[...] so forth. Now “Mirandized,” Osama bin Laden was energetic off to Afghanistan, afterwards to Gitmo, afterwards to New [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Curt posted the extraordinary news that the Obama Administration will now treat terrorists captured on the [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Now they are going to ship these Terrorists to third world countries that have neither the infastructure or the facilities to house and keep them locked up. Does this not remind everyone of the deal the DEA worked out with Mexico to house Pablo Escobar. After a few months he was basically coming and going as he pleased. How long before one of the prisons realizes that they misplaced or allowed the Terrorist to escape?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

madness absolute madness.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

As a member of the military I just cannot fathom having to read some one Miranda rights after and IED attack or a firefight. Its just stupid to think that will everything else going on in a combat zone that we are going to take the time to pull out this little card and begin to read off their littany of rights. Also in what language are we suppose to read them their rights? Those guys come from all over the middle east and not all of them speak arabic, so does this mean I am going to have to carry a card in Pashtun, a card in Farsi, and an Arabic card?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

How dare they: Affording the rights of our U.S. constitution to enemy combatants, especially on foreign soil? A U.S. citizen visiting a foreign country doesn’t enjoy those rights. Yet another outrageous obamanation: In a long train of abuses and usurpations: (evincing a design to reduce us under absolute despotism?)

I smell economic stimulus for his ACLU / ACORN pals.
As, our tax dollars will be used to pay for the enemie’s counsel, if they are unable to afford it. Never before in the history of this, or any other country, has such stupidity been executed.

This is a slap in the face to the families who have lost loved ones in the World Trade Center Attack or the War on Terror. “Change we can believe in ?’ And, our cons in congress sit idly by….

Like or Dislike: 0  0

So, if they forget to mirandize the TERRORISTS ARE off scott free? Yup! And, what about a jury of your peers? That’s right. We’ll have to import them from Afghanastan! Well, that’s only “FAIR”!!!

Like or Dislike: 0  0

This is the answer to closing Gitmo. If we’re at war, why do we need lawyers? If we are not at war, are we just going around kidnapping people? If we are not at war, why do we have soldiers on foreign soil killing people? Is there something wrong with this picture?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Didn’t someone warn us that Obie would do this?

Why yes, she did as a matter of fact:

Victory in Iraq is finally in sight; he wants to forfeit. Terrorist states are seeking nuclear weapons without delay; he wants to meet them without preconditions. Al Qaeda terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America, and he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights. ”

How prescient.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Flopping Aces: Yup, lets return the days of treating terrorism as a crime rather then as a act of war. It worked out so well during the 90’s didn’t it? [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0