What amazes me (although I guess it shouldn’t) is the number of women who will defend their right to murder infants like a drowning person clings to a floating tree branch, yet have absolutely no knowledge of the eugenics movement and it’s ideological foundations. They do not want to hear it either (think fingers in ears, “LA LA LA LALALA”). I am repeatedly impressed by the brainwashing prowess of the left to have ingrained a sense of entitlement to infanticide within the psyches of so many. It is horrible enough to see women value their convenience and “right” to behave irresponsibly more than the life of a child. When you are aware that the whole scheme is another version of the final solution without the expense of building camps or “showers” or ovens, it makes you wonder how human kind made it this far. The Germans would have been impressed. They never thought of charging the Jews train fare for the ride to the camps…

Like or Dislike: 0  0

The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. That’s a direct quote from Margaret Sanger, Hillary Clinton’s role model and hero. I suspect many (Hillary at least pretending to be one of the ignorant), are totally unaware that the early feminists, as in the Susan B Anthony types, were totally against abortion.

These early feminists regarded abortion as violence against
women and their children, and attributed its practice to the
denial of their rights and a dearth of nonviolent choices
for women

For any who choose to stay in denial and think that our abortion obsessed culture is going to end up any differently than the Holocaust, well, you’ve already missed the beginning. I suggest you peruse Wesley Smith’s blog for some eye openers as to how far down the slippery slope we’ve already slid. Even once prestigious medical journals are now on board.

The blind spot is simply jaw dropping, but then, I often write that many in this day and age can’t recognize evil. How can any country (at least one that calls itself civilized), kill 50 million babies, the majority of them black, and AT LEAST not make the connection that we already went down this wrong and iniquitous path with slavery (both Roe v Wade and Dread Scott were won based on non personhood).

Earlier this month, after Hillary’s visit to Our Lady of Guadalupe visit coinciding with her Sanger award. Congressman Chris Smith wrote a scathing piece which was only covered by Catholic Media (surprise!).

He went on to say that Secretary Clinton in her speech said that Margaret Sanger’s “life and leadership” was “one of the most transformational in the entire history of the human race.”
“Mr. Speaker, transformational, yes. But not for the better if one happens to be poor, disenfranchised, weak, a person of color, vulnerable, or among the many so-called undesirables who Sanger would exclude and exterminate from the human race.”

[…]

Smith extensively quoted little known, terrifying passages of Sanger’s writings, loaded with racism and contempt for the poor.

“The most serious charge that can be brought against modern benevolence is that it encourages, and I say this again, the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents, and dependents,” was one of Sanger’s statement quoted by the NJ representative.

“Which begs the question, Mr. Speaker. Is our Secretary of State unaware of Margaret Sanger’s inhumane beliefs? Was she not briefed on Margaret Sanger’s cruel and reckless disregard for poor, pregnant women? Respectfully, Secretary Clinton should at a minimum return the Sanger award.”

“More importantly,” continued Smith “Congress and the White House must at long last take a long, hard, second look at the multimillion, almost billion, dollar corporation called Planned Parenthood – Child Abuse Incorporated.”

For any, like Hillary who asked “who painted it” and was told by the Bishop, “Ahh, that would be God”, not familiar with the miracle of Our Lady of Guadalupe, the cultural irony is stunning. Not only did it result in the largest Christian conversion on planet earth (9 million), it came after a much accepted practice of chopping off heads on top of pyramids. The only difference between their human sacrifice and ours with abortion is that we do our killing in the womb. To date, not only has science been unable to explain away this miracle, it continues to become more fascinating with the advancement of technology.

Curt thanks for this great and important post. It was fascinating (and most telling), to watch the response of Hillary; not even a hint of conscience after Fortenberry’s potent words. Notice how she’s all about ‘choice’, until it comes to the most vulnerable. Yeah, “choice and equality”, isn’t that the left mantra? Gee, who could know it when we kill 4000 babies a day, 300,000 a year by Planned Parenthood alone, which is largely government funded. If the abortions aren’t bad enough, the cover up of sexual abuse (which the press can’t get enough of if it’s a Catholic Priest from 40 years ago), goes largely ignored.

I don’t have the exact numbers of the daily US abortions done on sentient babies, so I will be conservative and estimate at least one fourth, which would approximate 1000 a day. The reality is, these fetuses (many of whom could sustain life outside the womb), are ripped apart, limb by limb.

Now compare that outrage to the current outrage that the US water boarded 3, yes, ONLY 3, or our enemies. I’m no fan of torture, only making the point of the hypocrisy in this land of “equality and choice.”

We Americans best be warned that abortion is coming back to bite, big time. At least know, the end game was never about “choice for women.” We have and continue co operate in one of the greatest evils of mankind; of which the consequences will be enormous.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

And if Margaret Sanger’s ideology had been acted upon in one instance, Madame Secretary may well have been the POTUS. Since Obama is at least in part belonging to the race Sanger wished exterminated.

It amazes me how Obama is pro-abortion as is Clinton. That goes beyond pro-choice. When you do as Curt wrote, export the abortion industry, you are not offering choice, you are implicating your sovereignty over reproductive “rights”…

In Obama’s case, it reminds me that Hitler was part Jewish too. Lucky for Hillary she can work for him, proving that she is not racist in her desire to spread abortion throughout the world! {sarcasm}

Like or Dislike: 0  0

its my opinion that chelsey clinton has bad hair, doesn’t mena i want the girl dead. classy hillary, keepin it classy. right there it shows that planned parenthood has so many branches in the ghetto for a reason.

Like or Dislike: 0  0