I don’t believe Queen Elizabeth has a problem with Ma’am. Isn’t that considered proper?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Ugly,nasty SKANK!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@cassie:

Really cassie?

Are you sure?

Show me, will you please?

Actually, let me show you what the Army manual says.

Here ya go:

View at EasyCaptures.com

Anyone who knows anything about Army protocol knows that you address those that are above you on the food chain as “Sir or Ma’am”. Obviously you know very little about the military.

I wonder, in what other areas does your ignorance excel?

Oh yeah, about that e-mail that you sent….we do indeed have the “brass ones” necessary to publish your comment. You’ll note that it’s above, and has been since 4:34am Pacific time.

We also have the “brass ones” necessary to demonstrate your ignorance to everyone who is watching.

Enjoy.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I think the term that would best settle this is if we called her, EX-SENATOR.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

She defies description…. well, printable description… What a silly twit!
VOTE HER OUT!!!!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I know how I would address her but I will not post it here.

The Boxers of this nation are not entitled to anything more
than civility. I will address her any way I choose because I
served my Nation and not myself like she has. The term Bitch
is reserved for female dogs in my house. I have other terms
that apply to her but you will not read them here.

She is quite obnoxious and demeaning a Career Soldier is not above her.
I would have stood up and left the room had she tried to scold me like that.
It was a cheap stunt on her part and I would not have dignified it with my presence.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

What a cunning stunt!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

The key operative words are “I worked very to become a Senator.” The problem “Senator” Boxer has is the same most of the rest of congress has; BECOMING NOT BEING!

This so beautifully makes the point I made the other day about Glenn Beck; humility! Humility is everything, and until our leaders have it, it’s impossible to relate in any meaningful way, subsequently, to ever be “for the people.”

I’ll take (and be more than accepting), of the quirkiness and patois of the Glenn Becks and Sarah Palins of America any day over the ‘entitled elite’, that BTW, are elected to serve US. The only thing that matters is being “real and for the people”, period: no room for egos!

Boxer’s comment was truly astounding, albeit not surprising. It should be played 24/7 until all of America is awakend to the ego maniacs we have in office destroying this country. I suggest for the 2010 vote out incumbent slogan:

Replace Boxers with Bachmanns

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Damn! can you imagine that some uppity woman actually asked that she be addressed in the manner that she has EARNED?

Especially since the Army’s OWN Protocal is that any Senator be referred to as “Senator” with an itililaized line that “Women Senators are to be addressed as ‘Senator’” for emphasis. I guess they didn’t bold that so the General didn’t get it!

And the misgoynists come out with their claws bared!

Can you actually imagine a woman requesting that she be called by her preference or her EARNED title, no matter what that might be? Whether that be Miss, Ms or Mrs. or a PhD actually be called “Doctor” or even a “Doctor” not be called a nurse because she has a white coat on!

This was a request during an adult conversation – which is sadly lacking nowadays – where there was no disrespect intended on either side and the “gentleman” simply agreed to comply with a woman’s preference! Damn her!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

The video has been restored.

Like or Dislike: 0  0