I used to be recommended this web site via my cousin. I’m now not certain whether or not this submit is written through him as nobody else recognize such exact about my problem. You are amazing! Thank you!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Thanks kids for your participation. This one was like lifting a great weight from my heart, it is reassuring to know I am with kindred spirits and not alone with my feelings.

Thanks again, G-dspeed. Long live the Republic. Skook

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@ B-Rob

Late to this one too. I guess you’re talking about Rasul v. Bush, which was decided 6-3, not 7-2 or something. I’m not a lawyer, but I think that was a ruling saying prisoners that proclaimed their innocence couldn’t be held indefinitely. It said nothing about a right to a U.S. trial.

Regardless, you’re rant about the rights of terrorists fall short. Civil law focuses on protecting the rights of an individual against the overwhelming power of the state.

I’m pretty sure that KSM and the other terrorists weren’t read their rights. I’m pretty sure that the chain of evidence procedures weren’t followed. This is because we are at war with them, not trying to convict them on the RICO act. The only right they have is to a new rope.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Rockman, that was classic, I’m sure Will Shakespeare would have laughed his arse off, well done and so appropriate for our chief and his light in the loafers crowd. Great material, do you kow what makes sarcasm funny? When it is the truth, but then it becomes a tragedy. Keep them coming, I need humor.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@MataHarley: Thank you. B-Rod is part of the “Read them their rights on the battlefield” crowd. He is for world government when it’s convenient; imposing our constitution on people around the world to make a point yet ready to savage the constitution for its own citizens.

As a former life long democrat (yellow dog), I can only wonder how he explains this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGZFgMNM-UU.

There are actually 4 parts posted on YouTube. As a SFO (Sucker for Obama) I doubt you’ll be able to watch even one…too threatening to lose that cotton in your ears and blindfold over your eyes. If the election hadn’t been stolen, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. The videos show how the corrupt Obamacrats destroyed what was left of the Democrat party. Good viewing for anyone (you don’t have to feel any sympathies for Hillary) because they repeated these tactics in the GE and this is what they will try again. BTW, most of the people in these videos left the Democrat party in disgust, becoming New Independents. My ancestors fought along side Washington, donated their crops to save the troops from starvation. What became abundantly clear to me after the last debacle is that I will always belong to the Country Before Party crowd.

So save the champagne, B-Rod because I’m not going anywhere. It’s the traitorous goons (were you a thug for Obama?) discussed by the former Democratic women in “We Will Not Be Silenced” who belong with the Russians and your guy’s pal in Libya.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“Cry Uncle, and let slip the poodles of appeasement” is the Obama Battle-Cry.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@B-Rob:

If there is not enough evidence to convict them, then the Bush administration should not have held them in the first place.

The Bush Administration was seeking to keep them off the battlefield in a time of war; the CIA in gathering intell; the FBI, in its law-enforcement mentality, was concerned with evidence-gathering to build legal cases for prosecutions.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Bravo!!! Its long past time for Obama to start acting like a Commander instead of someone who is still on the running for the office. Someone might want to tell him he won, and Has been sworn in

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I love it when these lefties start squawking about the Geneva Conventions in relation to terrorists captured on the battlefield.

They go on and on pontificating about the “rights” that these animals supposedly have under the GCs while conveniently ignoring what the GCs have to say about those who are fighting out of uniform and/or hiding among civilian populations.

Those that fall into those groups are specifically DENIED coverage by the GCs. They are subject to immediate execution.

Too bad we didn’t have the stomach to do that.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

R-Bob… When THEY follow the “Geneva Convention” THEN they can claim rights under it…. until then, they are like the “Pirates” of old….. outside the norm of human law…. and treated as such. They were CAUGHT, they were HUNG!! End of story…. Todays “Terrorist” is equal, and deserves NO LESS…..

And you claim the “Supreme Court” says…. the same one who declared “eminent Domain” now means that the Gov can take land merely because the NEW owner will pay MORE taxes (revenue to Gov) on it?? (new London case) or the one where one of our “justices”( used loosely) claims she wants to use FOREIGN law and court decisions in HER rulings, In SPITE of this VIOLATING her own OATH of Office???? The one who doesn’t know the meaning of “shall not infringe”??? THAT court???
ETC. ETC….
You throw out the “Liberal Activist” Judges, and i’ll give them some credence…. as they stand now??? Worthless……

Like or Dislike: 0  0