UPDATE Mata note: To appease Jan’s persistence in beating the dead horse, and in my interest in keeping her so called “reporting” accurate from her borderline slanderous post #32… the attorneys are not being dispatched to Alaska to “retrieve the clothes still in her possession”.

Rather, because allegedly (and according to only one news source) there are some whining disgruntled “anonymous” campaign aides, the RNC is*likely* to send attorneys to “conduct an inventory and account for all that was spent* to eliminate any possible confusion, and allow the accounting for the campaign expense to be open and paid for thru appropriate channels. This from a non-Palin fan, the ADN. And their reports are merely regurgitated Newsweek BS.

This, unlike what Jan insinuates, is not going to Alaska and seizing clothes that she alludes to as theft by Palin. You want tabloid journalism, Jan? I suggest you pick up your local Star or Nat’l Enquirer. But not here at FA on my threads.

I will repeat the facts for you one more time, Jan… since you have a hard time absorbing them. *All* accounting for expense receipts for any such clothing are filed with the FEC. What Palin opts to keep, she is responsible for in tax and reporting liabilities…. which eliminates “theft” as a charge. And she has every option to keep them, or return them for auction sale and charitable donation. And if you had any clue about Alaska living, you would realize that Armani suits have little use in a world of LL Bean pullovers and parkas.

At this point, the max “reported” amount is $150K.

Personally, I’d love to know when Jan and her cronies think just when and where, in Palin’s hectic Veep campaign schedule, she had time to take limos and secret service details on a $150K family shopping spree in downtown Manhattan? But then reality often clouds the agenda for the blindly faithful…

Until there is “news” and not “anonymous” campaign aides accusing Palin of acquiring clothes without assuming her legal financial liability, this is a non-scandal. Period.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Don’t flatter yourself, Jan. I do nothing more than scan your posts. Aye said it was two copy/pastes in a row, and Mike’sA had informed me a couple of days ago about deleting your post on the same subject on an unrelated thread.

If you choose to beat a dead horse, do it on your own blog.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

… yet still: not repetitive.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Not to mention, I’m sure there’s a large call for Armani suits in the dead of Alaska’s winter…. uh huh. Might as well own a full length mink coat in Miami… get about as much use out of it.

What a geographical challenged fool you are, Jan.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

So it wasn’t repetitive. You simply didn’t like what was reported.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Jan, give it a rest. You can’t make a scandal out of a non-scandal. Palin doesn’t own the clothes, but has the right to keep them, and pay taxes on them if she chooses.

She didn’t buy them, an aide did. She didn’t ask them to buy them, the campaign chose to do so. She didn’t even wear the majority, and left them in the plane… who knows who did what with them. She was a little busy to keep an eye on the GOP’s wardrobe. Not her job.

If you want to whine about wasteful and scandalous campaign funds, go talk to your Obama camp who hires bands to play concerts for free as a “rally”, then doesn’t show up. Or.. in other words (since he was in Ohio that night), he threw a free concert with his name as the host. I’d call that bribery. But I happen to know that everyone… including my GOP friends, enjoyed the music on the nickel of fools like you.

That, compared to outfitting a candidate in temporary clothing, is far more a scandal and waste of funds. If you find GOP campaign funds for wardrobes so important, go get your own blog and hope for someone who gives a shit.

Other than that, don’t test my patience with your attempts to discredit Palin with BS news equivalent to David Axelrod stubbing his toe. You’ve already been deleted by Mike on another thread with this stuff.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

How is it repetitive?

Where else in the thread did it disclose “that a Republican Party lawyer would be dispatched to Alaska to inventory and retrieve the clothes still in her possession.” ?

Show me.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Fixed, Aye. And the answer to your last question is, of course, no. But Jan’s in OT for the 2012 potential run. If there is one person that scares Obamatrons, it’s Palin. Obama probably has his cyber hit squad in gear for the next run. That would be his style.

Like or Dislike: 0  0

@Jan:

That’s two copy/paste posts in a row for you on this thread Jan in addition to several on other threads as well.

Are you not capable of an original thought of your own?

Like or Dislike: 0  0

Jan’s evidently starting early to discredit a Palin run in 2012. Scared, Jan? Try to keep your scandal mongering down to a single post, and appropriate thread, pls.

Mata

Like or Dislike: 0  0