8 Jan

Juan Cole Blames Israel for 9/11

It’s funny how for lefties, “blowback” is only something that happens when we take violent actions; never: “Hamas is experiencing blowback for launching thousands of rockets into Israel”; not “al-Qaeda is incurring blowback for pissing off the United States”.

Juan Cole is one of those academics poisoning the young minds of college students and gullible left-leaning minds.

He now sees fit to hold Israel accountable for bringing on the events of 9/11.

His post from Wednesday:

In 1996, Israeli jets bombed a UN building where civilians had taken refuge at Cana/ Qana in south Lebanon, killing 102 persons; in the place where Jesus is said to have made water into wine, Israeli bombs wrought a different sort of transformation. In the distant, picturesque port of Hamburg, a young graduate student studying traditional architecture of Aleppo saw footage like this on the news [graphic]. He was consumed with anguish and the desire for revenge. As soon as operation Grapes of Wrath had begun the week before, he had written out a martyrdom will, indicating his willingness to die avenging the victims, killed in that operation–with airplanes and bombs that were a free gift from the United States. His name was Muhammad Atta. Five years later he piloted American Airlines 11 into the World Trade Center. (Lawrence Wright, The Looming Tower, p. 307: “On April 11, 1996, when Atta was twenty-seven years old, he signed a standardized will he got from the al-Quds mosque.l It was the day Israel attacked Lebanon in Operation grapes of Wrath. According to one of his friends, Atta was enraged,and by filling out his last testamentd during the attack he was offering his life in response.” ).

And if Atta didn’t find offense and inspiration from Operation Grapes of Wrath, his radical beliefs would have found outrage by any number of other subsequent perceived “offenses” against fellow Arabs/Islam. And if Atta hadn’t participated in the events of 9/11, perhaps his soul wouldn’t know unrest from having participated in a terrorist act that has led to the deposition of an Islamic fundamentalist state in Afghanistan and the hanging of an Arab dictator, the violent deaths of hundreds of thousands of Muslims, and the loss of prestige of al-Qaeda in the eyes of the Muslim world. These are all “blowback” for his actions.

And speaking of “blowback”, Juan Cole includes Michael Scheuer in his post:

Michael Scheuer, who headed the CIA Bin Laden desk for some years and knows something about radical fundamentalism, concludes, “What is likely to become known across the Islamic world as the “Gaza slaughter” will ensure the continued growth of the Sunni insurgency al-Qaeda leads and inspires.”

And as though on cue, Ayman al-Zawahiri came out with a video Tuesday, saying, “”We will never stop until we avenge the death of all who are killed, injured, widowed and orphaned in Palestine and throughout the Islamic world . . .” He then attacked Barack Obama, saying “These air strikes are a gift from Obama before he takes office, and from Hosni Mubarak, the traitor who is the primary partner in your siege and murder.”

What I am saying is that Israeli leaders like Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak and the Israeli high command and intelligence all knew this danger very well when they launched this bloodbath. They subjected you and me to it anyway, because it is immaterial to them what happens to the United States as a result of their bloody-mindedness. They want theirs. They are no different in that regard from American hawks. Bush knew he was endangering Madrid and Glasgow when he attacked Iraq. He didn’t care about his allies, either. In the Hawk Business, provoking terrorism is all to the good. Nor are they different in this regard from the leadership of Hamas, which also acted provocatively without regard to the wider consequences.

Juan Cole is a useful idiot to the likes of Zawahiri and Hamas; an ally in their propaganda dissemination. Zawahiri is being opportunistic here, trying to salvage al-Qaeda’s failed goal of uniting the Muslim world to answer THEIR call to “jihad”. Zawahiri doesn’t need Israel as an excuse to continue on with al-Qaeda’s murderous killing spree in the name of Allah; but Israel defending itself does give him propaganda fodder. And rather than countering it, Cole gives legitimacy to it in the eyes and ears of those Palestinian supporters and Hamas sympathizers who have a slanted perspective on Israel-Palestine history. He is an appeaser and an enabler for the world to receive more of the very violence he decries.

The burden of peace is on Hamas. It is the writings and lectures of liberal academics like Juan Cole who make the moral inversions of terrorist apologists and the anti-war movement possible. They are silent on Iranian dissidents being tortured in Iran everyday; they express love and admiration for dictators like Castro; they sympathize with the plight of Hamas and Islamic terrorists; all the while they call President Bush who has liberated 60 million Muslims the warmonger, and the plight of Israel “illegitimate”, “criminal”, and an “illegal occupation”.

