[...] Scott has suggested that the answer may lie in the ability of reality challenged lefties to simply flip a switch and all of a sudden discover that national security is important if it’s a Democrat in the White House. It reminds me of that old Clinton saying: “it all depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” -Mike’s America on Bush’s Third Term [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

As real as BDS is, so too conversely is the reality that once a non-B is in office, with a D behind their blame….the BDS claims evaporate and dissolve. That’s the nature of BDS. It’s Bush-centric.

We see it already EVERY DAY. Obama will push for FISA, and the alleged threat will be ignored. He might even be praised, but when GWB says it, BDS kicks in and he’s opposed. Just as Howard Dean’s rants about neocon cabals sound almost verbatim to Osama Bin Laden’s, so too will Obama’s rationale for keeping US troops in Iraq, for sending more troops to Afghanistan, for bombing Iran, for continuing tax cuts (though they’ll no longer be called The Bush Tax Cuts), and so on.

The One can do no wrong.

HOWEVER!!!!!

When the msm starts posting pictures of him without his halo…then we’ll know the honeymoon is over.

Note to Democrats: there is a reckoning that starts in 20 days. Obama’s opponents (40-50% of America) are going to start calling him on every broken promise, and on every continuation of a Bush policy that was either blocked or suffered because of BDS.

2009, the year of the progressive reckoning.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Mad,

Leftist Democrats will never be able to see Georges W.Bush greatness. Why? Because they are idiots. As simple as that.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Here we go again, another connoissuer of lefty talking points who’s obviously allergic to carrots. A trip to the archives will provide proper nourishment that could allow “madmong” a real eye-opener, an opportunity to see the light. I doubt he/she/it has the intestinal fortitude to make that venture, carry on silly one.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

You mix and match your metaphors like Ray Charles were dressing himself. Musta been Brother Ray reading the (lack of) intelligence briefings before the Iraq War.

The greatness of Georges W Bush? He’s the reason people were willing to vote for a smoke and mirrors poker game in the sand player(attitude?)(??). That was one of the reasons Obama was able to beat an honorable war vet (with his tranny W vice presidential candidate). That’s how bad things had gotten.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

“Say. If Obama is Bush lite doesn’t that mean you guys should like him?” (Madmonkey)

I would reverse the question. If Obama is Bush lite, doesn’t that mean that you guys will start appreciating one of your greatest President: Georges W. Bush?

But answering your real question, I would have to answer: NO. Because this guy is not even close to the greatness of Georges W. Bush. Obama is all smoke and mirrors. Right now, this fraud is playing a poker game, he is bluffing ang gets away with it because he relies on your head in the sand attitude.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Because Bush light is less filling and tastes great?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

madmonq: Doesn’t that mean you should hate him?

Besides, why should we prefer the lite version over the real thing?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Have you seen the few predictions out there that many of the left will discover a sudden appreciation of B43 policies when they become O44 policies? They will begin to heal from BDS as Obama gently administers a sugar coated dose of Bush lite, not to be confused with Busch lite. Busch lite, and much of it, will be reserved for the kos/firedoglake crowd.

OT, Mike, do you remember Tom Roeser? I don’t remember if it was Reagan or Bush 41 that he worked for, but, here’s another problem that really isn’t a problem with the MSM. But if it were BuchCheneyHitlerMcBurton it would be.

http://www.tomroeser.com/sectionlist.asp?Month=12&Year=2008

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Say. If Obama is Bush lite doesn’t that mean you guys should like him?

I do, but only with as much resolve and conviction to policy and principle as he demonstrates. Get it?

Like or Dislike: 0  0