[...] The EPA admits that its findings on GW are political and not scientific [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Heads up higher!!!

Put a fork in this fustercluck!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/climategate_tko_in_copenhagen.html

Let’s see…according to my calculations, the planet will be in the midst of cold not seen since 1820 by then. Considering the news that snow is falling “down under” during the beginning of the Australian summer, I think I’m on safe ground here.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Heads up!!!! Dept. of Energy sends litigation hold notice on all things related to CRU:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/14/doe-sends-a-litigation-hold-notice-regarding-cru-to-employees-asking-to-preserve-documents/

Bet they intend to bury the info.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Welcome Yachika!

We have many articles concerning AGW in the archives
( http://www.floppingaces.net/categories/ ).

I tend to recommed this one…cuz I wrote it.

http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/11/28/the-conspiracy-of-the-centuries-reader-post/

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Obama claimed that the average American would not bear the brunt of this historic tax-increase: he stated that instead ““It is paid for by the polluters who currently emit dangerous carbon emissions.”

Just compare this outrageous falsehood to Ronald Reagans’ famous quote:

“The most dangerous myth is the demagoguery that business can be made to pay a larger share, thus relieving the individual. Politicians preaching this are either deliberately dishonest, or economically illiterate, and either one should scare us.

Business doesn’t pay taxes, and who better than business to make this message known? Only people pay taxes, and people pay as consumers every tax that is assessed against a business.”

And after the way the rammed this through the House with little debate, without legislators even reading it… and while quarantining the GOP from any meaningful input whatsoever, any foolhardy individuals who still believe Obama’s threadbare “bipartisanship” spiel ought to have their head examined.

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@openid.aol.com/runnswim: Long ago (during my tenure) EPA started investigating the possibility of regulating “Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock.”

It’s not much different from regulating exhalations.

Why don’t all you libs practice holding your breath to save the planet?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@openid.aol.com/runnswim:

Since each of us exhales CO2, that makes each of us polluters.

Mike, you are too smart to make such a silly statement.

1) We all breath.

2) We all exhale CO2.

3) CO2 is a pollutant.

Which part is silly?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Since each of us exhales CO2, that makes each of us polluters.

Mike, you are too smart to make such a silly statement.

– Larry W

Like or Dislike: 0  0

[...] Thanks to Mike’s America at Flopping Aces [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

The EPA making CO2 a controlled substance, will cause the price of gas and heating oil to rise .. this rise will force the poor to make decisions between heating their homes and medical/drug expenditures .. thus putting them at risk. Therefore the EPA should control itself.

Like or Dislike: 0  0