[DELETED BY AUTHOR]
20 Oct
Another Mao Lover in the White House?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Tuesday, October 20th, 2009 at 1:10 pm | 23 views
- Share:
a free lunch???? you mean social security recipients and welfare recipients right??? that is the only free lunch i see. and its not really free because the american capitalist worker who pays taxes pays for their lunch!!! this guy makes me sick!
Wonder how larry will try to spin this one away.
Love these moderate picks of obama. I’d hate to see what an extremist would be (sarcasm).
I wish these leftist scumbags would just move to cuba and be done with it.
Pingback: The Snooper Report
Maybe it is part of the deal with China? If they buy our debt, we take their Maoist?
Pingback: Ironic Surrealism v3.0 ยป Video: Obama Manufacturing Czar Ron Bloom Agrees With Mao Too “Free Market Is Nonsense”
Just How Many Radicals Are There in the White House?
All of them up to and including the POTUS and his lovely wife. After all, he said in “Dreams of my Father” that he chose his friends very carefully…all radicals of one kind or another.
Matt
After you have paid into social security for 50 years you can say the tax payer is paying the tab on social security. This is an insurance plan, bub. If I could have invested in a personal account with compund interest all the money my husband and I put into this fund I would now be a millionaire. My husband died at 67 so there is all that money lost because I also worked and am collecting for my own job. Get mad at the government for spending this money and not investing it since 1975 but don’t blame the recipients who paid through the nose for this benefit. As far as medicare goes, we had no choice. It was either not be insured and lose your social security check or enroll in medicare. Congress made a law that insurance companies could not insure anyone over 65 who was eligible for medicare and that anyone eligible not enrolled in medicare would lose their ss check.
Welfare. I agree with you on that. These people did not pay a dime for this benefit but it had been expanded to the ridiculous (cradle to grave for generations). Of course, we do have to take care of the people not able to take care of themselves but that does not mean people who can but won’t work. Actually we are doing a poor job of taking care of the helpless. Witness the mentally disabled homeless on the streets who were released from institutions because of crowded conditions.
i am sorry . i should of made myself more clear. if you are a senior citizen who is eligible for ss benefits or are physical disabled or have special needs , that is obviously very valid. i am talking about the able bodied citizens and illegal immigrant who drain the ss system. i would never criticize americans who have been pouring their hard working dollars into the system throughout their entire lives! again i do apologize for my lack of clarity in my comment
C’mon, when are we gonna start seeing some quotes from non commies out of this WH?
When you say you agree to a thing in principle you mean that you have not the slightest intention of carrying it out in practice.
Otto von Bismarck
In this case, equally applicable to this WH. Totalitarianism be it left or right…
Well to quote the Beatles…
You say you want a Revolution
Well, you know, we all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know, you better free your mind instead
‘Cause if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow!
If you want money for people with minds that hate
All I can tell you is, brother, you have to wait!
New Guy, “when are we going to start hearing quotes from non-commies coming from the White House.” That statement is a lot deeper than it sounds. You put a cold chill in my back.
If they were more competent politicians and not radical Marxist wanna-be types, they would quote the founding fathers as a smoke screen, now and then.