I agree we aren’t better off because we now have “let’s remake America into a Euro-socialist country” Obama. The economic superiority of numbers and stats under Bush… including Bush budget increases which, under Obama in just 11 months, can be considered modest… are far superior to what the Dems have done in Congress since 2007 to date. Remember it’s Congress who holds the purse strings. And the largest deficit drive up came at their hands.

As far as national security… we are far safer than we were on 912. Whether that remains to be seen with importing enemy combatants to US soil and giving them Constitutional rights is anyone’s guess. Frankly, it looks to me to convolute prosecution of war on the battlefield, and opens up mirandizing those detained… as well as risking valuable intel demanded by the bench during a trial.

Obama is going an entirely different route in his quest to enhance the military, technological, political and economic superiority of this country. We will know in four years whether his approach has succeeded.

Actually, we’ll know in July 2011… well before “da won’s” term’ination. As far as “enhancing”? Exactly what has Obama done to “enhance” any of the four categories mentioned? another day older and deeper in debt economy – political policies on energy and healthcare that will bankrupt this nation for decades – and hamstringing the military. Yeah, count me impressed.

But I will agree that I don’t pay much attention to polls either. I do, however, pay attention to demonstrations in the streets over the spending frenzy.

If Obama is taking this country in a direction you do not like, you are free to move elsewhere. But the rest of us will stay, be optimistic, and continue to work to make this country the best it can be.

Considering it’s you and your ilk, as well as your POTUS, working actively to subvert the founding principles of the US Constitution, I suggest it is you who should be shown the door. “Remake” this country in Obama’s image while I draw breath? I’ll go down fighting…

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Mike

LOL!!! EXACTLY like that!

(I knew you wouldn’t let me down!)

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Patvann: You mean like this?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Donald

You will increasingly find that Rob excels in the “strawman”. He argues with his own internal voices, that he attributes coming from you. Debate grade: “F”. This shows a strong pre-conceived position, unable to accept new datum.

He will also attempt to diminish your posit by “position-association”. See how Glen Beck is constantly brought to the fore, no matter the topic. Debate grade: “F”. This betrays an internal methodology, in that because HE uses populist information for his posit(s), then YOU must also be doing the same. Which means bringing up Beck, or any other highly visible person to transfer his emotional hate he has for them, onto you, regardless of the facts shown, or the source cited.

Then there is the “comparator”. The old standby, in which anything seen as “bad” in the present tense, is immediately compared to past events. or persons. Debate grade: “F”. We have witnessed this weak tact countless times.

Distributed among his scatology of debate tactics, is the ever-present name-calling. Which by itself shows weakness-of-position, but can be excused when 4th-order exasperation is attained by whomever is having to deal with his inane, fact-less, and pathetic methodology.
In this light we witness Mike’s America, and almost everyone else who’s had the misfortune of attempting a serious debate with him end up cussing him out…which he remarkably sees as a net-positive for his position. (or lack there-of, because the difference is so slight.)

All this leads on to wonder why in light of the fact that not only is he here alone, and suffering along at a 1% “correct” quotient, does he continue to come back over and over and over and…?

I suspect masochistic tendencies.

Facts, data, experience, history, quotes, research…none of this matters to him, as they can all be internally re-defined so-as to trigger the external “hate-strength”, that substitutes for the lack of an internal “love-strength”. Many Progressive suffer this malady.

I recommend ridicule. One need not even feel bad about doing so, as he will actually feel better (and more loved) when you do.

You may now fart in his general direction.

Like or Dislike: 0  0