It is the moral inversion of liberal peace/anti-war movements that causes war and the perpetuation of “the cycle of violence” by not protesting and pressuring the true dictators and violators of human rights.

I encourage all FA readers to go support Michael Totten in defeating Juan Cole in the 2008 Weblog Awards for Best Middle East or Africa Blog:

Juan Cole is decrying all the neocons he’s forced to compete with in the 2008 Weblog Awards for Best Middle East or Africa Blog. He thinks Helena Cobban — a deranged Hezbollah supporter — should have been nominated instead of someone like me. He’s worked his leftist readers into a tizzy, and they’re putting him over the top. I don’t really care if I win this award; I won it last year. But Juan Cole certainly doesn’t deserve it.

You know what kind of abject nonsense he’s peddling now? He’s arguing that Israel’s 1996 attack in Qana, Lebanon, inspired Mohammad Atta, who led the Al Qaeda cell on September 11, to write his “martyrdom will.” But Atta’s will, as Martin Kramer points out, was written before the attack in Qana. And it wasn’t a martyrdom will. It was a standard will. But Cole won’t let facts get in the way of blaming Israelis for just about anything, including violence committed by Al Qaeda.

Don’t let Cole win. Go over there and vote for me.

Go vote. Spread the word. Let Juan Cole experience firsthand what blowback is for his years of blogging 6 years of long-winded academic cyber-rubbish.

Also blogging:
American Power
Yaacov Lozowick’s Ruminations

       submit to reddit
This entry was posted in Academic Intolerance, Anti-Americanism, Foreign Policy, Islam, Israel/Palestine, Middle East. Bookmark the permalink. Thursday, January 8th, 2009 at 12:12 am
| 17 views

12 Responses to Juan Cole Blames Israel for 9/11

  1. Pingback: Conspirama

  2. SpideyTerry says: 1

    If I was in Cole’s class and had to listen to this crap, I would say certain things and you would hear me because I would be yelling so loudly that people in Israel could hear me! Quite frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Cole regularly wore a swastika arm band. He strikes me as being that full of hate and that full of stupid.

    BTW, I voted in the poll and Totten currently has a 45.9%.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Scott Malensek says: 2

    Juan better get on the DNC crazy train soon because it’s leaving the station in support of ISRAEL, and his little search for scapegoat is leading him down the wrong path and away from militant Muslim extremism.
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,477450,00.html

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. marbleblaster says: 3

    Well, I voted, and Totten’s blog is over double the votes of Cole’s :)

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Neo says: 4

    It can also be said that Usama bin Laden (UBL) inspired a generation of young Americans (“Generation Kill”) to take up arms against idiot Muslin zealots who think it sport to kill non-combatants in their quest for sexual adequacy with the mythical 72 (re-virginating) virgins.
    In the process, UBL made the US public more complacent to accept the Israeli operation in Gaza as the price to be paid when dealing with those who indescriminately fire rockets into civilian (non-combatant) areas.
    This then goes to prove that UBL is responsible for the Israeli attack of Gaza.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. By the same logic, then japanese and vietnamese terrorists should be killing millions of americans for the nuking of Nagasaki, Hiroshima and the bombing of Vietnam.

    OK, let’s all start killing americans now. We can start with academics.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Raymond in DC says: 6

    Cole is an idiot. His presence is one reason I no longer support my alma mater ( U of Michigan). Did Cole consider that the World Trade Center was first hit in February, 1993 – THREE YEARS before the Qana tragedy? And you just knew he would try again or go for a similarly spectacular operation. If not with Atta then with someone else. There’s an army of offended, frustrated, outraged or humiliated Muslims out there looking for an excuse and an opportunity.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. MataHarley says: 7

    Yup… agree with Raymond in DC. Cole is, and has always been, an idiot. Hang, said idiot wrote the only difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists (the PC phrase for the terrorist enemy) was lipstick for heavens sake. Reality left the Cole household a long time ago. So no surprises there for me.

    Yet I wonder if Cole will weigh in on the latest rocket attack into Israel, coming from Lebanon? One hit a nursing home’s kitchen, where the residents were eating breakfast. Now there’s a strategic military target… uh huh. And I’m unaware of Lebanon being the object of a blockade, or under Israeli occupation.

    The Lebanese govt has condemned it (that oughta stop it…. snort), and Hezbollah isn’t taking credit. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was Hamas friendlies assailing Israel on another front, trying to incite them into substantial response. They are hard at work on the anti-Israel PR war. But can Cole see this? Hang no…. the guy needs to replace the rose-colored specs with something more transparent.

