[DELETED BY AUTHOR]
5 Dec
2008 Coolest Year of the 21st Century Thus Far
This entry was posted in Global Warming. Bookmark the permalink.
Friday, December 5th, 2008 at 11:59 am | 11 views
Stats
It’s because of the steps they took to save the planet that made their predictions incorrect (major sarcasm).
Don’t laugh. I’ve had a few lefties say that to me.
This whole issue is ridiculous and then you can listen to videos of Obama saying that this will be his number one priority when he takes office. Are you serious! Now i agree with the liberal illuminati that something needs to be done. We can just ignore the environment or someday we will have a real problem but this might not be the pressing issues that some want us to think it is.
Ok, some editor needs to be fired. The stylebook clearly says that 2008 should have been described as “8th warmest”.
The fraudulent “chart” shows “Temperature relative to 1961-1990 average, C.” It does not show temperature over time from 1961 to 1990., which would show definite cooling, whereas this fraud shows “warming”, and a reduction in warming.
This is best these dishonest scum can do. To them, anything is better than showing the obvious cooling since 1998.
They will cling to the lies about “man made global warming” until well after the earth has its next ice age, which may be sooner than anyone wants. A lot more people die from cold than from a minor warming, which stopped in 1998, and has been wiped out by the recent cooling.
50,000 Scientists Disbelieve Global Warming
http://noworldsystem.com/2008/07/25/50000-scientists-disbelieve-global-warming/
And here, you will find more than 100 articles on the subject:
The official position of the World Natural Health Organization in regards to global warming is that there is NO GLOBAL WARMING! Global warming is nothing more than just another hoax, just like Y2K and the global freezing claims in the 1960′s and 70′s were. Global warming is being used to generate fear and panic. Those behind this movement are using it to control people’s lives and for financial gain.
http://www.wnho.net/global_warming.htm
From 2003. Longish but nails it.
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~scranmer/SPD/crichton.html
HT: MikeC at GCP
Tom
Ummm…not to disturb the flat earth crowd from your fantasies, but there are obvious errors in what you are saying.
For instance:
“The fraudulent “chart” shows “Temperature relative to 1961-1990 average, C.” It does not show temperature over time from 1961 to 1990., which would show definite cooling, whereas this fraud shows “warming”, and a reduction in warming. ”
This is a nonsense statement. The temperature relative to an average is the same thing as temperature over time, it’s relative to an average over time.
Secondly, short term cooling trends caused by episodic El Nino events no more disprove Global Warming than a paper airplane disproves gravity. According to this theory, if the stock market goes down tomorrow then that disproves that stocks will be worth more a hundred years from now.
Finally, these supposed articles about scientists and organizations like WHO and APS reversing their stance on global warming are all complete hogwash. Just because you make up something doesn’t make it true. Here’s the truth about that:
http://neuralgourmet.com/2008/07/20/american-physical-society-reverse/
Me thinks some people need some more education.
Global Warming Lie #5: That Darn Consensus Again
Get it through your thick skull, Al: The science never was, nor is it still, settled.
More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting “global warming,” the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth’s climate.
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate,” the petition states. “Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
Read the rest:
http://vocalminority.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/global-warming-lies-that-darn-consensus-again.html
I Marty: I worked for years at the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington.
What additional education would you suggest?
Please tell me after you describe your own credentials in this field.
Here’s a point-by-point refutation of the Gore movie by Christopher Walter, Third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, a former policy advisor to Margaret Thatcher during her years as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
35 Inconvenient Truths; The Errors in Gore’s Inconvenient Truth Movie
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html
U.N. Scientist Professor John Christy rejects sharing the Nobel Peace Prize with climate alarmist Albert Gore Jr.
