Comments on: Obama Calls For Unity In Pre-Emptive Political Attack Speech http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:37:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tom http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/#comment-203365 Tom Thu, 21 May 2009 19:44:02 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=21856#comment-203365 Fear, fear, fear! There. Feel better RAP? Zero is always talking unity. He basically did so at Notre Dame, with his Rodney 'can't we all get along' whine. I will say this, he does have a smooth delivery, especially when you are basically double-talking. You get a same feeling of emptiness after a Chinese dinner. But, he does deliver it well - of course, in partnership with the teleprompter.

Fear, fear, fear! There. Feel better RAP?

Zero is always talking unity. He basically did so at Notre Dame, with his Rodney ‘can’t we all get along’ whine. I will say this, he does have a smooth delivery, especially when you are basically double-talking. You get a same feeling of emptiness after a Chinese dinner. But, he does deliver it well – of course, in partnership with the teleprompter.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Real American Patriot http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/#comment-203361 Real American Patriot Thu, 21 May 2009 19:33:17 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=21856#comment-203361 that's it Hawk talk FEAR FEAR FEAR... it's the only thing the righties has left! drive home that FEAR!!!

that’s it Hawk talk FEAR FEAR FEAR… it’s the only thing the righties has left!

drive home that FEAR!!!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: bill-tb http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/#comment-203351 bill-tb Thu, 21 May 2009 19:21:09 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=21856#comment-203351 ZERO does swan dive face first, onto the pavement ....

ZERO does swan dive face first, onto the pavement ….

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Hard Right http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/#comment-203328 Hard Right Thu, 21 May 2009 18:19:10 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=21856#comment-203328 Why yes, I'm all for working with those *&^%$ Rethuglicans. I'm more than happy to listen to their stupid @#$%&*~ ideas. Then when all is said and done they can #@$% my ^&*@$.

Why yes, I’m all for working with those *&^%$ Rethuglicans. I’m more than happy to listen to their stupid @#$%&*~ ideas. Then when all is said and done they can #@$% my ^&*@$.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Hawk http://floppingaces.net/2009/05/21/obama-calls-for-unity-in-pre-emptive-political-attack-speech/#comment-203325 Hawk Thu, 21 May 2009 18:16:04 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=21856#comment-203325 "But I have no interest in spending our time re-litigating the policies of the last eight years" Really? Then why are we re-visiting the water boarding issue at all? I mean I don't know what re-litigating is if that is not what is being done! Maybe his definition of re-litigating is different that mine (and others). Just like Clinton's definition of *is* AND, I take issue with the statement "...nor will we release detainees within the United States who endanger the American people.Where demanded by justice and national security, we will seek to transfer some detainees to the same type of facilities in which we hold all manner of dangerous and violent criminals within our borders -" So they hold some trial. And someone is determined as "safe." If he is indeed safe, put him back where you got him. I don't want to see them released here (which I think could happen under this administration)

“But I have no interest in spending our time re-litigating the policies of the last eight years”
Really? Then why are we re-visiting the water boarding issue at all? I mean I don’t know what re-litigating is if that is not what is being done!

Maybe his definition of re-litigating is different that mine (and others). Just like Clinton’s definition of *is*

AND, I take issue with the statement “…nor will we release detainees within the United States who endanger the American people.Where demanded by justice and national security, we will seek to transfer some detainees to the same type of facilities in which we hold all manner of dangerous and violent criminals within our borders -”

So they hold some trial. And someone is determined as “safe.” If he is indeed safe, put him back where you got him. I don’t want to see them released here (which I think could happen under this administration)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>