[DELETED BY AUTHOR]
28 Nov
Hacked Emails are the Smoking Gun Revealing the Fraud of Manmade Global Warming
This entry was posted in ClimateGate, Global Warming, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Saturday, November 28th, 2009 at 12:44 pm | 123 views
- Share:
My buddy Fred from North Carolina was up here (NY) for Thanksgiving and he told ma about a great bumper sticker. “There’s a village in Africa missing an idiot”.
The sunspot data is available going all the way back to Galileo’s time, as it was some of the first observations he did.
Now that Hadley’s FORTRAN code is public, maybe there’s a way to remove all the “tricks” and retrieve the actual CO2 and temp-data from the proxies and the measured.
Then we can super-impose them atop each other and show the world the truth even more accuratly than this one does:
(Mike, if you could do us the honor of showing this.) [Mata: done, Patvann. For full size, click on the link]
http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu80/Patvann/Global2BWarming2B2.jpg
I wonder what my Dad the programmer/astronomer is doing in the next week or so?
Pingback: Tweets that mention Hacked Emails are the Smoking Gun Revealing the Fraud of Manmade Global Warming -- Topsy.com
Pingback: Hacked Emails are the Smoking Gun Revealing the Fraud of Manmade Global Warming - Conservative Viewpoint Blog
My My… isn’t it odd that the temperature seems to be nearly a perfect track along with sunspots while CO2 just seems to be doing it’s own thing?
Why, who ever would have thought such a thing possible?
Do you suppose we should tell the Warmers about this?
Here’s some more information I left out of my post:
Bigger and stronger hurricanes?
Dr. Tim Ball on how the Warmers corrupted the peer review and publication process. Ball also describes earlier efforts by the Warmers to “get rid of the Medieval warm period.”
The Pew Poll:
“Marines have always been environmentally conscious, but now they’re starting a new program that should really make liberals happy. They’re going to be selling lifetime carbon offsets. You pay them their fee, and the Marine will then kill someone in a foreign land, effectively offsetting your entire carbon footprint.”
5
Now that is one hell of a plan.
Climategate Foretold…
“• What is the current scientific consensus on the conclusions reached by Drs. Mann, Bradley and Hughes? [Referring to the hockey stick propagated in UN IPCC 2001 by Michael Mann.]
Ans: Based on the literature we have reviewed, there is no overarching consensus on MBH98/99. As analyzed in our social network, there is a tightly knit group of individuals who passionately believe in their thesis. However, our perception is that this group has a self-reinforcing feedback mechanism and, moreover, the work has been sufficiently politicized that they can hardly reassess their public positions without losing credibility.”
AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT ON THE ‘HOCKEY STICK’ GLOBAL CLIMATE RECONSTRUCTION, also known as The Wegman report was authored by Edward J. Wegman, George Mason University, David W. Scott, Rice University, and Yasmin H. Said, The Johns Hopkins University with the contributions of John T. Rigsby, III, Naval Surface Warfare Center, and Denise M. Reeves, MITRE Corporation.
I wish someone could hack into JournoList and let the world see why the Old Media is silent on ClimateGate.
Mike, it’s most disappointing that you chose to back up you “Galileo facts” with anti-catholic disproven urban legends, especially ‘’Wikipedia, which you would never accept as reliable reference for anything you were supporting. Adding to the disappointment, is the egregious (and I certainly hope not bigoted), comparison of Galileo with the “warmers”.
Unlike Al Gore/warmers, Galileo made major scientific contributions, just a bit over zealous (the REAL reason for his arrest), in being dogmatic in his heliocentric theory before the science was there to support it. He also eventually recanted.
Here’s a good read for anyone interested in the facts: (Excerpt)
Moving on…
Really Mike, Wikipedia as a reference? Guess that’s ok when it’s the Catholic Church you are referencing. Gee, even a Google search would have educated you to the fact that an encyclical by Leo XIII was well in place before JP II RE-CONFIRMED (that’s what Popes often do in their teachings)
Here’s another good factual reference:
Bottom line, it is absurdity (or bigotry) to draw a connection to the warmers and Galileo. It’s also more than unfair to paint the “inquisitive” Catholic Church as the villain of science, when in point of fact, it was the Scientists of the Catholic Church who contributed most to the sciences, especially astronomy, and still do to this day .
Currently, the Catholic Church is HONORING and celebrating Galileo and Astronomy (fat chance of that ever happening with Al Gore). Less than a month ago, they hosted a Congress at the Vatican, (regardless of religious belief), and it was fascinating.
A Vatican sponsored exhibit is now available:
Perhaps these words combined with Pope Benedict’s recent quote to the Astoomy Vatican Congress should give us all pause:
And if that doesn’t do it for you, at least know this: (my bold emphasis)
@pdill: It should have been clear that I consider the Warmers to be the modern day equivalent of the Inquisitors.
I’m trying to stir a Catholic pot here Pdill, so you’ll have to let me know if this reference I cited from John Paul II was accurate:
The Vatican today runs one of the most advanced observatories in the world, in Arizona called VATT (Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope), and Italy which was built in 1891 by Pope Leo. They have many Jesuit Brothers working alongside secular astronomers. They are also at the forefront of meteor research, and have the worlds biggest collection of them.
One of the quandaries the Vatican had with Galileo’s theory was that if the earth wasn’t the center, then the sun couldn’t be either because of the observed motion of the stars AND the sun. At the time, it actually made more sense that the earth was stationary, rather than the sun alone.
-That, and Galileo was a bit of a self-aggrandizer, and tended to put himself “above” all other scientists and church leaders of the time, even in things not astronomical. The church undoubtedly held more power over science and thought than acceptable by todays standards, but things were what they were.
I don’t think Mike set out to diss on the Church. If he wasn’t brought up under it’s theology, tenants, and history (like we were), and in light of the given public/secular info commonly available, it isn’t shocking to me that the “popular history” is slanted by anyone.
Angelo Secchi, is known as the father (pun intended) of astrophysics. The Big Bang theory was first proposed in 1933, by Father Georges Lemaitre. The Vatican today spends over a million/year on astronomy-related projects.
Last year Father Jose Funes of the Arizona facility gave a talk to my dads astronomy club here in the SF Bay area, and will make himself available to talk to any group of 25 or more for free.
Very interesting!
The book, “History’s Greatest Lies”, authored by William Weir and published in the U.S. by Fair Winds Press in Beverly Massachusetts provides extensive, fascinating, and accurate details about Galileo’s difficulties with the Catholic Church. That account is fully three dimensional in its humanity, rather than the simplistic one dimensional fiction that Galileo was condemned by an ignorant, intolerant, and anti-science Catholic Church.
In a much too brief summary, “History’s Greatest Lies” describes the realty as: “His trial for heresy was the culmination of a campaign to discredit him that was spearheaded by his enemies and rivals – and inflamed by Galileo’s own hubris.”
Most of the information presented briefly in this book was known to me from having read the book, “The Crime of Galileo” published by the Chicago Press sometime around the 1950′s. The name and publisher of this older book is from my memory, which I hope is accurate.
Both books identify that numerous factors were at play, beyond the simple theological question of exactly what has been revealed by God about the nature of the world. Personalities, rather than facts and the truth played far too great a role in the whole proceedings.