[...] The WaPo Tries To Buy Back Some Of It’s Credibility [...]

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Correct, Red73.. I have ceased to “bother”…. LOL

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Mata, why bother? Phillip is under the influence of something. He keeps quoting those ‘great poets’ of Sex, Drugs, and Rock n Roll.

When Clinton was in office oil was around $10.00 a barrel, and when he left office it was over $30.00 a barrel. Does not seem like much now but that was big deal at the time.

For more than seven years under Bush, the man who “stole” the election and is openly despised by the left, we had “the greatest story never told”* by our great left wing media. Unemployment was the lowest in the history of the Republic, but many Americans were not participating. Why? Our great left wing monolithic education system was not educating our students for the technological revolution we were in.

Of course the left cannot say that because our monolithic education system is controlled by the UNION. The union, whose job it is to protect and serve teachers and not the students, set the Marxist agenda.

If conservatives, whether Republican or Democrat, want to take back the country first you must take back the education system.

* “the greatest story never told” a line often used by Larry Kudlow, one of America’s great economists, and TV business show hosts.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Craig, the Red State link was pretty interesting, just don’t know what the point was for sanjay’s posting it. It’s about the betrayal of Sarah Palin by………lepers.

Having mainstream news papers, magazines etc. admitting bias in a crucial election is an admission of betrayal to the country, and citizens that support and depend on them.

Those gullible enough to have taken them seriously through this election have just been publicly made the fool and should be busy lashing out over at their playgrounds, I believe WaPo has a comment section. Shall we call it an outlet for the misled? Something obviously, hasn’t sunk in to these poor little suckers yet. sigh.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Sorry to hear that Craig. I was simply relating the fact that there were many conservative papers that were bias against McCain— other conservative writers are even gushing about Obama:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122600597583706149.html

It’s just a fact that we need to consider. Perhaps they should be on the Lepers list:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/erick/2008/nov/05/operation-leper/

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Sanjay,

I never read something as stupid as the article you have linked in your last comment. What a waist of time reading this stupidity. I will remember your name and never again will I read one of your idiot’s links.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

It’s not just the WP:

WSJ– But over the next decade and a half all that changed. Magazines like the Public Interest and Commentary became required reading for anyone seriously concerned about domestic and foreign affairs; conservative research institutes sprang up in Washington and on college campuses, giving a fresh perspective on public policy. Buckley, Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Peter Berger, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Norman Podhoretz — agree or disagree with their views, these were people one had to take seriously.

Coming of age politically in the grim ’70s, when liberalism seemed utterly exhausted, I still remember the thrill of coming upon their writings for the first time. I discovered the Public Interest the same week that Patty Hearst was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army, and its pages offered shelter from the storm — from the mobs on the street, the radical posing of my professors and fellow students, the cluelessness of limousine liberals, the whole mad circus of post-’60s politics. Conservative politics mattered less to me than the sober comportment of conservative intellectuals at that time; I admired their maturity and seriousness, their historical perspective, their sense of proportion. In a country susceptible to political hucksters and demagogues, they studied the passions of democratic life without succumbing to them. They were unapologetic elites, but elites who loved democracy and wanted to help it.

So what happened? […Read on…}
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122610558004810243.html

Like or Dislike: 0  0

While America lost her mind, New Zealand got hers back… lol

VOTERS END LABOUR’S RULE IN NEW ZEALAND

After a week in which the world’s focus was on political change in America, New Zealanders have voted for their first conservative government in almost a decade, ending the tenure of one of the world’s longest-serving elected female leaders.

… In their hundreds and thousands across the country they have voted for change, Key told supporters in Auckland. ‘Today New Zealanders have voted for action, for a safer, more prosperous and more ambitious New Zealand.’ Record numbers of people voted in the election, which polls had predicted would spell the end of Labour’s nine-year rule.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/09/new-zealand-labour-helen-clark

Like or Dislike: 0  0

I think I’ve given you more than is due, Mata.

And considerably more than I care about, Sam. Here’s hoping your local gig attendees are more interested.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Phillip Marlowe, are you on LSD or what? Your posts do not make any sense. Take a break. Come back after the effect is gone. No use right now. It is a waist of time to read your stupidities.

Still engaging in first grade taunts, Craig?
Very witty.

It’s the Starbucks energy drink.
And, Mata, thanks for indirectly agreeing with me.

Dreams unwind
Loves a state of mind
Dreams unwind
Loves a state of mind
-Stevie Nicks

Like or Dislike: 0  0