    In a more humorous note on Cole, he’s whining about Totten’s weblog lead on his “Informed Comment” site, accusing him of using the evil, underhanded Bush/Rove tactics he says they used on Kerry in 2004:

    These tactics ot Totten remind me very much of what Bush and Rove did to John Kerry in 2004, when Kerry complained that Bush had allowed Osama Bin Laden to escape at Tora Bora. Bush trotted out some military weasels to deny it all and then indicted Kerry for lack of patriotism. And he mobilized his base, and he won.

    So that’s how you do it.

    1) You assassinate the character of your opponent.

    2) You make his correct statements into a liability by propagandizing that they are false or unpatriotic. And

    3) you mobilize a base of single-issue true believers that you can depend on to dominate the discourse because most people don’t care and are not invested.

    Interesting that it’s a negative to respond to Kerry’s outright lie and slam against our military strategic leaders with actual military mouthpieces, telling it like it is. Instead, he calls fighting lies with truth, in essence, Rovian tactics.

    But who is actually utilizing the tactics Cole writes about? Hummm…. what about that Obama campaign play book based on Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals? Oh yeah… let’s compare:

    Juan Cole: You assassinate the character of your opponent.

    Saul Alinsky’s Rule #5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

    It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

    ~~~

    Juan Cole: You make his correct statements into a liability by propagandizing that they are false or unpatriotic.

    Saul Alinsky: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

    In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.” By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck. The target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target.

    ~~~

    Juan Cole: you mobilize a base of single-issue true believers that you can depend on to dominate the discourse because most people don’t care and are not invested.

    Saul Alinsky intro on tactics: For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people’s organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then…conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.

    Well… at least Cole is well versed on such tactics. But apparently he didn’t learn them from Rove.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Wordsmith says: 8

    @MataHarley:

    In a more humorous note on Cole, he’s whining about Totten’s weblog lead on his “Informed Comment” site, accusing him of using the evil, underhanded Bush/Rove tactics

    What a sniveling, petty snot.

    From Martin Kramer’s Sandbox:

    Yesterday, Cole called on his readers to turn out and vote for him. His pitch? “The ‘Middle East’ category is dominated by Neocons. Where are Marc Lynch (Abu Aardvark), Helena Cobban, Angry Arab, Raed in the Middle, etc., etc. I think the initial nomination voting must have been orchestrated.” In other words: a neocon conspiracy! It’s even subverted the 2008 Weblog Awards!

    So Cole, having raised the specter of the neocons, riled up his supporters, and his vote count rose considerably, putting him in the lead. But at that point, he must have realized that it was unseemly for him to have dismissed the procedures of an award he might even win. (Hey, with all those neocon blogs splitting the neocon vote, he could emerge on top! They’ve screwed up, like in Iraq!) No problem. Just cut out the offending passage, as though it never existed.I’m a collector of Cole’s retro-editing of blog posts. He’ll write something erroneous or outrageous, and then excise it from the record, without so much as a strikeout. In one instance, he made a crude insinuation against me, then deleted it. In another, he wrote that 9/11 was “in response to the Israeli attack on the Jenin refugee camp,” which he deleted when it turned out that, uh, Israel’s Jenin operation took place seven months after 9/11. He even once explained his “policy” on retro-editing—and then deleted that.

    Anyway, below is Cole’s original blog post of yesterday, which I retrieved from the Google cache not long before it disappeared from there as well. The prospect that Cole might win this award, in the midst of his wildly biased and hate-filled blogging on Gaza, is one I find repulsive. That the award should go to someone who retro-doctors his blog is likewise repulsive.

    Juan’s revision is absent of this:

    It is very odd that the “Middle East” category is dominated by Neocons. Where are Marc Lynch (Abu Aardvark), Helena Cobban, Angry Arab, Raed in the Middle, etc., etc. I think the initial nomination voting must have been orchestrated. What is the comparative Technorati authroity ranking of these blogs? I don’t think it is a good idea to merge Middle East and Africa, either- Africa was really stiffed here.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Wordsmith says: 9

    It seems you can vote every 24 hours.

    Go double Totten’s vote count.

    Thanks for the tip, Juan Cole.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  11. Missy says: 10

    Totten is now ahead 10,684 votes to Cole’s 7,146.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  12. Missy says: 11

    Last day to vote. Michael Totten is at 43.3% with 16,272 votes, Cole is at 31.6% with 11,902 votes.

    ReplyReply
    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>