5 Dec

Gropenhagen: Hookers Offer Freebies for Climate Conference Delegates!

[DELETED BY AUTHOR]

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Saturday, December 5th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
| 111 views

15 Responses to Gropenhagen: Hookers Offer Freebies for Climate Conference Delegates!

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Gropenhagen: Hookers Offer Freebies for Climate Conference Delegates! -- Topsy.com

  2. Skookum says: 1

    About a year ago, I called the Obama followers Lemmings in the threads of American Thinker, I can’t be sure, but I think I coined the term for Obamaites; now it appears he thinks we are all mindless followers of his nonsense and more than ready to jump off cliffs into the sea. This insanity has to be stopped. How long do we put up with this BS?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Pingback: Gropenhagen: Hookers Offer Freebies for Climate Conference Delegates! - Conservative Viewpoint Blog —>>—

  4. 11B40 says: 2

    Greetings:

    Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of a Ropenhagen.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Larry Sheldon says: 3

    Sez four–only see 2.

    On of those should get a knife–we don’t need that kind of talk.

    Plus–consider the implications of the succession law.

    What I came to ask is this–could it be the reason Obama is going for much shorter time is that Michelle doesn’t want to deal with him backing into a fireplug?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Rovin says: 4

    All that celebrity/big government/world socialist zeal won’t go unrewarded. Danish prostitutes have pledged to provide free services to attendees at the Copenhagen conference. The hookers are doing it to protest a Danish government warning not to enlist the girl’s services even though prostitution is legal in Denmark.

    Can the “naked truth” finally be told here? What irony that “the prostitutes” will be the attendees who plan on raping society for their services , (providing bogus data).

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. KingShamus says: 5

    “Save the icebergs, ride a prostitute, screw everyone else.”

    I say one thing about the warmists, they sure do have this self-serving philosophy thing down pat.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Steve In Tulsa says: 6

    Scientific Method

    1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.

    2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.

    3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.

    4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

    Dr Phil Jones at the CRU says they have no raw data. They don’t even know what stations were used to assemble the dataset. There is no record how the current cooked dataset was adjusted. The only thing they can give us is the final form of the dataset which, again, no longer identifies stationsand cannot be amtched to any stations. There is absolutely no way that any one could ever reproduce this study because there is no scientific method at work here. Only conspiracy and lies. This is a hoax with NO evidence at all. No tempurature record that can be tied to the real world. No evidence that CO2 will lead to catastrophic warming. No evidence that warming is harmful. Nothing!

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. eaglewingz08 says: 7

    I hope the 20,000 delegates paid up for their carbon credits for the global warming they will create by their rendezvous with these hos.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Patvann says: 8

    Notice this line?

    (snip)sensitivity to CO2 of 2.6°C/2xCO2 (mid-range case).

    The projections they use are baselined at 2 times the present CO2 concentration. Even Christy uses it. Yet even with these exaggerated numbers (an impossibility) notice how small the numbers are.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. JustAl says: 9

    Truly historic. . . not the conference, but the fact that possibly for the first time in human history. . . nookie will actually be free.

    Sounds like a good movie title, “Free Nookie!”

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. @Patvann: Thanks for pointing out that Christy bent over backwards to present a fair case.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Neo says: 11

    Yesterday we got copied on this message Schlesinger sent to New York Times science reporter Andy Revkin:

    Andy:
    Copenhagen prostitutes?
    Climate prostitutes?
    Shame on you for this gutter reportage. [Emphasis added.]
    This is the second time this week I have written you thereon, the first about giving space in your blog to the Pielkes.
    The vibe that I am getting from here, there and everywhere is that your reportage is very worrisome to most climate scientists.
    Of course, your blog is your blog.
    But, I sense that you are about to experience the ‘Big Cutoff’ from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included. [Emphasis added.]
    Copenhagen prostitutes?
    Unbelievable and unacceptable.
    What are you doing and why?
    Michael [Schlesinger of the University of Illinois]

    Any questions why the MSM has been so quiet ?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Donald Bly says: 12

    @JustAl

    There’s no such thing as free nookie. Pay me now or pay me later…. just ask Tiger.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Pingback: No matter what, Copenhagen will have a happy ending « Blog de KingShamus

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>