19 May

Stupidity Persists: Jesse Ventura on The View

How many households tune into The View? Apparently around 4.42 million for the 18-34 group. How many blog-readers click onto FA discussion threads? 300? A thousand?

Can you understand why stupidity persists on American daytime tv and how that affects public attitudes, knowledge and opinions?

Huffington Post:

There is a peculiar aspect to the debate over the use of waterboarding on terrorist detainees. Those who have actually experienced the procedure first hand insist it is ineffective at best and torture at worst. Those who couldn’t be more removed from its employment argue that it works in thwarting terrorist attacks.

On Monday’s taping of The View, former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura — who was waterboarded as part of his military training — repeated the mantra he offered last week, calling waterboarding torture and demanding criminal prosecution for those who authorized it.

“I would prosecute the people who did it,” he said. “I would prosecute the people who ordered it. And they would all go to jail.”

His opponent in the debate was none other than the conservative Elisabeth Hasselbeck, who insisted that the technique worked in breaking down al Qaeda suspects.

The exchange was good-natured and lively, with Ventura asking some leading rhetorical questions before making a few rather provocative political points.

“If waterboarding is OK, why don’t we let our police do it to suspects so they can learn what they know?” he asked. “If waterboarding is OK, why didn’t we waterboard [Timothy] McVeigh and Nichols, the Oklahoma City bombers, to find out if there were more people involved? … We only seem to waterboard Muslims… Have we waterboarded anyone else? Name me someone else who has been waterboarded.”

Jesus frakkin’ Cripes….the bozone layer is impenetrably thick around this one…what is it with Minnesota’s choice of governors, anyway?! What’s sad is this 9/11 Truther and (Ron) Paul bearer, this former WWF entertainer, will command some level of credibility amongst the viewing audience because he was a former governor and former SEAL UDT frogman, riding on the reputation of SEALs (thanks, Hard Right!).

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousShare
This entry was posted in 9/11, American Intelligence, Celebrity Idiots, CIA interrogation program, Economy, Guantanamo, Military, The Iraqi War, War On Terror. Bookmark the permalink. Tuesday, May 19th, 2009 at 10:19 pm
| 48 views

18 Responses to Stupidity Persists: Jesse Ventura on The View

  1. tahDeetz says: 1

    Maybe Jesse, your examples of American criminals are AMERICAN CITIZENS & as thus have Constitutional rights not afforded to Non-Uniformed Enemy Combatants!!!

    For a x-Governor, he sure is dense. No wonder he was only a 1 termer.

    As well, for someone that claims to be a staunch ‘Independent,’ he sure is always out schilling for the left, bigtime.

    I used to actually like the guy. Oh well.

    tahDeetz

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Hard Right says: 2

    Jesse Ventura was never a SEAL. He was Sea Bee, but that is all. As was stated, he’s also a delusional whack job and a liar.

    http://cursor.org/stories/seal_or_udt.htm

    From searching about the phony SEAL I can see the loony left is have a goregasm over his desire to waterboard Cheney. They are being taking in by yet another fraud because his words sound like the ones they spew. Mentally ill morons.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Maggie says: 3

    Ok … So, I had a decision to make.

    Watch the above video, or a video of jihadists torturing and cutting off fingers, beheading some guy, and blowing up prisoners.

    Which do you think I watched?

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Old Trooper says: 4

    The America hating View and that loony former Gov of Minnesota are irrelevant.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Scott Malensek says: 5

    We need more FA viewers.
    He brings up a good point: why don’t we let cops use waterboarding?
    ANSWER: ’cause killing burning, crushing, and otherwise murdering 3000 people along with leveling 2 zip codes and sending the nation into recession as well as war…is an act of war-not a criminal act.

    Another good point: if we’re supposed to be the good guys, how can we justify using torture?
    ANSWER: ’cause good guys need to be feared as well as loved, and that’s why desperate means like EIT are used as a last resort, used rarely, and kept secret (unless Dems want to make political hay to score Bush-hate-points)

    Someone please tell Joy that KSM was captured AFTER the invasion of Iraq; when the case for war was already irrelevant.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. tsoldrin says: 6

    You douchebags put stormfront to shame.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Alex says: 7

    Go back to MN or wherever he was. Hell back to wrestling would be better. Why in the heck do they give these moron’s air time. Oh…i forgot…he is liberal.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. The mainstream media wouldn’t do it. So we are trying to get your important messages to the American people. 27 This post is a suggested read at, http://aresay.blogspot.com/

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Wordsmith says: 9

    @tsoldrin:

    You douchebags put stormfront to shame.

    That comment was directed at Ventura the Paul Pot, and the wailing banshees of the View, right?

    If not, please elaborate further.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Wordsmith says: 10

    @Scott Malensek:

    He brings up a good point: why don’t we let cops use waterboarding?

    I thought it was an awful point for reasons already stated by tahDeetz. Scott’s answer also holds water, since extreme circumstances can sometimes call for extreme measures. I’m with Mark Bowden who thinks torture (real torture that goes beyond waterboarding and caterpillering) is justifiable if the situation demands it, but should be kept illegal, so as to not encourage large-scale abuses:

    In a nutshell, I argued that torture in all its forms should be banned, but that in some instances, as with the waterboarding of Zubaydah, it is defensible. The trial and punishment of those who break the law is always subject to the discretion of prosecutors, juries and judges. In rare cases, such as Zubaydah’s, in which a coercive method is employed to prevent a greater wrong, the interrogators involved should not be prosecuted.

