@Ian Fitzgerald:

Also, Don’t be fooled by GB DARING THE WHITE HOUSE TO CALL and correct him. They would never do it, even if GB claimed he slept with Michelle. Regardless of how they are actually affected by GB, they will never dignify him or any other political show (on either side) by correcting facts.

ORLY?

Roll the tape:

What was your point again?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

ROFLMAO!!!!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I just read Ian’s most recent post³.

I give him a solid B+

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Can I drag this one out again:

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Go away Ian. You’re boring us to tears.
Go away Ian. You’re boring us to tears.
Go away Ian. You’re boring us to tears.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Ian Fitzgerald: Ian: I realize you think your view is so much more important than anyone else’s but did you have to say it THREE TIMES?

Typical!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Well, I must say that was an interesting thread.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Whats really interesting about all this is my persistent desire to engage this bunch. Since there was some obvious confusion over the posts of Mr. Gray, I felt i needed to respond. Since I have been ousted for my heresy, i’m writing from another address of mine.

I’m not looking to win any battles any more but a few quick comments:

First of all, I have never posted from a different name. Notice I have no problem displaying my full name because I have no intention of hiding from any of my points… also notice my spelling errors.

Second: I think what “Mr. Gray” is saying about comment #45 going under the radar, is that it was a completely ridiculous post aimed to be slanderous and irrelevant to any pre-existing discussion. Thereby, i believe his point is that you guys have no limitations in what is written here as long as it either supports your cause or trashes your opposition’s. ‘

Third. A term like 1st Amendment Genocide doesn’t make any sense. Genocide cannot relate to one entity. Second its not against the first amendment to say that the world would be better off without someone. The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech, something not allotted by our hosts. I did not say, nor do i believe that Glenn Beck doesn’t have the right to do what he does, i just think his influence is a danger.

Fourth. As far as this Obama/Bush thing of Blake’s: First of all again, I prefer to think of myself as a libertarian so I don’t trust Obama’s administration any more than I did Bush’s. I just happen to prefer the things Obama is doing to the things Bush did. I am of the belief that regardless of any perceived present value to a war in Iraq, we had legitimate reason to go in the first place and we will have spent more than 3$ Trillion dollars before we are out (Wash Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html). That compared to saving hundreds of thousands of jobs and protecting one of Americas largest industries from moving to foreign countries at a time in which America is losing its grip as the premier economic power of the world.

I’m not saying that Obama’s actions are perfect or even the direction I would go. But (from the perspective stated in the above paragraph) I would prefer what Obama has done, than what Bush has done.

And i’m not sure from what info Blake you make your comment. As far as I’m concerned Bush left office with the highest national debt of any president and America was loosing a hundred thousand jobs a month. Im really not sure what could be worse than that from a completely objective stand point. Additionally, how is it that you can blame a democratic house for the debt caused by Bush’s war?

Anyway go a head with terms like sock-puppets as you all espouse the same views.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Whats really interesting about all this is my persistent desire to engage this bunch. Since there was some obvious confusion over the posts of Mr. Gray, I felt i needed to respond.

I’m not looking to win any battles any more but a few quick comments:

First of all, I have never posted from a different name. Notice I have no problem displaying my full name because I have no intention of hiding from any of my points… also notice my spelling errors.

Second: I think what “Mr. Gray” is saying about comment #45 going under the radar, is that it was a completely ridiculous post aimed to be slanderous and irrelevant to any pre-existing discussion. Thereby, i believe his point is that you guys have no limitations in what is written here as long as it either supports your cause or trashes your opposition’s. ‘

Third. A term like 1st Amendment Genocide doesn’t make any sense. Genocide cannot relate to one entity. Second its not against the first amendment to say that the world would be better off without someone. The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech, something not allotted by our hosts. I did not say, nor do i believe that Glenn Beck doesn’t have the right to do what he does, i just think his influence is a danger.

Fourth. As far as this Obama/Bush thing of Blake’s: First of all again, I prefer to think of myself as a libertarian so I don’t trust Obama’s administration any more than I did Bush’s. I just happen to prefer the things Obama is doing to the things Bush did. I am of the belief that regardless of any perceived present value to a war in Iraq, we had legitimate reason to go in the first place and we will have spent more than 3$ Trillion dollars before we are out (Wash Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html). That compared to saving hundreds of thousands of jobs and protecting one of Americas largest industries from moving to foreign countries at a time in which America is losing its grip as the premier economic power of the world.

I’m not saying that Obama’s actions are perfect or even the direction I would go. But (from the perspective stated in the above paragraph) I would prefer what Obama has done, than what Bush has done.

And i’m not sure from what info Blake you make your comment. As far as I’m concerned Bush left office with the highest national debt of any president and America was loosing a hundred thousand jobs a month. Im really not sure what could be worse than that from a completely objective stand point. Additionally, how is it that you can blame a democratic house for the debt caused by Bush’s war?

Anyway go a head with terms like sock-puppets as you all espouse the same views.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I’m not looking to win any battles any more but two quick comments:

First of all, Ive never posted from a different name…notice my spelling errors.

Second: I think what “Mr. Gray” is saying about comment #45 going under the radar, is that it was a completely ridiculous post aimed to be slanderous and irrelevant to any pre-existing discussion. Thereby, i believe his point is that you guys have no limitations in what is written here as long as it either supports your cause or trashes your opposition’s. ‘

A term like 1st Amendment Genocide doesn’t make any sense. Genocide cannot relate to one entity. Second its not against the first amendment to say that the world would be better off without someone. The first amendment guarantees freedom of speech, something not allotted by our hosts. I did not say, nor do i believe that Glenn Beck doesn’t have the right to do what he does, i just think his influence is a danger.

As far as this Obama/Bush thing of Blake’s: First of all again, I prefer to think of myself as a libertarian so I don’t trust Obama’s administration any more than I did Bush’s. I just happen to prefer the things Obama is doing to the things Bush did. I am of the belief that regardless of any perceived present value to a war in Iraq, we had legitimate reason to go in the first place and we will have spent more than 3$ Trillion dollars before we are out (Wash Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html). That compared to saving hundreds of thousands of jobs and protecting one of Americas largest industries from moving to foreign countries at a time in which America is losing its grip as the premier economic power of the world.

I’m not saying that Obama’s actions are perfect or even the direction I would go. But (from the perspective stated in the above paragraph) I would prefer what Obama has done, than what Bush has done.

And i’m not sure from what info Blake you make your comment. As far as I’m concerned Bush left office with the highest national debt of any president and America was loosing a hundred thousand jobs a month. Im really not sure what could be worse than that from a completely objective stand point. Additionally, how is it that you can blame a democratic house for the debt caused by Bush’s war?

Anyway go a head with terms like sock-puppets as you all espouse the same views.

Like or Dislike: 0  0