http://www.globalwarminghype.com/Christy.html
Global Warming – Following the money:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251458,00.html
Maurice Strong:
http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777
Research grants:
http://www.globalwarming.org/node/61
http://www.greentreegazette.com/articles/load.aspx?art=207
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/a883dc3da7094f97852572a00065d7d8/c756f70bcbcbf3eb8525646d0075d656!OpenDocument
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/grantsmanshipand_the_global_wa.html
http://true-science.groups.vox.com/
http://true-science.groups.vox.com/library/post/6a00d41440059a685e00fad69340010004.html
Carbon Credits:
Gore & Strong:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover031307.htm
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/03/global_warming_50.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a7li9Nhmhvg0&refer=home
The World Bank:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071224/wysham
http://cleantech.com/news/206/morgan-stanley-makes-3b-carbon-trading-
U.N. Agencies:
The United Nations Environment Program
http://www.unep.org/
UNEP FI is a global partnership between UNEP and the financial sector.
http://www.unepfi.org/
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7436263.stm
Carbon Credits AKA Carbon Offsets are nothing more than a fraudulent investment & trading activity of a nonexistent commodity. It gives big polluters a loophole to continue polluting and not pay restitution in the form of fines. Instead, they buy these carbon credits from industries that are awarded them for being non-polluters, giving them more money to invest. In actuality it does absolutely nothing. This scam could lead to the polluters and investors in Carbon Credits loosing vast amounts of money come 2012 if the Kyoto Treaty fails effectively pulling the rug out from under them. Watch for Gore and others to sell off all his Carbon Credits shortly before the deadline, which would create another organized financial crisis leading into the 2012 election.
Pingback: Brrrrr! 2008 Was Pretty Cold! : Stop The ACLU
Marty:
“According to this theory, if the stock market goes down tomorrow then that disproves that stocks will be worth more a hundred years from now.”
ROFLMAO! So you are comparing global warming to stocks?
Marty is an idiot, and a real hoot. But he is not very bright.
Steve;
If the end question in #11 you are asking about my #10 post. No, I’m not comparing Global Warming to the stock market. It isn’t about Global Warming, it’s about making bank on the myth of Global Warming. And yes Carbon Credits are indeed being traded as if they were a real commodity, there are companies on the market that are all about carbon credits with Gore & Strong laughing all the way to the bank on the gullibility of the environmental whack jobs. Carbon Credits is just a twist on the old “Emperor’s New Clothes” scam. Through pressure by the EPA and threats of fines, or worst forcing industrial plants to close, which means production halts, lay-offs, & likely bankruptcy they have strong-armed businesses to pay for something that doesn’t exits to remain in business. Environmentalist believe the lies that it’s all about Climate Change and Dems & the U.N. are actively doing something serious to reduce pollution when in reality it’s all about the money.
The interesting thing is it’s not really tied to actual Global Warming/Climate Changes. Hence, you will not see Carbon Credit trading going up and down with temperature averages or the seasons. But there will be fluctuations based on so-called “green” legislation and as the Kyoto Treaty 2012 deadline comes closer, so the trading prices for carbon credits will likely continue to rise as will stocks for “green product companies as long as that money keeps flowing in”. That is, unless this house of cards Gore and others have built topples beforehand and the Carbon Credit market collapses. Then we’ll see those companies that are buying up this false commodity who can no longer get them at the mercy of the UNEP, the EPA in our country, & equivalent agencies in other countries. In our country they’ll be outside Congress begging for bail-outs or moving production to other countries for lower overhead costs and cheaper labor.
Don’t you see the pattern in this? It’s the old “shell game” or “3-card monty” & not totally unlike what happened with Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. In that case the threat was low income housing, and the banking corps were being “encouraged” to invest. In this case, Dems & the U.N. are telling showing the public Climate Change in one hand and telling us that carbon credits are the way to go, while selling Carbon Offset investment angles to companies from the other hand.
Arrghhh!!! GLOBAL WARMING!!!!
But, hey, temperatures are low….
Arrghhh!! GLOBAL COOLING!!!
Hey, ya can’t have it both ways….
Arrghhh!! CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
Man, ya just can’t win this argument.
From the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland .. Rethinking Observed Warming
Compo and Sardeshmukh must be considered heretics at NOAA.
Thanks Neo. That would explain the uptick in land surface temperatures recorded over the last few years.
Just as this explains the recent drop in land surface temps:
http://www.greendaily.com/2008/03/24/nasa-scientists-puzzled-as-data-show-oceans-actually-cooling/
Meanwhile, the lower atmosphere, where any warming from greenhouse gases would be expected, is cooling:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11660