    I might imperfectly analogize it this way: Jaywalking is against the law. Yet what if I saw a child’s life in danger of being hit by a car and ran out into the street to save his life? Sure, fine me with the jaywalking ticket; or dismiss the violation by understanding the circumstance that prompted the act of violating the law.

    Also, read Thomas Sowell:

    One of the many signs of the degeneration of our times is how many serious, even life-and-death, issues are approached as talking points in a game of verbal fencing. Nothing illustrates this more than the fatuous, and even childish, controversy about “torturing” captured terrorists.

    People’s actions often make far more sense than their words. Most of the people who are talking lofty talk about how we mustn’t descend to the level of our enemies would themselves behave very differently if presented with a comparable situation, instead of being presented with an opportunity to be morally one up with rhetoric.

    What if it was your mother or your child who was tied up somewhere beside a ticking time bomb and you had captured a terrorist who knew where that was? Face it: What you would do to that terrorist to make him talk would make water-boarding look like a picnic.

    You wouldn’t care what the New York Times would say or what “world opinion” in the U.N. would say. You would save your loved one’s life and tell those other people what they could do.

    But if the United States behaves that way it is called “arrogance”– even by American citizens. Indeed, even by the American president.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Scrapiron says: 11

    The same people who think pro wrestling is real support a phony wrestler and made O’Dumbo POTUS. What a shock…

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. tahDeetz says: 12

    FTR,

    I have no problem w/ making a murder-minded towelhead ‘think’ he is about to drown on dry land.

    The mind can be a very powerful thing. That’s the whole idea behind WaterBoarding.

    The unmitigated douchbaggerry from the left is simple unfathomable on this issue.

    So, Jesse’s SEAL bona fides are questionable. Figures.

    The vast majority of Special Force types I have had the privilege to know, never brag about their accomplishments. They simply don’t have to. Their reputation precedes them & speaks volumes.

    The vast majority of SF braggarts I know, are simply liars.

    tahDeetz

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  13. Aqua says: 13

    @ Hard Right

    Wow, awesome read. Thanks.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  14. Hard Right says: 14

    Tsoldrin, me thinks thou doest project too much.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  15. Pingback: Jesse Ventura - former Minnesota Govenor - is ignorant of recent history

  16. SoCal Chris says: 15

    Isn’t Jesse Ventura kind of now in the same sensational category as Jenine Gerafalo and Wanda Sykes? Their careers are hurting and in need of a boost, perhaps?

    Maybe we could send them to Gitmo to see what kind of people (hard to call them people) they are defending so profusely.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Jerry F says: 16

    Why does he not call for the prosecution of those who waterboarded him? Let me get this right, Ok to waterboard SEALs in training, not Ok to waterboard terrorism plotters.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  18. ditto says: 17

    While I also hold high disgust for ‘the scum of the earth’ mentioned, I have to take a stance against torture (and yes, pseudo-torture). I find the disrespect for Mr. Ventura’s military service and the consideration of some that torture may be ‘acceptable’ to be sickening:

    In regards to it’s use on suspects or prisoners in American jails: Amendment 8 – Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Ratified 12/15/1791. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. A prisoner has the right to remain silent. The “third degree” or torture is a heinous violation of such Consitutional rights, and violates due process The SCOTUS recognizes that “due process” prohibits punishment before a trial has taken place, and it is the Judge’s place to prescribe penalties, not law enforcement (separation of powers).

    The US government on many occasions has proudly, and with nobleness firmly declared that the United States will not torture. The problem with the “unlawful civilian combatants” argument is that neither the Geneva Convention nor the UN convention provides for any distinction between what is allowed on civilian or military suspects/prisoners. (Notice that, as this is a treaty, these rules also apply towards the treatment of a signature country’s own citizens.)

    The Geneva Convention http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm

    United Nations Convention Against Torture,: http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html#Article 1.1

    Both of these conventions trump our country’s own Uniform Code of Military Justice, insomuch as persons in custody are concerned. (Not the other way around): http://usmilitary.about.com/od/justicelawlegislation/a/ucmjart2.htm

    Whether the torture of suspects/prisoners “saves lives” or not, is not germane. Torture is clearly prohibited by Federal and International law. Nor do I find the advising lawyer’s ‘technicalities’ arguments compelling or an excuse. The only important question is whether “water boarding” or the other “interrogation methods” used are considered torture.

    If any of what I wrote should make any Democrat readers feel smug, DON’T! Given the current Pelosi CIA war, the Democrats would be wise to drop the “war crimes” talk, as if the want to bring charges against Bush’s administration, they’ll have to bring charges on many members of Congress and other government/military officials as well. Nor was Janet Reno and the Clinton administration record any better regarding their handling of the “Branch Davidian” stand-off.

    I’ve said my piece and I don’t care whose feathers it ruffles. That’s my opinion. Take it as you will.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>